create account

RE: PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT by hive-detectives

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @mrtats/re-hive-detectives-s449uz

· @hive-detectives ·
> whether the NFT is considered an "Incorporated Product".

That's only for CGTrader.

# CGTrader is only 1 of the 5 platforms used

# .

- Not sharing the email thread at this stage

# .

> If you replace the model does that make the NFT lose value

That's what hundreds of similar cases on other blockchains say.

# .

> proper compensation for the original author

It is not. They do not allow you to re-sell them.
👍  
👎  
properties (23)
authorhive-detectives
permlinkre-mrtats-s44agn
categoryhive-140217
json_metadata{"tags":["hive-140217"],"app":"peakd/2023.10.1"}
created2023-11-14 14:19:39
last_update2023-11-14 14:19:39
depth4
children15
last_payout2023-11-21 14:19:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length417
author_reputation4,467,575,682,249
root_title"PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id128,853,178
net_rshares-811,929,588,855
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@mrtats · (edited)
$0.53
>CGTrader is only 1 of the 5 platforms used

While you listed some of the products used on different platforms, they are also available on CGTrader. 

For example; Drone. 

>That's what hundreds of similar cases on other blockchains say.

If NFTs are considered part of the game, they are part of the "incorporated product". This is a highly nuanced part of Intellectual Property. If you can find one where there is an actual similar case with proper licenses purchased and an actual ruling about. I would like to read about it. 

>It is not. They do not allow you to re-sell them.

Yes, they do not allow you to re-sell the model files themselves. That should be pretty obvious. An image however is not the model itself. And if the NFTs that are sold, don't grant to purchaser any rights to the image then there is no violation here. 



Edit:

I am not going to waste more of my time on this, as I do not particularly care whether you or PsyberX is right.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authormrtats
permlinkre-hive-detectives-s44cmc
categoryhive-140217
json_metadata{"app":"peakd/2023.10.1","tags":["hive-140217"]}
created2023-11-14 15:06:12
last_update2023-11-14 15:25:42
depth5
children14
last_payout2023-11-21 15:06:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.267 HBD
curator_payout_value0.267 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length957
author_reputation12,144,370,264,088
root_title"PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id128,854,223
net_rshares1,133,892,588,886
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@hive-detectives · (edited)
> they are part of the "incorporated product".

The incorporated product in this case is the NFT. Who cares about the game.

# .


![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/hive-detectives/EoibUBK2GPuMnHDwqx8SxXeBzrAaKsSt1oeThV2tJrh2fG9RfydWGJL5Ftkphf2ECUq.png)

## NFT = derivative work

# .

And even leaving aside legality for a second...

# <div class="phishy">This is DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL</div>
👍  ,
👎  
properties (23)
authorhive-detectives
permlinkre-mrtats-s44g4j
categoryhive-140217
json_metadata{"tags":["hive-140217"],"app":"peakd/2023.10.1"}
created2023-11-14 16:21:57
last_update2023-11-14 16:48:06
depth6
children13
last_payout2023-11-21 16:21:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length413
author_reputation4,467,575,682,249
root_title"PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id128,856,031
net_rshares-781,299,017,506
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@mrtats ·
$0.70
>NFT = derivative work

If the derivative work is too similar to the 3D asset. (Here the printing refers to 3D printing of the asset and selling it. As they are both 3D models. Which would make them too similar.) 

Whether the NFT is considered part of the game matters. If the NFT is part of the game, the game will be considered for the purposes of the license, not the NFT. As incorporated work would be the game, not the NFT. 


> This is DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL

There is nothing dishonest or unethical about this, if the proper license agreements are followed, and there is no breach of the agreement. Unless the authors of the works sue for breach of the license agreement and the courts decide there has been a breach, there is nothing wrong here. 
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authormrtats
permlinkre-hive-detectives-s44ixq
categoryhive-140217
json_metadata{"tags":["hive-140217"],"app":"peakd/2023.10.1"}
created2023-11-14 17:22:39
last_update2023-11-14 17:22:39
depth7
children12
last_payout2023-11-21 17:22:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.348 HBD
curator_payout_value0.348 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length756
author_reputation12,144,370,264,088
root_title"PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id128,857,421
net_rshares1,470,420,295,611
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)