It was already time to play with **Beem**, a python library designed to allow developers to easily access HIVE's network without dealing with all the related blockchain technology.

![Presentation1.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/macrodrigues/23uRLNvq1PkSEuYTa7yt1f6ApPgVaCDUkutZND45peVBWW9qbuAxcJwaQxv4997HU389N.png)

The following shows some **Exploratory Data Analysis** done using **Jupyter Notebooks**.

# Gathering Data 

Let's start by the necessary imports:

```
from beem import Hive
from beem.discussions import Query, Discussions
from beem.comment import Comment
import pandas as pd
```

Get queries and discussions:

```
q = Query(limit=10, tag="")
d = Discussions()
```
Get the generator containing the posts:
```
# post list for selected query
iter = 10000000
posts = d.get_discussions('hot', q, limit=iter)
```
Above you can see that I used a big iteration number, to get a decent Data Frame to work with.

Then I built a dictionary containing only the posts where the **Pending Payout Value** was bigger than 20 HIVE:

```
amount = 20
data = [
    {
        'ID': post['post_id'],
        'Author': post['author'],
        'Created': post['created'],
        'Title': post['title'],
        'Category': post['category'],
        'Reputation': post['author_reputation'],
        'Votes': len(post['active_votes']),
        'Body Length': post['body_length'],
        'Tags': post['tags'],
        'Metadata': post['json_metadata'],
        'Pending payout value': post['pending_payout_value'].amount,
        'Community': post['community']} \
    for post in posts if post['pending_payout_value'].amount > amount ] 
```
Then I converted the data into a dictionary, and saved as a .csv.

```
df = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(data)
df.to_csv('hive_data.csv')
```
Gathering the data took some time, because of so many iterations.

# Analysing the Data

More imports:

```
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
import plotly as px
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')
```
Convert the .csv back into a Data Frame and sort by **Pending Payout Value**.
```
df = pd.read_csv('hive_data.csv')
df.drop([df.columns[0]], axis = 1, inplace = True)
df = df.sort_values(by=df.columns[-2], ascending=False)
```

### Categories that generate the most value per post

The following results, don't show the categories that generate the most value, only the ones where the posts raised more than 20 HIVE. In addition I'm working with a "small" Dataset, taking into account the history of the blockchain. 

I grouped by **Category** and did a sum of the cells. Then I took the 20 best performing categories.

```
df_cat = df.groupby(by=['Category'])\
	.sum().sort_values(by=df.columns[-2], ascending=False)
df_cat_best = df_cat.head(20)
```

A bar plot displaying the results:


![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/macrodrigues/23xpWCjeuBJMjUWRWy7DwBJ2bcMKBa8ukzCrYfAL1NV8M84HJ4gLfufu9yzXix8xHbn57.png)

Any surprises?

**Leo Finance** and **Pinmapple**, clearly stand out compared to the other categories.

### Correlations

Do the features correlate? Number of votes with Pending Payout Value? Reputation?

```
import ast

df_corr = df[['Reputation', 'Votes', 'Body Length', 'Tags', 'Pending payout value']]
df_corr['Tags'] = df_corr['Tags'].apply(lambda x: ast.literal_eval(x))
df_corr['Number of Tags'] = df_corr['Tags'].apply(lambda x: len(x))
```

Above, I used the library "ast" to use the function `ast.literal_eval()`. Because when saving a list in a .csv cell, it is saved as a string instead. This function allows me to convert it back into a list. I also created another feature called "Length of Tags".

Plotting a heatmap:

```
sns.heatmap(df_corr.corr(), cmap="YlGnBu");
```


![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/macrodrigues/23ynojgz9669hbaFH7Qox7k7ZueA2jBWt2PPdMFgm4kpf3HygBo8DCJNnLWjWnQS53Crc.png)

From the heatmap above we can see that there aren't any strong correlation between features. The number of votes it's slightly correlated with the payout value. But reputation, number of tags and body length do not seem to affect the amount of rewards.


## What about the tags?

Taking into account the column having the list of tags, it was interesting to see which ones are contributing to the most value. Obviously this is not a proper analysis, because the tags should be in equal value along the sample, to know exactly which ones have the strongest influence, which is not the case.

```
df_temp_tags = df_corr.explode('Tags')\
	.drop(['Length Tags', 'Reputation', 'Body Length'], axis=1)
df_temp_tags['Tag Counts'] = df_temp_tags['Tags'].apply(lambda x: 1)
df_tags = df_temp_tags.groupby('Tags')\
    .sum().sort_values(by='Pending payout value', ascending=False)
df_tags
```

Above, I "exploded" the list of tags inside the lists and then I counted them.

With the new features, I did a new heatmap:

```
sns.heatmap(df_tags.corr(), cmap="YlGnBu");
```

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/macrodrigues/245Hz4eS6hoE13RxzL17XLEcNZfZNDeCx24PX81w9H8BeVuDQqPE5CK4HxU6Hue7h9JPM.png)

As expected, the "Tag Counts" is correlated with the Pending Payout Value, once again this doesn't mean that the tags with the most counts are the most effective, it can mean that most of the posts use  the same tag. Let's still see a bar plot of the best performing tags in this analysis:

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/macrodrigues/23zbkxjQ2kmjcyVGNxXdQMay94XUgRXGPR1DiVtztEoW4swxpRkdmV16gcpHYshj4LS7T.png)

The "neoxian" tag seems to be the best performing between all. Might be using it for this post, along with "proofofbrain" 😁

Expect more content on Exploratory Data Analysis using Beem, I'm not done yet with this library. See you soon!