>I am not a climate scientist, but I can see issues like the melting Arctic and fires breaking out around the world.

What are you talking about? Theres no such issue as "the melting Artic", or you don't have a clue regarding the idiotic "global warming" nonsense which conveniently is not "global warming" anymore but "climate change" and still repeat errenous and false bullshit as if it has any basis in reality at all. What fires breaking around the world? Obviously I don't have any proof that we aren't the cause for nonsensical and dogmatic idiocy of "global warming", so that means we are to BLAME for global warming. 

>If we are not to blame then it's an amazing coincidence that this happens as out emissions are at a peak.

So at any other time when it was literally at one time 'the peak' it didn't happen, but we passed that 'peak' threshold it seems,despite the fact that there is absolutely nothing to substantiate that bullshit with, a la non issue of Fires And/Or Global Warming nonsense "Melting Arctic". 

>When the scientific studies overwhelmingly point at human causes you have take notice.

Yeah why? Who funded those studies? What were the studies hypotheses? Who cares, they overwhelmingly point at human causes. I'm sure you don't peddle in bullshit though, I'm sure you're informed about what you believe, and I'm sure sharing with everyone that you aren't a "climate" scientist was only for the sake of full disclosure, not to imply that discussing these things with you will be met with disregard and eye rolls least I provide you with my "climate" science credentials. 

Listen man, I've seen you around here, you're a decent dude, you clearly care a lot about this place, not just the planet, but you are seemingly about as critical about your dogmatic bullshit as a faithful God Fearing Christian is of the Biblical Bullshit.

>Of course scientists have been wrong before, but the damage apart from the climate is worth doing something about.

Yeah, bullshit platitudes, why? Because I asked you directly what the fuck you warrant as "climate damage"  or conversely "healthy climate" and instead of addressing what you yourself brought up by making an entire spiel/rant/rave about it you seemingly didn't even think it warranted acknowledgment let alone redeem it with a simple, to the point answer, but instead you want to answer "kinda like a politician's answer to a seemingly simple yes or no question, full of crap and without any kind of substance regarding the question." telling some bullshit story about "dismissing it as Chinese fraud, without providing evidence". The only one in full dismissal mode is you, who dismissed the opportunity to define and clarify what you're ranting and raving about, and no ammount of bullshit "climate change" science will change the fact that the earth is cooling. 

> So you are making it about her and not the actual issue? Why do you expect a child to solve this difficult problem?

Yes exactly! This is the out of the Box answer and the reason why she gets funded and pushed around. That poor girl gets dragged around the globe and pushed in front of cameras while people tell her that she will save the world.
Thanks for being a sheep and repeating the narrative that you've been told by the media for weeks. Btw. she is 16, even if she looks 12 - that is barely a child anymore.


---

Now, start thinking for urself, there are solutions everyone can discuss about. Centralized CO² reconversion, strikter rules for meat animal breeding, reafforestation - what also includes the already running economic conflicts with Venezuela and Brazil and reconstruction of the atmosphere (what we already did in the past). If we get these things done right, there is no climate change anymore.

But you will never see that puppet of a poor girl allowed to talk about that because mainstream media has no intention of de-escalation and her funders even less. Only on that very day when they are done with her, she will be allowed to go back to normal and have a life again

So let's hear your position, I'm curious.

here check this out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koSgt4DzqjI

That is what you get, People called her out as a public figure making a lot of fuss and not providing solutions or pushing the discussion in the right direction are always getting this super aggressive "BUT SHE'S ONLY A CHILD" smackdown answer. That is not an argument, that is populism and victimization - pushing forword a narrative of guilt and not toxicating the air.

So once more, this Rick and Morty quote that is so important:
> Don't be sheep, think for urself!


... and she is 16, that is not a child anyway... and thinks to have a superpower xE

Yep. Totally.