Viewing a response to: @moneymisstress/re-sunlit7-pzjhjc
Different viewpoints in polls depending upon who they poll. You can do five polls in the same state and they can all vary as the people they call are randomly chosen. If you are going to conduct a poll with a specified number of one thousand people randomly chosen and the majority of those people are of one party or the other, whichever party is the majority in that poll will determine the direction/results of that particular poll. So say if a poll made contact with thirty percent of people who said they are republicans and sixty percent who said they are democrats the results calculated for republicans will be based on thirty percent out of one thousand people registered as republicans...hardly what one could establish as an overall view of all republicans in a particular state. That's saying three hundred republicans spoke for every republican in a state.
author | sunlit7 |
---|---|
permlink | pzk4eo |
category | threespeak |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-10-18 06:23:15 |
last_update | 2019-10-18 06:23:15 |
depth | 4 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2019-10-25 06:23:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 873 |
author_reputation | 20,338,140,984,398 |
root_title | "Republicans ABANDONING Trump Over Ukraine Fiasco" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 91,665,656 |
net_rshares | 4,675,732,281 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
moneymisstress | 0 | 4,675,732,281 | 100% |
Humm ok that's so controverse. We need real and strong informations. Why they never could doing a general poll in one Party and not only made with people they've choosen?! It's that one of the way how medias can manipulate the population. I think they should use blockchain for them votes and poll to have better overview and (ainsi) reduce diffences and inequity and thereafter giving informations. Because It's about president, democracy and population.
author | moneymisstress |
---|---|
permlink | re-sunlit7-pzn87q |
category | threespeak |
json_metadata | {"tags":["threespeak"],"app":"steempeak/1.18.0"} |
created | 2019-10-19 22:38:15 |
last_update | 2019-10-19 22:38:15 |
depth | 5 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2019-10-26 22:38:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 456 |
author_reputation | 2,086,958,243,189 |
root_title | "Republicans ABANDONING Trump Over Ukraine Fiasco" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 91,717,499 |
net_rshares | 0 |
If I was a pollster instead of doing just the first randomly selected I'd keep going until I found my first five hundred democrats then my first five hundred republicans or you could reduce both groups equally by choosing to allocate whatever percentage of independents, libertarians are estimated in your state. Still overall though I don't think asking any group of one thousand any way you mix it to be a good representation of the overall population of any state.
author | sunlit7 |
---|---|
permlink | pznbol |
category | threespeak |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-10-19 23:53:12 |
last_update | 2019-10-19 23:53:12 |
depth | 6 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-10-26 23:53:12 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 468 |
author_reputation | 20,338,140,984,398 |
root_title | "Republicans ABANDONING Trump Over Ukraine Fiasco" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 91,718,911 |
net_rshares | 0 |