Viewing a response to: @steemitblog/proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives
Cool! Would be awesome if the blog creator could send all of the blogs rewards to the comments (proportional to all the votes). So people will find they have way more voting power in the comment if large voters upvote the post. This is very important in the alt-media communities. Corbett in this video gives several examples of what he calls [Open Source Investigations](https://youtu.be/IfbFBhG1zyI). In this model the comments are everything.
| author | jamesc |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t190954865z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://youtu.be/IfbFBhG1zyI"]} |
| created | 2016-11-18 19:09:54 |
| last_update | 2016-11-18 19:09:54 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 450 |
| author_reputation | 11,900,157,451,513 |
| root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 1,797,114 |
| net_rshares | 27,841,951,362 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| teamsteem | 0 | 7,226,182,908 | 1% | ||
| matrixdweller | 0 | 20,529,304,639 | 100% | ||
| lamech-m | 0 | 86,463,815 | 1% |
I'm not sure I understood you exactly but what I get from it is that it would make sense if the total comments reward of a post should be some proportion to the reward of the post. Post with big rewards should gather more reactions and comments and those should gather more weight/reward compare to comments on post with smaller reward. I'm not sure how feasible that would be but I feel this concept has some value. Posts and comments would most probably have to be 2 separated pool rewards.
| author | teamsteem |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-jamesc-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161119t025151180z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-11-19 02:51:45 |
| last_update | 2016-11-19 02:51:45 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 496 |
| author_reputation | 284,804,541,406,803 |
| root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 1,799,673 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks