Viewing a response to: @trafalgar/eip-faq
How exactly does this solve the “problem”? Authors get less rewards, controversial posts are encouraged to be downvoted, and bid bots will still be profitable if they upvote themselves or proxy accounts. Sorry but it sounds like a terrible idea and really just a lazy solution. If anything it’s just going to encourage even more circlejerking
author | yallapapi |
---|---|
permlink | psbldv |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-05-30 13:56:21 |
last_update | 2019-05-30 13:56:21 |
depth | 1 |
children | 6 |
last_payout | 2019-06-06 13:56:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.026 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.008 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 342 |
author_reputation | 106,969,209,795,209 |
root_title | "EIP FAQ" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 85,751,387 |
net_rshares | 68,550,451,782 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
anthonyadavisii | 0 | 35,777,605,451 | 25% | ||
guiltyparties | 0 | 9,038,620,267 | 3.22% | ||
quillfire | 0 | 23,734,226,064 | 100% |
Authors get more in reality because most of the rewards go back into the pockets of stakeholders right now. 50% of a large pie is far better than 75% of next to nothing. I believe abusive post farms and poor quality bid bot posts would likely be a much larger target for free downvotes than posts about controversial subject matters, generally speaking.
author | trafalgar |
---|---|
permlink | psbmn2 |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-05-30 14:23:30 |
last_update | 2019-05-30 14:23:30 |
depth | 2 |
children | 5 |
last_payout | 2019-06-06 14:23:30 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 354 |
author_reputation | 196,449,472,677,173 |
root_title | "EIP FAQ" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 85,752,785 |
net_rshares | 34,196,481,295 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
yourmaker | 0 | 10,413,369,874 | 57.2% | ||
quillfire | 0 | 23,259,682,034 | 100% | ||
rheuxe | 0 | 523,429,387 | 100% |
How exactly is it a larger pie? Still doesn’t solve the problem of people upvoting their friends because they are friends. Good content will never organically reach the top on this platform unless you figure out a way to completely get rid of self voting and voting rings. But more than that, there will always be a small group of people who try to minmax any platform and game the system. But as long as there is money to be made then you can’t stay ahead of them. As I see it the only thing this change will do is make it impossible for people to use bots for exposure, at least not without taking a massive hit. So we’ll go back to the small group of cool kids getting their posts constantly upvoted by their cool kid friends, full of unnecessarily positive “great job!” type comments... Maybe just outlaw bidbots altogether and heavily penalize people who use and operate them. There are always ways around it but this would get rid of most of them for sure and at least make them invisible to most users. Make using bidbots a bannable offense. But like I said even then that’s not going to solve the problem of people just putting money in their friends pockets instead of actually upvoting good shit.
author | yallapapi |
---|---|
permlink | pscmg1 |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-05-31 03:16:51 |
last_update | 2019-05-31 03:16:51 |
depth | 3 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2019-06-07 03:16:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.036 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.012 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 1,212 |
author_reputation | 106,969,209,795,209 |
root_title | "EIP FAQ" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 85,785,744 |
net_rshares | 95,940,624,377 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
guiltyparties | 0 | 9,034,937,875 | 3.12% | ||
skepticology | 0 | 40,217,578,848 | 100% | ||
quillfire | 0 | 24,217,872,783 | 100% | ||
votum | 0 | 22,470,234,871 | 100% |
How is friends upvoting each other even a problem? That is the point. The follower feature is essential to the whole ecosystem, you cannot fix "friends supporting each other" without completely breaking any premise that social media, community and society itself is predicated on. Speaking of social media, the point is to gain an audience. You seem to think that it's a problem, or that people will not try to make friends with new people, that they won't vett friends to others and introduce them to their groups. I literally did just that with [@lordless.exyle](https://steemit.com/@lordless.exyle) and [@quillfire](https://steemit.com/@quillfire), I hardly can call them acquaintance to top it all off, I'm possibly THE most antisocial person on here and I'd give the most cave dwelling isolated recluse a run for their money but even someone as socially autistic as myself won't subscribe to the notion that "friends being friends" is a problem. There's no voting rings, stop the nonsense. Also, the point of the proposal is not to rid the place of any profit maximizing behavior, it's to make profit maximizing behavior in line with discovering content, making friends and genuinely curating. It means that we compete with those who are dead set on extracting every penny they can get out of their stake by "maximizing", and we could even have a decent chance of outperforming them. The white paper talks about how preventing abuse should not be the goal, the goal should be to penalize it because prevention comes with a much higher cost that everyone will be burdened with. People can put money in their friends pocket and upvote cool shit, it's not as if those things are remotely exclusive to one another, they may very well be the same thing any number of times. I wish people would really consider what the proposal is aimed at, instead of putting up these strawmen and false premises for what it is about, especially since the problem is clear and it's past the point of debating it, maybe then we can actually discuss the proposal or similar proposals that focuses on the actual problem instead of spinning in circles. = _ =
author | baah |
---|---|
permlink | baah-re-yallapapi-pscmg1-20190602t065109324z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"app":"partiko","client":"android"} |
created | 2019-06-02 06:51:09 |
last_update | 2019-06-02 06:53:09 |
depth | 4 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2019-06-09 06:51:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.150 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.049 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 2,143 |
author_reputation | -15,002,280,126,271 |
root_title | "EIP FAQ" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 85,898,204 |
net_rshares | 369,028,448,776 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
trafalgar | 0 | 344,576,869,793 | 1% | ||
quillfire | 0 | 24,451,578,983 | 100% |