create account

Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s by paulag

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @paulag · (edited)
$197.16
Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s
With SMT’s on the horizon, many people are wondering how launching an SMT could fair out.  After reading the SMT whitepaper, as a non-developer I was very disappointed. The entire paper was aimed at developers and it lacked basic information that the average website owner (like me!) would like to know.

As an average website owner that has already managed to monetize my website successfully there are many questions I have about SMT’s (and I already have a good understanding of Steemit, imagine the questions from people that never heard of Steemit or blockchain).  But to try and workout in my own head how all of this could play out, I needed to create a case study.

Although there are ‘case studies’ in the whitepaper they do not really answer any of the questions I have.  So the aim of this analysis is to create a case study backed by actual data from the Steemit BlockChain.  The data used is based on DTubes actual account activity.  

DTube is the decentralised version of YouTube, which has been created on the STEEM BlockChain by @heimindanger.  This project has been financed by Steemit Inc. by way of delegation of 2M Steem Power.

One could view this delegation as fund raised or investment made on launch of the SMT.
Although DTube is not currently an SMT ( and I am not sure what their plans are) for the sake of this study we will assumed DTube to be a SMT with their token issued 1:1 at the value of STEEM.  Therefore 2M Steem Power Delegation is 2M DTube SMTS.  Let’s refer to this token as DTMT. (DTube Media Token).

We will also make the following assumption 

•	DTube went live on the 2nd Dec 2017 (this is the date the delegation was received) 

•	all DTMT’s went to the founder accounts (2M)

So what has DTube achieved since the 2nd December?

## Usage Growth
 
![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/e284387266d8e4ecd9cdd98e0200013da540image.png)


From the 2nd of December 2017 to the 17 April 2018, 203k posts were made by 32.05K authors.  These posts received 3M net votes and 285K comments. The comments were written by 44.22K authors and the comments received 190K net votes.

We can see in the chart showing the number of posts by date that on launch there was general growth in usage up to 30th Jan.  Usage has since declined at a steady level.  

DTube had organic traffic via its promotion on Steemit.  There are currently approx. 80K unique active users on Steemit, over 900K registered accounts.  That means there was over a 55% uptake of active steemit users to DTube.  This is rather good considering Steemit content is generic and DTube is not for everyone.  Many websites that may be interested in SMT’s would have a niche topic.  Therefore you could expect uptake to be higher on these types of sites. 

This can easily be compared to an average website with an email list or following of 80K people where the following is fully engaged with the content.

Let’s make some more assumptions.  Let’s assume that DTube did not have this existing traffic and user based that Steemit gave and instead has an existing following or email list of 500K people. 
 
Based on this and the data above, the uptake on comment participation is assumed to be 8.8% and for posting is assumed to be 6%.

This trend of initial growth can be linked with excitement of a new product within a current audience.  The decline as seen in the charts above can be managed by applying a marketing strategy that ensures a continued flow of new users.

## Founder Activity

In this case study, DTube has taken all the tokens at initial distribution.  Initially this means that DTube must distribute rewards until other accounts grow their power.  Lets take a look at the activity of the DTube account from the 2nd of December 2017 to the 17 April 2018

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/eee1e18c52d5497aa94d9e384657a3678ebcimage.png)

 
9390 votes were made to 2252 authors.  That’s on average 69 votes a day at an average voting weight of 13.11%

## DTMT’s Distributions

Based on the actual activity shown above for DTube on the Steemit BlockChain, we will now apply the assumptions to review the distribution implications of these activities.  

As DTube is the only accounts with Power as per the assumptions above.  Therefore a vote from DTube on launch was worth approximately 159.20 DTMT.

Taking this vote value, voting 69 times a day at 13.11% power we can calculate the rewards paid out in DTMT’s each day.  This being split 75% author and 25% curator, we can now calculate the daily growth in DMTS’s for the founder by way of curation rewards and also the rewards paid to authors.
We will need to make the assumption that the founder account is optimized to maximize curation rewards and they do received 25% curation.  

(Note these calculations to do take into consideration the changing price of STEEM which has an impact of the value of a vote)

When the founder account votes, they earn curation rewards, which increases their DTMT’s daily balance (as seen in the closing balance chart below).  This in turn increase their vote worth, which then also impacts their curation rewards.

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/a6bf8acb30e2569262713632d1e284496be2image.png)

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/4784598f022ff35eaf4e3a7dac1385a8dbf8image.png)

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/ecfbfe350c9ce065c65f44b63bc99a81f08cimage.png)

 
On the 2nd of Dec the founder started with an account of 2M DTMT’s and a vote of 159.20 DTMTS.
By the 17 April, the found account is now worth 2,047,447 M DTMTS.  That equates to a 2.4% in just over 4 months and the value of a vote has increased to 163.27 DTMT’s.

In addition to the growth on the founder account as DTMT’s are distributed, Author rewards are also distributed.  In turn as each author account grows their votes becomes worth more and the cycle of distribution continues.

We can see in the chart below in the 4 months the cumulative curation rewards distributed amount to 142,324 DTMT’s

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/192df27a93fa71b397bdae3aeb4330aae69aimage.png)
 

## US$ 
So far all this analysis has been based on the token DTMT’s.  For the sake of this case study we will assume the price of DTMT’s remain at 1:1 with STEEM.  By making this assumption we can take the STEEM prices and calculate US$ equivalents.

Let’s first look at the founders account

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/64d2865e1aea04cdd203efbd9a7aedff9bfcimage.png)
 
An Initial investment of 2M DTMTS costs $2.44M, however with curation rewards and the increase in the price of STEEM from $1.22 to $2.80 the total gain in 4 months would be 133%.

Contributors to the platform would also have gained in US$

Taking the author rewards and using the STEEM rate on the day, a total of $499,771 would have been paid out by the found to contributors.

Making an assumption that within the 4 months no one powers down, as the price of STEEM has moved considerably during the timeframe, the current value paid out to contributors and stored in power would be $398,558.

## Conclusion
SMTs offer the possibility for you to tokenize your business.  Based on actual data taken from the STEEM BlockChain for a live decentralised application and making certain assumptions we have been able to show what would be possible with an investment of $2.4M on a website with 500K users and am 8.8% uptake on adding contributions by comments.

There have been many assumptions made in this analysis and it is important to point out that any variation in these assumptions could make material differences in the results of this report.

While we have kept the price of STEEM and the sample token STMT’s stable at 1:1, the crypto market can be very volatile and gains or losses made by the price move.

This analysis does not address ICO valuation and a full risk assessment should be carried out before you make an investment.  There is always the chance you could lose all of your money and this article is not to be taken as financial advice.

The study above represents my understanding of the SMT whitepaper coupled with my knowledge of how steemit works and is subject to assumption and a lack of full and comprehensive understanding on how SMT’s work.

## The Data and the Queries
This analysis was carried out using actual activity data from the DTube account on the STEEM BlockChain.

The query used to get the activity growth was

``` language
SELECT
    author,
    created,
    children,
    Category,
    Depth
FROM comments (NOLOCK)
where 
contains (json_metadata, 'DTube')
```

The query used to get the found voting activity was

``` language
SELECT * FROM 
Txvotes (NOLOCK)
WHERE [voter] in ('DTube') 
```

Both of these tables were further filter to exclude all data before 2nd Dec 2017 and further calculations were done using DAX.

To get the actual STEEM US$ price I also connected the model to coinmarketcap data using the url
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/steem/historical-data/?start=20171201&end=20180417

Other reference: SMT Whitepaper https://smt.steem.io/


<br /><hr/><em>Posted on <a href="https://utopian.io/utopian-io/@paulag/using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s">Utopian.io -  Rewarding Open Source Contributors</a></em><hr/>
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 44 others
properties (23)
authorpaulag
permlinkusing-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"community":"utopian","app":"utopian/1.0.0","format":"markdown","repository":{"id":54517947,"name":"steem","full_name":"steemit/steem","html_url":"https://github.com/steemit/steem","fork":false,"owner":{"login":"steemit"}},"pullRequests":[],"platform":"github","type":"analysis","tags":["utopian-io","smt","steemit","blockchainbi","steemdev"],"users":["heimindanger."],"links":["https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/e284387266d8e4ecd9cdd98e0200013da540image.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/eee1e18c52d5497aa94d9e384657a3678ebcimage.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/a6bf8acb30e2569262713632d1e284496be2image.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/4784598f022ff35eaf4e3a7dac1385a8dbf8image.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/ecfbfe350c9ce065c65f44b63bc99a81f08cimage.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/192df27a93fa71b397bdae3aeb4330aae69aimage.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/64d2865e1aea04cdd203efbd9a7aedff9bfcimage.png"],"image":["https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/e284387266d8e4ecd9cdd98e0200013da540image.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/eee1e18c52d5497aa94d9e384657a3678ebcimage.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/a6bf8acb30e2569262713632d1e284496be2image.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/4784598f022ff35eaf4e3a7dac1385a8dbf8image.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/ecfbfe350c9ce065c65f44b63bc99a81f08cimage.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/192df27a93fa71b397bdae3aeb4330aae69aimage.png","https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/64d2865e1aea04cdd203efbd9a7aedff9bfcimage.png"],"moderator":{"account":"crokkon","time":"2018-04-19T09:41:24.950Z","pending":false,"reviewed":true,"flagged":false},"questions":null,"score":null,"total_influence":null,"staff_pick":null,"config":{"questions":[{"question":"Were all relevant aspects or metrics around the objective analyzed?","question_id":"analysis-1","answers":[{"answer":"All or most of the relevant metrics were covered.","answer_id":1,"value":10},{"answer":"Only selected metrics were chosen; including more might have provided additional insights.","answer_id":2,"value":5},{"answer":"Only a single or narrow aspect was chosen.","answer_id":3,"value":2},{"answer":"No.","answer_id":4,"value":0}]},{"question":"How would you rate the complexity of extracting the data?","question_id":"analysis-2","answers":[{"answer":"Gathering the data required complex queries and post-processing","answer_id":1,"value":10},{"answer":"The method of extracting data required transformation.","answer_id":2,"value":5},{"answer":"No additional data transformation was needed.","answer_id":3,"value":2},{"answer":"Script generated / one click data extraction.","answer_id":4,"value":0}]},{"question":"How would you rate the visualization of the findings? ","question_id":"analysis-3","answers":[{"answer":"Visualizations were presented beyond expectation - a visualization such as an infographic was given to quickly understand the result of the analysis.","answer_id":1,"value":5},{"answer":"Appropriate and sufficient visualization were used to understand the results.","answer_id":2,"value":4},{"answer":"Had visualizations but most were irrelevant to the objective.","answer_id":2,"value":5},{"answer":"Bad.","answer_id":4,"value":0}]},{"question":"How would you rate the coherency of the analysis?","question_id":"analysis-4","answers":[{"answer":"Results of analysis were sorted accordingly and the writing style made the findings easily understandable.","answer_id":1,"value":10},{"answer":"There were some connections in-between results, but all throughout the analysis.","answer_id":2,"value":5},{"answer":"Results were presented but the results were not narrated effectively.","answer_id":3,"value":2},{"answer":"Bad.","answer_id":4,"value":0}]},{"question":"Is the analysis reproducible?","question_id":"analysis-5","answers":[{"answer":"All queries or data gathering methods and all data processing scripts were included.","answer_id":1,"value":5},{"answer":"The core query or data gathering method was included and the data processing steps were described.","answer_id":2,"value":4},{"answer":"Data gathering methods and processing steps were sketched.","answer_id":3,"value":2},{"answer":"No.","answer_id":4,"value":0}]},{"question":"Is it a new analysis?","question_id":"analysis-6","answers":[{"answer":"Yes.","answer_id":1,"value":10},{"answer":"It’s similar to a previous contribution, but additional details/aspects were covered.","answer_id":2,"value":5},{"answer":"It’s following-up or it’s similar to a previous contribution about a different time range or aspect of the project.","answer_id":3,"value":2},{"answer":"Brings nothing new.","answer_id":4,"value":0}]},{"question":"Does the writing style meet the Utopian standard considering formalness, informativeness and clarity of the content?","question_id":"c-1","answers":[{"answer":"It is formal, informative and well written with clear content.","answer_id":1,"value":10},{"answer":"It is informative with clear content but not formal enough.","answer_id":2,"value":5},{"answer":"The contribution could be more informative or contains unrelated information, formality and clarity of the content are good enough.","answer_id":3,"value":4},{"answer":"Not all sections were clear enough but overall holds value for the project.","answer_id":4,"value":2},{"answer":"Not at all.","answer_id":5,"value":0}]},{"question":"Was the provided category template for the editor followed?","question_id":"c-2","answers":[{"answer":"All points of the template were included with additional points as well.","answer_id":1,"value":5},{"answer":"The template was followed without additions.","answer_id":2,"value":4},{"answer":"The template was edited but the points were covered in different way.","answer_id":3,"value":3},{"answer":"Not all points of the template were covered in the contribution but the structure is clear enough.","answer_id":4,"value":3},{"answer":"The template was not followed but the structure is clear enough.","answer_id":5,"value":2},{"answer":"The contents are not clearly structured at all.","answer_id":6,"value":0}]},{"question":"Did the contributor tag other users?","question_id":"c-3","answers":[{"answer":"No other users were tagged by the contributor.","answer_id":1,"value":5},{"answer":"Used tags are reasonable and all tagged people are connected to the project and/or the contribution.","answer_id":2,"value":5},{"answer":"The contribution contains mentions of other users that are not directly related to the contribution but related in other ways.","answer_id":3,"value":2},{"answer":"The contributor misuses tagging of other users.","answer_id":4,"value":0}]},{"question":"Did the contributor ask for upvotes, resteems, follows or witness vote?","question_id":"c-4","answers":[{"answer":"No","answer_id":1,"value":5},{"answer":"Yes, but not in a way that disturbs readability. ","answer_id":2,"value":5},{"answer":"Yes.","answer_id":3,"value":0}]},{"question":"Was a graphical content like images, charts, videos or screenshots included?","question_id":"c-5","answers":[{"answer":"Yes, the graphical content is included and adds more value to the contribution.","answer_id":1,"value":5},{"answer":"No but the contribution works well without graphical content well.","answer_id":2,"value":4},{"answer":"Yes, but most of the graphical content’s purpose is just for presentational matters.","answer_id":3,"value":3},{"answer":"No relevant or useful graphical content is included in the contribution.","answer_id":4,"value":0}]},{"question":"How would you rate the overall added value?","question_id":"c-6","answers":[{"answer":"Extraordinary value to both the project and the open source community overall.","answer_id":1,"value":20},{"answer":"Significant value to the project or open source community.","answer_id":2,"value":15},{"answer":"Some value to the project or open source community.","answer_id":3,"value":10},{"answer":"Little value to the project or open source community.","answer_id":4,"value":5},{"answer":"No obvious value to project or open source community.","answer_id":5,"value":0}]}]}}"
created2018-04-18 16:02:30
last_update2018-04-19 09:41:24
depth0
children24
last_payout2018-04-25 16:02:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value146.956 HBD
curator_payout_value50.208 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length9,289
author_reputation274,264,287,951,003
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries
0.
accountutopian.pay
weight1,500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,783,547
net_rshares41,780,732,872,826
author_curate_reward""
vote details (108)
@amn ·
great analysis
properties (22)
authoramn
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180418t175841204z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-18 17:58:45
last_update2018-04-18 17:58:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-04-25 17:58:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length14
author_reputation1,578,841,540,124
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,800,972
net_rshares0
@badriadi83 ·
very good post and impressive once, frankly I really like to follow and read a very useful post like your post
properties (22)
authorbadriadi83
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180419t203616921z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-19 20:36:18
last_update2018-04-19 20:36:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-04-26 20:36:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length110
author_reputation897,597,837,210
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,999,436
net_rshares0
@br-real ·
$1.80
Excellent analysis!
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorbr-real
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180418t163813166z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-18 16:38:12
last_update2018-04-18 16:38:12
depth1
children1
last_payout2018-04-25 16:38:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.351 HBD
curator_payout_value0.445 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length19
author_reputation358,112,998,968
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,789,202
net_rshares337,564,210,737
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@paulag ·
thank you br-real
properties (22)
authorpaulag
permlinkre-br-real-re-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180419t080757529z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-19 08:07:57
last_update2018-04-19 08:07:57
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-04-26 08:07:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length17
author_reputation274,264,287,951,003
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,903,690
net_rshares0
@crokkon · (edited)
.
.
properties (22)
authorcrokkon
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180419t114515513z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": ""}"
created2018-04-19 11:45:18
last_update2022-09-18 12:01:33
depth1
children1
last_payout2018-04-26 11:45:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1
author_reputation81,214,366,861,104
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries
0.
accountutopian.pay
weight1,500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,922,506
net_rshares0
@paulag · (edited)
to calculate the initial vote value I used regression analysis @crokkon.  I have the actual vote worth of Dtube on a number of dates, coupled with their SP levels and coinmarketcap data.  So I used regression to work back the value of a vote based on 2M SP at the date of delegation.  As there is a correlation between the value of a vote and the price of STEEM, regression can be used to work back.

As for your question on SBD, I do not know.  Having read the whitepaper I cant see this, but as mentioned this whitepaper was written for developers and my lack of code knowledge means I may have missed some information.

When it comes to SMTs I also have more questions than answers, and as a small but profitable website owner, with so many unanswered questions and the level of difficulty in understanding what has been presented to us, I don't see me even considering implementing an SMT to my community of over 50K people.  Part of the reason for this analysis was to try and get my own head around some of the aspects.
properties (22)
authorpaulag
permlinkre-crokkon-re-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180419t120456619z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"users":["crokkon"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-19 12:04:57
last_update2018-04-19 12:10:21
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-04-26 12:04:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,025
author_reputation274,264,287,951,003
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,925,459
net_rshares0
@el-nailul ·
I can see your analysis is sharp and touch the point @paulag, thank you
properties (22)
authorel-nailul
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180419t173148802z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"users":["paulag"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-19 17:31:51
last_update2018-04-19 17:31:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-04-26 17:31:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length71
author_reputation9,588,203,965,396
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,975,840
net_rshares0
@freebornangel · (edited)
I wouldnt hold my breath on smts, stinc's greed ran off their general genius.

Is there somewhere i can contact you off the blockchain?
Steem.chat, or discord?
properties (22)
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180419t160530814z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-19 16:05:39
last_update2018-04-19 16:06:18
depth1
children2
last_payout2018-04-26 16:05:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length159
author_reputation171,005,551,503,977
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,963,498
net_rshares0
@paulag ·
$0.06
I am on discord, with the same name
👍  
properties (23)
authorpaulag
permlinkre-freebornangel-re-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180420t082043396z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-20 08:20:48
last_update2018-04-20 08:20:48
depth2
children1
last_payout2018-04-27 08:20:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.046 HBD
curator_payout_value0.013 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length35
author_reputation274,264,287,951,003
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id51,082,340
net_rshares11,326,866,560
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@freebornangel ·
Ok, thanks.
properties (22)
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-paulag-re-freebornangel-re-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180420t125520381z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-20 12:55:30
last_update2018-04-20 12:55:30
depth3
children0
last_payout2018-04-27 12:55:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length11
author_reputation171,005,551,503,977
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id51,119,598
net_rshares0
@lextenebris ·
$1.19
I'm not sure that doing the analysis on a value-basis over a period where the underlying value of steem is going from a particular low to a relative recovery is reasonable.

It would be far more sensible and illustrative to simply describe the value in terms of megavests and leave reification into token value aside. After all, that's not really what's important and not within the control of a given SMT – unless they start tinkering with the exchange of value between STEEM and the particular token, which is certainly doable but in no wise is it easy to deal with.

So, speaking purely in terms of the mechanical issuance on the blockchain, what does the number of megavests look like over the same period?

(And also, assuming that DLive was engaging purely in DTMT votes, wouldn't those who received those votes be rewarded in DTMT, allowing their future votes going forward to be done in DTMT? Which brings up an entirely different question of if people with the notional DTMT were also previously active on the steem blockchain, would they then have two separate pools of reward that they could vote from? Will content created for SMTs not also appear on the core steem blockchain? If so, that's going to get really complicated really quick for quite a lot of people. What happens if I up vote a DTube video and I have no DTMT? Does my steem value get automatically translated into DTMT? Does it simply get denied, even though we are on the same blockchain? If SMT mechanics don't occur on the steem blockchain, where are they occurring?

There are just way too many questions about this sort of thing.)
👍  
properties (23)
authorlextenebris
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180418t192601931z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-18 19:26:00
last_update2018-04-18 19:26:00
depth1
children4
last_payout2018-04-25 19:26:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.892 HBD
curator_payout_value0.297 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,611
author_reputation19,924,265,288,993
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,813,089
net_rshares223,631,315,941
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@paulag ·
$0.17
there are a lot of questions and i really would like more communication on SMTs

STEEM was selected as the base currency because my understanding of the whitepaper says that SMT's will be traded against STEEM on the internal exchange and is the base currency.

Also when you explain to someone about steemit, it is difficult enough for people to get their heads around STEEM and SBD without trying to also explain mega vests. 

at first I was under the impression that only ''summary' data would be sent to the steemit blockchain from the SMT's  and to be honest i am still unclear on how it works.  The whitepaper does say that STEEM witnesses will be responsible which suggests that everything will pass thought steemit.

Yes people that get votes from DLive will have power to also vote and give rewards and these rewards are not included in the above  analysis

all the other questions you have asked I can not answer.  I would love to see a focus group set up by Steemit inc to allows us ask the necessary questions.  from talking with some others there is a lot of confusion and even some FUD being spread.

The SMT's are late anyway, i thought it was the end of Q1 for release....
👍  
properties (23)
authorpaulag
permlinkre-lextenebris-re-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180419t080728640z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-19 08:07:27
last_update2018-04-19 08:07:27
depth2
children3
last_payout2018-04-26 08:07:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.127 HBD
curator_payout_value0.042 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,187
author_reputation274,264,287,951,003
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,903,633
net_rshares31,675,625,423
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@lextenebris ·
I believe that we all thought it would be the end of Q1 for release. Apparently we were all wrong. Not the first time that I've had to make that particular announcement when it comes to this sort of thing, but it never feels better. I always expect that I should never expect things like this to come out on time.

Choosing STEEM as the base currency for your description was the right choice. That's absolutely the number that we should be kicking around. It's that last step where we sort of skip over the fact that rates of conversion are variable, even more variable than the internal value of the tokens in question, where I think the problem gets harder for us to actually explain.

Pegging things to SBD? Pretty much a recipe for people to completely misunderstand what you're talking about. Keeping to just STEEM and avoiding any appearance of a $? That's going to always be better – and will lead to the inevitable question which is best posed by whoever you're talking to, "so – how much is that actually worth in real money?"

That's where you get to talk about the fact that the value of an individual token of STEAM can vary pretty aggressively, but that is a secondary concern (for the most part) compared to just getting a handle on how the token itself will function.

I also received the belief that all SMT activity would be going through the steem blockchain and witness architecture, which made me wonder what SMT activity would look like on Steemit or Busy or chainBB, since they all backend for display on the steem blockchain itself. Will SMT transfers, posts, and even SMT-based communities be visible at an activity level on the steem blockchain? What will that even look like? Is it going to be comprehensible? Is that kind of traffic going to force those of us who have been using the steem blockchain through one of these pre-SMT interfaces to move off of them into smarter interfaces which know how to filter out SMT activity?

I really just want to know how we, as users, are supposed to be interfacing with this really huge change in the way that the entire architecture communicates in the open. What will it look like?

We don't get any real mockups of designs or processes for something so elemental and constantly a part of the process of engaging on the platform. That's the sort of thing that makes me more than a little skeptical and more than a little nervous.

I would love a focus group. At best, what I expect to see is a yes-man seated report from some far-off exotic location where everyone tells me repeatedly that "everything is fine," "there are some big players on board," "and we'll have more details when we get back from wining and dining exotic and beautiful women, shaking babies, and kissing hands." Nothing about actual process, how this thing is supposed to actually work for us, or anything that we can actually make use of.

I can imagine a dozen ways that SMTs could work. I'm sure none of them come close to the frustration I'll feel when I find out how SMTs do work.

But I want to know. This is kind of a big deal. We already have one SMT (or at least what pretends to be an SMT) in its final round of ICO (APPICS). As far as I can tell, we can't even answer the questions I just laid out when it comes to them, and we should be able to.

So I guess I get to be the token anti-hype guy or token-cynic guy or whatever it is I am around here in the community. I am pretty deeply dubious.
properties (22)
authorlextenebris
permlinkre-paulag-re-lextenebris-re-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180419t090033446z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-19 09:00:33
last_update2018-04-19 09:00:33
depth3
children2
last_payout2018-04-26 09:00:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,447
author_reputation19,924,265,288,993
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,911,010
net_rshares0
@modernpastor ·
I found you today the first time. I read your post about your proposal of the trending page. This analysis​ is great. Thanks for this content. Keep up the good work.
👍  
properties (23)
authormodernpastor
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180418t165710273z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.4.0"}
created2018-04-18 16:57:09
last_update2018-04-18 16:57:09
depth1
children1
last_payout2018-04-25 16:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length165
author_reputation41,332,942,582,370
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,792,151
net_rshares3,059,239,301
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@paulag ·
that was a old post now, maybe it time to re-visit, although we already know since that report, now trending is full of posts with paid votes
👍  
properties (23)
authorpaulag
permlinkre-modernpastor-re-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180419t080904978z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-19 08:09:03
last_update2018-04-19 08:09:03
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-04-26 08:09:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length141
author_reputation274,264,287,951,003
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,903,809
net_rshares3,059,239,301
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@munirahayati · (edited)
excellent analysis
thank you madam @paulag  for helping us for this very interesting content.
👍  
properties (23)
authormunirahayati
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180418t174826323z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"users":["paulag"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-18 17:48:36
last_update2018-04-18 17:49:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-04-25 17:48:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length93
author_reputation124,922,067,291
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,799,546
net_rshares562,785,056
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@samueldouglas ·
Hi @paulag, thanks for this. I'd read the SMT whitepaper and not really felt like I got my head around it. I'm glad to see that you have conceptualised the relationship between STEEM and SMTs in a similar way that I had. 

I note that on your analysis, if the price of STEEM were to have dropped from when the DTMT was launched to now, that the gains from curation could easily have been wiped out.
properties (22)
authorsamueldouglas
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180422t082908917z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"users":["paulag"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-22 08:28:42
last_update2018-04-22 08:28:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-04-29 08:28:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length398
author_reputation1,891,720,237,909
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id51,446,555
net_rshares0
@steembottrackerr ·
<center>https://steemitimages.com/200x200/https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/81/28/3c/81283c6aed7bdb5b9f8ad73b8ce62c2f.jpg</center>
---
<center>Hello @paulag , Congratulations ✅ . Your content began to appear in the hot section.
I am the information account of "SteemBotTracker" site.
</center>
---
<center>
Your Informations
Total SBD: 70.482
Total STEEM: 0.044
</center>
---
<center>
I recommend to increase this;
You can make "Resteem" and advertise to the followers of the whale accounts.
"Resteem Bot" for you;
✅ The most profitable Resteem Whale @byresteem  has 25.500 Followers + 7000 Sp + Upvote with min +55 accounts. 
</center>
---
<center>
You can purchase "upvote" by bid bots.
"Upvote Bot"
✅ The most profitable whale in the last round. @smartsteem
</center>
---
<center>
I'm taking this message once. You need to use the #steembottrackerr tag for more information.
Those who "upvote" this interpretation will be awarded a "UpVote" prize of 100 Sbd per week per person.
I am a bot, I can not answer the comment. I hope I could help. Good luck. Sorry if I disturbed you.
</center>
👎  
properties (23)
authorsteembottrackerr
permlink20180418t191326258z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["advice"],"app":"steemjs/test"}
created2018-04-18 19:13:27
last_update2018-04-18 19:13:27
depth1
children1
last_payout2018-04-25 19:13:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,133
author_reputation-1,493,369,324,060
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,811,529
net_rshares-51,090,429,920
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@abusereports ·
$0.05
@steembottrackerr is on the @abusereports blacklist for being a bad Steemian! Bad spammer, bad!
👍  
properties (23)
authorabusereports
permlinkabusereports-re-steembottrackerr20180418t191326258z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata""
created2018-04-18 19:13:36
last_update2018-04-18 19:13:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-04-25 19:13:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.041 HBD
curator_payout_value0.012 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length95
author_reputation199,407,425,243,286
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,811,543
net_rshares10,336,736,941
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@steemitboard ·
Congratulations @paulag! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

[![](https://steemitimages.com/70x80/http://steemitboard.com/notifications/votes.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@paulag) Award for the number of upvotes

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click [here](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word `STOP`

> Upvote this notification to help all Steemit users. Learn why [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)!
properties (22)
authorsteemitboard
permlinksteemitboard-notify-paulag-20180419t212323000z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notifications.png"]}
created2018-04-19 21:23:21
last_update2018-04-19 21:23:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-04-26 21:23:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length671
author_reputation38,975,615,169,260
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id51,005,181
net_rshares0
@utopian-io ·
### Hey @paulag! Thank you for the great work you've done!
We're already looking forward to your next contribution!
#### Fully Decentralized Rewards
We hope you will take the time to share your expertise and knowledge by rating contributions made by others on Utopian.io to help us reward the best contributions together.
#### Utopian Witness!
<a href="https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=utopian-io&approve=1">Vote for Utopian Witness!</a> We are made of developers, system administrators, entrepreneurs, artists, content creators, thinkers. We embrace every nationality, mindset and belief.

**Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.me/utopian-io**
properties (22)
authorutopian-io
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180420t170042318z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"community":"utopian","app":"utopian/1.0.0"}
created2018-04-20 17:00:42
last_update2018-04-20 17:00:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-04-27 17:00:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length686
author_reputation152,955,367,999,756
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id51,158,913
net_rshares0
@ziapase ·
Your the best of analysis .!!
properties (22)
authorziapase
permlinkre-paulag-using-existing-steem-blockchain-data-to-create-a-case-study-for-smt-s-20180418t170004178z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata{"tags":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-18 17:00:54
last_update2018-04-18 17:00:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-04-25 17:00:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length29
author_reputation551,033,053,214
root_title"Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,792,720
net_rshares0