Viewing a response to: @exyle/lfnengld
I don’t grok the idea of Steem potentially not being in the reward pool and instead using SMT’s for rewards. Part of my comment from another thread: >Many of us here have worked to build our SP *for the long haul*. A move to SMT-only rewards has the potential to invalidate that strategy. Would only authors/curators no longer earn Steem? Would inflation be trimmed so that only witnesses, the DAO, and SP hodlers earned Steem? Or would one or more of *those* also no longer get the inflation? There are so many unknowns.
author | preparedwombat |
---|---|
permlink | pypye2 |
category | threespeak |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-10-01 23:25:15 |
last_update | 2019-10-01 23:25:15 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-10-08 23:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 524 |
author_reputation | 871,014,010,838,324 |
root_title | "Crypto Talk Monday #10 - A talk with witness @yabapmatt about the state of Steem and Splinterlands." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 91,139,168 |
net_rshares | -1,797,377,003,929 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
starkerz | 0 | 22,179,761,878 | 1% | ||
haejin | 0 | -3,009,102,424,143 | -26% | ||
oracle-d | 0 | 589,107,412,407 | 0.75% | ||
pro-content | 0 | 200,968,566 | 1% | ||
top-exchanges | 0 | 61,380,899,556 | 1% | ||
dapplovers | 0 | 139,954,298,606 | 0.75% | ||
threespeak | 0 | 398,357,694,916 | 1% | ||
threespeak.com0 | 0 | 290,639,404 | 1% | ||
threespeak.com1 | 0 | 63,426,187 | 1% | ||
threespeak.com2 | 0 | 63,493,487 | 1% | ||
threespeak.com3 | 0 | 63,396,162 | 1% | ||
threespeak.com4 | 0 | 63,429,045 | 1% | ||
threespeak.com5 | 0 | 0 | 1% |