Viewing a response to: @ned/re-tcpolymath-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181012t164143214z
That strongly suggests that most "legacy" Steem behavior will not be supported going forward. There are very few existing features of Steem that forward those goals. A development roadmap with that as the endpoint ought to start by removing the Steem rewards system wholesale, as an extremely expensive feature that none of the long-term goals actually require. It also implies that everything anyone's building for the "first-layer" Steem right now will become obsolete through the SMT development process. Would definitely like to know where I'm wrong about this, because if that's your mission statement I probably shouldn't continue working on projects here.
| author | tcpolymath |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181012t172123130z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2018-10-12 17:21:24 |
| last_update | 2018-10-12 17:21:24 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 2 |
| last_payout | 2018-10-19 17:21:24 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.026 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.007 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 665 |
| author_reputation | 72,516,729,960,969 |
| root_title | "Steem Governance is Multiparty" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 73,160,950 |
| net_rshares | 25,865,562,330 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lextenebris | 0 | 7,418,165,080 | 33% | ||
| glenalbrethsen | 0 | 18,447,397,250 | 12% |
“Interactive currencies” includes STEEM and SBD
| author | ned |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-tcpolymath-re-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181012t204555678z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2018-10-12 20:45:57 |
| last_update | 2018-10-12 20:45:57 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2018-10-19 20:45:57 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 47 |
| author_reputation | 94,449,026,656,258 |
| root_title | "Steem Governance is Multiparty" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 0.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 73,170,230 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
So the blockchain of your vision is going to run very similar content-voting-and-rewards systems on multiple levels of abstraction? That seems anathema to the efficiency-and-scaling doctrine. Once you've built new voting systems and dropped dApps into their SMT walled gardens, I think it's going to be way too tempting to drop first-layer content voting and rewards and just have the core blockchain support content storage and SMT operation, while all the rest is done per-dApp on the SMT layer, in the name of chain efficiency. And it's probably the right thing to do from a system design standpoint. It kind of calls into question why starting from Steem is a good idea, though.
| author | tcpolymath |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181013t031832388z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2018-10-13 03:18:33 |
| last_update | 2018-10-13 03:18:33 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2018-10-20 03:18:33 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.041 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.012 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 686 |
| author_reputation | 72,516,729,960,969 |
| root_title | "Steem Governance is Multiparty" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 73,185,720 |
| net_rshares | 40,493,145,155 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lextenebris | 0 | 22,090,006,375 | 100% | ||
| glenalbrethsen | 0 | 18,403,138,780 | 12% |
hiveblocks