create account

RE: [Steemit Etiquette] Using 95+ Bot Accounts to Upvote your own Content. Fair Game or Not Cool? by anyx

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @recursive/re-anyx-re-riensen-steemit-etiquette-using-95-bot-accounts-to-upvote-your-own-content-fair-game-or-not-cool-20160802t154529862z

· @anyx · (edited)
$4.00
I tested at first, and then I tried to talk about sybils in my latest post. In retrospect I agree, I should have been more clear that I was trying to break things -- e.g. just make a single post about sybils and push that one (not just as one of the 3 topics in my last post).
The more attention we get the better, at least, so we can fix the problem. See smooth's response as well for some more insight and how to fix it.
👍  , , , , , , ,
👎  
properties (23)
authoranyx
permlinkre-recursive-re-anyx-re-riensen-steemit-etiquette-using-95-bot-accounts-to-upvote-your-own-content-fair-game-or-not-cool-20160802t171504119z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-08-02 17:15:06
last_update2016-08-02 17:15:27
depth3
children2
last_payout2016-09-01 23:15:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value3.912 HBD
curator_payout_value0.089 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length422
author_reputation98,676,136,100,181
root_title"[Steemit Etiquette] Using 95+ Bot Accounts to Upvote your own Content. Fair Game or Not Cool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id563,065
net_rshares3,034,680,261,783
author_curate_reward""
vote details (9)
@riensen ·
See also this newly created a Bug Report.
There is an on-going discussion on how to fix this issue with the steem Devs: https://github.com/steemit/steem/issues/233

> Both Hot and the Vote Count can be easily manipulated to make an article more visible and thus indirectly increase payout.
Using the API we can easily create hundred of accounts whenever a POW is found. In fact this behaviour is encouraged in order to mine continuously, or we are penalized. However when duplicate accounts are used to upvote content than it skyrockets in the Hot section. Also the vote count is misleading as it suggest that many low steem power users support the post although it is actually the same person.
The below image is a an example. It was upvoted with 150 Bot accounts and appears at the top of the Hot section although there is little payout associated with it.
![](https://i.imgsafe.org/fba2b190fe.png)
👍  
properties (23)
authorriensen
permlinkre-anyx-re-recursive-re-anyx-re-riensen-steemit-etiquette-using-95-bot-accounts-to-upvote-your-own-content-fair-game-or-not-cool-20160802t173721474z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"links":["https://github.com/steemit/steem/issues/233"]}
created2016-08-02 17:37:21
last_update2016-08-02 17:37:21
depth4
children0
last_payout2016-09-01 23:15:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length900
author_reputation6,335,831,989,133
root_title"[Steemit Etiquette] Using 95+ Bot Accounts to Upvote your own Content. Fair Game or Not Cool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id563,453
net_rshares227,669,838
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@vegeta ·
You're worse than Dr. Gero! The work is appreciated however to help prevent future Dr. Gero's on here.
👍  
properties (23)
authorvegeta
permlinkre-anyx-re-recursive-re-anyx-re-riensen-steemit-etiquette-using-95-bot-accounts-to-upvote-your-own-content-fair-game-or-not-cool-20160802t221757287z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-08-02 22:18:03
last_update2016-08-02 22:18:03
depth4
children0
last_payout2016-09-01 23:15:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length102
author_reputation1,942,378,084,099
root_title"[Steemit Etiquette] Using 95+ Bot Accounts to Upvote your own Content. Fair Game or Not Cool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id568,638
net_rshares48,305,358
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)