I'm very happy with this development @steeveapp and have enough RC's to cover the additional comments.

The only issue would be for people who have low RC's but I don't think @steeveapp would earn much from them anyways (since they probably only have a small amount of Steem Power).

Maybe you could exclude charging people with a small amount of Steem Power @hr1 and increase the charge for people like me with enough Steem Power.

I'd be happy to pay 15% of my vote or even 20% of my vote for posts that I found through @steeveapp. I wouldn't have found them without @steeveapp anyways so I am happy to pay.

When you have more users you might be able to run a poll to see how much your users are willing to pay for your service and a lot of people might be very happy to pay more (like me).

<hr>

**QUESTION**

I don't want to set @steeveapp as a beneficiary for all of my @steeveapp upvotes but I want to upvote the @steeveapp notification comment at 100%. Is there a setting to allow that?

**P.S.** I'm really happy that it will automatically notify people that I found them through @steeveapp since I have had to tell people manually in the past.

Dear @steeveapp

Just decided to see how have you been doing, since I didn't hear from you in a while. I noticed that you didnt post anything in a while.

Did you give up on Steemit? :(

Yours,
Piotr

Interesting way to workaround the current limitation. Previously, I have also thought of using similar method to solve the problem where rewards are not given for upvotes after 7 days of content creation.

I think this will be an interesting experiment. Looking forward to how it will turn out :)

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://steemit.com/@partiko-android)

I might need someone to explain this to me more in detail ... i would like to help

This is what i call technological innovation, creating a bot that serves it main purpose

That is an interesting idea. Though, I am sort of lost in the numbers. One, even though you disable curation rewards, you will not increase the author's rewards. (Or did it change?) That means you are able to get 75% of total pending rewards. Two, you claim that you take 10% of the original vote weight and use it for yourself. I'll use examples to better explain myself.

User wants to vote 100%
A) Does the user vote 100% for the post and you use another 10% for the comment?
B) Does the user vote 90% for the post and you use the rest 10% for the comment?

Woww that's great..

Im ready to test out Steeve.app but i was not able to sign in using the Keychain extention.

I get this error:
![error01.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQuQkoQXSeaXpcB5sDq8bPuG8cwwVsyt8JqJveQaks5sk/error01.png)

I have provided both Active and Posting key, Keychain wont accept the Memo key.

Is anyone here using Keychain on Steeve?

So you're solution is to spam the blockchain. I'd facepalm if you could see it...

I'm a huge fan of Steeve's "Read Next" feature...but this...is not your best idea.

Ahhh, so here it is! I am looking forward to see this evolve. Keeping a close eye on Steeve ;)

<sub>Posted using [Steeve](https://www.steeve.app/@steeveapp), an AI-powered Steem interface</sub>

If the story beneficiarie is set to steeve, is that only for entries I work on steeve or on all condensers...?

<sub>Posted using [Steeve](https://www.steeve.app/@steeveapp), an AI-powered Steem interface</sub>

upvoted and resteemed because it's a nice idea.. good luck

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://steemit.com/@partiko-android)

Hello. Congratulations for the initiative, I have a question: does publishing the post by the steeve app using any specific tags give the possibility of being voted as happened in the old busy.org? thank you.

<sub>Posted using [Steeve](https://www.steeve.app/@steeveapp), an AI-powered Steem interface</sub>

Interesting new idea!

> Since the comment is actually created by @steevebot, the author reward goes to us (curation rewards being disabled for the comment).

If you disable curation rewards by setting `allow curation rewards: false` in `comment_options`, that reward will go back to reward pool. Isn't it better to reward the voter?

Am I getting right or there is something else?

This is a very interesting way to do this and I am looking forward to how it is going to work in practice. I see several potential applications for this feature later too, but let's see :)

Benefactor vote weight can be now aligned in Settings. By default se to 10%, but can be raised up to 100% of the original vote. So it is relative to the original vote still, not absolute vote weight.

<sub>Posted using [Steeve](https://www.steeve.app/@steeveapp), an AI-powered Steem interface</sub>