RE: PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT by hive-detectives

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @mrtats/re-hive-detectives-s43vpa

hive-140217 · @hive-detectives · Nov 14 '23 (edited)

<div class="pull-left">

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/hive-detectives/23tbLvcqMLvfxPKWoymDr7ZgF1KdqVMW5G38kcCKXYt4RjnimSfshaAkcWfpJ97rQmUTL.png)
</div>

#### <u>Getting replies in their favour at the top. Not surprised.</u>

.
.

__1.__ Incorrect, as confirmed by the attorney in the email at the bottom.

__2.__ They are indeed valuable part of the NFTs. What you are saying does not stand in court.

> you can argue that NFTs are "Incorporated Products" and the 3D Assets themselves are not the actually valuable part of these

But don't listen to me, and watch hundreds of other similar cases where entire projects were blacklisted from marketplaces for much less.

__3.__ Incorrect as well.

# .

> CGTrader license

# And that's only one of the 5 platforms used.

# .

#### You cannot re-sell it.

In most cases it is illegal, and where it's on the edge it's still...

# <div class="phishy">DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL</div>

...to profit from someone else's work without attribution or compensation.

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/hive-detectives/EoibUBK2GPuMnHDwqx8SxXeBzrAaKsSt1oeThV2tJrh2fKEUhWuJJ3SXwXTicDREv7V.png)

### NFT = Derivative Work

. . . . . 

PS.

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/hive-detectives/Eo45JsdSPvYYqw5iowMbtk7FqBuufhtxohauf9iHdzX8v6Gs1EktJGSeJAAjcXgUtgA.png)

👍 jacobtothe, hive-detectives
👎 psyberx

`author`	hive-detectives
`permlink`	re-mrtats-s447cx
`category`	hive-140217
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["hive-140217"],"app":"peakd/2023.10.1"}
`created`	2023-11-14 13:12:36
`last_update`	2023-11-14 19:52:48
`depth`	2
`children`	17
`last_payout`	2023-11-21 13:12:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	1,356
`author_reputation`	4,467,575,682,249
`root_title`	"PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	128,851,647
`net_rshares`	-852,730,413,642
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
jacobtothe	256,749,243,669	40%
psyberx	-1,110,037,664,099	-100%
hive-detectives	558,006,788	100%

@mrtats · Nov 14 '23 (edited)

$0.55

>Incorrect, as confirmed by the attorney in the email at the bottom.

Is this attorney an attorney who is an expert at licensing agreements? Did you send them the licensing agreement for CGTrader or some other licensing agreement? 

There is only one snippet saying it is a breach of the licensing agreement, but there is no context for the whole e-mail. There is no context if all the facts of the matter were properly communicated to said attorney. 

There is no evidence of this attorney being a real attorney.  

> They are indeed valuable part of the NFTs. What you are saying does not stand in court.

If you replace the model does that make the NFT lose value, if not then they are not a valuable part of the NFT. That is one criterion. The second criterion is whether the NFT is considered an "Incorporated Product". 

> Incorrect as well.

There is nothing incorrect about this. This is what a licensing agreement is. If you have evidence of them not getting a license, feel free to share so. If not, getting a license is permission and the amount the author put on their license is proper compensation. 

Have a wonderful day.

👍 psyberx, dynamicrypto, psx-bank, sketchygamerguy, lermagreen

`author`	mrtats
`permlink`	re-hive-detectives-s449uz
`category`	hive-140217
`json_metadata`	{"tags":"hive-140217"}
`created`	2023-11-14 14:06:36
`last_update`	2023-11-14 14:07:00
`depth`	3
`children`	16
`last_payout`	2023-11-21 14:06:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.274 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.273 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	1,136
`author_reputation`	12,082,674,773,266
`root_title`	"PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	128,852,856
`net_rshares`	1,164,813,170,098
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (5)

voter	rshares	pct
dynamicrypto	123,886,721,073	56.25%
lermagreen	475,518,621	100%
sketchygamerguy	13,260,175,711	100%
psyberx	927,796,797,566	75%
psx-bank	99,393,957,127	100%

@hive-detectives · Nov 14 '23

> whether the NFT is considered an "Incorporated Product".

That's only for CGTrader.

# CGTrader is only 1 of the 5 platforms used

# .

- Not sharing the email thread at this stage

# .

> If you replace the model does that make the NFT lose value

That's what hundreds of similar cases on other blockchains say.

# .

> proper compensation for the original author

It is not. They do not allow you to re-sell them.

👍 jacobtothe
👎 psyberx

`author`	hive-detectives
`permlink`	re-mrtats-s44agn
`category`	hive-140217
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["hive-140217"],"app":"peakd/2023.10.1"}
`created`	2023-11-14 14:19:39
`last_update`	2023-11-14 14:19:39
`depth`	4
`children`	15
`last_payout`	2023-11-21 14:19:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	417
`author_reputation`	4,467,575,682,249
`root_title`	"PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	128,853,178
`net_rshares`	-811,929,588,855
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
jacobtothe	0 B		275,948,481,100	40%
psyberx	0 B		-1,087,878,069,955	-100%

@mrtats · Nov 14 '23 (edited)

$0.53

>CGTrader is only 1 of the 5 platforms used

While you listed some of the products used on different platforms, they are also available on CGTrader. 

For example; Drone. 

>That's what hundreds of similar cases on other blockchains say.

If NFTs are considered part of the game, they are part of the "incorporated product". This is a highly nuanced part of Intellectual Property. If you can find one where there is an actual similar case with proper licenses purchased and an actual ruling about. I would like to read about it. 

>It is not. They do not allow you to re-sell them.

Yes, they do not allow you to re-sell the model files themselves. That should be pretty obvious. An image however is not the model itself. And if the NFTs that are sold, don't grant to purchaser any rights to the image then there is no violation here. 



Edit:

I am not going to waste more of my time on this, as I do not particularly care whether you or PsyberX is right.

👍 psyberx, dynamicrypto, psx-bank

`author`	mrtats
`permlink`	re-hive-detectives-s44cmc
`category`	hive-140217
`json_metadata`	{"app":"peakd/2023.10.1","tags":["hive-140217"]}
`created`	2023-11-14 15:06:12
`last_update`	2023-11-14 15:25:42
`depth`	5
`children`	14
`last_payout`	2023-11-21 15:06:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.267 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.267 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	957
`author_reputation`	12,082,674,773,266
`root_title`	"PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	128,854,223
`net_rshares`	1,133,892,588,886
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
dynamicrypto	122,516,391,352	56.25%
psyberx	913,958,389,368	75%
psx-bank	97,417,808,166	100%

14 replies