create account

RE: Distribution of reputation levels 2017-12-27 / Verteilung der Reputationslevel 27.12.2017 by themanwithnoname

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @cryptoriddler/re-chrismccron-re-cryptoriddler-distribution-of-reputation-levels-2017-12-27-verteilung-der-reputationslevel-27-12-2017-20171227t133111568z

· @themanwithnoname ·
$0.12
I'm new to Steem. I had browsed the site for a bit before signing up for an account. Honestly, I had forgotten about the site between the time I signed up and got approved. There has to be a faster way of verifying accounts. What is the process for them to do so? How can it be accelerated?
👍  , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorthemanwithnoname
permlinkre-cryptoriddler-re-chrismccron-re-cryptoriddler-distribution-of-reputation-levels-2017-12-27-verteilung-der-reputationslevel-27-12-2017-20171229t171135344z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-29 17:11:39
last_update2017-12-29 17:11:39
depth3
children2
last_payout2018-01-05 17:11:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.117 HBD
curator_payout_value0.006 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length290
author_reputation27,720,428,062,795
root_title"Distribution of reputation levels 2017-12-27 / Verteilung der Reputationslevel 27.12.2017"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id25,909,072
net_rshares9,660,670,073
author_curate_reward""
vote details (10)
@lukas-schulz ·
I think the big lag relies upon that the team is still approving accounts personally. It takes more time because they don't want to just verify your account/your email address but they also want that good content is posted on this site. This is especially important for the young age of this platform and I, therefore, think that it's good to take some time before approving/verifying accounts. Also, you have to consider that, if a "spammer" signed up, he wouldn't want to wait for days to be verified.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorlukas-schulz
permlinkre-themanwithnoname-re-cryptoriddler-re-chrismccron-re-cryptoriddler-distribution-of-reputation-levels-2017-12-27-verteilung-der-reputationslevel-27-12-2017-20180107t112652515z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-07 11:26:51
last_update2018-01-07 11:26:51
depth4
children0
last_payout2018-01-14 11:26:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length503
author_reputation112,202,157
root_title"Distribution of reputation levels 2017-12-27 / Verteilung der Reputationslevel 27.12.2017"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id27,739,553
net_rshares0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@tonyot ·
Similarly, I found the lag time a bit discouraging.
I suppose the diagrams above potentially support the need for checks and balances, though, to (perhaps optimistic to suggest it) limit the capacity for creating multiple or automated accounts.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authortonyot
permlinkre-themanwithnoname-re-cryptoriddler-re-chrismccron-re-cryptoriddler-distribution-of-reputation-levels-2017-12-27-verteilung-der-reputationslevel-27-12-2017-20180104t020519496z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-04 02:05:42
last_update2018-01-04 02:05:42
depth4
children0
last_payout2018-01-11 02:05:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length244
author_reputation10,008,667,697
root_title"Distribution of reputation levels 2017-12-27 / Verteilung der Reputationslevel 27.12.2017"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id26,918,165
net_rshares365,627,500
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)