Viewing a response to: @smooth/re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t045611600z
I couldn't understand the reason why you flagged this post until the very last paragraph on your comment. I now understand your concern when it come's to 'lists of shame', however I found this information to be very useful. My curiosity gets the better of me sometimes, it's one of the reasons I really enjoyed this post. Do you think that steemcleaners report is another example of a 'wall of shame'? If so, do you think it should be flagged as well? Would obfuscating the name with a generic link like steemcleaners does make it worth removing your flag?
| author | akrid |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t052855981z |
| category | statistics |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-07-24 05:28:57 |
| last_update | 2017-07-24 05:29:36 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 8 |
| last_payout | 2017-07-31 05:28:57 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.187 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.061 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 557 |
| author_reputation | 13,705,218,706,244 |
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 9,494,581 |
| net_rshares | 65,074,294,121 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cryptogee | 0 | 64,331,470,485 | 100% | ||
| mrwilson | 0 | 742,823,636 | 100% |
I think the information is very useful to the community. Maybe the name "shame" is inappropriate. Steem blockchain explorers are not fully featured and data like this *is* helpful.
| author | kyle.anderson |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-akrid-re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t145350448z |
| category | statistics |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-07-24 14:53:51 |
| last_update | 2017-07-24 14:53:51 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-07-31 14:53:51 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.218 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.068 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 184 |
| author_reputation | 8,970,579,009,561 |
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 9,545,874 |
| net_rshares | 76,100,088,138 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| demotruk | 0 | 33,236,382,866 | 1% | ||
| laurieanderson | 0 | 18,802,975,533 | 100% | ||
| kalestew | 0 | 24,060,729,739 | 100% |
> Do you think that steemcleaners report is another example of a 'wall of shame'? Steemcleaners focuses on actual abuse such as well-documented plagarism. It has clear guidelines as to what constitutes plagiarism, identity theft, etc. I know this because I helped write those guidelines. This post is nothing like that. There is nothing in this post to indicate whether any of those authors have engaged in any form of abuse, or are actually contributing a lot of value to Steem/it (both are possible).
| author | smooth |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-akrid-re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t053215500z |
| category | statistics |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-07-24 05:32:18 |
| last_update | 2017-07-24 05:32:18 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 6 |
| last_payout | 2017-07-31 05:32:18 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.213 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.057 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 504 |
| author_reputation | 253,602,537,834,068 |
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 9,494,815 |
| net_rshares | 70,552,493,651 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cryptogee | 0 | 62,743,039,115 | 100% | ||
| guttormf | 0 | 1,901,007,085 | 100% | ||
| randomwhale | 0 | 834,274,440 | 100% | ||
| financialcritic | 0 | 5,074,173,011 | 1% |
Yes, I understand now and can see the potential flaws, thank you. "It doesn't even matter if someone only upvotes themself, if their content is good. Maybe some people are mostly content creators and don't spend a lot of time reviewing/reading/curating other content. There's nothing at all wrong with that." If everybody acted in this manner, do you think it would damage the success, potential and reputation of steem/it?
| author | akrid |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-smooth-re-akrid-re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t055324432z |
| category | statistics |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-07-24 05:53:27 |
| last_update | 2017-07-24 05:53:27 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 4 |
| last_payout | 2017-07-31 05:53:27 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.022 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.006 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 425 |
| author_reputation | 13,705,218,706,244 |
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 9,496,437 |
| net_rshares | 7,561,356,594 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kobold-djawa | 0 | 7,561,356,594 | 10% |
I don't find that hypothetical to be plausible, though if it were to happen (lots of lots of _high-value_ content being posted and no one other than the poster bothering to vote on it), I'm honestly not sure whether that would be good or bad. It's actually quite complex to work through how such a situation would arise or persist (considering incentives, investment flows, web traffic, etc.)
| author | smooth |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-akrid-re-smooth-re-akrid-re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t060118600z |
| category | statistics |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-07-24 06:01:24 |
| last_update | 2017-07-24 06:02:42 |
| depth | 6 |
| children | 3 |
| last_payout | 2017-07-31 06:01:24 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 392 |
| author_reputation | 253,602,537,834,068 |
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 9,496,966 |
| net_rshares | 4,028,518,277 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| whatsup | 0 | 3,270,086,968 | 1% | ||
| randomwhale | 0 | 758,431,309 | 100% |
Exactly...Steemcleaners is on a different level of reporting. The report in this post, in my opinion, is raw data with no analysis.
| author | financialcritic |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-smooth-re-akrid-re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170726t202706016z |
| category | statistics |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-07-26 20:26:27 |
| last_update | 2017-07-26 20:26:27 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-08-02 20:26:27 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 131 |
| author_reputation | 4,167,827,191,421 |
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 9,835,555 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks