Viewing a response to: @smooth/re-fingolfin-re-dantheman-follow-up-to-people-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-rewards-20160811t222058800z
I know but we need to reach some kind of consensus on what it should be for - people consensus rather than blockchain consensus lol.
| author | thecryptofiend |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-smooth-re-fingolfin-re-dantheman-follow-up-to-people-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-rewards-20160811t233505979z |
| category | steemit |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
| created | 2016-08-11 23:35:06 |
| last_update | 2016-08-11 23:35:06 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-09-11 08:34:30 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 132 |
| author_reputation | 323,603,913,866,384 |
| root_title | "Follow Up to People Rank Algorithm for Better Curation Rewards" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 755,398 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks