It does sound like an idea whose time has come . So what's the route ? Lobby witnesses ?

but on other side, I got some messages from minnowbooster with that amount.
Important messages, btw, but not a scam "get 200 upvotes from my bots"

maybe instead of setting levels for accepting money we could just block/mute  spam-senders?

This will be amazing if this is implemented.
It is annoying getting bombarded with 'resteem services' and 'come check out my post'. I don't want to fucking buy your services.
I really hope this becomes a reality

Yep yep yep!

You know, I'm a tolerant person, everybody can send me as much money as he wants... :)
I dont give a shit what they write anyway, I dont follow or upvote anyone because of that. And the transfer messages are not as annoying as the "great post - pls follow me" comments.
But its a nice idea anyway, if somebody wants to block the transfer spam.

Thanks for information @fyrstikken

yeah this is much needed as people are spamming writing big messages just for upvote services :(

You had to recieve 0.001$ payments so many times to hate them LOL
More of anti-spam features is what this network need.

Yep, I agree.  Set a deposit threshold on our accounts, and kick it off to null if it is not met, or reverse the transaction.

0.001 SBD ill post your stuff... 

collect until 1.001 SBD pay 1 SBD for RESTEEM ..... i have 0.001 of yours  MUUUHHHHAAAAAHHHAAAAAAHHHAHAAAA!!!!!!

0.001$ . you would have to get a thousand of that to make up $1. what a pain,lol or you could just flag the user if its a spam that should deter them.

yes!! good idear bud! I dont get a whole bunch of them but I can only imagine how many bullnonsense ones you get

Great idea!  A lot of social media should probably operate this way.

Interesting proposal. But if it gets implemented, the spams will be more costly, the spammers will be broke in no time! Poor spammers.
☑️

Sounds like a solid feature to be added

You can send me as much money as you want to my wallet. I don't care.

As for the notifications, I haven't received them in a while, so again, it's not a big issue for me.

Either way, we need to remove ALL SPAM. I don't think the WALLET SPAM is nearly as big of a problem as ALL OF THE OTHER SPAM that we see on a daily basis.

Maybe we focus on the other Spam first, then Look at the Wallet Spam later. After-all, Wallet Spam is simply increasing your value of Steem, and decreasing someone else's value -- which isn't a problem as long as you're an upstanding member of the community :)

Good idea. Your smart people for share information very usefull. Thanks you @fyrstikken

Hi fyrsikken, sorry for contacting you this way.  You kicked me from steemspeak

I think you may of misunderstood something I said.  I am looking for info if anyboby from steemit have talked about what seems to be misleading info from polo, as steem transfers are working fine on bittrex the problem seems to be on polos end.

I am just concerned that as polo is still a large exchange a lot of people are seeing this notice and are lead to believe the problem is on steems side.

I think a post by someone more in the know (you maybe) debunking the implied message by polo would help.

Anyway if you could unblock me on discord, I would love to continue discussing it.

Note to self: If sending @fyrstikken a memo, set SBD amount to $100.

Fantastic idea @fyrstikken, the wallet SPAM, and spam in general is getting out of hand. I would love to see this implemented.

i dont understand why if, someone were sending money to request upvotes, they would only send 0.001 steem. I mean, I'm not saying that I condone paying for getting upvotes in general, but if you gotta bribe someone, at least give them a reasonable amount xD

I think it's a great idea to have this configurable on an account level.  This way people like you can turn it up and be less annoyed by all the incoming dust, while us minnows down here can keep it low to slowly accumulate some pennies and gradually increase it as we grow and get more spam.  Win-win for everybody!

spam in wallet is tiring, we should just add flag system to wallet too, so if someone send money we just receive money without msg if they are flagged

This is genius, but it will prevent alot of new users with no money invested from upvoting quality content.

I have an even better idea. Instead of reject you can choose an account to 'delegate'
You could say: all transfers below 1sbd go to @hairshares and you dont notice anymore

J

Edit. Nah seems not really better on the second thought. Could lead to more spamming.

Sweet post. I am new and goimg nuts figuring out this steemit.  Thank you for the info,  nice knowing what ro look for

I wish I was facing this , I'd feel good about myself then . 

I guess you're the man for a reason, smart idea

Meh, agree to disagree. It is nice to get the small amounts when you are a minnow

But this is actually a great idea man.

Somebody needs to do something. These spammers are not properly directing their own funds.  We would grow better with an organic system like you described,  one of real value. What say you, @pastbastard  ?

Awesome feature idea. You definitely have my vote.

I've been noticing, as I try to catch up a backlog of unvoted/un-replied-to comments, that the block-chain seems to be getting slower over time. I can only imagine these sort of spam transactions are a big part of the problem. 

Anything under half an SBD hardly seems worth taxing the chain, but the idea to allow you to set an auto-reject is even better. The auto-reject could return the SBD, or it could even send it to @null and destroy it...just an option.

Resteeming this one.

Great option , awesome thinking we have to protect this community :)
wise man with great thinking
thank you

I proposed this at the senders end a while back to stop spam, but this is an EXCELLENT idea for incoming Steem/SBD! UV/RS big man!! :)

This is definitely a fair feature-request. Either reject it or don't show it in the wallet!

Agree with you, success always for you @fyrstikken

I support your idea as I think having options are always better than no options:)
But I personally would not activate this feature myself.

On my first week on steemit, I was very happy to receive my first ever 0.001 STEEM from @bottymcbotface. It gave me the feeling that someone already noticed my presence.

I understand, that it can be frustrating after the 1000th occurrence.

On the other hand, it is 1000x0.001 = 1 STEEM for free! Who rejects free money nowadays? :D

Sounds like too many people mistaking value (.001) for valuable (your time)...

Very informative @frystrikken

I am not at the level of exploding yet but I do start to get annoyed when I see those posts in my wallet. There are other ways to promote a service. 
Now if they would send me 1,00  I might like them a bit more..... So a hint for all who wants to do this.... Send more money, make it worth it!

What would be even better? That all the transactions bellow the users limit would be transferred back to the reward pool without showing on the destination account.  That way, the "ignorant" users that donates without checking the limit would be "punished" by contributing to the reward pool :)

Everyone loves money, and everyone want it, but struggle still exist here!

Thanks @fyrstikken . They really annoyed