create account

RE: An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5 by sneak

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @noisy/q6kk1r

· @sneak ·
It seems that they can and did.  I don't even think there is a reasonable presumption that they *should not*.  After all, the money is entrusted to them and is under their control.  Why shouldn't they vote it?
👍  
properties (23)
authorsneak
permlinkq6kkf7
categorytron
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-03-02 14:04:18
last_update2020-03-02 14:04:18
depth3
children8
last_payout2020-03-09 14:04:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length209
author_reputation28,694,344,106,492
root_title"An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,997,485
net_rshares23,371,147,624
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@fredrikaa ·
Philosophically I agree that whoever owns a token should be able to vote with it. (Nevermind the discussion of whether or not STINC was bound by their promise not to vote).

But any DPoS chain that wants me involved going forward need to have some sort of mechanism that still prevents this type of take-over from being possible.

Maybe a delay in time from when tokens are staked to when they can be used to vote for witnesses/BP combined with max votes being reduced to 5 would be sufficient.
properties (22)
authorfredrikaa
permlinkq6klfp
categorytron
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-03-02 14:26:12
last_update2020-03-02 14:26:12
depth4
children0
last_payout2020-03-09 14:26:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length494
author_reputation310,528,541,043,341
root_title"An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,998,009
net_rshares0
@noisy ·
Maybe they should be able to do that, maybe not.  But for sure, locking up stake of their clients by converting to Steem Power (with all implications of that) IMO is a crime.
👍  
properties (23)
authornoisy
permlinkq6kklc
categorytron
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-03-02 14:08:00
last_update2020-03-02 14:08:00
depth4
children2
last_payout2020-03-09 14:08:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length174
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,997,560
net_rshares302,115,234,004
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ash · (edited)
$0.07
not your keys... etc. by sending DPoS tokens to an exchange, you give up your voting rights, and make them your "proxy". 

I hate it too, but those are the rules.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorash
permlinkre-noisy-q6kl5y
categorytron
json_metadata{"tags":["tron"],"app":"steempeak/2020.02.6"}
created2020-03-02 14:20:24
last_update2020-03-02 14:20:42
depth5
children0
last_payout2020-03-09 14:20:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.036 HBD
curator_payout_value0.037 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length162
author_reputation286,803,743,324,398
root_title"An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,997,869
net_rshares441,310,602,279
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@sneak ·
Crimes aren't generally matters of opinion, and most cryptocurrency exchanges have "locked up" their customer funds offline for safety purposes, taking several days to access them from cold wallets.  This doesn't seem that different to me.

What laws do you think have been broken, in which countries?
properties (22)
authorsneak
permlinkq6klri
categorytron
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-03-02 14:33:18
last_update2020-03-02 14:33:18
depth5
children0
last_payout2020-03-09 14:33:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length301
author_reputation28,694,344,106,492
root_title"An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,998,179
net_rshares0
@valued-customer · (edited)
$0.05
Because it deprives the actual owners of the funds, to whom they have a fiduciary trust, of their private right of ownership of those funds, which includes the sole and exclusive right to vote with those funds.

No part of their contracted arrangement with exchanges forfeited that lawful right of ownership.  The exchanges seized those funds and exercised ownership of them in violation of their fiduciary trust.  Hanging's too good for 'em.

Remember your legal theory when you have a daughter in school, under the control of authority figures there.
👍  
properties (23)
authorvalued-customer
permlinkre-sneak-q6loam
categorytron
json_metadata{"tags":["tron"],"app":"steempeak/2020.03.1"}
created2020-03-03 04:25:54
last_update2020-03-03 04:27:57
depth4
children3
last_payout2020-03-10 04:25:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.025 HBD
curator_payout_value0.025 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length552
author_reputation362,735,841,790,042
root_title"An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id96,008,530
net_rshares302,029,190,293
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@sneak · (edited)
$0.66
Surrendering the funds to a second party by depositing them to an exchange deprives the "actual owners of the funds" their right of private ownership of those funds.

Money in the bank isn't your money.  It's the bank's money, and a corresponding liability to you.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possession_is_nine-tenths_of_the_law

https://sneak.berlin/20191119/your-money-isnt-yours/
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorsneak
permlinkq6loxw
categorytron
json_metadata{"links":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possession_is_nine-tenths_of_the_law","https://sneak.berlin/20191119/your-money-isnt-yours/"],"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-03-03 04:39:33
last_update2020-03-03 04:40:06
depth5
children2
last_payout2020-03-10 04:39:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.329 HBD
curator_payout_value0.329 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length388
author_reputation28,694,344,106,492
root_title"An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id96,008,666
net_rshares3,134,267,122,383
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@valued-customer · (edited)
$0.05
Money isn't voting rights, and Steem is.  Powering it up does prevent it's use by it's rightful owners, and violates the fiduciary trust these exchanges undertake.   

Banks are thieves, which is why I don't use banks.
👍  
properties (23)
authorvalued-customer
permlinkre-sneak-q6ls9t
categorytron
json_metadata{"tags":["tron"],"app":"steempeak/2020.03.1"}
created2020-03-03 05:51:48
last_update2020-03-03 05:52:30
depth6
children0
last_payout2020-03-10 05:51:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.025 HBD
curator_payout_value0.025 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length218
author_reputation362,735,841,790,042
root_title"An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id96,009,491
net_rshares301,380,963,578
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@wikitextbot ·
$0.05
<b>Possession is nine-tenths of the law</b>
Possession is nine-tenths of the law is an expression meaning that ownership is easier to maintain if one has possession of something, or difficult to enforce if one does not. The expression is also stated as "possession is nine points of the law", which is credited as derived from the Scottish expression "possession is eleven points in the law, and they say there are but twelve."Although the principle is an oversimplification, it can be restated as: "In a property dispute (whether real or personal), in the absence of clear and compelling testimony or documentation to the contrary, the person in actual, custodial possession of the property is presumed to be the rightful owner. The rightful owner shall have their possession returned to them; if taken or used.
👍  
properties (23)
authorwikitextbot
permlink20200303t043939344z
categorytron
json_metadata{"tags":["test"],"app":"steemjs/examples"}
created2020-03-03 04:39:39
last_update2020-03-03 04:39:39
depth6
children0
last_payout2020-03-10 04:39:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.025 HBD
curator_payout_value0.025 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length812
author_reputation231,556,605,589
root_title"An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id96,008,667
net_rshares301,325,318,882
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)