![WhiteHouseFlag.jpeg](https://images.hive.blog/DQmfA7dYMry683HSzzCrVmmNXnPnCvVQBtfHRRc6Ddmb5Db/WhiteHouseFlag.jpeg)

What if the swamp is undrainable?

As in, you have a position of power, in a corporation, that runs the free world…
If such a position exists, then there will be a power struggle to get that position.  The position goes to the highest bidder.  And this has almost nothing to do with the campaign trail, or speeches in front of crowds, or R or D, this has to do with currying favor from the top oligarchs.

In Detroit it is so blatant, that if you run for office, some "nice" guys with suits will show up and ask "how much are you willing to give for this position?"

Instead of building a port in Louisiana, they dug a huge long channel into Texas.  All that extra money spent, just to avoid all the corruption in Louisiana.

Can one actually drain the swamp?  Everything there is corrupted.  If not the clerk, then the boss, if not the boss then the job duties, if not the job duties then the mission statement.  Either way, the clerk does things a certain way, a corrupted way.  So, you really have to clean the entire structure.  And maybe that is impossible.  So, the solution is to start anew.

It may be essential to leave the swamp, maybe wall it up, and start anew somewhere else.

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>
## Leave the structure, and you will get again, what you had.

It isn't really the current batch of politicians.  It is the structure in which they reside.

Our current structure says, that he who pays the most, gets control of the levers of power.  It is written into The US constitution.

Our constitution could say things like, if the representative is not representing their constituents, they can be sued for damages.  Or, that they can instantly be thrown out of office and their last votes recalled.  That somehow the representative can be held accountable.

We don't have that in our current structure, and i doubt it is because they writers overlooked it.

Anyway, if we got rid of all the people in Washington DC, and didn't change the structure, in a few years it would be back to just as it is now.

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>
## Real Change Comes From a Paradigm Shift

A really good example of a paradigm shift is bitcoin.  A radically decentralized, trustless, agreed-upon ledger.

This bitcoin, does away with, in one fell swoop, all the controlling structure that makes debt based fiat currency so bad.

The den of evil, the group of banksters and their control is gone.  That control position  no longer exists.  This is the biggest thing that bitcoin has done.  It changed the structure, while also redefining money, and money use.

And so, in the near future, so many things that govern-cement does will be overturned.

Like, why does the DMV exist?  They really do not do anything.  Especially nothing useful.  They were started so that people would register their cars (register means to give ownership to the govern-cement, in return they give you exclusive rights to use it) but we no longer get the benefit that was promised to us.  Theft is so prevalent that some insurance companies are not insuring certain highly stolen cars.  The DMV has failed the people, yet it is still used to bludgeon people and extort money and time.  If we need this entity to tell us who owns which car, a block-chain would clean that up in a jiffy.

And why do we elect a governor who will appoint a person to fix a road?  Why not just elect the person to be in charge of fixing the road?  And why pay for it through taxes, why not a GoFundMe?  So, we elect the guy to be in charge of building a road, and his time in office is very easy to evaluate.  Is the road built?  Is it built well?  In this way we have a responsible party, and they do not have lots of tasks and bureaus to hide money in.  The corruption possible is minimized, and the powers of the office are well defined, and limited in time.

Paradigm shifts take what seems to be a problem, and often make that problem non-existent.
We are no longer asking govern-cement to fix govern-cement.

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>
## So, what to do about DC?

It may be of great importance to build a border wall…
around the 69 square miles of foreign occupied territory on the Potomac! 

Most of the people inside those boundaries are guilty of many crimes.  Crimes against the people.
(not doing illegal things, because they were sure to write in that the bad stuff they are doing is "legal")

Most of the people in office in DC aren't American citizens as they are supposed to be.  Instead, they are citizens of Isreal.  And they have given an oath to have no country before the BAR (what every lawyer does).

So, these people are foreign dissidents running our country.

We really need to put a stop to this.
And this may require moving the capital of America.


<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>
<center><em>All images in this post are my own original creations.</em></center>