RE: Steemit needs a "read/save for later" feature, ASAP. There is far too much content and not enough time to read it all right away.... by msjennifer
View this thread on:
hive.blog
|
peakd.com
|
ecency.com
Viewing a response to: @thedashguy/steemit-needs-a-read-save-for-later-feature-asap-there-is-far-too-much-content-and-not-enough-time-to-read-it-all-right-away
steemit ·
@msjennifer ·
properties (23)author | msjennifer |
---|
permlink | steemit-needs-a-read-save-for-later-feature-asap-there-is-far-too-much-content-and-not-enough-time-to-read-it-all-right-away |
---|
category | steemit |
---|
json_metadata | "" |
---|
created | 2016-08-01 00:11:24 |
---|
last_update | 2016-08-01 00:11:24 |
---|
depth | 1 |
---|
children | 0 |
---|
last_payout | 2016-08-31 12:31:42 |
---|
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
---|
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
---|
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
---|
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
---|
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
---|
body_length | 21 |
---|
author_reputation | -1,468,839,175,006 |
---|
root_title | "Steemit needs a "read/save for later" feature, ASAP. There is far too much content and not enough time to read it all right away...." |
---|
beneficiaries | [] |
---|
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
---|
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
---|
post_id | 523,310 |
---|
net_rshares | -225,770,288 |
---|
author_curate_reward | "" |
---|
vote details (5)voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|
steemservices3 | 0 B | | -223,781,576 | -1% | |
cheetah05 | 0 B | | -4,956,928 | -20% | |
steemo | 0 B | | 3,696,665 | 100% | |
antispam | 0 B | | -4,415,578 | -5% | |
steema | 0 B | | 3,687,129 | 100% | |