![cuddle_naughty.png](https://images.hive.blog/DQmQW7QHV6XwCtsxYaq4fV1HHxJCa7qVfzFX1crbvvXzudr/cuddle_naughty.png)

I agree, discrimination is real. It's easy for it to take place between the weak and the powerful. No matter where this occurs, when there is force from one to another and no help in sight, the weaker one is disadvantaged. Commonly the poor (unfree) in front of the rich.

Modern science - which can be biased to the core - only cares about differences if something profitable can be made out of them. What has to do with medicine and runs via scientific, so-called empirical studies, cannot deal with deviations, exceptions and peculiarities, because study participants who react to a drug being tested, for example, in a unique way that is not found in any other subject are excluded from the studies. Since the studies must always be repeatable under exactly the same conditions, outliers are not suitable for making accurate statements. 

But actually there are no identical reactions from different people at all, there are only effects that the participants describe and judge as severe, moderate or mild. 

Modern medicine does not take into account that a disease once diagnosed could just as well disappear on its own. That the intake of 50 milligrams could be a high dose for one person in relation to, for example, his age, his daily form, daylight, ingested food, psychological mood, geological weather conditions, season, etc., for another a barely noticeable amount and for the next it makes no difference. 

The deeper and more intensely one looks, the more innumerable subtle as well as gross differences can be detected between people. Everyone has a unique flora and fauna in and on their body. We will never know exactly how all the influencing factors relate to the medicines administered and to each person's particular body. But we like to pretend that we do. 

Every mass-produced product that is exactly the same in form, composition and weight etc. always meets people who are very different. Technology, however, forces us to regard ourselves as the same in form, composition and measurement, and so it is now the other way round that human beings serve medicine and technology, not as individually unique beings but as collectively identical functionaries. 

The talk of race, gender and skin colour is merely a pastime, a distraction from the fact that politically correct drivel has not the slightest thing to do with aliveness and love, with acceptance of differences. People who publicly advocate "protecting the rights of minorities", for example, and have that on their agenda, make me sceptical from the start. 

If we really believed the nonsense about "saving ourselves" through medicine, we would have to believe just as much that if damage occurred, we could quite as easily, without error, attribute the damage to a specific cause. 

But interestingly, when this is attempted on the way back, for example, to prove that bee mortality is caused by pesticides, we are unsuccessful in doing so with the manufacturers. In fact, they have a point there, because the entire ecosystem is also considered to influence bees and their deaths, i.e. numerous influencing factors that cannot all be taken into account. Of course, it would still be wise to do without pesticides, but tell that to the manufacturers and monoculture farms. 

An interested scientist always looks at the peculiar, investigates the single case, the specific environment and asks for differences, not only similarities.

> The English had a long history of separating themselves from others and treating foreigners, such as the Irish, as alien “others.” By the 17th century their policies and practices in Ireland had led to an image of the Irish as “savages” who were incapable of being civilized.

Dear @logiczombie, I was shocked that the British racialized the Irish. The British and the Irish belong to the same Celts. Although often famous for racism between whites and blacks in the United States, racism among whites in Europe is not.

Many Koreans who visited Europe argued that European racial discrimination was worse than in the United States.

Congratulations @logiczombie! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

<table><tr><td><img src="https://images.hive.blog/60x70/http://hivebuzz.me/@logiczombie/upvoted.png?202012140237"></td><td>You received more than 8000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 9000 upvotes.</td></tr>
</table>

<sub>_You can view your badges on [your board](https://hivebuzz.me/@logiczombie) and compare yourself to others in the [Ranking](https://hivebuzz.me/ranking)_</sub>
<sub>_If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word_ `STOP`</sub>



**Do not miss the last post from @hivebuzz:**
<table><tr><td><a href="/hivebuzz/@hivebuzz/proposal-2021"><img src="https://images.hive.blog/64x128/https://i.imgur.com/qYidoDJ.jpg"></a></td><td><a href="/hivebuzz/@hivebuzz/proposal-2021">The Hive Gamification Proposal #2</a></td></tr></table>

![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdeE6iYSCEYSoagbQtSHdsM4MTzpUKLpqA5E7dCt27rce/image.png)

Thank you very much for your post, have a good week

thank you very much for the post, have a good week

Interesting thought.
But still races are a biological fact, not only in humans but also in animals and plants. What you describe is an abuse of that biological principle in order to oppress poor people. But you can´t conclude that races are fabricated. They just exploited them.