create account

RE: [Steemit Etiquette] Using 95+ Bot Accounts to Upvote your own Content. Fair Game or Not Cool? by riensen

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @anyx/re-recursive-re-anyx-re-riensen-steemit-etiquette-using-95-bot-accounts-to-upvote-your-own-content-fair-game-or-not-cool-20160802t171504119z

· @riensen ·
See also this newly created a Bug Report.
There is an on-going discussion on how to fix this issue with the steem Devs: https://github.com/steemit/steem/issues/233

> Both Hot and the Vote Count can be easily manipulated to make an article more visible and thus indirectly increase payout.
Using the API we can easily create hundred of accounts whenever a POW is found. In fact this behaviour is encouraged in order to mine continuously, or we are penalized. However when duplicate accounts are used to upvote content than it skyrockets in the Hot section. Also the vote count is misleading as it suggest that many low steem power users support the post although it is actually the same person.
The below image is a an example. It was upvoted with 150 Bot accounts and appears at the top of the Hot section although there is little payout associated with it.
![](https://i.imgsafe.org/fba2b190fe.png)
👍  
properties (23)
authorriensen
permlinkre-anyx-re-recursive-re-anyx-re-riensen-steemit-etiquette-using-95-bot-accounts-to-upvote-your-own-content-fair-game-or-not-cool-20160802t173721474z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"links":["https://github.com/steemit/steem/issues/233"]}
created2016-08-02 17:37:21
last_update2016-08-02 17:37:21
depth4
children0
last_payout2016-09-01 23:15:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length900
author_reputation6,335,831,989,133
root_title"[Steemit Etiquette] Using 95+ Bot Accounts to Upvote your own Content. Fair Game or Not Cool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id563,453
net_rshares227,669,838
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)