create account

RE: What is next after web 3.0? by thealgodev

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @yintercept/r6ew58

· @thealgodev ·
Thanks for the contribution,the read-only phrase is used for the majority of static websites that were the earliest usage of web 1.0 up
properties (22)
authorthealgodev
permlinkre-yintercept-r6mxcm
categoryweb
json_metadata{"tags":["web"],"app":"peakd/2022.01.2"}
created2022-02-01 16:48:24
last_update2022-02-01 16:48:24
depth2
children4
last_payout2022-02-08 16:48:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length135
author_reputation956,371,742
root_title"What is next after web 3.0?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id110,048,220
net_rshares0
@yintercept ·
Public access to the web came through dial up services like CompuServe, AOL and Prodigy.  There were numerous dial up BBS services.

The very first public sites on the Internet were dynamic forums. 

People of the Web 1.0 ridiculed static web sites as online brochures.

The dynamic forums were quickly followed by online shops like eBay and Amazon. eBay is an auction house. People buy and sell through dynamic auctions on eBay. There were numerous classified ad sites.

Unfortunately, people were reluctant to give their credit card numbers to small web sites. Local states had to charge local sales tax. So people wanted to shop out of state to avoid the tax. The sad result is that Amazon came to dominate ecommerce.

I worked for a telephone company. Our site let people pay their bills, review their voice mail, send text messages, etc.

Most of the early sites were dynamic.

Google came along. The PR algorithm of Google favored static pages which were keyword rich. The Web Archive archived static pages. This might give the illusion that the web was flat, but it was dynamic.

Google favored blogs to online forums. I guess you could call blogs read only. Most blogs allowed user comments and included guestbooks and featured things like Webrings.

Spammers attacked routinely attacked any open feature on a blog and blogs reduced their use of community features.

The term Web 2.0 was used to describe web sites designed for smart phones. Twitter was initially built on the concept of text messaging which is why they had the 144 character limit for tweets.

The claim that Web 1.0 was nothing but static pages is an outright lie.
properties (22)
authoryintercept
permlinkr6p3np
categoryweb
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2022-02-02 20:59:51
last_update2022-02-02 20:59:51
depth3
children3
last_payout2022-02-09 20:59:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,641
author_reputation27,812,710,794,661
root_title"What is next after web 3.0?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id110,086,923
net_rshares0
@thealgodev · (edited)
Well that's of your view not of  Tim berners Lee the founder of the web view who actually said in numerous interviews that the web 1.0 is characterized with static page
properties (22)
authorthealgodev
permlinkre-yintercept-r6rt3t
categoryweb
json_metadata{"tags":["web"],"app":"peakd/2022.01.2"}
created2022-02-04 08:04:54
last_update2022-02-04 08:12:48
depth4
children2
last_payout2022-02-11 08:04:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length168
author_reputation956,371,742
root_title"What is next after web 3.0?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id110,132,364
net_rshares0
@yintercept ·
If you are interested in the evolution of the Internet, you should read the [RFCs from ARPANET](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index.html). The RFCs started in 1969. They are clearly talking about dynamic read/write data.

If the W3C intended the Internet to be exclusively for static data; then why did they include the FORM element in the HTML specification? This the [FORM Element Defined in HTML 2.0](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1866#page-40) in 1995. Apparently, HTML 2.0 was the first formalized definition of HTML.

> Well that's of your view not of Tim Berners Lee the founder of the web view 

I looked up the [Wikipedia article on Web 2.0](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0). It has an interesting paragraph that reads:

> Whether Web 2.0 is substantially different from prior Web technologies has been challenged by World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee, who describes the term as jargon. His original vision of the Web was "a collaborative medium, a place where we [could] all meet and read and write".

Apparently Tim Berners-Lee openly refutes your claim. Yes, his very first example was static. But that is true of almost every program. The reason for this is that one has to create an authentication system before allowing writes.

Berners-Lee even calls Web 2.0 jargon. It was a marketing ploy. Claiming that the Internet before Web 2.0 was static is a demonstrable lie created by marketers for big tech selling people on centralized social media platforms.
properties (22)
authoryintercept
permlinkre-thealgodev-r6sr32
categoryweb
json_metadata{"tags":["web"],"app":"peakd/2022.01.2"}
created2022-02-04 20:18:42
last_update2022-02-04 20:18:42
depth5
children1
last_payout2022-02-11 20:18:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,493
author_reputation27,812,710,794,661
root_title"What is next after web 3.0?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id110,148,282
net_rshares0