Hi @neavvy and @crypto.piotr, 

Thanks for your ever lending support and for the transfer of memos. You people are fascinating.  Your coverage of topics are also very much fascinating.

I have just given a thought about it and just a moment ago, this idea flashed in my mind.

Unfortunately, a lot of budding female kids are being raped all around the world by some draconian monsters and to put a full stop to this deadly crime, why should not we employ AI to save those beautiful flowers of the next generation from withering before blooming!

We can also send AI-controlled robots to the places of extreme danger, e.g. to attack terrorists in their own dens, to name a few. 


Coming to the topic, 

"......speech recognition, which does not cause any problem for 5 years old human child, while Google spends millions of dollars in order to improve their technology in this area."

While I was in medical transcription in earlier 2000, many a time,  we were under intense pressure due to the loss of our jobs due to this "Speech Recognition-AI concept".

At that time, our company owners used to tell that they no longer need medical transcriptionists as the SR will easily do our work with 99 percent accuracy and that final level QCs are enough for 100 percent quality. But what happened? Speech Recognition failed miserably due to the fact that it was unable to understand the dictation perfectly e.g. the patient is a 45-year-old....sorry,  sorry... the patient is a 54-year-old.....and if you see the output,  it will be a sort of text written as per the dictation without any editing, the reason being SR had been in its infancy! 

Now I don't know about the latest developments, but AI struggled a lot in this concept at that point in time. 

Keeping that in my mind, I can boldly say that it will take some time to master the Speech Recognition concept for the AI Technology. 

That's it for now...Bye.........