Viewing a response to: @logiczombie/q5hqtt
May I ask you, have you ever tried the self-test of the systemic consensus? So, between the given variants of - skiing, - skateboarding, - cycling, - swimming - hiking, do you proceed in such a way that you choose each of the activities on its own, on the basis of your least inner resistance in giving your each score between 0 and 10? In principle I have nothing against AI helpers, but because man is vain and this vanity is a (rather annoying) fact in the world, he wants to keep the feeling that he can make decisions even with people among people. I would just like to ask you to try it out for a short time on yourself or in your circle of friends or family, if, for example, you cannot find a quick agreement on a question (which produces relatively simple suggestions). This little self-experiment should suffice for that long. I would like to know whether you would recommend it to others once you know it?
author | erh.germany |
---|---|
permlink | q5hukv |
category | steemstem |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2020-02-10 16:17:21 |
last_update | 2020-02-10 16:18:27 |
depth | 4 |
children | 5 |
last_payout | 2020-02-17 16:17:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 928 |
author_reputation | 73,742,580,962,927 |
root_title | "GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 95,294,631 |
net_rshares | 19,403,090,371 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
logiczombie | 0 | 19,403,090,371 | 100% |
It sounds like RCV (Ranked Choice Voting) - https://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_(RCV)
author | logiczombie |
---|---|
permlink | q5hxb4 |
category | steemstem |
json_metadata | {"links":["https://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2020-02-10 17:18:03 |
last_update | 2020-02-10 17:18:03 |
depth | 5 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2020-02-17 17:18:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 94 |
author_reputation | 41,793,140,992,203 |
root_title | "GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 0 |
post_id | 95,296,386 |
net_rshares | 79,714,301,518 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
erh.germany | 0 | 79,714,301,518 | 100% |
No, it is the exact opposite of a preferential choice. With systemic consensus, you don't go for what you consider your favourite from several possibilities. You determine your resistance to every statement available for election. The proposal that expresses the least resistance in a number of all voters wins the election. If Hans is the person from a class representative election to whom the whole class has the least resistance, then Hans wins the election. Which can actually be quite different from voting for only one of the favoured candidates.
author | erh.germany |
---|---|
permlink | q5hygq |
category | steemstem |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2020-02-10 17:41:15 |
last_update | 2020-02-10 17:41:15 |
depth | 6 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2020-02-17 17:41:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 555 |
author_reputation | 73,742,580,962,927 |
root_title | "GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 95,297,018 |
net_rshares | 19,050,398,602 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
logiczombie | 0 | 19,050,398,602 | 100% |
Here is a comparison of the two methods: 
author | erh.germany |
---|---|
permlink | q5hylm |
category | steemstem |
json_metadata | {"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTAujU4f9W4oHZGSf5HGE2TGQXoKPWE8hpNn4pBgbWNrY/image.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2020-02-10 17:44:12 |
last_update | 2020-02-10 17:44:12 |
depth | 6 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2020-02-17 17:44:12 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 134 |
author_reputation | 73,742,580,962,927 |
root_title | "GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 95,297,154 |
net_rshares | 18,463,362,340 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
logiczombie | 0 | 18,463,362,340 | 100% |
Your "least resistance" example looks like RCV, but your "majority voting" example is NOT RCV.
author | logiczombie |
---|---|
permlink | q5i00v |
category | steemstem |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2020-02-10 18:16:45 |
last_update | 2020-02-10 18:16:45 |
depth | 7 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2020-02-17 18:16:45 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 94 |
author_reputation | 41,793,140,992,203 |
root_title | "GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 0 |
post_id | 95,298,171 |
net_rshares | 0 |