create account

RE: GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus by erh.germany

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @logiczombie/q5hqtt

· @erh.germany · (edited)
May I ask you, have you ever tried the self-test of the systemic consensus? So, between the given variants of 
- skiing, 
- skateboarding, 
- cycling, 
- swimming  
- hiking, 

do you proceed in such a way that you choose each of the activities on its own, on the basis of your least inner resistance in giving your each score between 0 and 10? 

In principle I have nothing against AI helpers, but because man is vain and this vanity is a (rather annoying) fact in the world, he wants to keep the feeling that he can make decisions even with people among people. I would just like to ask you to try it out for a short time on yourself or in your circle of friends or family, if, for example, you cannot find a quick agreement on a question (which produces relatively simple suggestions). 

This little self-experiment should suffice for that long. I would like to know whether you would recommend it to others once you know it?
👍  
properties (23)
authorerh.germany
permlinkq5hukv
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2020-02-10 16:17:21
last_update2020-02-10 16:18:27
depth4
children5
last_payout2020-02-17 16:17:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length928
author_reputation73,742,580,962,927
root_title"GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,294,631
net_rshares19,403,090,371
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@logiczombie ·
It sounds like RCV (Ranked Choice Voting) - https://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_(RCV)
👍  
properties (23)
authorlogiczombie
permlinkq5hxb4
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"links":["https://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2020-02-10 17:18:03
last_update2020-02-10 17:18:03
depth5
children4
last_payout2020-02-17 17:18:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length94
author_reputation41,793,140,992,203
root_title"GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id95,296,386
net_rshares79,714,301,518
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@erh.germany ·
No, it is the exact opposite of a preferential choice. With systemic consensus, you don't go for what you consider your favourite from several possibilities. You determine your resistance to every statement available for election. The proposal that expresses the least resistance in a number of all voters wins the election. 

If Hans is the person from a class representative election to whom the whole class has the least resistance, then Hans wins the election. Which can actually be quite different from voting for only one of the favoured candidates.
👍  
properties (23)
authorerh.germany
permlinkq5hygq
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2020-02-10 17:41:15
last_update2020-02-10 17:41:15
depth6
children0
last_payout2020-02-17 17:41:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length555
author_reputation73,742,580,962,927
root_title"GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,297,018
net_rshares19,050,398,602
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@erh.germany ·
Here is a comparison of the two methods:

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTAujU4f9W4oHZGSf5HGE2TGQXoKPWE8hpNn4pBgbWNrY/image.png)
👍  
properties (23)
authorerh.germany
permlinkq5hylm
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTAujU4f9W4oHZGSf5HGE2TGQXoKPWE8hpNn4pBgbWNrY/image.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2020-02-10 17:44:12
last_update2020-02-10 17:44:12
depth6
children2
last_payout2020-02-17 17:44:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length134
author_reputation73,742,580,962,927
root_title"GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,297,154
net_rshares18,463,362,340
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@logiczombie ·
Your "least resistance" example looks like RCV, but your "majority voting" example is NOT RCV.
properties (22)
authorlogiczombie
permlinkq5i00v
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2020-02-10 18:16:45
last_update2020-02-10 18:16:45
depth7
children1
last_payout2020-02-17 18:16:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length94
author_reputation41,793,140,992,203
root_title"GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id95,298,171
net_rshares0