RE: Introducing Steemverify! Anonymous, Secure, Badge-Based Verification Service Now Available!! by steemverify

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @bacchist/re-steemverify-introducing-steemverify-anonymous-secure-badge-based-verification-service-now-available-20160921t183121987z

steemit · @steemverify · Sep 21 '16

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/01/SL-trust-network.jpg

This service is not to replace good judgement.

Yet, a seal-of-approval from trusted community members can make the difference between healthy pseudo-anonymous verification process and a witch hunt. Keeping a database of verified users, either on the block chain or off will curtail repeated (and aggressive) requests for verification.

👍 ausbitbank, steemitqa

`author`	steemverify
`permlink`	re-bacchist-re-steemverify-introducing-steemverify-anonymous-secure-badge-based-verification-service-now-available-20160921t202042963z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"],"image":["https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/01/SL-trust-network.jpg"]}
`created`	2016-09-21 20:20:45
`last_update`	2016-09-21 20:20:45
`depth`	2
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2016-10-23 03:08:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	404
`author_reputation`	1,259,753,411,468
`root_title`	"Introducing Steemverify! Anonymous, Secure, Badge-Based Verification Service Now Available!!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,320,569
`net_rshares`	25,114,713,259
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
ausbitbank	0 B		19,326,794,354	100%
steemitqa	0 B		5,787,918,905	91%

@bacchist · Sep 22 '16

I don't think it has no merit.... I just think that it doesn't solve the underlying problem. In fact, it creates a singular point of failure, rather than a more transparent solution.

👍 roy.batty, rubellitefae

`author`	bacchist
`permlink`	re-steemverify-re-bacchist-re-steemverify-introducing-steemverify-anonymous-secure-badge-based-verification-service-now-available-20160922t005953913z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-09-22 00:59:54
`last_update`	2016-09-22 00:59:54
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-10-23 03:08:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	182
`author_reputation`	85,392,357,715,964
`root_title`	"Introducing Steemverify! Anonymous, Secure, Badge-Based Verification Service Now Available!!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,322,844
`net_rshares`	2,432,611,587
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
roy.batty	0 B		2,002,805,608	100%
rubellitefae	0 B		429,805,979	100%

@clevecross · Sep 23 '16

I can agree it doesn't solve an underlying problem. I think it offers something people can show though.... like recognition-at-a-glance credentials. 

I see it as an available avenue and option, one not required by any means, but if it could be helpful to some... it could be nice to have.

👍 roy.batty

`author`	clevecross
`permlink`	re-bacchist-re-steemverify-re-bacchist-re-steemverify-introducing-steemverify-anonymous-secure-badge-based-verification-service-now-available-20160923t033522505z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-09-23 03:35:21
`last_update`	2016-09-23 03:35:21
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-10-23 03:08:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	289
`author_reputation`	7,635,074,529,912
`root_title`	"Introducing Steemverify! Anonymous, Secure, Badge-Based Verification Service Now Available!!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,334,274
`net_rshares`	2,002,805,608
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
roy.batty	0 B		2,002,805,608	100%