Viewing a response to: @aggroed/time-to-consider-tribes-again
This is all really encouraging. I'm glad you're back in the top 20. I didn't know you had dropped out. I delegated all my votes during the Forkening and forgot all about it. There's a lot going on in here right now. It has my head spinning. I hope I don't get dizzy and pass out before the party starts. Fucking WOOOO!!!!!
author | sinistry |
---|---|
permlink | re-aggroed-qocco8 |
category | tribes |
json_metadata | {"tags":["tribes"],"app":"peakd/2021.01.3"} |
created | 2021-02-11 01:40:54 |
last_update | 2021-02-11 01:41:30 |
depth | 1 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2021-02-18 01:40:54 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.080 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.080 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 326 |
author_reputation | 13,185,830,863,871 |
root_title | "Time to consider Tribes again" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 101,816,204 |
net_rshares | 553,746,908,018 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
abh12345 | 0 | 502,402,982,084 | 15% | ||
d-zero | 0 | 51,223,909,114 | 100% | ||
khazrakh.leo | 0 | 120,016,820 | 100% |
Yeah so many don’t pay attention to their witness votes. That’s why so many are where they are, old stale votes. If you haven’t yet vote for Leo finance to help their witness! Posted Using [LeoFinance <sup>Beta</sup>](https://leofinance.io/@cmplxty/re-sinistry-24pqa6)
author | cmplxty |
---|---|
permlink | re-sinistry-24pqa6 |
category | tribes |
json_metadata | {"app":"leofinance/0.2","format":"markdown","tags":["tribes","leofinance","hive-167922"],"canonical_url":"https://leofinance.io/@cmplxty/re-sinistry-24pqa6"} |
created | 2021-02-11 02:15:00 |
last_update | 2021-02-11 02:15:00 |
depth | 2 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2021-02-18 02:15:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.048 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.049 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 269 |
author_reputation | 774,415,546,660,097 |
root_title | "Time to consider Tribes again" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 101,816,620 |
net_rshares | 349,567,072,005 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
whatsup | 0 | 349,567,072,005 | 100% |
I'd like a list of top 25-50 contenders for top 20 with a brief summary of what they specialize in and what they envision for the short and long term for HIVE. That would go a long way, in making it easier for the community to get involved, but more than that. HIVE has the potential to subtly and incidentally teach us how we should demand to be governed until we can transition to leadership from governance. I'd like to see occasional leanings in that direction. For example, if you haven't cast or delegated all of your votes, you periodically get a pop up of the list I mentioned above. Once or twice a year we should create and send out simple yes/no vote tokens for propositions of magnitude so everyone knows they have a role to play and can watch it play out without tampering. We (society) need to set our expectations higher and blockchain tech can play a role in that as well I think.
author | sinistry |
---|---|
permlink | re-cmplxty-qocf3s |
category | tribes |
json_metadata | {"tags":["tribes"],"app":"peakd/2021.01.3"} |
created | 2021-02-11 02:33:27 |
last_update | 2021-02-11 02:33:27 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2021-02-18 02:33:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 899 |
author_reputation | 13,185,830,863,871 |
root_title | "Time to consider Tribes again" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 101,816,844 |
net_rshares | 0 |
While I certainly see the merit of a system like that I think it would be challenging for new witnesses to make any headway into the top 50. There are some exceptions but I think it might end up causing less people to try and make a witness with it being that challenging. I could be wrong for sure but it would be best if they do end up implementing the witness decay vote that blocktrades is toying around with getting to work. After a year I think it is, a witness vote goes away and you have to redo it. Don't know how it will all work but that's the best scenario I think. Then I think more people will delegate to someone who is actively on top of that, to vote in a witness proxy trail.
author | cmplxty |
---|---|
permlink | re-sinistry-qocff6 |
category | tribes |
json_metadata | {"tags":["tribes"],"app":"peakd/2021.01.3"} |
created | 2021-02-11 02:40:21 |
last_update | 2021-02-11 02:40:21 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2021-02-18 02:40:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 694 |
author_reputation | 774,415,546,660,097 |
root_title | "Time to consider Tribes again" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 101,816,904 |
net_rshares | 0 |