create account

RE: My position on the soft fork - I am not running the changes on my witness node by timcliff

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @bryan-imhoff/re-timcliff-q66feo

· @timcliff ·
There is definitely discussion about it although it does not nullify the current situation. They could just divide it up across two accounts and vote in 10 witnesses each.
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkq66fhh
categorywitness-update
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-02-23 22:51:18
last_update2020-02-23 22:51:18
depth2
children4
last_payout2020-03-01 22:51:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length171
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"My position on the soft fork - I am not running the changes on my witness node"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,756,737
net_rshares0
@bryan-imhoff ·
$0.04
Any reduction in number of witness votes still helps. Right now we have a system of governance wherein voting rights are equal to SP times 30. SP times 10 is still a massive improvement, but cutting witness votes to 5 or 6 is probably what would be needed to prevent the Steemit Inc. stake from being able to control consensus outright.  Not saying they couldn't control 10+ seats still if they chose, but at least they'd probably need to negotiate with some community backed "spoilers" at that level.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorbryan-imhoff
permlinkre-timcliff-q66h1e
categorywitness-update
json_metadata{"tags":["witness-update"],"app":"steempeak/2020.02.2"}
created2020-02-23 23:24:51
last_update2020-02-23 23:24:51
depth3
children3
last_payout2020-03-01 23:24:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.021 HBD
curator_payout_value0.020 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length501
author_reputation71,780,425,099,152
root_title"My position on the soft fork - I am not running the changes on my witness node"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,757,426
net_rshares267,112,726,790
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@timcliff ·
It would cut other stakeholders votes by the same amount as well. The Steemit, Inc. accounts would still have proportionally the same amount of advantage.
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkq66h5h
categorywitness-update
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-02-23 23:27:15
last_update2020-02-23 23:27:15
depth4
children2
last_payout2020-03-01 23:27:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length154
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"My position on the soft fork - I am not running the changes on my witness node"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,757,471
net_rshares0
@marki99 ·
No, because they wouldn't be able to enforce a witness supermajority. Even though they will still have an advantage, it won't be enough to centralize the chain.
properties (22)
authormarki99
permlinkq66lkw
categorywitness-update
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-02-24 01:02:57
last_update2020-02-24 01:02:57
depth5
children1
last_payout2020-03-02 01:02:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length160
author_reputation11,400,723,818,181
root_title"My position on the soft fork - I am not running the changes on my witness node"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,759,734
net_rshares0