Viewing a response to: @lexiconical/allow-authors-to-determine-curation-split-and-timing-edit-30-minute-delay
On Golos [ which is forked Steemit ] apart from "official" golos.io there's another client site goldvoice.club [Just like on Steemit there's busy.org ] Goldvoice.club allows authors to pay "cashback" to curators, rShares received are calculated and author can decide which % of reward received going to be transferred back to curators proportional to rShares. There's an initiative on Golos for authors sharing rewards with curators 50/50 instead of 75/25. They can use *goldvoice* to settle it or just use another "cashback bot" available. All posts using 50/50 principle are reblogged by "50/50 community account" this giving more exposure. Last week over 100 authors published posts using 50/50 principle and participants of this initiative now do distribute about 13% of total reward pool on Golos. The moral is, there's no need to appeal to developers, all that could be realized by a group of interested users.
| author | svamiva |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-lexiconical-allow-authors-to-determine-curation-split-and-timing-edit-30-minute-delay-20171101t092607425z |
| category | utopian-io |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-11-01 09:26:09 |
| last_update | 2017-11-01 18:03:27 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2017-11-08 09:26:09 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.175 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.058 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 916 |
| author_reputation | 9,635,062,598,275 |
| root_title | "Allow Authors To Determine Curation Split & Timing (Edit 30 Minute Delay)" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 19,151,700 |
| net_rshares | 114,065,683,997 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lexiconical | 0 | 114,065,683,997 | 8% |
*"Goldvoice.club allows authors to pay "cashback" to curators, rShares received are calculated and author can decide which % of reward received going to be transferred back to curators proportional to rShares."* That's very cool. I would certainly have made use of that option. It's nice to offer the extra promotion to those who participate. *"The moral is, there's no need to appeal to developers, all that could be realized by a group of interested users."* I don't see why both options can't be available. Your option, notably, requires trust if using bots rather than a decentralized blockchain, so appealing to developers is still worthwhile. Or, we can simply code the option ourselves and post it to Git.
| author | lexiconical |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-svamiva-re-lexiconical-allow-authors-to-determine-curation-split-and-timing-edit-30-minute-delay-20171102t170254979z |
| category | utopian-io |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-11-02 17:02:57 |
| last_update | 2017-11-02 17:02:57 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-11-09 17:02:57 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 2.157 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.717 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 715 |
| author_reputation | 183,198,168,434,738 |
| root_title | "Allow Authors To Determine Curation Split & Timing (Edit 30 Minute Delay)" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 19,279,849 |
| net_rshares | 1,399,714,199,310 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| svamiva | 0 | 74,203,479,757 | 100% | ||
| nikez452 | 0 | 1,325,510,719,553 | 47% |
hiveblocks