create account

RE: Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour by haphazard-hstead

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @personz/self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour

· @haphazard-hstead ·
$0.06
I wonder how you will handle someone setting up another account to upvote themselves, or groups of people agreeing to upvote each other. I don't have any issue with people upvoting their own post. I think people should have to **pay to upvote their own comment**, just like a post promotion, because it changes the rank in a comment stream. I have, once or twice, upvoted my own comment to rank in higher in a comment stream. It didn't seem right that I was rewarding myself for increasing my visibility.
👍  
properties (23)
authorhaphazard-hstead
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t021332446z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 02:13:30
last_update2017-07-07 02:13:30
depth1
children29
last_payout2017-07-14 02:13:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.044 HBD
curator_payout_value0.014 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length504
author_reputation36,666,374,575,794
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,591,826
net_rshares13,065,779,373
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@elfspice · (edited)
We are not seeking to do this, and the main beneficiaries of disabling self voting will be minnows, who will then instead be able to use their votes as part of their engagement strategy. Self-Circle-Jerk takes a far more advanced bot than we have made at this point. But it's a start.

I agree that getting paid to promote yourself is wrong! That's the whole point!
properties (22)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t040341001z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:03:42
last_update2017-07-07 04:05:27
depth2
children28
last_payout2017-07-14 04:03:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length365
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,599,894
net_rshares0
@fuzzyvest ·
Lol...bots bots bots. Will u care about how unreasonable this is?

Bots armies of fucking bots...and u guys are attacking self voting. What a waste of time.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorfuzzyvest
permlinkre-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t111137278z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:11:39
last_update2017-07-07 11:11:39
depth3
children6
last_payout2017-07-14 11:11:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length156
author_reputation16,076,269,237,260
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,630,872
net_rshares1,327,972,051
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@elfspice ·
You have a solution for bots? What is it exactly? Let's focus on your solution since you think mine is not going to work.
👍  
properties (23)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-fuzzyvest-re-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t141146634z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 14:11:51
last_update2017-07-07 14:11:51
depth4
children5
last_payout2017-07-14 14:11:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length121
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,647,091
net_rshares727,547,265
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@haphazard-hstead ·
It will be interesting to see how it plays out. Steemit is such a complex ecosystem now that prediction of consequences seems less practical than testing and adjusting. It would be nice to see some analyses afterwards showing whether the planned effects are actually occurring. I appreciate all the experimentation that goes on here!
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorhaphazard-hstead
permlinkre-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t042849681z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:28:48
last_update2017-07-07 04:28:48
depth3
children14
last_payout2017-07-14 04:28:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length333
author_reputation36,666,374,575,794
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,601,680
net_rshares3,338,333,664
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@elfspice ·
$0.05
The 4th member of the Co-Operative, @rycharde, is a mathematician who does a lot of work on Game Theory, and there is in fact models you can create that give pretty clear predictions of how humans will play with new things.

He has friends in the field who can quickly build a simulation based on a series of variables that is pretty accurate at predicting it. Basically, it just models the process of people learning how to exploit the system. From this you can in fact judge the effect, before implementation, to a pretty large degree. 

I was absolutely ecstatic when he showed up to talk about what his angle was. This gives our development process some really good evidence to justify changes. He also happens to practically share my own theories about gravity and biology as well.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-haphazard-hstead-re-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t052812920z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["rycharde"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 05:28:15
last_update2017-07-07 05:28:15
depth4
children13
last_payout2017-07-14 05:28:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.039 HBD
curator_payout_value0.010 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length786
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,605,989
net_rshares11,017,199,862
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@lexiconical · (edited)
$0.96
*"I agree that getting paid to promote yourself is wrong! That's the whole point!"*

Why? You do realize where the value of Steem comes from, right? People investing money into it?

I'm confused, do you think it's difficult to create a second account and send Steem there to vote for yourself? There is no barrier of technical knowledge here.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorlexiconical
permlinkre-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t042900689z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:29:12
last_update2017-07-07 04:35:33
depth3
children5
last_payout2017-07-14 04:29:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.721 HBD
curator_payout_value0.236 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length342
author_reputation183,198,168,434,738
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,601,706
net_rshares205,363,347,303
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@fuzzyvest · (edited)
$0.05
100%
Congrats...u just walked into the vipers den and said "i smell alot like chicken...whats the problem?"

Lol...
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorfuzzyvest
permlinkre-lexiconical-re-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t111223497z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:12:27
last_update2017-07-07 11:12:45
depth4
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 11:12:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.041 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length115
author_reputation16,076,269,237,260
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,630,934
net_rshares10,894,752,461
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@personz ·
$0.22
No but it does take more effort. Minimally more I'll grant you, but more. It is friction and the interface is not designed to work for that use case.

From reading your comments it's clear that you think this is not a solvable problem. But is that the only reason you oppose this, because you think it cannot be done? Or do you agree with self voting in some fundamental way? I'm curious.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-lexiconical-re-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t104626182z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 10:46:27
last_update2017-07-07 10:46:27
depth4
children2
last_payout2017-07-14 10:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.166 HBD
curator_payout_value0.054 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length388
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,628,864
net_rshares47,897,104,661
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)