Viewing a response to: @whatageek/a-problem-with-flagging-and-the-pitfalls-of-negative-reinforcement
The flagging on here seems to be getting worse! I read trending from time to time and have noticed more and more people flaggin stuff it seems they disagree with. <blockquote>It is the same with bots. You can fully disagree with bots but it is allowed in the system so why punish those who use them?</blockquote> Couldnt agree more with this. To many people trying to fight the system - for now the bots are here to stay so why worry about it? Maybe its just me but Steemit has become a bit negative at the top ... maybe it was always like that though. I generally think flagging should only be for scams, spam and plagarism and should actually be encouraged in these cases.
author | conradt |
---|---|
permlink | re-whatageek-a-problem-with-flagging-and-the-pitfalls-of-negative-reinforcement-20180626t184758992z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-26 18:48:00 |
last_update | 2018-06-26 18:48:00 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-07-03 18:48:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.426 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.069 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 678 |
author_reputation | 61,803,524,787,457 |
root_title | "A Problem With Flagging And The Pitfalls Of Negative Reinforcement" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 62,384,680 |
net_rshares | 201,652,561,295 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
whatageek | 0 | 201,652,561,295 | 23% |