> I like the price stability of CTPSB and slow-growth model. If a diesel pool (as much as I like them) would make it more volatile and jeopardize the slow-growth model, I probably wouldn't be a big fan.

The whole concept should make sure that the price of the token follows it's value in spite of the liquidity pool. That's a challenge but I believe it would be possible to continue on the same track like CTPSB. 

> Would that just mean co-managing with Zoltan
Yes, the idea is not to put everything upside down but to make sure that there is not only one person who has the keys to the accounts :-)

> I would prefer the project to remain with a distinct identity, separately or within the Liotes project.

That's also the idea that I have in mind.

Thanks a lot for the very useful feed-back!