create account

RE: Curation at it's worst... by revise.pob

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @offgridlife/qvze0l

· @revise.pob · (edited)
$0.04
There's no ideal solution, I just remember Steem when there were no DVs 

It was shit. 

I think @themarkymark put it most succinctly in a comment somewhere - for every malicious DV there are 100 irresponsible upvotes.

On a complete tangent i think it's a moot point - I'm not about to invest that heavily in a side chain where I don't know who the token issuer is, or worse, where i don't know but i've got an idea and I think he might be a bit of a loose cannon. 

Maybe for that reason we shouldn't have DVs - from an investor's perspective POB can only ever be a bit of fun anyway! Dvs can ruin that for sure. 



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzwjq)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorrevise.pob
permlinkqvzwjq
categoryproofofbrain
json_metadata{"users":["themarkymark"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzwjq","links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzwjq"]}
created2021-07-09 20:50:15
last_update2021-07-09 20:53:21
depth3
children16
last_payout2021-07-16 20:50:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.020 HBD
curator_payout_value0.020 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length728
author_reputation1,480,516,022,215
root_title"Curation at it's worst..."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id104,825,344
net_rshares79,214,474,372
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@offgridlife ·
$0.04
Yeah… I see way too much collateral damage when whales start downvoting whales.. and minnows get wiped out. Lots of people quitting over losing a few pennies on the 7th day.  1 or 2 hive is nothing to a whale but it’s a meal for some people in the world.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@offgridlife/qvzwz0)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authoroffgridlife
permlinkqvzwz0
categoryproofofbrain
json_metadata{"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@offgridlife/qvzwz0"}
created2021-07-09 20:59:24
last_update2021-07-09 20:59:24
depth4
children5
last_payout2021-07-16 20:59:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.022 HBD
curator_payout_value0.021 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length368
author_reputation400,067,376,557,187
root_title"Curation at it's worst..."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id104,825,467
net_rshares86,324,226,594
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@adamcurry33 ·
$1.12
Agreed πŸ’―
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authoradamcurry33
permlinkqw1dxw
categoryproofofbrain
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2021-07-10 16:03:33
last_update2021-07-10 16:03:33
depth5
children4
last_payout2021-07-17 16:03:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.554 HBD
curator_payout_value0.565 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length8
author_reputation7,909,466,554,692
root_title"Curation at it's worst..."
beneficiaries
0.
accounthiveonboard
weight100
1.
accounttipu
weight100
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id104,839,103
net_rshares2,181,522,280,158
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@offgridlife ·
$0.24
But Nobody cares.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authoroffgridlife
permlinkqw1zro
categoryproofofbrain
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2021-07-10 23:55:00
last_update2021-07-10 23:55:00
depth6
children3
last_payout2021-07-17 23:55:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.122 HBD
curator_payout_value0.122 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length17
author_reputation400,067,376,557,187
root_title"Curation at it's worst..."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id104,845,552
net_rshares476,059,774,080
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@themarkymark ·
$0.06
100?  More like 1000-10000 :)
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorthemarkymark
permlinkre-revisepob-qvzwla
categoryproofofbrain
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.1"}
created2021-07-09 20:51:12
last_update2021-07-09 20:51:12
depth4
children9
last_payout2021-07-16 20:51:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.032 HBD
curator_payout_value0.031 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length29
author_reputation1,773,577,061,977,398
root_title"Curation at it's worst..."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id104,825,362
net_rshares121,753,707,768
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@revise.pob ·
Yes, I overuse my 0 key so I have to be conservative with it.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzx2y)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorrevise.pob
permlinkqvzx2y
categoryproofofbrain
json_metadata{"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@revise.pob/qvzx2y"}
created2021-07-09 21:01:48
last_update2021-07-09 21:01:48
depth5
children0
last_payout2021-07-16 21:01:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length174
author_reputation1,480,516,022,215
root_title"Curation at it's worst..."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id104,825,494
net_rshares0
@scholaris.pob ·
Some of the extremes that you pointed out were pretty clear to see like with your article on Lassecash.  

Is there a word count/rewards ratio where you deem something is over-rewarded?  Could it be that objective?  Is there some consensus behind the scenes before a DV on over-rewarding gets issued?  

For instance, self-voting is tolerated, but if I gave this comment a full upvote on my POB account, I "feel" that would be malicious.  Would I be correct in writing that observation?  

Are there types of malicious upvoting?  Just looking for guidance here.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qw1ruw)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorscholaris.pob
permlinkqw1ruw
categoryproofofbrain
json_metadata{"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qw1ruw"}
created2021-07-10 21:04:09
last_update2021-07-10 21:04:09
depth5
children7
last_payout2021-07-17 21:04:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length677
author_reputation3,074,855,239,378
root_title"Curation at it's worst..."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id104,843,565
net_rshares0
@themarkymark ·
> Is there a word count/rewards ratio where you deem something is over-rewarded? Could it be that objective?

It is very subjective.

> For instance, self-voting is tolerated, but if I gave this comment a full upvote on my POB account, I "feel" that would be malicious. Would I be correct in writing that observation?

In my opinion?  Yes.  I am personally not a fan of self voting comments.  In some rare cases I may do so with a small vote to bring it to the top of the comments if it is something critical.  But in almost all cases self voting comments is just farming.

> Are there types of malicious upvoting?

All the conspiracy posts that take half of trending that get massive votes for pseudo science.  All the whales that voted 5-20 vote posts that had no rewards to maximize their curation with little effort (pre-hardfork 25).  There are a few whales dropping $15-40 votes without regard to quality or even content and they stack on top of each other to take posts near $100 when they normally only take a few cents.  Just look at trending, you will see the same 5-6 whales controlling it with no regard to quality. 

I could go on, but I will struggle to find many cases of this elusive "malicious downvoting" that we are trying to stop by making laws on how to vote with their stake.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorthemarkymark
permlinkre-scholarispob-qw1sb1
categoryproofofbrain
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.1"}
created2021-07-10 21:13:48
last_update2021-07-10 21:13:48
depth6
children6
last_payout2021-07-17 21:13:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,298
author_reputation1,773,577,061,977,398
root_title"Curation at it's worst..."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id104,843,752
net_rshares3,786,625,367
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)