Viewing a response to: @lucylin/it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better
I think this is a pretty clever summation. I wonder how making the rewards pool private property would change the distribution? If the witnesses would forgo their rewards (instead of keeping them) then how would witnesses choose to distribute them? Or is that not your point, and how they choose to distribute them or not, is simply the "free market?" Idk, this seems like a toughy. ;) Oh, the pretty pictures do help by the way! lol
author | dexterdumb |
---|---|
permlink | re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190314t011004056z |
category | blog |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-03-14 01:10:03 |
last_update | 2019-03-14 01:11:18 |
depth | 1 |
children | 10 |
last_payout | 2019-03-21 01:10:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.040 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.008 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 437 |
author_reputation | 2,492,649,115,795 |
root_title | "It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 81,269,617 |
net_rshares | 79,015,848,660 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dexterdumb | 0 | 65,724,194,632 | 100% | ||
lucylin | 0 | 13,291,654,028 | 70% |
MMMmmmmm......I dunno....I DO know without property being the consideration when writing code - it will not stand .... (no concept property, no ethics).
author | lucylin |
---|---|
permlink | re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190314t015353332z |
category | blog |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blog"],"community":"steempeak","app":"steempeak/1.8.4b"} |
created | 2019-03-14 01:54:15 |
last_update | 2019-03-14 01:54:15 |
depth | 2 |
children | 9 |
last_payout | 2019-03-21 01:54:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.034 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.011 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 152 |
author_reputation | 185,811,362,824,733 |
root_title | "It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 81,271,716 |
net_rshares | 68,497,638,888 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dexterdumb | 0 | 68,497,638,888 | 100% |
Correct me if I still don't understand completely. Most crypto projects tout the fact that they are open source, meaning those who are capable and willing, can contribute and see how exactly the source code works. NEO/BTC etc....Closed source (private property) are your Microsoft's/Apple/IBM's. When writing code with the intention of making it private, you become no longer "open source". Is this what you mean?
author | dexterdumb |
---|---|
permlink | re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190316t033806898z |
category | blog |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-03-16 03:38:06 |
last_update | 2019-03-16 03:38:45 |
depth | 3 |
children | 8 |
last_payout | 2019-03-23 03:38:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.028 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.008 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 416 |
author_reputation | 2,492,649,115,795 |
root_title | "It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 81,390,362 |
net_rshares | 57,105,987,781 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dexterdumb | 0 | 34,885,903,335 | 50% | ||
lucylin | 0 | 21,957,181,202 | 100% | ||
sergino | 0 | 262,903,244 | 1.5% |
It might be...if I understood what you meant..lol I mean that the rewards pool as it stands, is no ones property - therefore taking it - however you can - is acceptable. Without an ethical code in the system (code) there are no ethics. There can be no theft, or deception, or cheating....these are ethics. IF the reward pool belongs to no one -(which I think is correct) then any actions becomes acceptable - to take a slice, there is no 'right, wrong, good bad' - just whatever you can get, _however_ you can get it... Law of the jungle is not a structure that will endure - except as a financial instrument to make profit of price action. In the 'new world' structure - this is an incorrect model - this is exactly what _we are all_ railing against...Non ethical structures.
author | lucylin |
---|---|
permlink | re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190316t040611856z |
category | blog |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-03-16 04:06:24 |
last_update | 2019-03-16 04:07:12 |
depth | 4 |
children | 7 |
last_payout | 2019-03-23 04:06:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.016 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.005 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 783 |
author_reputation | 185,811,362,824,733 |
root_title | "It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 81,391,089 |
net_rshares | 34,537,029,522 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dexterdumb | 0 | 34,537,029,522 | 50% |