![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmfRtqv8Gqc8e8T89dsd4DwMy1RA71KR8UbTSGa6jbK9fM/image.png)

Although we make a creative thing,I guess we won't be equal to God.Because as powerful as hell that we make The results were not as great as God created. Thats my opinion my friend, i'm sorry if the answer isn't good. Regard and lets be friend.

@sauravrungta . I will argue the disadvantages  of  creating something more  smarter and more creative than us namely Artificial Intelligence or A. I for short . I am a fan of artificial intelligence but upto a point, creating a smarter, more creative being like ourselves bereft of human emotion could spell doom when the A. I beings start seeing us as an irrational, primitive, illogical host what is to stop them from using that same creativity and genius used to cook up horror stories, compose music and other amazing feats is channelled  to  the destruction of the human race. I know it sounds similar to scifi movies but I believe there is a hint of truth in them.

Artificial intelligence will soon become a part of our life!

![лллл.jpg](https://steemitimages.com/DQmc1YYahYFVqG43wfwEDCEKJJiCWSenduPbKxryCrW1h4N/%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%BB.jpg)

i think calling the AI output "creative" is probably the wrong term for it. we as humans can call it creativity because it's OUR form of output, based on emotions and experiences (the human version of data aggregation) whereas the AI is simply compiling all "creative" data and finding a way to make it. the AI is more cook rather than chef, more transcriber than writer, more "color in the lines" than artist, if my distinctions make sense?

we will eventually get there. hardware technology will eventually evolve and be able to handle more complex forms of AI. nice topic!

it would be very hard to say that when you create something machine which thinks on their own ,than it could be threat to us only,

AI is not creative. You learn it to do X, and then let it do X.

Wow, with AI becoming even more mainstream, it will be interesting to consider what "creative" work a machine will be capable of performing.... really thought-provoking post encouraging us to think about artistic expression in a different way.... wow!
Upvoted and resteemed in the hope that more Steemians will be able to read your post. Really interesting topic being discussed!

https://steemitimages.com/DQmTvmwfqbDjNntShzquFTBMe19rnJhQhaSYKr3TNCqx34z/steemreplypost-creativo.jpg
Good educational information should be shared so your post has been Upvoted and Resteemed. Hope more people get to read your blog

AI is not what most people think it is...  I have blogged about it several times...

Our human species has the ability to be gods and here we prove it, we can create intelligence in the machines, intelligence that can write novels, paint pictures, answer questions and much more. It is in our hands to make correct use of this intelligence that we are developing. Much success, greetings!

IMHO I think that a computer won't able to be creative, even an AI computer, because ultimately it would be the result of some humans programming and it doesn't have faculties to feel emotions like we do . 👩‍👦‍👦

I'd be intrigued to listen to an AI produced EDM track. Or even a classic piece. I wonder if technology could be so advanced that AI would create it's own original music.

![bruce-almighty-aman-tanrim_780x438-1seyfxgbw8.gif](https://steemitimages.com/DQmZerp2Z353gkQuZVBxvieMKuAohAw9SADdLxDz9yH4rUz/bruce-almighty-aman-tanrim_780x438-1seyfxgbw8.gif)

not possible for AI to do creative stuff.
if an AI can do it.
it's NOT creative.

Clearly the first AI who gets put on steemit is going to put us all out of the job! The problem is that the AI will not look at us as gods, it will look at us as obsolete.

there is common misconception that AI can not be as creative as human beings because AI don't posses emotions. but if we observe ourselves closely, we can find that our emotions too are results of patterns and data being processed in our brains. if human brain can do it then AI can do it, maybe not right now, but in near future

High quality creativity from an AI will take some time. Eventually it will happen  and I don't really see much of a problem with it. You eventually won't be able to tell the difference between a skilled composer and an artificial intelligence.  It is pretty inevitable so long as there is interest in making and marketing such a thing. What will be interesting is when AI makes music that sounds appealing to AI and not to us.

**There is such a myth that the human brain uses its potential only 10%. So can these creatures with artificial intelligence control some incomprehensible image of a person's consciousness and create their own kind of human hands? Something I'm uncomfortable with such terribly talented creatures! As they say in the famous proverb "Stop the Earth - I'll go down!". Here you can search for "For" and "Against" for a long time, since the robot can break down, crash in the program, but the person is not perfect either. The topic is very intriguing and contradictory,   @sauravrungta.**
>Существует такой миф, что человеческий мозг использует свой потенциал всего на 10%. Так может эти создания с искусственным интеллектом управляют каким-то непостижимым образом сознанием человека и создают себе подобных руками человека? Что-то мне неуютно рядом с такими ужасно талантливыми существами! Как говорится в знаменитой пословице "Остановите Землю - я сойду!". Тут можно долго искать "За" и "Против", так как робот может сломаться, дать сбой в программе, но и человек не идеален. Тема затронута очень интригующая и противоречивая.

As you might know, music and art that are based on fibonacci and golden rules are something that appeal to humans ears and eyes. Some of the greatest artists like davinci and bach have used these organic rules to produce beautiful pieces. For an AI to be able to do that, it'd be a piece of cake since all of those things are just a "search" away. They literally have advanced google as their brains. Not sure where all of this is going though but as I have written in my own post, IOTA technology could eventually  give AI the right to exchange currencies with other machines to get them to do things they want. That's doesn't feel right. Most of these AIs are funded by the elites and we all know what they have in mind. Everything has it's good and bad sides obviously. I just hope I won't see AI's getting hacked to kill all of us. That's the only thing that doesn't make me too happy about AI technology. They have been warning us through so many movies but this is part of the evolution and I don't think it can be stopped at this point.

Really interesting thoughts. 
From the creativity side -  as per one definition of creativity - to create something new/never seen before by combining or putting together things/thoughts/knowledge that we already possess. This can be easily be understood as an outcome feature of Deep Analytics.  I would say it can be applied to the music and novel as well - it didn't create it from the scratch, AI needed to combine something that was already taught to create it.  In other words - like human brain, but much faster. This is surely the beginning and I think it needs couple of years in order to be put in mainstream - couple, not dozens..   gives me chills.

Well if AI do creative stuff in a span of seconds or years they would achieve human rights cause they would program themselves to feel emotions because its the most logical solution to solve human fear of obsolete 

here is a vid to the awesome youtuber kurzgesagt - in a nut shell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHyUYg8X31c

And here is the bad side of automation


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSKi8HfcxEk

It seems to be something that is difficult for us to avoid. Technological advances make everything possible, even creating something smarter than human. But it may be bad news, because humans should be smarter than any species in the world.