RE: Self-voting user list since HF19 by smooth

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @akrid/re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t052855981z

statistics · @smooth · Jul 24 '17

$0.27

> Do you think that steemcleaners report is another example of a 'wall of shame'?

Steemcleaners focuses on actual abuse such as well-documented plagarism. It has clear guidelines as to what constitutes plagiarism, identity theft, etc. I know this because I helped write those guidelines.

This post is nothing like that. There is nothing in this post to indicate whether any of those authors have engaged in any form of abuse, or are actually contributing a lot of value to Steem/it (both are possible).

👍 cryptogee, financialcritic, guttormf, randomwhale

`author`	smooth
`permlink`	re-akrid-re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t053215500z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 05:32:18
`last_update`	2017-07-24 05:32:18
`depth`	4
`children`	6
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 05:32:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.213 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.057 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	504
`author_reputation`	253,602,537,834,068
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,494,815
`net_rshares`	70,552,493,651
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
cryptogee	62,743,039,115	100%
guttormf	1,901,007,085	100%
randomwhale	834,274,440	100%
financialcritic	5,074,173,011	1%

@akrid · Jul 24 '17

$0.03

Yes, I understand now and can see the potential flaws, thank you.

"It doesn't even matter if someone only upvotes themself, if their content is good. Maybe some people are mostly content creators and don't spend a lot of time reviewing/reading/curating other content. There's nothing at all wrong with that."

If everybody acted in this manner, do you think it would damage the success, potential and reputation of steem/it?

👍 kobold-djawa

`author`	akrid
`permlink`	re-smooth-re-akrid-re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t055324432z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 05:53:27
`last_update`	2017-07-24 05:53:27
`depth`	5
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 05:53:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.022 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.006 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	425
`author_reputation`	13,705,218,706,244
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,496,437
`net_rshares`	7,561,356,594
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
kobold-djawa	0 B		7,561,356,594	10%

@smooth · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

I don't find that hypothetical to be plausible, though if it were to happen (lots of lots of _high-value_ content being posted and no one other than the poster bothering to vote on it), I'm honestly not sure whether that would be good or bad. It's actually quite complex to work through how such a situation would arise or persist (considering incentives, investment flows, web traffic, etc.)

👍 whatsup, randomwhale

`author`	smooth
`permlink`	re-akrid-re-smooth-re-akrid-re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t060118600z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 06:01:24
`last_update`	2017-07-24 06:02:42
`depth`	6
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 06:01:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	392
`author_reputation`	253,602,537,834,068
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,496,966
`net_rshares`	4,028,518,277
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
whatsup	0 B		3,270,086,968	1%
randomwhale	0 B		758,431,309	100%

@cryptogee · Jul 24 '17

$0.41

Good debate guys!

[*Cg*](https://steemit.com/@cryptogee)

👍 pharesim, whatsup

`author`	cryptogee
`permlink`	re-smooth-re-akrid-re-smooth-re-akrid-re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t081909996z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"links":["https://steemit.com/@cryptogee"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 08:19:12
`last_update`	2017-07-24 08:19:12
`depth`	7
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 08:19:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.307 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.101 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	57
`author_reputation`	419,387,439,147,428
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,506,925
`net_rshares`	106,593,683,922
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
pharesim	0 B		103,323,596,954	0.02%
whatsup	0 B		3,270,086,968	1%

2 replies

@financialcritic · Jul 26 '17

Exactly...Steemcleaners is on a different level of reporting. The report in this post, in my opinion, is raw data with no analysis.

properties (22)