create account

Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour by personz

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @personz · (edited)
$58.45
Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour
A little update on the [pull request](https://github.com/steemit/condenser/pull/1541) (change to code) I made recently and talked about in my [witness update](https://steemit.com/witness-category/@personz/personzzz-witness-report-1).

### It has been accepted!

This change will become part of [Condensor](https://github.com/steemit/condenser), AKA steemit.com, and will set that little up vote check box to "off" by default instead of "on".

![no-more-self-vote-default.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmQYjceSLow28L6f1kvhSU2euXTTCJnLNd4KnZ4aA4wkP4/no-more-self-vote-default.png)

The change should come into effect soon when they push code changes to the production servers. I also closed the [ticket](https://github.com/steemit/condenser/issues/1540) I opened related to this as it is now solved.

It must be the smallest code change on record, just changing the letters "true" to "false 😂   But meaningful beyond that.

This is part of #project-smackdown, the initiative @l0k1, @the-ego-is-you and I have started to question self voting on Steemit. You can check our blogs for the other announcements on that but to summarize, we have a few ideas:

1. Change the default steemit.com self voting behavior when submitting a post - DONE!
2. With @smackdown.kitty flag self voted comments with a 1%, incrementing for each self vote recorded up to but no more than negating the self vote
3. Publishing some kind of self votes report, most likely ranked by highest total value of self votes in a period (probably a week)
4. Engaging the community to promote the idea of voluntary refusal to self vote
5. And ultimately a hard fork change removing self voting as an option from the Steem blockchain

### Change of plan and reflection

**HOWEVER** there is to be a change of plans specifically regarding point 2 above, the flagging bot.

We ran a test where only the three above mentioned users were flagged and the bot performed well after some teething problems were fixed. But we noticed that small value flags do not show prominently up on the steemit.com interface. This goes for the others too except eSteem, which obliterates the comment if the flag has moderate value.

As we don't want to flag a lot of comments hard (and it's not practical to either) we feel it would not be effective.

As a revised idea what do you think of this: **flagging the top rewarded comments every day**, let's say the top 4 or so, depending on how much delegated SP we have at any one time. In the end of things the most broad agreement we had was over so-called "abuse" of self voting, where authors are able to reward themselves sometimes hundreds of dollars worth from their comment.

To be clear, it's not that these comments may not be deserving of rewards. However we feel it is widely held, we certainly do, that these rewards should be awarded by peers, not the commenter.

I'd like to take the opportunity to thank everyone who as engaged with us in discussion about this. As you can see we engage with you too, take it on board, run tests and revise our plans. This is no different and is not set in stone.

![](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://steemitimages.com/DQmeBSShURMJ2EqKMt4ZS4hfuL5raZpk899shnH3n6YyCSg/A%20cat%20killing%20a%20balloon%20-%20Imgur.jpg)

### Steem Cooperative

This is broadly under the banner of the Steem Cooperative ( #steem-coop ) a group of likeminded users experimenting and trying to make tools and discussion to benefit Steemit in the Co-op style, for common benefit. Join us on steemit.chat in channel # steem-coop-general.

I have started making a tool to allow us to easily make posts which share rewards between members which is an ultra simplified version of my [Team Work](https://steemit.com/steemdev/@personz/team-work-reward-share-groups-new-app-for-steem-updated-proposal) app idea from a few months ago. I realized there is no easy front end interface to shared rewards yet so I'm working on one simply called [Rewards Share app](https://github.com/Steem-FOSSbot/reward-share-app).

It doesn't work yet but I'm hoping to have a beta release in a few days. 🤓   👍

#### You can my witness account @personzzz at the [witness vote page](https://steemit.com/~witnesses) if you what to support me on this journey
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 26 others
👎  ,
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkself-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev","condensor","selfvoting","project-smackdown","steem-coop"],"users":["l0k1","the-ego-is-you","smackdown.kitty","personzzz"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmQYjceSLow28L6f1kvhSU2euXTTCJnLNd4KnZ4aA4wkP4/no-more-self-vote-default.png","https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://steemitimages.com/DQmeBSShURMJ2EqKMt4ZS4hfuL5raZpk899shnH3n6YyCSg/A%20cat%20killing%20a%20balloon%20-%20Imgur.jpg"],"links":["https://github.com/steemit/condenser/pull/1541","https://steemit.com/witness-category/@personz/personzzz-witness-report-1","https://github.com/steemit/condenser","https://github.com/steemit/condenser/issues/1540","https://steemit.com/steemdev/@personz/team-work-reward-share-groups-new-app-for-steem-updated-proposal","https://github.com/Steem-FOSSbot/reward-share-app","https://steemit.com/~witnesses"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
created2017-07-06 23:01:48
last_update2017-07-06 23:20:39
depth0
children176
last_payout2017-07-13 23:01:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value46.644 HBD
curator_payout_value11.809 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted15.000 HBD
body_length4,277
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,577,355
net_rshares12,367,399,661,257
author_curate_reward""
vote details (92)
@ackza ·
$0.05
woah i just thought i must have posted on chainbb...but woah this is cool!
i hink self voting on a post is ok if u are just posting a few times a day....i meean its your steempower

upvoting alll ur own comments might be seen as different but nope its totally ok if u arent making enuf money (in your mind)

i dont self vote comments (on purpose)  but i will self votte posts! why not? i also give  out way more upvootesto other sers than i ever give to myself!

but if u are struggling but u gave the steempower u have everyright too pay urself

its all good tho this change is good! ANY few optiions are welcome!!!

i hoope we have more optiions foor all sorts f stuff! like option to post private messages via pgp encryption lol that will be fun

i guess we can alreasy do that now

wow steem witnesses have alot of power if they work together! i love  this syatem!

ppl coomplaining about whales having too much powrr are just alll super jeloys and envious that they didnt buy steempowr when it was 110 cents!! 

its ok everyone will be EXSTATIC once steem goes to $3 again! peopel will be SO happy like during the hard form everone will asicaly have thri money double!

I cant WAIt to see all the peopel who are in fights right now all becoming friends thanks to everones wallets dooubling in size! for anyone who has a thousand bucks in steem they will be making the easiest thousand bucks ever! (if they havent ben in crpto before) 
and then ppeopel with $10,000 or $100,000 will be on cloud nine! making $10,000 to $100,000 all in one day , it will be glorious! so many whales will be giving out powrful 100 percent upvotes!
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorackza
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170706t231032617z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-06 23:10:39
last_update2017-07-06 23:10:39
depth1
children4
last_payout2017-07-13 23:10:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.041 HBD
curator_payout_value0.012 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,632
author_reputation287,776,574,693,472
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,578,073
net_rshares11,710,545,337
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@l0k1 ·
Short term rewards versus the long term benefit of engagement will win out in the end, as my own account history testifies.
👍  
properties (23)
authorl0k1
permlinkre-ackza-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t074108568z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 07:41:12
last_update2017-07-07 07:41:12
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-07-14 07:41:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length123
author_reputation94,800,257,230,993
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,615,408
net_rshares1,455,094,530
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ackza ·
wait I am just amazed at how FAST they did this change!

I want to purchase so much steempower that I can actually run multiple witness nodes untill I have more witneses than anyone else and I want to take full control over steemit, and then hand it over to an AI that will be just and righteous

I am 100 percent confident that with a team of top people and philosophers I can actually maintain perfect equilibrium and grow steemit larger than any social media website

and I will go and look at every fued and I will create a tribunal where we invite all of steemit to give their opinion and see what the community ants...and if the community is wrong i will tell them! How can i be that arrogant? The AI will tell me if the community is wrong!

democracy is not the best thing, republicanism is the best! representative government is the answer, we cant just have a mob rule, look at the democratic party in thee United States...if it wasnt for us standing up and infowars and alex jones and alll the patriotic Americans standing up, the cultual marxists on the left would have taken over already!
they have numbers but the numbers are declining! peopel are waking up to their own best self interest

The alt right doesnt want to dominate anyone....but when u declare war on someone and their homeland and a wholepeople as a whole you will end up getting hit back hard! i have no idea why anyone would ever think they could defeat "White Male capitslsis" when we won ww2 and coneuered fortress europe!
people say the Nazis were so evil and so powerful....well then us Americans (and Russians) must e even MORE powerful and vicious if we coul conquer the grat monster, that mkes us an even greater monster! Not a bad thing, its beautful that we won ww2

and this IS a world war! this is world war 4 (ww3 was the cold war!) and its not a physical war its a fucking info war and genetic war

anyway i would love to have control over steemit to ensure its freedom! i would be a steward of the throne! 

I sincerely believe that we need to avoid political flagging!

even if open pedophile satanist communists started gaining a following and making money to fund their message, we sytill shouldnt flag them! now if a bunch of minnows want to flag em, then yeah the community has spoken!

yeah its such a difficult question but  hey I just fear that the Leftists from reddit.com/r/politics for example all make a move too take over steemit by simply buying steempower ....

imagine if they simply bought a few million dollars worth of steempower, like  hoardes of them!

shit this is a huge issue!i wish more of us would make these plans!

and also we need to all be saving steempwer for POLITICAL reasons! 

Imbeing a hypcrit here saying we shouldnt engage in pilitical flagging and yet I am affraid the left will do this! but i dont wwant steemit known as some sort of right wing hangout! It should have BOTH left and right wingers here on steemit! they can each have their own area!

I mean reddit is like that with r/politics for the left and r/the_donald for the right and oveerall reddit is now right leaning and the LEFTISTS in control of reddit in siliconvalley are all trying to look legit by allowing theonald to exist..even AFTER they totally banned anENTIRE subreddit known as r/altright which was a huge internet crime against free speech! even IF the altright subreddit had some open anti radical jewish suff so what? Radical Jewish people are allowed to cal for the death of whites...and the left is allwoed to calll for white genocide on twiitter, and i really dnt get why anyone would want to pick a fight against white males?  we only want whats best for humanity...just like any good person.
https://media.giphy.com/media/3o6Zthqgss4W4klvZC/giphy.gif

https://68.media.tumblr.com/770beac76a62e44e01f6f489eb35e727/tumblr_nxnzf5BdOT1s9gyh7o1_500.gif

https://68.media.tumblr.com/598a3ba31eed32243625a1c0020e9ff6/tumblr_nyxcgzuqHN1um8r3uo1_400.gif

https://68.media.tumblr.com/d7a3904387344410fbc009b12cbd95c2/tumblr_onz0m756st1vdj0mpo1_400.gif

we wont give up

we will go to mars 
https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/pCy_57dNz07EGipjmsfYtbjzTWU=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/7176199/giphy-4.0.gif

and we will bring the planet out of poverty with our blockchain!

![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmX8VAdRVk3VYev9rBe7q4oHJPSfJzqpUebA5Y7TYGPNyu/image.png)

![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmQNqpWv1RWvKV7V3PXqgDWQN1AuNnRK74Hrzw58ELef7j/image.png)

![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmRD45USDBP5yrgD6JYbksnE5vie4eUkNCdbbuG1m72Nun/image.png)

![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmZidcaUpYCD1EY31ciKf1f2kNmqTHwj19PRba5zVv4t9f/image.png)

it would bee really easy to grow weed on mars or even the moon if u can just keep the pants warm at night! there is plenty of light ! and plants just ned light! and the nutrients and water, that can all be placed in self contained units like this 
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmd1MubwcLdSUFEmzaBWM3BAmpMb9hrG7Z7XVXxtj5zX2n/image.png)

dude omg growing weed oon mars! it will be a GREAT steemit post!
properties (22)
authorackza
permlinkre-l0k1-re-ackza-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t220400643z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"image":["https://media.giphy.com/media/3o6Zthqgss4W4klvZC/giphy.gif","https://68.media.tumblr.com/770beac76a62e44e01f6f489eb35e727/tumblr_nxnzf5BdOT1s9gyh7o1_500.gif","https://68.media.tumblr.com/598a3ba31eed32243625a1c0020e9ff6/tumblr_nyxcgzuqHN1um8r3uo1_400.gif","https://68.media.tumblr.com/d7a3904387344410fbc009b12cbd95c2/tumblr_onz0m756st1vdj0mpo1_400.gif","https://steemitimages.com/DQmX8VAdRVk3VYev9rBe7q4oHJPSfJzqpUebA5Y7TYGPNyu/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmQNqpWv1RWvKV7V3PXqgDWQN1AuNnRK74Hrzw58ELef7j/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmRD45USDBP5yrgD6JYbksnE5vie4eUkNCdbbuG1m72Nun/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmZidcaUpYCD1EY31ciKf1f2kNmqTHwj19PRba5zVv4t9f/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmd1MubwcLdSUFEmzaBWM3BAmpMb9hrG7Z7XVXxtj5zX2n/image.png"],"links":["https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/pCy_57dNz07EGipjmsfYtbjzTWU=/800x0/filters:no_upscale"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 22:04:06
last_update2017-07-07 22:04:06
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 22:04:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length5,079
author_reputation287,776,574,693,472
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,691,679
net_rshares0
@fuzzyvest · (edited)
My account testifies the same thing. But i upvote myself and pay to build stuff. So which is it?

I refused to get a witness unlike some even though i could have had one. Because i oersonally thought it was unfair. In a world where force is used to dictate action, everyone..including idealists like me are FORCED to cheat and be criminals in a system built to help us.  So in game theory u are giving people less incentive to do anything good VOLUNTARILY because their good deeds may put them at a distinct disadvantage against people who find ways around the systems put in place.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorfuzzyvest
permlinkre-l0k1-re-ackza-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t112129130z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:21:33
last_update2017-07-07 11:21:45
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 11:21:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length582
author_reputation16,076,269,237,260
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,631,697
net_rshares2,751,465,278
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@allprowi ·
$0.49
After reading half of the comments it's very clear a compromise needs to be made. The fix is very simple, self voting on comments should be banned, however self voting actual posts should remain! If for some reason the community at large is interested in being allowed to up vote comments, steemit should go back to the 40 full strength up votes rather than the 10. To make those people work for it!
👍  
properties (23)
authorallprowi
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170710t234956110z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-10 23:49:57
last_update2017-07-10 23:49:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-17 23:49:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.371 HBD
curator_payout_value0.123 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length399
author_reputation2,011,458,164,540
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,044,642
net_rshares140,508,562,991
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@beautifulbella ·
$0.05
"flagging the top rewarded comments every day, let's say the top 4 or so"

I disagree with this. Flagging top 4 comments without review is abuse of power and discourage those who provide quality comments. I suggest do a manual review first and see if they deserved the pay.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorbeautifulbella
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t001415263z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 00:14:33
last_update2017-07-07 00:14:33
depth1
children4
last_payout2017-07-14 00:14:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.038 HBD
curator_payout_value0.010 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length273
author_reputation1,876,932,920,921
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,583,031
net_rshares10,546,330,470
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@elfspice ·
$0.04
The flag will never exceed the self-awarded payout.   If others also upvoted it, they still get that component of the reward. The abuse is in being top four... We will be talking about comments with rewards probably in excess of $10.

Hillary clinton might get paid a hundred bux or more just to say a couple of words but I don't think anything could possibly be worth that much, and from the statistics, likely we are talking about quite a bit in excess of such a high reward.
👍  
properties (23)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-beautifulbella-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t035738839z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 03:57:42
last_update2017-07-07 03:57:42
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 03:57:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.028 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length477
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,599,459
net_rshares8,021,965,395
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ackza ·
sorry but you sound like a socialist! whats next? Noone "deserves" to make more than $100,000 a year?

"the abuse is in being top four"
WOW so you think its ABUSE of steemit to succeeed and be on top? wtf?

And u bring up hillary clinton and her pai speeches as an example haha wtf we all hate hillary but her paid speeches were not for the fact that she spoke somewhere, that was pay forplay money she was acceptng bribes as money for a "speech" thats all, bad analogy , very conffusing

and look, if a commentgets over $10 who are ou to say thats too much money?

Look you have a real problem  if you think peopel dont deserve to make a smuch as they make!

this is a ffree market and if u go flagging people blindly just because they make money, espect to get flaggeed yourself! People will retaliate! i wont but others will! someoen will nvest millions into stempower JUST to help anyone whose been auto flagged unfairly! 
But hey u have your free market power to flag and take rewards away! I just hope u never make verymuch money here so u dont end up with very much power if this is howw u are going to be using your power, to punish people for being succesful and popular
Not everyone deserves to get steem for their shit comments! minows stay  poor because their content sucks!Just like how poor people in real life stay ppoor because they are bad with money! if a minnow isnt makeing much money thats their own fault! NOTthe fault of some whale who is making more thanthem!  if you have good content then it will rise to the top!
The ONLY excuse I can think of for flaggging succcesful steemitusers is if they cash out and dont hold steem or steempower or SBD! by cashing outw hen they amke thousands a day, that is bad for teem price ans we as community can excersize our free markiet  power to downvote 

Look whatever u are gonan doo what u want

But dont accuse others of cheating or unfairlly making money just because u dont make that much! 
Its shitty to arbitrarily decide how much someone should be allowed to make with their posts or comments
properties (22)
authorackza
permlinkre-elfspice-re-beautifulbella-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t234521340z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 23:45:27
last_update2017-07-07 23:45:27
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 23:45:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,062
author_reputation287,776,574,693,472
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,699,066
net_rshares0
@personz ·
On the contrary, a manual review would rely on our subjective judgement of what abuse is. While there's nothing wrong with that, we aim for this to be impartial. It operates under the premise that all self voting is bad, and that those who gain the most from self voting are having the greatest effect on the reward pool, which is one of the problems of self voting.

Personally I don't agree with the idea that comments "deserve" pay. Reward is decided on by votes, which are given freely. Further, no one deserves to pay themselves, that is our core position on this.
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-beautifulbella-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t105919915z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 10:59:18
last_update2017-07-07 10:59:18
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 10:59:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length569
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,629,848
net_rshares0
@ackza ·
noone deserves to pay themselves? WHy not? What if they booight steempower and havent beenmaking much off it, steem price tanks, and they just want to make some money back?

if self voting was "undeserved" or somehow bad we wouldnt be allowed to do it at all!
Buts ory, if u can self vote, you can! and please dont make peope feel guilty for doing it!

its your rightto upvote yoru own comments! U CAN pay yourself and so why not?

Hopefully control freaks wont ever end up with very much steempower and flags from jelous people wont ever amount to much!

I really just wish people would stop this whole nonesnese of arbitrarily deciding how much someone is allowed to make everyday

Not all posts are created equal! if someone is getting a ton of upvotes, and those upvotes are from accounts with high steempower, why would you try to stop that? 

Noone deserves anything here!

Im tired of minnows acting like it would be better if everyone just got the same amount of money for their posts, yeah that would createa sitruation where noone would ever try to make uality posts!

some posts can explain how a developer wrote some AMAZIING nw feature for steemit! Or someonee can sppend 1 year on a documentary about steemit and release it on ONE post

SO that post ddoesnt deserve to make tens of thousands of dollars?!?! A post releasing some dnew feature programmed from scratch for months and months and fnally released in one steemit post with link to the github post, that kind of post doesnt deserve to make it on top and earnthousands? what if someone actyally works so hard that they release a new upgradeto steemit or a new steemit documentary veryday for a week! and they getto the front page 7 days in a row! Are they not allowedto reap the rewards of all their hardwork ?

its ddoesnt MATTER how often someone is succeesful! thats ther choise! 

some peopel work harder than others and f they can get thousands of dollowersto upvote everyone of their daily posts, thenmaybe you should try harder instead of trying to find some fundamental problem with steemit  to just explain the inequality away as a symptome of som larger problem with free markets....yeah we need more free maret mre freedom NOT more control!
properties (22)
authorackza
permlinkre-personz-re-beautifulbella-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t235257629z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 23:53:03
last_update2017-07-07 23:53:03
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 23:53:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,223
author_reputation287,776,574,693,472
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,699,584
net_rshares0
@calamus056 · (edited)
$0.10
@personz Wow i literally was thinking about setting up a bot to counter self-voting and here it is ;)

Also setting the default self-vote on posts to false on steemit.com is great!

Good job
👍  
properties (23)
authorcalamus056
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t062238509z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["personz"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 06:22:48
last_update2017-07-09 09:15:24
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-07-16 06:22:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.078 HBD
curator_payout_value0.025 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length190
author_reputation5,645,464,390,253
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,833,954
net_rshares24,734,164,058
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz ·
Thank you! I appreciate it.

So I guess if / when @smackdown.kitty goes live we can count on your support?
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-calamus056-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t224556019z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["smackdown.kitty"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 22:45:54
last_update2017-07-09 22:45:54
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-16 22:45:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length106
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,920,593
net_rshares0
@calamus056 ·
$0.07
Yeah i might delegate some SP.
👍  
properties (23)
authorcalamus056
permlinkre-personz-re-calamus056-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t225039932z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 22:50:51
last_update2017-07-09 22:50:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 22:50:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.053 HBD
curator_payout_value0.017 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length30
author_reputation5,645,464,390,253
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,920,998
net_rshares18,819,472,652
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@cryptohazard ·
I already disable self voting a long time ago, since people get stuck in the quest for money and forget to interact with the community.
properties (22)
authorcryptohazard
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t075826704z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 07:58:27
last_update2017-07-08 07:58:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-15 07:58:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length135
author_reputation17,111,780,434,071
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,729,340
net_rshares0
@dali.soh ·
$0.62
I like the idea of limiting the use of self-voting, however, that would mean that minnows will have to try much harder to publish great content to garner a following. I suggest hard coding per user, an arbitrary amount of 5 self vote a day would be more useful. This would reduce the amount of abuse while not deny those people who actually put time and effort to shine through over the years to reap the benefit of their work.
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authordali.soh
permlinkre-personz-201779t1114364z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":"steemdev","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-07-09 09:14:39
last_update2017-07-09 09:14:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 09:14:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.588 HBD
curator_payout_value0.027 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length427
author_reputation631,538,961,852
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,845,288
net_rshares157,456,237,697
author_curate_reward""
vote details (15)
@fuzzyvest ·
Steempower is valuable because people have the freedom to use what they have invested in the project to do things they deem important. 

But lets just be honest here as to why this is a terrible idea. 

Ill just make a bunch of sockpuppet accounts and have them upvote me! So how does this fix anything?
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorfuzzyvest
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t104938630z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 10:49:42
last_update2017-07-07 10:49:42
depth1
children3
last_payout2017-07-14 10:49:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length303
author_reputation16,076,269,237,260
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,629,096
net_rshares1,359,573,356
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@ackza ·
Yes upvotes are not what we want to be valuable here! if we do that we will nd up like reddit or youtube where vote and view bots have alot of influence and you can BUY upvotes!
https://entresabanasyalmohadas.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/promgram.gif

Reddit could have become a steemit like system or evolved into one if they would have made karma transferable! And then reddit notes would have made karma a crypto curency ina way....
Now here on steemit, you have to PURCHASE steempower so u cant just creeate vote bots!

I see your comment here is to exlain how Direct Number of Votes is a BAD idea to base the rewards on!

Number of Votes should NEVER mean ANYTHINg because evenif we could prove that one human is one vote, we would have voting blocks and political parties promoting evil people !

 what about a self conscious AI do they get a vote? why not? Today on steemit if a bot has money it gets influence!

I am now off topic but rememeber 10 in the Animatrix?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTLMjHrb_w4
WOAH youtube just ffucking changed thei whole inteerface!

![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmc9766idaaZA5K3RZCqMGS4SQ8yJ1gG6Jxr7xsbEVjzUa/image.png)

And so we shoul worry about votiing bots becoming self aware instead of other humans hahaha

MONEY is the way you ENSURE that people cant just vote bot! because WHO is gonna spend their money on a vote bot just for votees when u can leeave it in your own steemit account and upvote ur posts this way anyway 

i think we should get interest in these topics by bringing up AI and the Animatrix ideas of robts creating their own cities and dominating financial markets hahaha

http://i.imgur.com/nwKEp7k.gif
properties (22)
authorackza
permlinkre-fuzzyvest-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t005625778z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"image":["https://entresabanasyalmohadas.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/promgram.gif","https://img.youtube.com/vi/cTLMjHrb_w4/0.jpg","https://steemitimages.com/DQmc9766idaaZA5K3RZCqMGS4SQ8yJ1gG6Jxr7xsbEVjzUa/image.png","http://i.imgur.com/nwKEp7k.gif"],"links":["https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTLMjHrb_w4"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 00:56:33
last_update2017-07-08 00:56:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-15 00:56:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,670
author_reputation287,776,574,693,472
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,703,523
net_rshares0
@calamus056 ·
SP is valuable because you have the power to curate content and earn monetary rewards in the process.

It's not a terrible idea, it's a good idea until there's a hard fork that addresses the self-voting issue (by increasing the incentive to curate others).
properties (22)
authorcalamus056
permlinkre-fuzzyvest-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t092224252z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 09:22:33
last_update2017-07-09 09:22:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 09:22:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length256
author_reputation5,645,464,390,253
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,845,825
net_rshares0
@rudyrun ·
Good point
properties (22)
authorrudyrun
permlinkre-fuzzyvest-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t181551086z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 18:15:51
last_update2017-07-08 18:15:51
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-15 18:15:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length10
author_reputation111,426,161,156
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,780,519
net_rshares0
@greatvideos ·
$0.08
I am looking forward for your new app rewards share app
Thanks for sharing
👍  
properties (23)
authorgreatvideos
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t105919353z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 10:59:27
last_update2017-07-09 10:59:27
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-07-16 10:59:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.061 HBD
curator_payout_value0.019 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length74
author_reputation6,696,611,383,944
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,853,075
net_rshares19,894,871,090
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz ·
Thank you, still waiting on the key information but hopefully I can find some time to experiment more and perhaps the solution will come to me 😄
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-greatvideos-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t225804641z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 22:58:03
last_update2017-07-09 22:58:03
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-16 22:58:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length144
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,921,483
net_rshares808,187,525
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@greatvideos · (edited)
I wish you good 🍀 
Keep it up 👆
properties (22)
authorgreatvideos
permlinkre-personz-re-greatvideos-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170710t004311584z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-10 00:43:18
last_update2017-07-10 00:44:33
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-17 00:43:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length31
author_reputation6,696,611,383,944
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,928,782
net_rshares0
@haphazard-hstead ·
$0.06
I wonder how you will handle someone setting up another account to upvote themselves, or groups of people agreeing to upvote each other. I don't have any issue with people upvoting their own post. I think people should have to **pay to upvote their own comment**, just like a post promotion, because it changes the rank in a comment stream. I have, once or twice, upvoted my own comment to rank in higher in a comment stream. It didn't seem right that I was rewarding myself for increasing my visibility.
👍  
properties (23)
authorhaphazard-hstead
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t021332446z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 02:13:30
last_update2017-07-07 02:13:30
depth1
children29
last_payout2017-07-14 02:13:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.044 HBD
curator_payout_value0.014 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length504
author_reputation36,666,374,575,794
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,591,826
net_rshares13,065,779,373
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@elfspice · (edited)
We are not seeking to do this, and the main beneficiaries of disabling self voting will be minnows, who will then instead be able to use their votes as part of their engagement strategy. Self-Circle-Jerk takes a far more advanced bot than we have made at this point. But it's a start.

I agree that getting paid to promote yourself is wrong! That's the whole point!
properties (22)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t040341001z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:03:42
last_update2017-07-07 04:05:27
depth2
children28
last_payout2017-07-14 04:03:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length365
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,599,894
net_rshares0
@fuzzyvest ·
Lol...bots bots bots. Will u care about how unreasonable this is?

Bots armies of fucking bots...and u guys are attacking self voting. What a waste of time.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorfuzzyvest
permlinkre-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t111137278z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:11:39
last_update2017-07-07 11:11:39
depth3
children6
last_payout2017-07-14 11:11:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length156
author_reputation16,076,269,237,260
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,630,872
net_rshares1,327,972,051
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@haphazard-hstead ·
It will be interesting to see how it plays out. Steemit is such a complex ecosystem now that prediction of consequences seems less practical than testing and adjusting. It would be nice to see some analyses afterwards showing whether the planned effects are actually occurring. I appreciate all the experimentation that goes on here!
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorhaphazard-hstead
permlinkre-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t042849681z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:28:48
last_update2017-07-07 04:28:48
depth3
children14
last_payout2017-07-14 04:28:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length333
author_reputation36,666,374,575,794
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,601,680
net_rshares3,338,333,664
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@lexiconical · (edited)
$0.96
*"I agree that getting paid to promote yourself is wrong! That's the whole point!"*

Why? You do realize where the value of Steem comes from, right? People investing money into it?

I'm confused, do you think it's difficult to create a second account and send Steem there to vote for yourself? There is no barrier of technical knowledge here.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorlexiconical
permlinkre-elfspice-re-haphazard-hstead-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t042900689z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:29:12
last_update2017-07-07 04:35:33
depth3
children5
last_payout2017-07-14 04:29:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.721 HBD
curator_payout_value0.236 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length342
author_reputation183,198,168,434,738
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,601,706
net_rshares205,363,347,303
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@happymoneyman ·
Through the eyes of a friendly hard-working minnow...
I invested my savings with hopes I could upvote my own post and gain visibility. 
I'd have no incentive to buy Steem if I wasn't trying to buy visibility. 
If I had less visibility my incentive to create content would go down. 
If I wasn't creating content I wouldn't be active in the community. 

In short without being able to upvote my own posts, my incentive would be to buy Steem tokens on the open market and sit on the sidelines. 

On the other hand, it does feel spammy to upvote my own comments. 
I put in little work to generate my comments. 
I comment because my incentive is to build relationships. 

My proposal is to let me pay for the opportunity to upvote my own posts with the hope I will gain visibility for my work. 
Don't let me upvote my comments because I'm not providing the same high value and I'm already incentivized by making friends. 

Cheers. Thanks for your thoughts.
properties (22)
authorhappymoneyman
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170711t223140251z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-11 22:31:39
last_update2017-07-11 22:31:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-18 22:31:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length951
author_reputation103,128,936,267,400
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,162,216
net_rshares0
@intelliguy · (edited)
$0.19
I've resteemed this for exposure. I don't know if I like it or dislike it yet.

I think the idea is good, but the possible workarounds are endless, which could penalize small new users who are trying to buy STEEM to power their accounts so they upvote their own posts and get noticed.

In order for this to work these same new users will have to be using the promoted feed instead, and the various whale upvote services.  (Or spend a long time getting a following through commenting, etc).

I don't know. I'm on the fence.

By the way, there was an extensive commentary on this subject on an old blog post I wrote 14 days ago. I'm not spamming the link... (it already received its payout)

Look through the 127 comments on this exact same subject about how people feel.

https://steemit.com/steemit/@intelliguy/to-vote-yourself-up-or-not-to-vote-yourself-up-that-s-the-question
👍  
properties (23)
authorintelliguy
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t050447540z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1","links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@intelliguy/to-vote-yourself-up-or-not-to-vote-yourself-up-that-s-the-question"]}
created2017-07-07 05:04:27
last_update2017-07-07 05:47:12
depth1
children21
last_payout2017-07-14 05:04:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.139 HBD
curator_payout_value0.046 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length877
author_reputation62,276,657,564,898
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,604,317
net_rshares40,109,826,977
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@elfspice · (edited)
I posit that in fact, this default is damaging to new accounts in the light of the greatly accelerated rate of vote power decay. They can't then send votes to other accounts to build up their fanbase, and that's the 100% most important factor in growing an account, I have proven it once with my @l0k1 account, making at least 15000SP over 6 months of networking and engagement, and I plan to prove it again with this new account, it will only take a couple of months to see that my strategy is the most effective.

BTW, don't confuse resteeming and linkdropping in a relevant discussion with self-voting. These two ways of promoting yourself do not take away rewards from the pool nor do they (usually) conflict with the keeping of discussions on topic.
properties (22)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-intelliguy-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t073629291z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["l0k1"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 07:36:33
last_update2017-07-07 07:37:48
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 07:36:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length754
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,615,068
net_rshares0
@personz ·
Thanks for the link, I will check it out.

I'm not sure the new users argument has any weight. A minnow self voting their own post will have minimal effect. The best way to get noticed is to comment on other people's posts.

But the worksarounds, sure they are a problem too. I'm thinking more about it now and will have more to say on it soon, it's the best hole in the plan 😉
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-intelliguy-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t094053805z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 09:40:54
last_update2017-07-07 09:40:54
depth2
children13
last_payout2017-07-14 09:40:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length377
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,623,856
net_rshares0
@intelliguy ·
$0.21
* Minnow makes new account.  Worth under $50 SP

* Minnow makes comments, makes a post, gets unnoticed since he doesn't have a lot of followers.

* Minnow buys $2500 worth of STEEM and powers up his account.

* Minnow creates new post, and votes up himself.  While looking under the "new" feed, people notice this post is already voted well above 25 cents and wonder why.  They read the post, and upvote it too.

When this happens, it encourages those tho can afford it to buy STEEM to power up.  We want that..
👍  
properties (23)
authorintelliguy
permlinkre-personz-re-intelliguy-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t122055721z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 12:20:33
last_update2017-07-07 12:20:33
depth3
children12
last_payout2017-07-14 12:20:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.173 HBD
curator_payout_value0.037 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length511
author_reputation62,276,657,564,898
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,636,866
net_rshares45,992,601,600
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@rycharde ·
$0.08
Self-voting and clique-voting (aka circle jerks) can never be wholly eliminated, but rules can be put in place to make it less effective *compared to the overall aim of max social utility* - assuming that is the primary objective and Steem price is the manifestation of that objective. 
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorrycharde
permlinkre-intelliguy-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t050447540z-201779t221850358z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"app":"chainbb/0.3","format":"markdown+html","tags":[]}
created2017-07-09 15:19:09
last_update2017-07-09 15:19:09
depth2
children5
last_payout2017-07-16 15:19:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.070 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length286
author_reputation19,101,504,594,449
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries
0.
accountchainbb
weight1,500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,878,262
net_rshares23,132,187,413
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@personz ·
It seems silly but I think there actually is some disagreement on that assumption, that the aspect to maximize is social utility. I think for some people the investment (or rather return on it) aspect is the most important.

Perhaps this should be the topic of another post, it's coming up a lot.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-rycharde-re-intelliguy-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-201779t221850358z-20170709t230603275z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 23:06:03
last_update2017-07-09 23:06:03
depth3
children4
last_payout2017-07-16 23:06:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length296
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,922,089
net_rshares1,914,984,497
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@iplazzy · (edited)
$0.12
These changes are interesting. Thank you for writing this up. While being relatively new to Steemit and having only just posted an article for the <b>first</b> time today, I already feel like Steemit is on uneasy ground when it comes to this self-voting stuff.

I've seen a lot of opinions on the topic representing a few sides. Personally, I think this update is great – if self-upvoting is false by default, it basically requires you to stop and consider why an upvote is necessary before checking it to true – instead of just doing it automatically and leaving no room for further thought.

Do I think people NEED to be considerate about self-upvotes? I don't know. But, I do believe the following objective you/you guys are working on is pretty interesting.

<blockquote>Engaging the community to promote the idea of voluntary refusal to self vote.</blockquote>

It's not simply a promotion of voluntary refusal to self-vote, it's effectively promoting the discourse of an honor system(s) on Steemit. And <b><i>honor</i></b> is a pretty darn good thing, right?
👍  ,
properties (23)
authoriplazzy
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170706t234421304z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-06 23:44:39
last_update2017-07-06 23:48:24
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-07-13 23:44:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.090 HBD
curator_payout_value0.027 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,064
author_reputation40,824,314,294
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,580,751
net_rshares25,621,771,064
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@personz ·
$0.02
> Personally, I think this update is great – if self-upvoting is false by default, it basically requires you to stop and consider why an upvote is necessary before checking it to true – instead of just doing it automatically and leaving no room for further thought.

Exactly the point, well put summary.

> It's not simply a promotion of voluntary refusal to self-vote, it's effectively promoting the discourse of an honor system(s) on Steemit. And honor is a pretty darn good thing, right?

There could be an argument that honor in this sense could work for your own self interest, as it might increase your reputation, garner followers and ultimately votes. But if self voting is easier and very effective in the short term, we are going to see it I think.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-iplazzy-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t111021580z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:10:21
last_update2017-07-07 11:10:21
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 11:10:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.019 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length758
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,630,773
net_rshares5,645,330,166
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@knircky ·
$0.16
This feature had pissed me off quite a bit. Thank god it's off.
👍  
properties (23)
authorknircky
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t045152758z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:51:51
last_update2017-07-07 04:51:51
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-07-14 04:51:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.118 HBD
curator_payout_value0.038 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length63
author_reputation212,905,587,244,262
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,603,381
net_rshares33,692,254,661
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@calamus056 ·
$0.02
Couldn't agree more, maybe they should even get rid of the checkbox as well.
👍  
properties (23)
authorcalamus056
permlinkre-knircky-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t072733187z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 07:27:42
last_update2017-07-09 07:27:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 07:27:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length76
author_reputation5,645,464,390,253
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,838,057
net_rshares5,914,691,405
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz ·
😊
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-knircky-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t111115161z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:11:15
last_update2017-07-07 11:11:15
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 11:11:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,630,845
net_rshares0
@knowledge1 · (edited)
$0.12
I had to say this.

While I don’t encourage self-voting, I definitely don’t think it’s right to look at someone who self-votes as a criminal and flag that person. All of us are here to make money, and we all choose our own path to achieve our goal.
 
Some of us who understand that the health of the community is important, make sure we follow the etiquette that such a community demands. But when people from all backgrounds are ENCOURAGED to sign up, it’s not right to degrade/demotivate them purely on the basis of self-voting.

I have come across many wonderful people who self-vote, even those that are doing everything they can for this community. By flagging such people, we are only harming the community.

As we all agree that self-voting does not serve the purpose of Steemit, we should be looking at other options:

-	**Restricting the number of self-votes per day, OR**
-	**Completely removing the self-voting option** 

Look outside the Steemit doors and see what’s happening. People talk about Steemit as a way of earning money from comments and posts. People are flocking in by the thousands each day – hoping to make some dollars. 

Please don’t misread or misinterpret what I wish to convey. I am NOT AGAINST RULES. All I’m saying is that it will help if things are done by not hurting anyone's self-respect. 

If someone is behaving in an untoward manner or posting stuff that should not be posted – deal with them – because inappropriate behavior is not acceptable anywhere. 

I hope you don’t mind a minnow jumping in with opinions,  but I think the *flagging* option should be reconsidered.
👍  
properties (23)
authorknowledge1
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170710t103539470z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-10 10:34:21
last_update2017-07-10 10:38:45
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-07-17 10:34:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.108 HBD
curator_payout_value0.012 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,611
author_reputation310,988,902,151
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,971,282
net_rshares33,337,351,556
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz ·
No I don't think "criminal" is appropriate either, but it is selfish, and a kind of selfish activity that is not aligned with the goal of some benefit for all. For example, previously because of curation rewards it was win-win to vote for someone else. Now we have win-lose, a zero sum game if we self vote too much.

Perhaps etiquette and social norms will be enough to encourage restraint in self voting by and large, and I feel that flagging some users will add to a culture of this. I don't think flagging self votes is harmful especially when we decide to only flag those making the most. We aim to do this until there is a blockchain level solution in the form of a hardfork, or until we are satisfied either it's not effective or has had it's effect.

I very much appreciate you taking the time to post, especially as a minnow. But flagging is always an option and I defend its usage.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-knowledge1-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170710t120923695z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-10 12:09:24
last_update2017-07-10 12:09:24
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-17 12:09:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length891
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,978,977
net_rshares3,432,984,715
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@knowledge1 ·
$0.06
Being a minnow myself, my opinion is based on the fact that *flagging* may be demotivating and hurting. I'm placing myself in other minnows' shoes.

However, I also understand and appreciate that your opinions/decisions will be based on your experience here, having seen thousands of us enter and abuse the platform.

Thank you for being so patient with your response. :)
👍  
properties (23)
authorknowledge1
permlinkre-personz-re-knowledge1-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170710t132430648z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-10 13:24:30
last_update2017-07-10 13:24:30
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-17 13:24:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.046 HBD
curator_payout_value0.015 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length371
author_reputation310,988,902,151
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,985,659
net_rshares17,206,374,996
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@krnel ·
$0.11
Nice move! I didn't vote on my own comments before, didn't start now, and I stopped voting on my own posts before HF19 came out. I was going to make a post today called "Only-Upvote-Others-Athon" to emphasize that it's others that should be evaluating our own content, not ourselves. Peace.
👍  
properties (23)
authorkrnel
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170710t174804020z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-10 17:48:06
last_update2017-07-10 17:48:06
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-07-17 17:48:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.080 HBD
curator_payout_value0.026 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length290
author_reputation1,343,547,270,297,082
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,012,943
net_rshares30,462,932,427
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz ·
Thanks @krnel!
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-krnel-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170710t183259274z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["krnel"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-10 18:33:00
last_update2017-07-10 18:33:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-17 18:33:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length14
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,017,243
net_rshares0
@leprechaun · (edited)
$0.05
This is just elitist.  Anyone who knows how to code and has extra steem can create a self voting bot and another account to vote up himself 100%.  This change shuts out minnows from self voting.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorleprechaun
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t004855299z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 00:49:03
last_update2017-07-07 00:49:57
depth1
children15
last_payout2017-07-14 00:49:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.037 HBD
curator_payout_value0.010 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length194
author_reputation43,003,961,497,973
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,585,515
net_rshares10,299,932,276
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@ackza ·
haha serioulsy man donttake this as directed at you! But i do have to say this about ur misconceptionabout how some hacker can just "cheat" and upvote his own posts with a second account, here is why thats completely wwrong: 
This isnt reddit or youtube...NOONE can just creeate a steemit upvote botthat has ANY value UNLESS THEY ACTUALLY SPEND MONEY to power it up it with steempower!!!

Quantity of upvotes doesnt do anythng! U can have 1000 accounts and upvote alll your posts and u wont make a dollar if all those accounts dt have any steempower! u have to BUY the steempower! u cant just get something for nothing here on steemit!
"anyone who knows how to code" wtf ??? this hasnothing to do with anything! you act like learing to code is omee magical unattanable skill that you can't learn in a week on your own if you just have the motvation!

butknowing how to code doesnt mean you can just cheat on steemit....

Voting yourself up 100 percent doesnt help you at all unless you put steempower inthat new acount! and where does that money coome from to buy that stempower>?? Oh you think they can hack theur way into steempower!?! come on! your argument is so bad, and you seem too have people agreeing with  you?!?!

I actually agree with you with your intent,but u dont seem to realize this change doest shut out anyone, because all this change does  is make self voting non automatic, but u can still self vote! 

dont worry about what some entitled dolphins and pre whales think, theeres alot of spoiled entitled brats who seem to have saved their way up into a position of power but who never owned a real business or know about fundamental free market forces, and its sad!

You can still self vote, all minnowws canstill self vote!

also ii need to remin people that MOST people joining steemit HAVE some money intheir life..they CHOOSE to be minows because they could all get a loan and buy someesteempower and become olphins if they actually had faith in steemit!

only those who believe insteemit get rewarded1 an those who try to earn their way to becoming a whale, like me,  I have been hard working enough to actually get to where I am and i did it all in matter of months! i jooined late march with $0 steem was 10 ccents and i should have saved every steem i had back then! 

People who save their steem are smart and DESERVE to make money here!

Minnows who refuse to buy iinto steem with their money or who CONSTANTLY cash out and refuse to powerup with their profits, they will loose out and i just get mad when they start complaining about the curation and upvoting system

they feeel like hey mised out on Bitcoin AND they missed ethereum AND they missed steem going up from 10 ccents to $2 and so now they are trying to find a way to get a bigger piece of the pie conerning the rewards pool!

Sorry but whoever is making money on steemitwith posts an comments deserves evvery peny and if minows wat more iinfluence tey should stop being minnows and eitheer 
A. get a loan and buy some steempower 
B. use some of theeir own mony from their real life job to buy steempower
C. Sell some of their stuff they dont need to buy steempower
D. FInd some work on #steemgigs of fivver or on craigslist por join ubeer or lyft rent a car an start driving and save up some money to buy steempowerTHAt way
E. Start posting high quality posts everyda in a series that people actually respond to, ccreate steemit videos or something unique and actyaly earn income on steemit!

An thats not even mentioning all the infinite ways you can amke money in real life or online and buy stempower INCLUDNINg making money here on steemit!

there is NO excuse for minnows! Nooone  has to be a minow! everone here can save up some money anbuy $1000 insteempower! I have helped africans in developing nations who can barely find a job intheir village, to make $1000 off a single post! so dont tell me u cant save up steempower! (and this isnt directed at you @leprrechaun im just ranting here :D )
properties (22)
authorackza
permlinkre-leprechaun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t000538790z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemgigs","steemdev"],"users":["leprrechaun"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 00:05:45
last_update2017-07-08 00:05:45
depth2
children5
last_payout2017-07-15 00:05:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,994
author_reputation287,776,574,693,472
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,700,455
net_rshares0
@leprechaun ·
Can you help me make $1,000 on a single post?  😇
👍  
properties (23)
authorleprechaun
permlinkre-ackza-re-leprechaun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t025929367z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 02:59:33
last_update2017-07-09 02:59:33
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-07-16 02:59:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length48
author_reputation43,003,961,497,973
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,820,387
net_rshares1,497,859,884
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@lexiconical ·
*"Voting yourself up 100 percent doesnt help you at all unless you put steempower inthat new acount! "*

Which is exactly what everyone would do. The only delay is a one-time power down.
👍  
properties (23)
authorlexiconical
permlinkre-ackza-re-leprechaun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t035820460z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 03:58:33
last_update2017-07-08 03:58:33
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-07-15 03:58:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length186
author_reputation183,198,168,434,738
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,714,790
net_rshares748,929,942
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@elfspice ·
'Anyone who knows how to code' is a pretty narrow criteria. It certainly does not to apply to at least 90% of new users.

This is @l0k1 in a new, minnow account, by the way. I get 4 votes a day before I have nearly no power in this account. A self vote on 4 posts a day and I can't support anyone else's work. As the account history of @l0k1 will amply demonstrate, I built up nearly 15,000 steem power by supporting other people's work over a 6 month period. Anyone who was following my advice about engaging with the audience, which does not include self voting, also has massively improved their financial situation.
👍  
properties (23)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-leprechaun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t040252371z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["l0k1"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:02:54
last_update2017-07-07 04:02:54
depth2
children5
last_payout2017-07-14 04:02:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length619
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,599,833
net_rshares485,031,510
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ackza · (edited)
EXACTLY! U build up steempower by SUPPPORTING OTHERS!
i have beeen TRYING to tell all these selfish people "Ask not what steemit can do for you,ask what you can do for steemit" 

be Service to Others not Service to Self

When u are worrie about your own account balance peopel can tell and they get turned off!

When u are AONLy worrying about helping others, peopel like that! and u will benefit yourself!

Yes man THAN you for ALSO explaining how a self vote from a second account wont do much unles that second account has stempower which SOOMEONE has to buy! U cant just create vote bots like reddit or view bots like youtube! To make money here on steemit SOMEONE with steempower has to upvote u! and steempower isnt free like karma on reddit , its like bitcoin, noonees gonna jst give out free bitcoins anymore!  same with steem!

anyway yes PLEASE getthis through your foollowers heads that ENGAGING WITH THE AUDIENCE is what helpes you! upvote al ur commenters and respons to them with upvoting minnows walls and showing them you did it! like this!
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmUpo2rKtkVXRmGYhx9BkgcLJ5EK8YvThwCeXKSMc7gUxp/image.png)

for anyone watching, see how i just upvoted all of @elfspice rrecent posts and took a screenshot and showed him? And my upvotes are woorth 1 cent at current power so att least its something!
to a minnow givving them a few cents per post is great! it shows that things are happening at least!

Now, I just followed you! ccuz i see i have already been following your other accountt l0ki! so bravo and keep spreading the light of trth to brn through the fog of ignorance!

toooo many people here who thin they haveiit all figured out!

This aiint no democracy and it aint no commune! I wish minnows would understand the perspective of whales who SACRIFICED MILLIONS of dollars that they COULD have made with ethereum, JUST to support steemit, and they get ATTACKED for fucking making a TINY but of money when they COUL have made 1000 times as much with ethereum! And these minnows have the NERVE to coplain about whales making "too much money" ??? I know u are an oldschool whale who joined a year ago so u must have alot to say about this! u should explainto more minnows how much whales have lost from NOT cashing out and just invsting in ethrum..JUST to suppport steemit.....and how if u have the steempower YOU DESERVE the money EVENif u have to self vote! they are YOUR upvotes and u deserve to do whatevr ru want with em!

No good deed goes un punished!
properties (22)
authorackza
permlinkre-elfspice-re-leprechaun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t001428675z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["elfspice"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmUpo2rKtkVXRmGYhx9BkgcLJ5EK8YvThwCeXKSMc7gUxp/image.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 00:14:36
last_update2017-07-08 00:18:12
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-07-15 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,503
author_reputation287,776,574,693,472
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,700,974
net_rshares0
@lexiconical · (edited)
*"It certainly does not to apply to at least 90% of new users."*

But, I'm pretty sure 90% of new users know how to make a second account. In fact, I reckon 100% of them do, and I bet they can even click the transfer button too, or run a delegation script... rendering any self-voting witch hunt completely pointless.

How do you plan to address users simply creating another account?
👍  
properties (23)
authorlexiconical
permlinkre-elfspice-re-leprechaun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t043605062z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:36:18
last_update2017-07-07 04:37:00
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-07-14 04:36:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length384
author_reputation183,198,168,434,738
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,602,229
net_rshares727,547,265
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@fuzzyvest ·
LOL...so true. Is this a steemspeak initiative? I have heard many times people talking about upvote bots and even heard this ats-david guy from there is bitching. 

Just remember one thing here...everone circle jerks in here in some way. Pitch Forks will change nothing. :/
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorfuzzyvest
permlinkre-leprechaun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t112352820z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:23:54
last_update2017-07-07 11:23:54
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 11:23:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length273
author_reputation16,076,269,237,260
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,631,866
net_rshares556,182,960
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@lykencrypto ·
$0.31
@fuzzyvest can you tell me what happened?

TRANSFER	
From	lawrence-lyken
To	whaleshares
Quantity	100 BEYONDBIT
Memo	U https://steemit.com/steemit/@lykencrypto/reached-usd7-000-in-steem-and-buying-more-bill-gates-says-bitcoin-is-better-than-currency-thank-you-steemit
Fee	1 WHALESHARE
👍  
properties (23)
authorlykencrypto
permlinkre-fuzzyvest-re-leprechaun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t122012279z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["fuzzyvest"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@lykencrypto/reached-usd7-000-in-steem-and-buying-more-bill-gates-says-bitcoin-is-better-than-currency-thank-you-steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 12:20:12
last_update2017-07-09 12:20:12
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 12:20:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.231 HBD
curator_payout_value0.076 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length283
author_reputation31,967,323,529,462
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,859,864
net_rshares76,607,594,810
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz ·
That's a contradiction. If someone has extra Steem to have an effect they are not a minnow. Minnows are shut out from self voting _as it stands_ in that the effect is so small as to be negligible.

The issue of multiple accounts though is valid and we are considering it.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-leprechaun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t110412154z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:04:12
last_update2017-07-07 11:04:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 11:04:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length271
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,630,267
net_rshares727,547,265
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@lexiconical ·
$0.15
*"And ultimately a hard fork change removing self voting as an option from the Steem blockchain"*

Not productive. Will simply punish the low level users. All large abusers will simply recreate sock puppets, delegate, vote trade. I do not support this.

*"However we feel it is widely held, we certainly do, that these rewards should be awarded by peers, not the commenter."*

I'm concerned this is turning into a witch hunt. I don't feel this premise has been proven.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorlexiconical
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t042711355z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:27:24
last_update2017-07-07 04:27:24
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-07-14 04:27:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.130 HBD
curator_payout_value0.015 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length468
author_reputation183,198,168,434,738
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,601,584
net_rshares31,416,787,545
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@personz ·
$0.04
How will it punish low level users? For low level users they have only had any kind of self voting effect at all since hard fork 19, which is a matter of weeks.

Whether the premise is convincing or not this is not a witch hunt. The idea is to be only minorly discriminate in flagging (if we end up going down that route).
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-lexiconical-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t103827007z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 10:38:27
last_update2017-07-07 10:38:27
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 10:38:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.032 HBD
curator_payout_value0.010 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length322
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,628,265
net_rshares9,579,420,932
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@lexiconical · (edited)
I think this is a better reply to your first question than I will generate here in an ad-hoc fashion:

https://steemit.com/steem/@sean-king/life-ain-t-fair-and-neither-is-steem-deal-with-it-and-self-vote-away
properties (22)
authorlexiconical
permlinkre-personz-re-lexiconical-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t150619292z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@sean-king/life-ain-t-fair-and-neither-is-steem-deal-with-it-and-self-vote-away"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 15:06:33
last_update2017-07-07 15:06:39
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 15:06:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length208
author_reputation183,198,168,434,738
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,652,621
net_rshares0
@maochitse ·
@personz interesting to note upcoming changes
👍  
properties (23)
authormaochitse
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t080145453z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["personz"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 08:01:54
last_update2017-07-09 08:01:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 08:01:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length45
author_reputation1,462,962,999,395
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,840,395
net_rshares2,690,415,057
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@miriador ·
Hello all. Some people give themselves a lot of self-vote, and I struggle and I'm bothering myself, and I do not understand why my posts are not more visible. I have one vote, a maximum of three for each post, either in Romanian or in English. And I'm really working hard. I write in Romanian, and I hired a student to translate into English. I do not necessarily care about money, and even spend money on translations, but I would love my articles not to be read by myself and two or three others. Do you think you can help me with some advice ... @personz or anyone else who sees this comment.
properties (22)
authormiriador
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t082926901z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["personz"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 08:29:27
last_update2017-07-09 08:29:27
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-07-16 08:29:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length595
author_reputation3,817,091,629
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,842,334
net_rshares0
@personz ·
My advice on gaining more exposure for your work is to comment meaningfully on posts by authors in your interest area or that you admire. It's tough at the start but hopefully you'll get there.
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-miriador-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t230029871z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 23:00:30
last_update2017-07-09 23:00:30
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-16 23:00:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length193
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,921,666
net_rshares0
@miriador ·
I understand. thank you for the advice. So I will.
properties (22)
authormiriador
permlinkre-personz-re-miriador-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170710t064112157z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-10 06:41:09
last_update2017-07-10 06:41:09
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-17 06:41:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length50
author_reputation3,817,091,629
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,954,923
net_rshares0
@preparedwombat ·
$0.04
>With @smackdown.kitty flag self voted comments with a 1%, incrementing for each self vote recorded up to but no more than negating the self vote

Care to translate that into English?
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorpreparedwombat
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t052030831z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["smackdown.kitty"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 05:20:30
last_update2017-07-07 05:20:30
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 05:20:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.031 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length183
author_reputation863,645,778,272,832
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,605,438
net_rshares8,749,512,660
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@personz ·
Sorry I was trying to keep it brief but maybe it's too compact 😉

The kitty does the following:

1. Every 10 minutes look at the new votes on comments and puts them in a list
2. Of those votes, it keeps the votes which are _self votes_ on the list and discards the rest
3. It then discards any self votes from accounts which have less than 1000 SP, i.e. red fish
4. For each self voter it checks it's own database (or catabase 😂) to see how many previous self votes are on record. It decides to add a flag of N %, where N is total number of self votes it has witnesses since coming to life
5. Before it actually flags though it makes sure that N % will not have an effect greater than the self vote itself, i.e. it will only counter the self vote, and not flag with power greater than that

I hope that's a bit more understandable.

Please bear in mind that this is the old plan though. We are now proposing just flagging the top few self votes per day.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-preparedwombat-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t093048455z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 09:30:48
last_update2017-07-07 09:30:48
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 09:30:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length953
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,623,084
net_rshares727,547,265
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@preparedwombat ·
$0.12
I just don't see why anyone would think that self-voting is wrong in any way.

*In the short-term* it makes perfect sense for someone to do so even if *in the long term* it may work against them since every self-vote you do means less curation and less engagement with other members. People who do nothing but self-vote will fail here in the long run.

But I see nothing at all wrong with some voting for yourself as long as you do some curation and engagement too.

For what it's worth, I think that  Project Smackdown is a solution in search of a problem.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorpreparedwombat
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t052917507z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 05:29:18
last_update2017-07-07 05:29:18
depth1
children5
last_payout2017-07-14 05:29:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.089 HBD
curator_payout_value0.027 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length557
author_reputation863,645,778,272,832
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,606,059
net_rshares25,254,543,746
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@personz ·
I think you answered your own question - self voting is not beneficial to Steem in the long term (or even medium term I would suggest).

> For what it's worth, I think that Project Smackdown is a solution in search of a problem.

Hardly, the problem is very clear - self voting! As we've laid out, it is counter to the purpose of Steem which is distributing Steem by the votes of others. The problem is that since HF 19 the old incentives against which discouraged self voting have been significantly weakened. We are looking for solutions to that if it was not clear to you.
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-preparedwombat-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t104313895z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 10:43:15
last_update2017-07-07 10:43:15
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-07-14 10:43:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length575
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,628,642
net_rshares0
@preparedwombat · (edited)
$0.03
I said that in the long term it's not good for *them*, self-voting  is not a good long term strategy for *members*. That's very different than thinking that it's bad for Steem/Steemit.

Oh, it very clear to me what you're doing. I just think  you're wrong.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpreparedwombat
permlinkre-personz-re-preparedwombat-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t122620965z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 12:26:21
last_update2017-07-07 17:21:39
depth3
children3
last_payout2017-07-14 12:26:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.031 HBD
curator_payout_value0.002 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length256
author_reputation863,645,778,272,832
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,637,355
net_rshares7,487,167,702
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@roused ·
$0.03
Personz as I read through the comments and your patient & thoughtful answers I'm impressed.  I'm so new I hadn't yet voted for a "witness", but you just got my first witness vote. ;-) & my upvote for this post & follow  

Thanks for all your effort! @roused
👍  
properties (23)
authorroused
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170712t183647908z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["roused"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-12 18:36:51
last_update2017-07-12 18:36:51
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-07-19 18:36:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.024 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length257
author_reputation44,639,808,169,282
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,255,396
net_rshares9,254,354,354
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz ·
Wow thank you! 😊  I appreciate you voting for me as witness and following this discussion here.
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-roused-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170713t202659576z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-13 20:26:57
last_update2017-07-13 20:26:57
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-20 20:26:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length95
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,379,794
net_rshares0
@rtdcs ·
$0.04
Good. This default setting had already bothered me a lot.

Thanks for sharing!
👍  
properties (23)
authorrtdcs
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t130707418z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 13:07:09
last_update2017-07-07 13:07:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 13:07:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.037 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length78
author_reputation19,449,784,090,468
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,640,876
net_rshares8,556,763,088
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@rudyrun · (edited)
$0.02
I am just a red fish 
So I have practically no power 

But let me explain some thoughts
Fact is that the majority of our community is consuming much more than 10 articles a day but they have only the "payment" for 10 articles 

The rest of the "journalists "get not payed anything for there work

Let me suggest a small basic income on the base of how many community members are reading the article and on top the possibility to upvote 

In the moment it happens every day that I spend my votes 
But I read more even if I want to vote I have nothing left 
That means that the articles I read later ,have no chance of being upvoted 

Please take this in consideration
Wouldn't it be nice if we could see how many people reading our articles maybe we could have this info included
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorrudyrun
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t044051163z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 04:40:51
last_update2017-07-07 04:52:12
depth1
children3
last_payout2017-07-14 04:40:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.020 HBD
curator_payout_value0.004 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length778
author_reputation111,426,161,156
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,602,560
net_rshares5,665,961,275
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@ackza ·
your idea is trash! You have no idea how this works! sorry for getting angry and calling your idea trash, but i am not calling you trash, you are a smart personjust for even being on steemit!
but your idea is just trash!
i shouldnt even have to explain why your idea is trash but it REAKS of socialism and a desire to FORCE income equality!

You complain about not having any upvote power left?? Then  you should set your upvote slider to under 10 percent so u save your upvote power!
I am guessing you dont even have enogh steempower yet to even have the slider!
So u should maybe get more experience here before you start complaining and making requests!

You are simply confusing the community and distrating minows and making minnows believe there is some great injustice ggoing on!

"Fact is that the majority of our community is consuming much more than 10 articles a day but they have only the "payment" for 10 articles"
NOT a fact and it would help your own reputation to not soo casually call something a FACT hahah

that is NOT a fact, you simply dont have the slider bbaryet to control how much of your voting power is usd on each upvote!
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmbpMt758drTqWnEJVierKyEk4dqaL5mghU7bbzPNsA2s9/image.png)
So i you actually believed in steemit you would have bought steempower by now! But no you refuse to invest any of your own mony into steemit! And im sorry but I can garuntee you that you have something you can sell or u probobly have somemoney saved up and if you WANTD you could sell it and buy some steempower!
Its ok if u work hard you can earnthe steempower! but if you just buy the steempower you will NOTregret it! youll end up making your money back very fast 

BUT MY POINT is simple! You simplyare not aware of the FACTthat yOU CAN control how mich u spend on each upvote!

You can conserve your voting power and make surethat you have enough upvote money to pay ALL of the good article you read!

Also this is your OWN fault for spending all of your upvptes! Maybe you should read AL of the days stories BEFORE you decide which one to upvote!

Also steemit already IS a basic income system! but uou have to WORk for it!

NEXT problem i have with your comment: Theese people u call "journalists" sorry but theey are not all journalists! Only the ones who actually have their posts viewed and upvoted, maybe they are journalists but why do you assume that everyone who  posts news stories deserves to get paid? 

ALSO you CAN see how mny people read your articles! there is a VIEW counter in the vvery boottom right!
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmcFqHG9bX9W9WgMpARXy4qBSUDuT6tAvgty351ZztYg5Z/image.png)

This will show sometims less views than actual upvotes because many users just upvotethe story  withot even clicking onit, wwhich is good and we need to keep this system!

ANYWAY just try a little harder anyou wwiill make mney!

anyone complaining "on behalf of the community" is just complaining for themselves!

and so BEWARE of ANYONE compainng about whales making too much money! Ignore all of them!

only be around peopeel who MAKE mony!

Its about HARD WORK and LUCK has NOTHINGto do with it!

anyway please excuse my attitude and anger, i have my own problems but i get VER defensive about steemit!

it s a more perfect system thn ANYWHERE on the web!So we shouldd be PRAISINg steemit and maybe thinking of UPGRADES but Look if u have talent steemit WILL ppay you!

an if ur not aking anough money maybe u ccan change your strategy! 

ANYWAY please remmeber, if u canjust save 1000 SP, we will ALl be millionaires once steem hits $1000 !!!!!!

http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/265/e/b/_i__m_gonna_doing_internet___by_d4v1n5-d5fjd8l.gif
I LOVE you guys! thank u steemit! I will CONTINUE to save like 80 percent of all y steem as steempower!
properties (22)
authorackza
permlinkre-rudyrun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t003113028z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmbpMt758drTqWnEJVierKyEk4dqaL5mghU7bbzPNsA2s9/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmcFqHG9bX9W9WgMpARXy4qBSUDuT6tAvgty351ZztYg5Z/image.png","http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/265/e/b/_i__m_gonna_doing_internet___by_d4v1n5-d5fjd8l.gif"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 00:31:18
last_update2017-07-08 00:31:18
depth2
children2
last_payout2017-07-15 00:31:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,806
author_reputation287,776,574,693,472
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,702,040
net_rshares0
@rudyrun ·
Thx for your reaction at least you read it
My point is that thousands of people trying out every day if steem works
I want to find out if it works without investing a lot of money or is it a pyramid game where the early players make the money with the investment of the later guys
Only if I can be shure that someone normal with no money can make it in a fair system ,I can invest or tell a friend to join 
I believe there are much more who have not got this slider 
At least if the system functions then there should be more guys without slider
Anyway let's hope you are not wright and the system works without investment because if half of the people just loose there investments so that a few can make a fortune that's not a system that's called scam
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorrudyrun
permlinkre-ackza-re-rudyrun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t045005459z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 04:50:06
last_update2017-07-08 04:50:06
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-15 04:50:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length753
author_reputation111,426,161,156
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,718,157
net_rshares2,084,084,157
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@rudyrun · (edited)
An other point I want to make 
I am working on my steem development for over 14 days I am checking and learning and trying to get somewhere
But if I look at the statistics there was not one day that the statistics where right they are always false very strange
This kind of things matter when it comes to investment
An other question is why does it take more than 3 days to change from sbd to steem in your own account 
So some questions have to be sorted befor the big money will show up
Because if you want to pure speculate there is plenty of opportunities out there
Invest and shut up is not the right slogan for success 
Specially when crypto currency's are in the red for days now
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorrudyrun
permlinkre-ackza-re-rudyrun-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t053651297z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 05:36:51
last_update2017-07-08 06:01:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-15 05:36:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length686
author_reputation111,426,161,156
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,720,887
net_rshares2,625,820,932
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@saffisara ·
Great thing u do, have been waiting for this.
Upvoting urself in comments without even reading a persons post is rude I think.
U never get to know anyone that way.
properties (22)
authorsaffisara
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170712t210150383z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-12 21:01:54
last_update2017-07-12 21:01:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-19 21:01:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length163
author_reputation344,658,062,669,226
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,269,256
net_rshares0
@sc-steemit · (edited)
$0.28
# Self-voting doesn't add value to the network!
Great work @l0k1 and @personz and everyone behind this!
I stand behind you for this as I believe that self voting isn't standing for what steemit stands for. Steemit should be about adding great value instead of massive content, and self-voting doesn't add *any* value what so ever.

Punishing the top self-voting comments to the extent that they are loosing what they would earn from that vote is a good way to do it. As many point out, the comment can be good enough to deserv any possible earnings, but they shouldn't gain any benefit from voting on it by themselves.

Voting should be for finding other great content, not for self-voting.

## And no, it's not hard to make a second account
But you need to lock your steem in some way on either account, so it will be more costly to do it this way. You will need to sacrifice some of your curation power if you do it this way, cause the SP you lock in your self voting account could have been in your own account making you a more powerful curator.
#### They will loose this battle.
<center><h6>Vote @sc-steemit for [Steemit Witness](https://steemit.com/witness/@sc-steemit/witness-update-backup-nodes-security-gridcoin-supporter-and-future-ideas). 
<a href='https://steemit.com/~witnesses'><img src='https://steemitimages.com/DQmNMUctDGwFLodWPEhtsNNqX49czWPTPffReVEeWcHRwmt/vote_witness_scsteemit.PNG'></a><br />Proud Supporter of the [Cryptocurrency Gridcoin](https://www.steemit.com/trending/gridcoin)</h6></center>
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorsc-steemit
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t043307565z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["l0k1","personz","sc-steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1","image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmNMUctDGwFLodWPEhtsNNqX49czWPTPffReVEeWcHRwmt/vote_witness_scsteemit.PNG"],"links":["https://steemit.com/witness/@sc-steemit/witness-update-backup-nodes-security-gridcoin-supporter-and-future-ideas","https://steemit.com/~witnesses","https://www.steemit.com/trending/gridcoin"]}
created2017-07-07 04:33:21
last_update2017-07-07 04:39:45
depth1
children13
last_payout2017-07-14 04:33:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.211 HBD
curator_payout_value0.068 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,519
author_reputation28,448,644,499,713
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,602,004
net_rshares60,293,258,947
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@elfspice ·
That's right, the extra effort isn't the only cost, the spreading of SP around will also diminish the benefits. But people so often don't think  more than one step ahead with anything, or to the secondary outcomes after a primary outcome. This is the result of humans short lifespans and is called 'Time Preference' in Austrian economics. The effect it has on behaviour here is unquestionable, and that is why the defaults need to be changed.

BTW, I voted for your witness with @l0k1, keep up the good work :)
👍  
properties (23)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t073111317z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["l0k1"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 07:31:15
last_update2017-07-07 07:31:15
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 07:31:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length510
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,614,658
net_rshares2,558,344,947
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@fuzzyvest · (edited)
$2.81
You sure about that? 

Self voting on an average of 1 post per day was how i paid to have whaleshares built. 

This is like telling a miner...he cannot mine tokens for him or herseld and that u and the community will take away mining rights as soon as they get jealous.  Meanwhile there re real problems...like sock puppet accounts that upvote everything from a distance.

Something tells me people wont care. 

Also...what about people who are witnesses AND post. Maybe since they are earning sp from being witnesses...we just make it so they cant make money from blogging...cause how is it right they get to double dip?

See how easily this can get out of hand?
👍  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorfuzzyvest
permlinkre-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t105441968z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 10:54:45
last_update2017-07-07 11:04:03
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 10:54:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.132 HBD
curator_payout_value0.679 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length663
author_reputation16,076,269,237,260
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,629,486
net_rshares604,717,262,861
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@sc-steemit · (edited)
Well, I still think that a post/comment should be rewarded based on its value to the community. If people vote on it, it obviously have value to the community. Earning shares from the pool because you're a wealthy entity isn't what I think is good practice.

Sure, the issue has been very much more pressing since the rewards curve was flattened and the power per vote increased.

I understand your view to. But one full vote per day isn't the same as just using all your votes for voting on yourself, which is what I think is pure wrong. And there is, as you point out, more issues as sock puppet accounts to. I will reflect on this some more 👍

> Also...what about people who are witnesses AND post. Maybe since they are earning sp from being witnesses...we just make it so they cant make money from blogging...cause how is it right they get to double dip?
See how easily this can get out of hand?

## I hear you man. Thanks for your reflections as well!
You're a supporter of the community and I know you're using it for good. Maybe I should have larger trust in the greater whole? Self voting is a way to earn, but it's contradictory to what I think steemit stands for.

We need to discuss it more though 👍 
Maybe you're interested some day.
properties (22)
authorsc-steemit
permlinkre-fuzzyvest-re-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t110852657z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:09:00
last_update2017-07-07 11:34:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 11:09:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,245
author_reputation28,448,644,499,713
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,630,674
net_rshares0
@personz ·
I disagree with the term "punishing" but yes, letting our opposition be known and felt is the idea 😄

Thanks for the support!

> And no, it's not hard to make a second account
> But you need to lock your steem in some way on either account, so it will be more costly to do it this way.

To be honest this was more effective under the square rewards curve, and I think the reason @ats-david previously suggested actually rolling back hard fork 19. I'm going to consider the multiple accounts argument more. It was something we explicitly said was outside the scope of the project but it's becoming clear to me that support for this project may be contingent on an answer to this too.
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t094357477z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["ats-david"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 09:43:57
last_update2017-07-07 09:43:57
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 09:43:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length682
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,624,124
net_rshares0
@sc-steemit ·
$0.04
Fully agree. Maybe punishing isn't the word, but at least set a statement. 

This issue has arrised much more after the new rewards curve system AND a higher voting power. Many smaller witnesses where pointing this out.
👍  
properties (23)
authorsc-steemit
permlinkre-personz-re-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t111128443z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:11:42
last_update2017-07-07 11:11:42
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 11:11:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.029 HBD
curator_payout_value0.009 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length219
author_reputation28,448,644,499,713
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,630,875
net_rshares8,556,763,088
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@sean-king ·
$0.24
The ability to self-vote absolutely adds value to the system.  Specifically, it makes the Steem token more valuable.  People want to own the token, and will pay good money for it, in part because they can self-vote their content and thereby gain more influence and a larger voice within the Steem community.   Steem was never meant to be "fair". Rather it was meant to reward holders of SP with INFLUENCE, thereby increasing demand for Steem and raising its market value.  Deny SP holders this influence and all you will do is diminish the desirability and value of the Steem token itself.  That's short sighted.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorsean-king
permlinkre-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t113158196z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 11:31:57
last_update2017-07-07 11:31:57
depth2
children7
last_payout2017-07-14 11:31:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.182 HBD
curator_payout_value0.058 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length612
author_reputation84,123,051,136,467
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,632,511
net_rshares52,237,733,789
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@calamus056 · (edited)
$0.06
@sean-king You're so unbelievably wrong. Buying STEEM makes the token more valuable. Having SP gives you the ability to earn curation rewards. That's how the platform was intended. It was intended to be fair, as in that everyone would be making money. 

If you are self-voting, everyone is making less money and it becomes less "fair". The more people self-vote, the less people will earn, until everybody is earning hardly anything and the price of STEEM will drop like there's no tomorrow. It's as simple as that.
👍  
properties (23)
authorcalamus056
permlinkre-sean-king-re-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t064334585z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["sean-king"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 06:43:42
last_update2017-07-09 06:47:09
depth3
children3
last_payout2017-07-16 06:43:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.047 HBD
curator_payout_value0.015 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length515
author_reputation5,645,464,390,253
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,835,329
net_rshares15,055,578,122
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@intelliguy · (edited)
> Deny SP holders this influence and all you will do is diminish the desirability and value of the Steem token itself.

I agree with you.  I hope you and I are both wrong. :)
properties (22)
authorintelliguy
permlinkre-sean-king-re-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t125835078z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 12:58:12
last_update2017-07-07 12:58:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 12:58:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length174
author_reputation62,276,657,564,898
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,640,093
net_rshares0
@personz ·
$0.08
Yes, SP designed to reward holders with influence, and for their investment to appreciate over time. But this appreciation comes at the cost of the other purpose of Steem which you have not mentioned - distributing rewards to _other_ members, not yourself. Every token that someone allocates to themselves is necessarily not allocated socially. Steem is not simply an interest deposit where you can post any old thing and self vote to get your "dues". 

Increasing the value of the Steem token is not a simple cause and effect, it's complex. There are a lot of people bringing up the concern that self voting is in fact scammy behavior and this might actually go against adoption and the value of the coin.

Nobody is proposing to deny SP holders influence, it's pretty much gospel here. But letting their influence increase too much is not the goal either.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-sean-king-re-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t124901066z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 12:49:00
last_update2017-07-07 12:49:00
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 12:49:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.061 HBD
curator_payout_value0.020 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length857
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,639,308
net_rshares17,980,956,488
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@sc-steemit ·
That's a good point, I hear you.
I feel the need for it to be more openly discussed, this is good. 

I'm mearly expressing my view in my previous post, but my view may change as I discuss this topic. Nothing is fixed.

Thanks for your view of it, I need to think on this more 😀
properties (22)
authorsc-steemit
permlinkre-sean-king-re-sc-steemit-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t121336194z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 12:14:00
last_update2017-07-07 12:14:00
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 12:14:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length277
author_reputation28,448,644,499,713
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,636,258
net_rshares0
@sean-king ·
$0.71
I strongly disagree with the idea that self voting is wrong and should be discouraged, and I strongly would oppose any hard fork that removed it as an option.  Steem Power is valuable because it represents influence on the Steem blockchain.  More Steem Power = more influence.  The ability to self vote is one of the things that makes Steem Power influential and therefore desired and valuable.  Prohibiting self voting will make Steem less valuable than it otherwise could be. Yes, some people abuse the self-voting privilege, but the community can easily  respond  to such abuse via flagging.
👍  , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsean-king
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t001510673z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 00:15:09
last_update2017-07-07 00:15:09
depth1
children17
last_payout2017-07-14 00:15:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.538 HBD
curator_payout_value0.169 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length594
author_reputation84,123,051,136,467
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,583,075
net_rshares150,948,818,181
author_curate_reward""
vote details (12)
@avilsd ·
$0.09
If self voting is going away, so will I alongside my Steem Power. No point in supporting another Reddit. This is why I love Steemit, the freedom here compared to other sites.. but this would just piss me off endlessly.
👍  
properties (23)
authoravilsd
permlinkre-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170711t222003117z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-11 22:20:03
last_update2017-07-11 22:20:03
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-18 22:20:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.090 HBD
curator_payout_value0.003 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length218
author_reputation20,163,046,179,161
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,161,351
net_rshares27,880,666,898
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@anthonyadavisii ·
Self-voting is allowed on Reddit. In fact, your posts there are upvoted by default.

Being able to self-vote is not what makes Steem distinct and it is certainly not a merit of the platform. 

On the contrary, I believe it retards the rate of adoption by people who understands the natural bias of self and how that affects actual quality and the level of effort authors put into their work. Self voting lends to complacency (especially higher stake holders ) don't necessarily have to work as hard whereas a minnow busting their ass creating content is under rewarded. This is centralization and has the tendency to result in less diversity of content.

I have seen a ton of low effort content receive inordinate rewards because of rampant self-voting and vote-buying. Because of this and other problems, I agree with this initiative of @l0ki and @personz 100% although I am not sure of it's current state. 

To be frank, it is the nature of the self voter to oppose this because it undermines the very mechanism by which they are profiting in a manner that MANY believe is ethically questionable. They are making relatively easier money which is precisely why they don't want to level the playing field. Well, the end result is Steem is "pay to play" not unlike politics. I will say it and will say it again. Self voting is antithetical to decentralization and is why I have been apprehensive about investing any more money onto this platform and I would venture there are not only a few of us that feel the same. We are many but are voices muzzled while the voices of self voters get louder.
properties (22)
authoranthonyadavisii
permlinkre-avilsd-re-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20171219t061045704z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"users":["l0ki","personz"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-19 06:10:48
last_update2017-12-19 06:10:48
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-12-26 06:10:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,594
author_reputation212,565,147,344,592
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,137,046
net_rshares0
@calamus056 · (edited)
It's literally the other way around. Self-voting **removes** value from SteemIt. Every single cent you aren't spending on good content creators is lowering the overall value.

Curators can make more money by finding undervalued posts (30 minutes+ old) and resteeming it or otherwise promoting it. That's a win-win, because the content creator is happy, the curator is happy and the curator didn't remove value from the platform.

The value of STEEM will rise anyway if you never self-vote, in fact it probably will rise even more in the long-term!

Self-voting is so terrible for the platform that there should be a hard fork to disincentivize it on the blockchain level.
properties (22)
authorcalamus056
permlinkre-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t063212122z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 06:32:21
last_update2017-07-09 06:49:48
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-07-16 06:32:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length671
author_reputation5,645,464,390,253
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,834,564
net_rshares0
@sean-king · (edited)
You assume that the people who are self voting aren't "good content creators".  If indeed they are not, then we can counteract their overindulgent self-voting by flagging (and people are already starting to do that, myself included).  

Banning self-voting can only undermine the price of Steem.  For instance, I have personally purchased thousands of dollars of SP (and I know many others who have done the same) so that I can influence what content gets visibility on the Steem platform, INCLUDING ESPECIALLY MY OWN.  I (and many others) would have NEVER purchased so much, much less held it for so long, if doing so didn't increase my ability to get more exposure for my own content.   

What you are overlooking is that it's NOT the authors and curatiors that give Steem value.  The authors and curators come here only becasue Steem HAS value, and Steem has value not because it's "earned" by posting and curating but becasue people like my are willing to BUY it with money and HOLD it.  It has value because capital (money) is flowing into it.  That money flows into it in large part becasue people who acquire and hold Steem have a greater likelihood gaining exposure for their own content.   The more Steem one holds, the greater one's voice on the platform.   If we only allow that voice to be heard when it speaks of others and not when it speaks of the Steem holder himself or herself, then Steem's value declines. 

Were there no other way of dealing with inappropriate self-voting, then I would agree that the damage done to capital inflows by banning self-voting may be worth it.   But when the problem is easily solved by other means (like flagging), banning self-voting will do nothing but limit capital inflow and thereby reduce the value of Steem.  Lower Steem prices means inferior authors and curators.

Look around, friend,  Steem is healthier than ever.  New users are way up.  The price of Steem is way up.  Alex ranking is way up!   Growth is exponential.   Your panic over self-voting is completley unjustified and unneeded.   

Here's the bottom line:  Those who want to ban self-voting are mainly folks who seek to acquire Steem by posting and curating rather than by PURCHASE.  But it's only the latter that gives Steem value.   And folks who are willing to purchase Steem do so in large part becasue they can influence the exposure of their own content.
properties (22)
authorsean-king
permlinkre-calamus056-re-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t144238570z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 14:42:39
last_update2017-07-09 14:47:51
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-07-16 14:42:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,381
author_reputation84,123,051,136,467
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,874,403
net_rshares0
@sean-king ·
From the whitepaper:

____
Eliminating “abuse” is not possible and shouldn’t be the goal. Even those who are attempting to “abuse” the system are still doing work. Any compensation they get for their successful attempts at abuse or collusion is at least as valuable for the purpose of distributing the currency as the make-work system employed by traditional Bitcoin mining or the collusive mining done via mining pools. All that is necessary is to ensure that abuse isn’t so rampant that it undermines the incentive to do real work in support of the community and its currency.
The goal of building a community currency is to get more “crabs in the bucket”. Going to extreme measures to eliminate all abuse is like attempting to put a lid on the bucket to prevent a few crabs from escaping and comes at the expense of making it harder to add new crabs to the bucket. It is sufficient to make the walls slippery and give the other crabs sufficient power to prevent others from escaping.
____

More from the whitepaper:

----
The impact of this voting and payout distribution is to offer large bounties for good content while still rewarding smaller players for their long-tail contribution.
The economic effect of this is similar to a lottery where people over-estimate their probability of getting votes and thus do more work than the expected value of their reward and thereby maximize the total amount of work performed in service of the community. The fact that everyone “wins something” plays on the same psychology that casinos use to keep people 
gambling. In other words, small rewards help reinforce the idea that it is possible to earn bigger rewards.
____
👍  
properties (23)
authorsean-king
permlinkre-calamus056-re-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t151111726z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 15:11:15
last_update2017-07-09 15:11:15
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 15:11:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,666
author_reputation84,123,051,136,467
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,877,411
net_rshares0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@elfspice ·
$0.17
Which is what we are doing...
👍  
properties (23)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t035808150z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 03:58:12
last_update2017-07-07 03:58:12
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 03:58:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.126 HBD
curator_payout_value0.042 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length29
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,599,499
net_rshares36,366,243,126
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz ·
On that point, exactly
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-elfspice-re-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t094646216z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 09:46:45
last_update2017-07-07 09:46:45
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 09:46:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length22
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,624,355
net_rshares0
@greatvideos ·
Thank you very much for the truest words
properties (22)
authorgreatvideos
permlinkre-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t110402701z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 11:04:12
last_update2017-07-09 11:04:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 11:04:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length40
author_reputation6,696,611,383,944
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,853,415
net_rshares0
@personz ·
$0.05
I think you're forgetting that self voting _from the same account_ only just became really lucrative, since hard fork 19. You and several others talk about it like it's some kind of institution but the truth is that it has exploded since hf 19 when everyone realized it gave them so much.

Are you aware that self voting was something the creators of Steemit explicitly tried to incentivize **against**? Check this out from the whitepaper which I'll quote at length in an attempt to deal with this criticism generally:

> ### 2.5.2 Voting on Distribution of Currency

> The naive voting process creates a Prisoner’s Dilemma whereby each indi- vidual voter has incentive to vote for themselves at the expense of the larger community goal. If every voter defects by voting for themselves then no cur- rency will end up distributed and the currency as a whole will fail to gain network effect. On the other hand, if only one voter defects then that voter would win undeserved profits while having minimal effect on the overall value of the currency.

> In order to realign incentives and discourage individuals from simply voting for themselves, money must be distributed in a nonlinear manner. For example a quadratic function in votes, i.e., someone with twice the votes of someone else should receive four times the payout and someone with three times the votes should receive nine times the payout. In other words, the reward is proportional to ```votes^2``` rather than ```votes```. This mirrors the value of network effect which grows with ```n^2``` the number of participants, according to Metcalfe’s Law.

> Assuming all users have equal stake, someone who only receives their own vote will receive much less than someone who receives votes from 100 different users. This encourages users to _cooperate_ to vote for the same things to maximize the payout. This system also creates financial incentive to _collude_ where everyone votes on one thing and then divides the reward equally among themselves.

Some something has happened here, either this is no longer relevant as Steemit has changed, or the current situation actually amounts to a bug. I believe it is the latter.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t122802913z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 12:28:03
last_update2017-07-07 12:28:03
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 12:28:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.041 HBD
curator_payout_value0.013 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,179
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,637,503
net_rshares11,878,668,483
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jarexx ·
The Steemit guys talk about collusion and giving those with most votes a *disproportionate* amount of rewards as if it's a good thing, but they don't really explain *why*.

In what way does it help Steemit that 99% of its users get close to nothing but 1% get the vast majority of rewards?

It also creates some kind of perverse incentive, which makes quadratic voting even worse than FPTP voting, if it were to be used for politics. Think about it - with FPTP you're already incentivized to only vote for the two biggest parties/two most popular candidates, due to the spoiler effect. 

With quadratic voting you're *super-incentivized* to vote for the two most popular candidates/parties. Can you see how bad quadratic voting would be for a democracy, by creating a permanent super-duopoly? If so, then you draw the same conclusions for why quadratic voting is bad for Steemit.
properties (22)
authorjarexx
permlinkre-personz-re-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t125605611z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 12:56:09
last_update2017-07-09 12:56:09
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 12:56:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length879
author_reputation44,973,699,759
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,863,186
net_rshares0
@ppitonak ·
And you can still game the system by using another account :)
👍  
properties (23)
authorppitonak
permlinkre-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t061856202z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 06:18:57
last_update2017-07-07 06:18:57
depth2
children5
last_payout2017-07-14 06:18:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length61
author_reputation806,385,627,054
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,609,560
net_rshares2,138,160,326
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@elfspice ·
But that comes with several costs: one, the effort of managing at least two accounts (I am now doing this, and it's an irritating load on my attention) and two, that the rewards cannot be quickly moved to the voting account from the reward receiving account, at least, the half of the rewards that goes into SP.
properties (22)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-ppitonak-re-sean-king-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t074251243z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 07:42:51
last_update2017-07-07 07:42:51
depth3
children4
last_payout2017-07-14 07:42:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length311
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,615,514
net_rshares0
@sharingandcaring ·
$0.02
All very confusing for me a new Steemit blogger.  All I do know is Selfvoting is dishonest - kinda like bragging - a trait I never appreciated in any forum.  I guess what you're telling us is this practice will be coming to an end.  Great!
👍  
properties (23)
authorsharingandcaring
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t191615011z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 19:16:18
last_update2017-07-09 19:16:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 19:16:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length239
author_reputation107,406,908,304
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,901,910
net_rshares5,914,691,405
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@sornprar ·
Psstttt....  I'm looking for 6 other Accounts to be members of my Midnight Crew Network, must be heavily Vested for maximum damage***
***sarcasm font, this is what I've been fighting against and losing.<br>
<center>~ You can set up two different types of Networks, a bot or a human one.
~ Each Network should consist of a set of seven Accounts.
~ You can have 7, 14, 21, or 28 (and so on) Accounts, logisticaly each set of seven would be considered it's own Network.
~ Concentrate each Account on a specialty target - usually blogs about how great the steem platform is, cryptocurrencies, and the markets themselves.  Each Network should also focus on recruitment, new user registration (the bread & butter), & encouraging mass investing into the steem system. Best results when your Market is the majority of people who basicly have no clue about finance, marketing, or running a wallet (who treat steemit like facebook and might or might not figure out the markets later).
~ A Network Schedule would be set, most probably in variants of 7 as well.
~ All 7 days of a week each Account would refrain from upvoting or flagging anything, save for one scheduled Account (acct. 1 on Monday, 2 on Tuesday....). ~ Though doing as little upvoting as possible, the other 6 Accounts would primarily comment/engage only with other Accounts in any other of your Networks.
~  The scheduled Account for it's particularly scheduled day would follow the following script:
1)  Allocate the first 72-100% of 100% of your voting power to upvoting your own content.  No brainer.
2)  Allocate the next 25- 72% of 100% voting power to upvoting content of other Accounts in your Networks.
3)  Allocate 11-25% of 100% voting power to flagging (this metric can be applied further up or down the allocation chain depending on the value of the post/comment flagging).
4) Allocate 4-11% of 100% voting power to upvoting Red Rish/Minnow accounts outside of your Network.
5) When voting power reaches 0-4% (the second an upvote's value is nearing $0.01), discontinue upvoting and let it recharge for the next 6 days.
~ Account posting should be limited to 4 per day (remember, any posts after 5 in a 24 hour period exponetially decreases the payout value of all posts in that period).
~ The only day any Account should do any active upvoting would be only on it's scheduled upvoting day.
~ Occasional flagging of high value content is encouraged to maximize the rewards pool for your Network's benefit.  Being careful not to over-use it, most of the time it may even go un-noticed in the longer voting lists.  Though not exactly "flying under the radar", maximizing affect in relation to rewards pool is to flag posts/comments who's value are less than your vote's value, essentially only returning all those rewards-from-others to the rewards pool in exchange for your 2% voting power....
Anyone running this set-up will make a pile while only leaving a little bit of scraps left for the rest (just enough to keep the masses chasing it).
<center><strong><h1>*Battle of the Bots*</h1></strong></center>
<center>https://anonimag.es/i/Screenshotat2017-07-0613-56-0911cf358.png</center>
<center><strong>*Not even a good, gentle bot can stand up against a bad, malicious Network.*</strong></center>
<center>https://anonimag.es/i/Screenshotat2017-07-0711-52-45c5c37.png</center>
properties (22)
authorsornprar
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t003957531z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"image":["https://anonimag.es/i/Screenshotat2017-07-0613-56-0911cf358.png","https://anonimag.es/i/Screenshotat2017-07-0711-52-45c5c37.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 00:39:57
last_update2017-07-08 00:39:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-15 00:39:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,344
author_reputation-81,801,702,718
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,702,571
net_rshares0
@steemitboard ·
Congratulations @personz! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

[![](https://steemitimages.com/70x80/http://steemitboard.com/notifications/comments.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@personz) Award for the number of comments

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click [here](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word `STOP`

> By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)!
properties (22)
authorsteemitboard
permlinksteemitboard-notify-personz-20170710t210929000z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notifications.png"]}
created2017-07-10 21:09:27
last_update2017-07-10 21:09:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-17 21:09:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length688
author_reputation38,975,615,169,260
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,032,317
net_rshares0
@sylviategan ·
$4.90
Sooo... this is sort of related... I am pretty new here and was trying to figure it all out. I was on Steemnow.com typing in usernames out of curiosity when I noticed that someone had a bunch of upvotes from usernames that sound familiar or somehow relate to that of the user being upvoted. I looked at some of these users that looked kind of suspicious to me and they were all very new accounts, all had blogged nothing...It looked super suspicious to me, like someone created a bunch of accounts to upvotes themselves. Not sure what do to with this information..I know there are no "rules" but I feel like that kind of thing sort of breaks the code of conduct, right? And, I could be totally wrong... But if I am right, what should I do with the information?? Thanks!!
👍  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsylviategan
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t053913130z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 05:39:15
last_update2017-07-07 05:39:15
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-07-14 05:39:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value3.682 HBD
curator_payout_value1.222 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length770
author_reputation738,716,031,088
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,606,758
net_rshares1,047,781,355,432
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@personz ·
$0.76
There's no explicit code of conduct for voting, it is completely up to you how to vote and with which accounts. There's nothing for creating multiple accounts either, though steemit.com implies you should only have one account by disallowing new registrations to use previously used authenticated methods (i.e. phone number and email). However it is easy to create an account, you just have to pay for it yourself (check out Anon Steem).

However self voting was explicitly disincentivized in the founding plan of Steemit (which you can read [here](https://github.com/steemit/whitepaper/blob/master/whitepaper.pdf), though it's not an easy read and a bit out of date). So the idea was not to ban it but to make it not as worth while as voting for other people.

When the recent changes (known as hard fork 19) came in this incentive went on it's head for a few reasons:

1. The votes of people with less Steem Power became more valuable
2. Voting power depletion increased by 400%, so people could vote less at full power

Suddenly it became _really_ attractive to vote on your own posts. Since people do what makes sense based on the evidence they have and box they are in, lots of people started doing this.

But we think this is not a good thing for the Steemit project as a whole so we're looking for solutions.

A long way to say it, but what you should do with that information, in my opinion, is talk about it like you are now and support people who are trying to do something about it.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-sylviategan-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t133711424z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"links":["https://github.com/steemit/whitepaper/blob/master/whitepaper.pdf"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 13:37:12
last_update2017-07-07 13:37:12
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 13:37:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.576 HBD
curator_payout_value0.187 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,493
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,643,895
net_rshares167,214,275,022
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@sylviategan ·
Thank you! I really appreciate the explanation and history!!! When you get a chance, please let me know of others I can support.
properties (22)
authorsylviategan
permlinkre-personz-re-sylviategan-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t140533398z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 14:05:36
last_update2017-07-07 14:05:36
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-14 14:05:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length128
author_reputation738,716,031,088
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,646,487
net_rshares0
@theabsolute ·
What about people like me who upvote their own content, but also upvote other people's work? I don't think self-voting should be taken away. Too much regulation and change can take away from what many enjoy about the system.
properties (22)
authortheabsolute
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170708t032509542z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-08 03:25:09
last_update2017-07-08 03:25:09
depth1
children5
last_payout2017-07-15 03:25:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length224
author_reputation30,582,991,953,296
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,712,678
net_rshares0
@calamus056 · (edited)
$0.02
If you're a quality content creator then a self-vote wouldn't be that bad, but the problem is that you're not the best person to decide how good your own content is. 

But the problem currently is that comments which are contributing hardly anything or even spam comments are being self-upvoted.

It's best if self-voting is eliminated almost entirely by the protocol itself.
👍  
properties (23)
authorcalamus056
permlinkre-theabsolute-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t093030218z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 09:30:39
last_update2017-07-09 09:32:00
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-07-16 09:30:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length375
author_reputation5,645,464,390,253
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,846,363
net_rshares5,914,691,405
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@theabsolute ·
I can see that, but wouldn't a self-voting from someone without much SP be negligible?  If someone is self-voting, but has a lot of SP, wouldn't that mean they either paid a lot into the system or have had other people give them upvotes?
properties (22)
authortheabsolute
permlinkre-calamus056-re-theabsolute-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170712t161928820z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-12 16:19:30
last_update2017-07-12 16:19:30
depth3
children3
last_payout2017-07-19 16:19:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length237
author_reputation30,582,991,953,296
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,241,928
net_rshares0
@tiandao ·
So self voting has been around since the inception? Why now is it just going away, is it the hard fork is it that there are more users, is it political? I just find it strange that when the amount of users jumped up all these changes happened! 
I still don't know everything I need to know about this platform, and because of my ignorance I don't know if this system can be gamed and to what extent! I came online just before the hard fork 19 and it seemed to work well, but maybe that was only from my perspective. After the hard fork stuff just seems to be working against all users of this platform! I guess I just have not been here long enough!
properties (22)
authortiandao
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170713t005855061z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-13 00:58:45
last_update2017-07-13 00:58:45
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-07-20 00:58:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length649
author_reputation279,218,179,107
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,286,950
net_rshares0
@personz ·
Self voting has been around since the start, the system makes no difference in a self vote or a outgoing vote. But it is only since HF 19 that it has been much more tempting to vote for yourself.

This is definitely a problem which has gotten worse since HF 19 so it does kind of work against users, but the debate will go on 🙂
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-tiandao-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170713t202525125z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-13 20:25:24
last_update2017-07-13 20:25:24
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-07-20 20:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length327
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,379,657
net_rshares0
@tiandao ·
I see, thank you for the reply!
properties (22)
authortiandao
permlinkre-personz-re-tiandao-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170714t020148469z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-14 02:01:36
last_update2017-07-14 02:01:36
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-07-21 02:01:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length31
author_reputation279,218,179,107
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,404,540
net_rshares0
@timcliff ·
$0.03
Great job on the pull request!
👍  
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170707t233138276z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-07 23:31:39
last_update2017-07-07 23:31:39
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-07-14 23:31:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.023 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length30
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,698,115
net_rshares7,527,789,061
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz ·
$0.05
Thanks! Couldn't be simpler 😉
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-timcliff-re-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170709t225630463z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-09 22:56:30
last_update2017-07-09 22:56:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-16 22:56:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.036 HBD
curator_payout_value0.012 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length29
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,921,392
net_rshares13,095,119,609
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@warrenvee ·
Self voting is not cool!
properties (22)
authorwarrenvee
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170711t111800060z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-11 11:18:06
last_update2017-07-11 11:18:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-18 11:18:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length24
author_reputation345,569,415,638
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id8,095,015
net_rshares0
@weetreebonsai ·
$0.02
Thank You for sharing and updating us on this, looking forward to the future here! Resteemit!
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorweetreebonsai
permlinkre-personz-self-voting-will-now-not-be-default-steemit-com-behaviour-20170706t231145589z
categorysteemdev
json_metadata{"tags":["steemdev"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-06 23:11:33
last_update2017-07-06 23:11:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-07-13 23:11:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 HBD
curator_payout_value0.003 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length93
author_reputation2,145,502,320,998
root_title"Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id7,578,143
net_rshares4,763,413,054
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)