Viewing a response to: @offgridlife/qvze0l
There's no ideal solution, I just remember Steem when there were no DVs It was shit. I think @themarkymark put it most succinctly in a comment somewhere - for every malicious DV there are 100 irresponsible upvotes. On a complete tangent i think it's a moot point - I'm not about to invest that heavily in a side chain where I don't know who the token issuer is, or worse, where i don't know but i've got an idea and I think he might be a bit of a loose cannon. Maybe for that reason we shouldn't have DVs - from an investor's perspective POB can only ever be a bit of fun anyway! Dvs can ruin that for sure. --- <center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzwjq)</sub></center>
author | revise.pob |
---|---|
permlink | qvzwjq |
category | proofofbrain |
json_metadata | {"users":["themarkymark"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzwjq","links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzwjq"]} |
created | 2021-07-09 20:50:15 |
last_update | 2021-07-09 20:53:21 |
depth | 3 |
children | 16 |
last_payout | 2021-07-16 20:50:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.020 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.020 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 728 |
author_reputation | 1,480,516,022,215 |
root_title | "Curation at it's worst..." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 104,825,344 |
net_rshares | 79,214,474,372 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
scholaris.pob | 0 | 3,756,455,825 | 4% | ||
adamcurry33 | 0 | 75,458,018,547 | 100% |
Yeahβ¦ I see way too much collateral damage when whales start downvoting whales.. and minnows get wiped out. Lots of people quitting over losing a few pennies on the 7th day. 1 or 2 hive is nothing to a whale but itβs a meal for some people in the world. --- <center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@offgridlife/qvzwz0)</sub></center>
author | offgridlife |
---|---|
permlink | qvzwz0 |
category | proofofbrain |
json_metadata | {"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@offgridlife/qvzwz0"} |
created | 2021-07-09 20:59:24 |
last_update | 2021-07-09 20:59:24 |
depth | 4 |
children | 5 |
last_payout | 2021-07-16 20:59:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.022 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.021 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 368 |
author_reputation | 400,067,376,557,187 |
root_title | "Curation at it's worst..." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 104,825,467 |
net_rshares | 86,324,226,594 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
paulo.sar | 0 | 4,049,878,568 | 100% | ||
scholaris.pob | 0 | 3,753,558,367 | 4% | ||
adamcurry33 | 0 | 78,520,789,659 | 100% |
Agreed π―
author | adamcurry33 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
permlink | qw1dxw | ||||||||||||
category | proofofbrain | ||||||||||||
json_metadata | {"app":"hiveblog/0.1"} | ||||||||||||
created | 2021-07-10 16:03:33 | ||||||||||||
last_update | 2021-07-10 16:03:33 | ||||||||||||
depth | 5 | ||||||||||||
children | 4 | ||||||||||||
last_payout | 2021-07-17 16:03:33 | ||||||||||||
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 | ||||||||||||
total_payout_value | 0.554 HBD | ||||||||||||
curator_payout_value | 0.565 HBD | ||||||||||||
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD | ||||||||||||
promoted | 0.000 HBD | ||||||||||||
body_length | 8 | ||||||||||||
author_reputation | 7,909,466,554,692 | ||||||||||||
root_title | "Curation at it's worst..." | ||||||||||||
beneficiaries |
| ||||||||||||
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD | ||||||||||||
percent_hbd | 10,000 | ||||||||||||
post_id | 104,839,103 | ||||||||||||
net_rshares | 2,181,522,280,158 | ||||||||||||
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
stimialiti | 0 | 18,789,926,554 | 100% | ||
geneeverett | 0 | 1,995,579,355,037 | 76% | ||
adamcurry33 | 0 | 167,152,998,567 | 100% |
But Nobody cares.
author | offgridlife |
---|---|
permlink | qw1zro |
category | proofofbrain |
json_metadata | {"app":"hiveblog/0.1"} |
created | 2021-07-10 23:55:00 |
last_update | 2021-07-10 23:55:00 |
depth | 6 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2021-07-17 23:55:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.122 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.122 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 17 |
author_reputation | 400,067,376,557,187 |
root_title | "Curation at it's worst..." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 104,845,552 |
net_rshares | 476,059,774,080 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
geneeverett | 0 | 240,524,235,966 | 10% | ||
paulo.sar | 0 | 3,968,001,994 | 100% | ||
adamcurry33 | 0 | 231,567,536,120 | 100% |
100? More like 1000-10000 :)
author | themarkymark |
---|---|
permlink | re-revisepob-qvzwla |
category | proofofbrain |
json_metadata | {"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.1"} |
created | 2021-07-09 20:51:12 |
last_update | 2021-07-09 20:51:12 |
depth | 4 |
children | 9 |
last_payout | 2021-07-16 20:51:12 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.032 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.031 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 29 |
author_reputation | 1,773,577,061,977,398 |
root_title | "Curation at it's worst..." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 104,825,362 |
net_rshares | 121,753,707,768 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
craigcryptoking | 0 | 43,806,255,081 | 100% | ||
revise.pob | 0 | 966,732,126 | 50% | ||
adamcurry33 | 0 | 76,980,720,561 | 100% |
Yes, I overuse my 0 key so I have to be conservative with it. --- <center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzx2y)</sub></center>
author | revise.pob |
---|---|
permlink | qvzx2y |
category | proofofbrain |
json_metadata | {"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzx2y"} |
created | 2021-07-09 21:01:48 |
last_update | 2021-07-09 21:01:48 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2021-07-16 21:01:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 174 |
author_reputation | 1,480,516,022,215 |
root_title | "Curation at it's worst..." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 104,825,494 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Some of the extremes that you pointed out were pretty clear to see like with your article on Lassecash. Is there a word count/rewards ratio where you deem something is over-rewarded? Could it be that objective? Is there some consensus behind the scenes before a DV on over-rewarding gets issued? For instance, self-voting is tolerated, but if I gave this comment a full upvote on my POB account, I "feel" that would be malicious. Would I be correct in writing that observation? Are there types of malicious upvoting? Just looking for guidance here. --- <center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qw1ruw)</sub></center>
author | scholaris.pob |
---|---|
permlink | qw1ruw |
category | proofofbrain |
json_metadata | {"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qw1ruw"} |
created | 2021-07-10 21:04:09 |
last_update | 2021-07-10 21:04:09 |
depth | 5 |
children | 7 |
last_payout | 2021-07-17 21:04:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 677 |
author_reputation | 3,074,855,239,378 |
root_title | "Curation at it's worst..." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 104,843,565 |
net_rshares | 0 |
> Is there a word count/rewards ratio where you deem something is over-rewarded? Could it be that objective? It is very subjective. > For instance, self-voting is tolerated, but if I gave this comment a full upvote on my POB account, I "feel" that would be malicious. Would I be correct in writing that observation? In my opinion? Yes. I am personally not a fan of self voting comments. In some rare cases I may do so with a small vote to bring it to the top of the comments if it is something critical. But in almost all cases self voting comments is just farming. > Are there types of malicious upvoting? All the conspiracy posts that take half of trending that get massive votes for pseudo science. All the whales that voted 5-20 vote posts that had no rewards to maximize their curation with little effort (pre-hardfork 25). There are a few whales dropping $15-40 votes without regard to quality or even content and they stack on top of each other to take posts near $100 when they normally only take a few cents. Just look at trending, you will see the same 5-6 whales controlling it with no regard to quality. I could go on, but I will struggle to find many cases of this elusive "malicious downvoting" that we are trying to stop by making laws on how to vote with their stake.
author | themarkymark |
---|---|
permlink | re-scholarispob-qw1sb1 |
category | proofofbrain |
json_metadata | {"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.1"} |
created | 2021-07-10 21:13:48 |
last_update | 2021-07-10 21:13:48 |
depth | 6 |
children | 6 |
last_payout | 2021-07-17 21:13:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 1,298 |
author_reputation | 1,773,577,061,977,398 |
root_title | "Curation at it's worst..." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 104,843,752 |
net_rshares | 3,786,625,367 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
scholaris.pob | 0 | 3,786,625,367 | 4% |