RE: Idea For Upvotes & Downvotes by valued-customer

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @jaki01/pvqn5k

upvote · @valued-customer · Aug 10 '19

$0.03

>"...I plead for a committee of elected users with some delegated Steem power from Steemit, Inc., which could decide (in case someone complains) if flags are justified or not, and if "yes" just counter them with upvotes."

I strongly disagree with this.  Bernie was involved in a flagwar (surprise!) with @fulltimegeek, and now Steemit is censoring all FTG's accounts.  This indicates to me that ninjaminer Bernie has some sway with Stinc, and such an elected body being dependent on Stinc stake would not be likely to counter Bernie.

Nothing is stopping users from electing and delegating to such a flag review board right now, although such a board would have insufficient SP to counter whale flags nominally.  I have also been flagged by Stinc devs in the past, so have more evidence to align Bernie's interests with theirs.  

tl;dr  evidence aligns Bernie's interests with Stinc's, and expecting Stinc SP to counter Bernie's seems naive.

Thanks!

👍 jaki01

`author`	valued-customer
`permlink`	re-jaki01-pw1alc
`category`	upvote
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["upvote"],"app":"steempeak/1.14.12"}
`created`	2019-08-10 18:41:42
`last_update`	2019-08-10 18:41:42
`depth`	3
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2019-08-17 18:41:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.023 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.007 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	952
`author_reputation`	362,740,291,107,602
`root_title`	"Idea For Upvotes & Downvotes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,378,466
`net_rshares`	93,110,193,964
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
jaki01	0 B		93,110,193,964	3%

@jaki01 · Aug 10 '19

$0.54

Steemit, Inc. should only delegate the SP, but of course not influence the decisions of the elected committee (elected by the community, not by Steemit, Inc.).
Of course that should be made clear before, otherwise it wouldn't make sense.

Also the criteria of how to elect the committee needed much fine tuning. One could for example think about conditions like that every voter should be on STEEM for at least some weeks and had published some posts to prevent multi account voting. All that wouldn't be easy at all but worth a try ...

👍 bleujay, valued-customer, marina007, votes4minnows

`author`	jaki01
`permlink`	pw1n2r
`category`	upvote
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["upvote"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-08-10 23:11:15
`last_update`	2019-08-10 23:11:15
`depth`	4
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2019-08-17 23:11:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.407 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.135 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	536
`author_reputation`	543,040,889,066,288
`root_title`	"Idea For Upvotes & Downvotes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,384,432
`net_rshares`	1,597,045,331,646
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
marina007	1,529,380,141	5.5%
bleujay	1,581,610,775,990	100%
valued-customer	12,944,413,753	25%
votes4minnows	960,761,762	1.89%

@valued-customer · Aug 11 '19

$0.03

>"Steemit, Inc. should only delegate the SP, but of course not influence the decisions of the elected committee (elected by the community, not by Steemit, Inc.)."

I just don't think that's possible.  I am unable to recall an example of folks providing funding without having influence on how it's spent, other than taxpayers, and that's because we're just extorted.

👍 jaki01

`author`	valued-customer
`permlink`	re-jaki01-pw37lz
`category`	upvote
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["upvote"],"app":"steempeak/1.14.12"}
`created`	2019-08-11 19:32:33
`last_update`	2019-08-11 19:32:33
`depth`	5
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2019-08-18 19:32:33
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.024 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.007 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	366
`author_reputation`	362,740,291,107,602
`root_title`	"Idea For Upvotes & Downvotes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,413,737
`net_rshares`	94,623,211,053
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
jaki01	0 B		94,623,211,053	3%

@jaki01 · Aug 11 '19

$0.09

Nevertheless, that would be my suggestion (Steemit, Inc. contributes only the SP, and the community elects an independant committee).
If Steemit, Inc. would agree to doing that, is another question of course ... :)

👍 englishtchrivy, valued-customer, curx, zapncrap, osm0sis, fukako

`author`	jaki01
`permlink`	pw3a67
`category`	upvote
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["upvote"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-08-11 20:27:45
`last_update`	2019-08-11 20:27:45
`depth`	6
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2019-08-18 20:27:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.066 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.021 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	214
`author_reputation`	543,040,889,066,288
`root_title`	"Idea For Upvotes & Downvotes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,415,079
`net_rshares`	260,965,780,244
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (6)

voter	rshares	pct
englishtchrivy	246,889,787,926	100%
fukako	0	1%
valued-customer	10,858,803,566	25%
osm0sis	710,498,254	1%
zapncrap	841,147,736	1%
curx	1,665,542,762	1%