I amazes me that liberal sheeple expect others to provide them with research! I POSTED this video already. Get off your complacency and go find it on my posts...I see no reason to duplicate effort.

>These are YOUR WORDS, "to protect his Son from a criminal investigation".

1) He forced the Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating the company paying his son $50,000.00...a MONTH, in an area he has zero experience. 
2) He did that by threat of withholding US Military funding. 
3) This protected His son from criminal investigation.

"Logic"...sorry you can't follow a simple series of cause and effect!

>It s a crime to impede an investigation.

Yes it is.

>Are you talking about claiming blanket immunity in order to justify withholding evidence in an ongoing criminal investigation?

No as I said, I was talking about Biden having the Ukrainian prosecutor fired to protect his son.

As far as this most recent Travesty of justice; Only a Conservative can be guilty of Nothing, and pull a federal investigation. As I have said before; There has to be a crime first, and that is a liberal speciality.


>It is a crime to use your office to provide income for your Son;

>I agree in principle, but can you reference the specific law?

Here is where you, as a legal scholar can look for yourself:
www.google.com it is safely owned by liberal hacks, so it should be low risk, with no new ideas to worry about. 

Since you are obviously a lawyer, you should have this on your bookshelf....

But most grade school kids would know that this is bad. Maybe they will look it up for you.



>It is a crime to use your office to provide income for your Son;

I agree in principle, but can you reference the specific law?

I have never seen a liberal 'principle', it must be like hens teeth....

Do you own damn research, since you don't give a flip about the Rule of Law anyway. Or check with the grade school kids again...

But a man with no experience, that does not speak the local language, being paid $50,000.00 a month does NOT pass the stink test! 

>It is illegal to threaten the withhold US Military aid, knowing full well that the country will be over run by the Russians without that aid.

>I agree in principle, but can you reference the specific law?

It is disappointing that you only agree in principle, as this should be an absolute; even with sheeple, SMH! When something is wrong, that should even include if the infraction is done by a liberal minion; this is NOT conditional.

As I have said, do your own searches...not my job. Or ask the kids.


>It is illegal to secure loans, based on your father's government job;

>I agree in principle, but can you reference the specific law?

Is there no absolute beyond hate of all Conservatives? You are telling me there are instances where you are fine with securing loans based on your Father's government job. I am stunned that this is acceptably practice for you, but sadly I am not surprised. This allows you to wait until you are given your opinion....


>then use that money to invest in companies that are sanctioned.

>Yes, it is illegal to invest in companies that have been listed as illegal to invest in.

WOW, an absolute from a liberal! That does surprise me.

>Are you suggesting that Zlochevsky and Burisma was under U.S. sanctions at the time that Hunter Biden became involved with them?

Neither of us knows when this began, but it becomes an illegal act, after the sanctions are imposed, to continue to invest!

Not to mention this money came from China to buy influence, AND $1,500,000,000.00 is a LOT of influence to accept, even for a liberal minion!

The fact is that every one of your talking points comes from someone else, This canned "discussion" is BORING! IF you want a liberal echo chamber, you should go to Facebook, not steemit!