create account

RE: How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain by timcliff

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dantheman/how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain

· @timcliff ·
$0.10
> The best way to achieve these properties while maintaining flexibility is to have a robust cross-chain communication protocol and keep all new / changing features on separate chains. You could have one chain for STEEM, one for SBD, one for STEALTH STEEM, and one for STEALTH SBD.

If we were to go this route, would each chain need to have its own coin associated with it, along with miners, witnesses, etc. - or would they all somehow be tied together via STEEM?
👍  ,
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t010223348z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"]}
created2016-12-02 01:02:21
last_update2016-12-02 01:02:21
depth1
children7
last_payout2017-01-02 05:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.081 HBD
curator_payout_value0.021 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length465
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,894,118
net_rshares2,090,806,338,569
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@dantheman ·
$0.11
Just one token and set of witnesses
👍  ,
properties (23)
authordantheman
permlinkre-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t014148095z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"]}
created2016-12-02 01:41:48
last_update2016-12-02 01:41:48
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-01-02 05:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.097 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length35
author_reputation240,292,002,602,347
root_title"How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,894,471
net_rshares2,115,414,686,202
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@timcliff ·
Cool, that's awesome!
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-dantheman-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t015025269z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"]}
created2016-12-02 01:50:24
last_update2016-12-02 01:50:24
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-01-02 05:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length21
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,894,514
net_rshares0
@thecryptofiend ·
OK so is this the same as side-chains on Bitcoin or the Lightning network?
properties (22)
authorthecryptofiend
permlinkre-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t021758056z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"]}
created2016-12-02 02:17:57
last_update2016-12-02 02:17:57
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-01-02 05:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length74
author_reputation323,603,913,866,384
root_title"How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,894,722
net_rshares0
@faddat ·
Definitely not.  

Both achieve the effect of scale, but to be frank this is much, much better.  Once segwit and lightning kick in, I anticipate some issues in the world of bitcoin, specifically because they more or less move some transactions off of the blockchain.  @dantheman's solution does not propose such madness.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorfaddat
permlinkre-thecryptofiend-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t115348195z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"],"users":["dantheman"]}
created2016-12-02 11:53:27
last_update2016-12-02 11:53:27
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-01-02 05:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length320
author_reputation36,581,868,473,026
root_title"How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,897,338
net_rshares66,378,676,006
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@thecryptofiend ·
OK cool.  I am also wondering if we could take some of the ethereum thunder with regards to "smart contracts" too.  We have the speed and scaling - which they have not yet fixed and from what I am reading there seems to be a loss of confidence in their blockchain overall.  I'm not being mean to ethereum but it seems there is an opportunity there right now.
properties (22)
authorthecryptofiend
permlinkre-faddat-re-thecryptofiend-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t131555902z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"]}
created2016-12-02 13:15:54
last_update2016-12-02 13:15:54
depth4
children1
last_payout2017-01-02 05:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length358
author_reputation323,603,913,866,384
root_title"How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,897,840
net_rshares0
@timcliff ·
Not sure.
👍  
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-thecryptofiend-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t053248304z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"]}
created2016-12-02 05:32:48
last_update2016-12-02 05:32:48
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-01-02 05:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length9
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,895,764
net_rshares12,934,360,307
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)