create account

RE: Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives by teamsteem

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @jamesc/re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t190954865z

· @teamsteem ·
I'm not sure I understood you exactly but what I get from it is that it would make sense if the total comments reward of a post should be some proportion to the reward of the post. Post with big rewards should gather more  reactions and comments and those should gather more weight/reward compare to comments on post with smaller reward.  

I'm not sure how feasible that would be but I feel this concept has some value. Posts and comments would most probably have to be 2 separated pool rewards.
properties (22)
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-jamesc-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161119t025151180z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 02:51:45
last_update2016-11-19 02:51:45
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 18:20:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length496
author_reputation284,804,541,406,803
root_title"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,799,673
net_rshares0