create account

Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested by steemitblog

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @steemitblog ·
Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested
https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2017/05/24/11/40/desert-2340326_960_720.jpg

The Steemit dev team is hard at work wrapping up several of the remaining 2017 roadmap items. We still have some major releases that we are planning to deliver before the end of the year, including a highly secure mobile wallet app for Apple and Android, and an updated notifications system for steemit.com!

<h1>Early 2018</h1>

We also have some important developments on the horizon for 2018, including an improved account signup process along with hardfork 20 (β€œVelocity”), as well as Smart Media Tokens (SMTs). 

<h1>Roadmap: Community Input</h1>

We are in the process of putting together our 2018 roadmap, and plan to share our vision of 2018 with all of you once the roadmap is complete. As part of our 2018 roadmap, we would like to get input from all of you. In the comments below, or with posts using the #roadmap2018 tag, we would like you to answer the question:

***What would you like Steemit to make a priority for 2018?***

We promise to review and consider all of the input from the community regarding the roadmap, but please understand that we will not be able to implement all of the requests. The team has limited resources, and it is important that we focus on the items that will add the most value to the platform.

Even though all of the requests may not make it into the 2018 roadmap, that doesn’t mean we won’t bear them in mind and implement them eventually. In addition, these suggestions could prove a valuable resource for 3rd party developers and entrepreneurs looking to build businesses on Steem.

We hope that the #roadmap2018 discussion will spark a lot of great ideas about where the future development of our platform, and community will lead!

Steem on,

_Team Steemit_
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 640 others
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorsteemitblog
permlinksteemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018","roadmap","steemit","steem","steemdev"],"image":["https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2017/05/24/11/40/desert-2340326_960_720.jpg"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
created2017-11-16 20:01:48
last_update2017-11-16 20:01:48
depth0
children556
last_payout2017-11-23 20:01:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,784
author_reputation332,472,558,821,177
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,607,404
net_rshares163,941,516,346,260
author_curate_reward""
vote details (705)
@aaronburt ·
$0.13
I would really like to see some work done on the organization and layout of the individual blogs. It would be awesome if posts could be somehow categorized by topic, date, quality, earnings, etc. A user friendly interface to categorize would go a long way for me as a creator since I would love to be able to separate my Travel posts from my Technology articles. Another useful feature would be a set of share buttons allowing people to easily embed their posts on other platforms to 1) get the word out about steem/steem based tokens and applications, and 2)to share valuable content currently exclusive to this platform (maybe something that prompts people to sign up for steem from other platforms)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoraaronburt
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t035513904z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 03:55:12
last_update2017-11-18 03:55:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 03:55:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.096 HBD
curator_payout_value0.032 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length701
author_reputation3,652,614,713,336
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,739,584
net_rshares60,153,789,955
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@admiralsp ·
Creating a benefit for referrals would be nice, this would definitely inspire old timers to encourage newbies to get on the platform.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoradmiralsp
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171219t143844677z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-19 14:38:57
last_update2017-12-19 14:38:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-26 14:38:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length133
author_reputation8,279,235,092,307
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,195,385
net_rshares922,603,613
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@adrianbucks ·
I'm a litle late to this post
properties (22)
authoradrianbucks
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t091124270z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 09:11:21
last_update2017-11-18 09:11:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 09:11:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length29
author_reputation100,201,489,008
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,759,126
net_rshares0
@akintunde ·
I would really love it if #Questions are allowed with a #ASK button. Some of us like to ask and answer questions and not necessarily post all the time like Quora
properties (22)
authorakintunde
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t030040540z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018","questions","ask"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:00:54
last_update2017-11-17 03:00:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:00:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length161
author_reputation16,541,536,778,040
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,634,082
net_rshares0
@allmonitors ·
$0.11
Maybe introduce a referral system where the referrer can benefit from especially if we can attract whales to be investors. Just my thoughts.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorallmonitors
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t033155079z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:31:57
last_update2017-11-17 03:31:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:31:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.084 HBD
curator_payout_value0.028 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length140
author_reputation1,276,428,598,957,072
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,636,174
net_rshares53,537,583,249
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@anarcho-andrei ·
$0.45
A lot of these suggestions have already been made, but I want to reiterate some of them:

- **A Resteem Tab** - This should go without saying, and it's been mentioned several times already.  This would greatly reduce clutter on a user's page while making it easier to navigate for users looking to follow a particular other user and see their content, as opposed to resteemed content.
- **UI Improvements** - Adding night mode was definitely a step in the right direction, but as @drakos pointed out, the UI is still sparse.  It's bare.  Steemit has to spend some time developing a user interface that grabs a potential user's attention and marks it as unique.  This doesn't have to be ostentatious or clogged with features, but it has to be more discerning than what we currently have.
- **A Native Messenger** - We've been relying on steemit.chat since I joined in August and before then, but forcing users off of the page to interact socially is not conducive to keeping users on the platform and using it.  Most activity is either between steemit.chat and Discord, but it would be absolutely fantastic to have an onboard messaging system that allows you to DM individual users without having to search them out in a Discord server or chat room.
- **Change Voting Reward Allocation** - As @ats-david said, linear voting has been an abject failure and has caused more problems than it's solved.  I'm not thrilled about <em>n<sup>2</sup></em> voting, either, but surely there's something else that can be implemented to address this issue.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authoranarcho-andrei
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t000714012z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["drakos","ats-david"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:07:15
last_update2017-11-17 00:07:15
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 00:07:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.373 HBD
curator_payout_value0.072 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,540
author_reputation27,098,621,645,365
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,623,114
net_rshares208,479,131,807
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@mattclarke ·
Scammers slightly butchering the spelling of recognised steemians over in steemit.chat would be really inconvenienced by this.  
(Can you imagine how bad the man-in-the-middle attacks would be if we did the same thing for transactions as we do for pm's?)
properties (22)
authormattclarke
permlinkre-anarcho-andrei-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t085853569z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 08:58:54
last_update2017-11-17 08:58:54
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 08:58:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length254
author_reputation127,494,657,382,255
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,658,276
net_rshares0
@anarchyhasnogods ·
$0.35
acting like youtube and putting posts that are similar on the side could help smaller authors, make it easier to read posts for long periods of time in one subject area, and to actually make promotion useful.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoranarchyhasnogods
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t144526894z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 14:45:27
last_update2017-11-17 14:45:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 14:45:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.264 HBD
curator_payout_value0.087 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length208
author_reputation61,353,529,646,265
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,685,410
net_rshares163,271,576,120
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@andyblack ·
Please integrate into the platform chat option, this would make steemit really awesome!!!
properties (22)
authorandyblack
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t213551913z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 21:35:51
last_update2017-11-17 21:35:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 21:35:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length89
author_reputation18,818,475,461,039
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,718,581
net_rshares0
@aneukaceh.coffee ·
Good job friend, you can go to trending with you good writing more.
properties (22)
authoraneukaceh.coffee
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171117t221122145z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-17 15:15:06
last_update2017-11-17 15:15:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 15:15:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length67
author_reputation58,829,545,872
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,688,326
net_rshares0
@angelicagarcia ·
I think introduceyourself posts should be one of the priorities that needs attention. Not all new Steemians gets the same welcome as the others, especially if that person is really a famous one (e.g. YouTuber) compared to a non-famous one. This is just an observation. :)

Next is that, it'll be great if we can PIN our post on top. The "about me" section on the profile is just a nutshell. A lot of people get lost with the page because of posts cluttered everywhere. Like, your own post vs. resteemed posts. The two should be seperated under the blog category. Resteeming is fine especially you are spreading the content of a fellow, but wouldn't it be great if your important post that you'd like to feature would stay on top of your blog page?

Mentions is also important. If you are currently online thru a web browser, you'll see a notification. Otherwise, you'll lose track of the people giving shout-outs and mentions to you. We fail to say thank you to some of them because we're not aware that we've been mentioned by them.
properties (22)
authorangelicagarcia
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171121t022045424z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-21 02:20:45
last_update2017-11-21 02:20:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-28 02:20:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,033
author_reputation1,081,596,056,092
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,040,794
net_rshares0
@ankitchoudhary ·
eagerly waiting for mobile wallet app
properties (22)
authorankitchoudhary
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t200639373z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:06:45
last_update2017-11-16 20:06:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:06:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length37
author_reputation2,267,468,120,312
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,607,786
net_rshares0
@arcange ·
Congratulations @steemitblog!
Your post was mentioned in the [hit parade](https://steemit.com/hit-parade/@arcange/daily-hit-parade-20171116) in the following categories:

* Comments - Ranked 1 with 307 comments
* Pending payout - Ranked 1 with $ 343,78
properties (22)
authorarcange
permlinkre-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t163700000z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata""
created2017-11-17 15:35:06
last_update2017-11-17 15:35:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 15:35:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length253
author_reputation1,146,616,139,479,238
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,690,329
net_rshares0
@arshadsayed ·
great information and easy to understand
properties (22)
authorarshadsayed
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t072809302z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 18:29:12
last_update2017-11-18 18:29:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 18:29:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length40
author_reputation-7,322,454,651
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,802,796
net_rshares0
@ashleysmith ·
@steemitblog

I would like to see some kind of edit ability within posts that are older than a week.

Currently when I write an article, I mention keywords that I will write an article on in the future. I want to be able to link to this future article for quick reference for the reader.

Is there a way we can do this currently?

Maybe in our new posts we can have a link to option that let's us link to this article from another. That could stop any unwanted editing. Although I'd still like the option.

Maybe a certain reputation score can unlock the ability?

What are Your thoughts?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorashleysmith
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180211t214651892z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemitblog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-02-11 21:46:51
last_update2018-02-11 21:46:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-02-18 21:46:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length588
author_reputation60,573,601,191
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id36,765,750
net_rshares614,449,068
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ats-david · (edited)
$17.48
My primary suggestions mostly have to do with blockchain protocols.

1. Change the voting algorithm from full linear to anything but full linear. This has been an abject failure in practice and ought to be rolled back. Then we can discuss a better alternative that is neither *n<sup>2</sup>* nor *n.*

2. Restore the 40-vote target. 

3. Remove the STEEM Power delegation function. It not only reduces user demand for STEEM on the open markets, but it has also created another avenue for widespread mismanagement and abuse/exploitation of the collective and limited reward pool.

4. Reintroduce stronger bandwidth limitations. The amount of spam on the network via posts, comments, and wallet transfers/memos from new accounts is very high and is greatly inflating the daily "transaction" numbers for the blockchain. This is "bloat" that can be easily managed. Those who wish to spam can spend money on STEEM, if they so choose.

5.  Consider reintroducing the four-post reward limits. This has no impact on the number of posts that one may publish in a given day. It only affects the total number of rewards that one user can receive from the limited collective reward pool. 

Other than those suggestions, I'd still like to see some basic features/functions implemented on the Steemit.com website. Here are some additional suggestions:

1. A separate "Resteem" tab on your individual profile page that sorts your posts from those that you have shared. This has been a feature request for over a year.

2. Restoring the pop-out window for viewing of posts that could be neatly closed without having to push the 'back' button, which often brings you back to the wrong place on the page that you were previously on. 

3. Serious consideration of revenue models that can be partially shared with investors in Steem and users of Steemit.com and affiliated apps/websites that Steemit, Inc. owns. 

4. Additional "gamification" of the platform, particularly related to holding STEEM Power - *if* the other protocol changes are made.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 2 others
properties (23)
authorats-david
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t213306723z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:33:06
last_update2017-11-16 21:38:51
depth1
children53
last_payout2017-11-23 21:33:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value13.266 HBD
curator_payout_value4.218 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,027
author_reputation324,017,334,201,433
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,614,041
net_rshares8,155,098,139,997
author_curate_reward""
vote details (66)
@anarchyhasnogods ·
$1.47
>Remove the STEEM Power delegation function. It not only reduces user demand for STEEM on the open markets, but it has also created another avenue for widespread mismanagement and abuse/exploitation of the collective and limited reward pool.

What about groups like steemstem that partially (or even fully) depend on delegation?
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authoranarchyhasnogods
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t144100694z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 14:41:00
last_update2017-11-17 14:41:00
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-11-24 14:41:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.106 HBD
curator_payout_value0.362 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length328
author_reputation61,353,529,646,265
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,685,051
net_rshares679,441,853,757
author_curate_reward""
vote details (13)
@ats-david ·
>What about groups like steemstem that partially (or even fully) depend on delegation?

Why are they so dependent on delegation? And if I recall correctly, SteemStem was operating fairly successfully long before delegation began.
properties (22)
authorats-david
permlinkre-anarchyhasnogods-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t214418491z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 21:44:21
last_update2017-11-17 21:44:21
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 21:44:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length229
author_reputation324,017,334,201,433
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,719,060
net_rshares0
@freebornangel ·
When one minnow votes s/he gets the entire reward pool for that vote.
When one minnow and one whale vote the whale gets most of the pool and the minnow gets next to nothing.
Enlarging the numbers do not change the ratios.
Whales delegating sp that previously was not getting voted is what made my vote go from a dollar just after the hf to a dime today.

The only out I see is if folks with more than 35mvests don't vote, then all the little votes grow in influence and the little voters have a reason to be here.
Otherwise it will devolve into only the 'whales' circle jerking each other and the price will tank.
#m2c
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-anarchyhasnogods-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t204134094z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018","m2c"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 20:41:30
last_update2017-11-17 20:41:30
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 20:41:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length618
author_reputation171,005,551,503,977
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,715,023
net_rshares912,107,714
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@azfix ·
Very valuable advice, it shows your commitment to this platform. I am a big fan of stronger bandwidth limitations to cut down on spam.
properties (22)
authorazfix
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t011615850z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:16:15
last_update2017-11-17 01:16:15
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 01:16:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length134
author_reputation30,302,235,653,453
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,627,374
net_rshares0
@beajinsu ·
Absolute good comments. I loved the old system of steemit.
properties (22)
authorbeajinsu
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t033115332z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:31:06
last_update2017-11-17 03:31:06
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:31:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length58
author_reputation7,015,876,621,009
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,636,130
net_rshares0
@captainobviou3 ·
$0.08
>A separate "Resteem" tab on your individual profile page that sorts your posts from those that you have shared. This has been a feature request for over a year.

I said the same thing.

I would add:
* Create a place where people can pay for steem with a debit card in house. For example, I can play clash of clans, throw $20.00 at it and not get anything in return. I don't play as much any more so I would be interested in throwing a few bux at steem here and there to see my account grow. Especially when I see a future explosion of growth. *with the implication of smt's we should see steem make a solid stay at over $1.00 for ever.*
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorcaptainobviou3
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t220050850z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:00:51
last_update2017-11-16 22:00:51
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-11-23 22:00:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.060 HBD
curator_payout_value0.016 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length637
author_reputation36,315,737,966,229
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,615,643
net_rshares36,117,260,654
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@ats-david ·
$0.06
>Create a place where people can pay for steem with a debit card in house.

I think this has a lot more legal barriers to consider. And it also makes the purchasing of STEEM possible off of existing exchanges, which could complicate price discovery, especially when the holder of that STEEM in question gained it at the outset of the blockchain's creation - when there was no price at all. 

In other words, it would be messy all around. But I'm pretty sure it doesn't happen because of the legal aspects. I could be wrong though.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorats-david
permlinkre-captainobviou3-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t214908121z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 21:49:09
last_update2017-11-17 21:49:09
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 21:49:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.049 HBD
curator_payout_value0.015 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length530
author_reputation324,017,334,201,433
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,719,344
net_rshares30,979,272,297
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@geekpowered ·
Definitely.
I would have already bought steem to power up if there was a way to buy it on the site.
As it is, I instead searched for over an hour if there was any site that sold steem directly. The one that said it did had poor reviews, and listed $0 in steem for $50 USD. Then I spent another hour trying to decide what crypto currency to buy to exchange for it, because of the horrible transfer fees on bitcoin recently, and ended up going to bed. Then the next day I saw a bot censor someone, and decided to think more on it first.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorgeekpowered
permlinkre-captainobviou3-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t025510716z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 02:58:15
last_update2017-11-17 02:58:15
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 02:58:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length534
author_reputation99,319,261,112,097
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,633,875
net_rshares1,453,333,350
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@cryptographic ·
I’ve created a word cloud for the comments section of this post that I hope you will find of value and will want to share. While the creation of the actual word cloud is relatively easy and straightforward, the creation of a relevant word list that will produce a meaningful word cloud is quite another matter, as I’m sure you know, and takes considerable time and effort. Unfortunately, as of now, the post has only had 41 views. It needs a little love. Perhaps a resteem might be of help, if you think it is worthwhile, and, of course, it would be much appreciated too. TIA
https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input
properties (22)
authorcryptographic
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171121t115349656z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-21 11:53:45
last_update2017-11-21 11:53:45
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-28 11:53:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length670
author_reputation111,198,190,831,086
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,080,622
net_rshares0
@d-pend ·
$1.43
Excellent suggestions.

>A separate "Resteem" tab on your individual profile page that sorts your posts from those that you have shared. This has been a feature request for over a year.

There seems to be widespread consensus here, quite perplexed as to why this hasn't already been implemented.

>Change the voting algorithm from full linear to anything but full linear. This has been an abject failure in practice and ought to be rolled back. Then we can discuss a better alternative that is neither n2 nor n.

This brings to mind the truth that "nature builds in curves, not straight lines." In my opinion, it also relates to my suggestion to change the 25/75 curation rewards, which is an 'unnatural' rigid number that does not work well.

>Remove the STEEM Power delegation function. It not only reduces user demand for STEEM on the open markets, but it has also created another avenue for widespread mismanagement and abuse/exploitation of the collective and limited reward pool.

A radical suggestion for a radical and widespread problem. Not sure if it's the answer, but it is evident that the current state of affairs is quite imbalanced.

>Additional "gamification" of the platform, particularly related to holding STEEM Power - if the other protocol changes are made.

This was listed in the whitepaper for 2017 yet I have seen nothing implemented along these lines thus far *(perhaps @steemitboard, but that doesn't really count if you ask me as it is not embedded into the actual site.)* The effects of gamification can't be overstated, as it makes the whole experience much more vivid for the average user.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authord-pend
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t222053033z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemitboard"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:20:51
last_update2017-11-16 22:20:51
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 22:20:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.072 HBD
curator_payout_value0.353 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,620
author_reputation419,325,790,516,151
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,616,914
net_rshares665,212,839,377
author_curate_reward""
vote details (10)
@teknow · (edited)
$0.16
In regards to delegation. I was thinking about this the other day. Delegation could exist via a model similar to crowdfunding, and evidently, the same way that earlier investors here  get reward for.. becoming early investors.

As an example, a new user joins. No one knows if they bring quality (if an identity already has a successful online identity then it's a no-brainer). They introduce themselves and outline their road map. They state: "I bring this, will be this active, and I intend to stay". If it's a blogger then a proof post might aid their cause. If it's a project, well then it's based on much more that just words.

So if a backer decides "I believe in you.. I'll delegate x amount of my SP to your cause". From there an agreement on return can be outlined. Maybe as a 'smart contract' but not mandatory. It's not like people can just cash out anyway. So as an early investor, you have a larger stake in their potential earnings. Along the way new investors have less and less. Or depending on the amount of delegation. 

New members, can then utilize that delegated SP to grow their blog/project. Not to pay themselves. Early followers could also receive a small fraction of the reward. Not automatic. Engagement would always be necessary. The delegated SP would go towards rewarding comments that are engaging. (Essentially by a system of attraction. Rather then the way that exist now. Which is, work your ass off for a year or pay the damn fee to get noticed).

This would drive thoughtful comments. As any one that sees that a thoughtful comment received say $5.00 reward, as opposed to ZERO for parasite comments that clearly don't even read the content. It would create buzz around quality bloggers. Hence = rewards for engagement = rewards for those that delegate SP. It would also never allow a blogger, who reaches heights to simply post.. and not engage their followers. Something evident in the current system.

It time, quality bloggers/projects could even exist as tradeable asset. Where say one investor has backed X amount which is doing fantastic. They have long received their return and are in surplus. Someone new comes along, invests in first STEEM. Wants to back something, as he/she has money but not so much the time or maybe talent to post and grow their investment. So they can now buy the stake that someone else has in an active member. Placing them in 'the game' from the get go as they work to find their own worthy candidates to invest in.

So essentially whales, who are cashed up grow a portfolio of valuable steemians. Grow their wallet but at the same time the platform and the community. In turn, the price of STEEM. So it pays to support quality. It also hurts to support members who don't live up to their claims. So @freedom throwing money at shitpost accounts for instance. Would and should suffer.

From the outside looking in, it also improves the platform image and would truly have that quality feel. This would drive external buzz and I believe would sell itself as the true alternative to the standard players in social media. That old line "build it and they will jizz" (or something like that) would reign supreme. Because one thing is undeniable. Steemit has a very bad reputation outside of the minds of loyalists. You can't pretend it's not the reason why it hasn't grown and become more mainstream.

This is my idea of a platform that attracts and retains quality without corruption.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorteknow
permlinkre-d-pend-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t102303973z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["freedom"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 09:21:48
last_update2017-11-17 09:23:30
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 09:21:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.124 HBD
curator_payout_value0.040 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,452
author_reputation1,338,108,277,063
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,659,974
net_rshares76,910,610,804
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@darthnava · (edited)
>Remove the STEEM Power delegation function. It not only reduces user demand for STEEM on the open markets, but it has also created another avenue for widespread mismanagement and abuse/exploitation of the collective and limited reward pool.

Delegating/leasing  Steem power is one of the best/efficient ways for us minnows to accumulate SP in order to become dolphins and dolphins to be orcas/mini-whales. Sadly, you are proposing to take that right away from us those with low Steem power.

Blaming that for the low Steem price is diverting the issue that one particular big whale seems to be now powering down/cashing out exiting Steem in batches without absolutely crashing the price according to @chitty in his post recently: https://steemit.com/steem/@chitty/steem-price-will-remain-low-i-am-sorry.
properties (22)
authordarthnava
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t063730709z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["chitty"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@chitty/steem-price-will-remain-low-i-am-sorry"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 06:37:30
last_update2017-11-18 06:39:39
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-11-25 06:37:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length804
author_reputation202,082,561,653,291
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,749,298
net_rshares0
@ats-david ·
$0.12
>Delegating/leasing Steem power is one of the best/efficient ways for us minnows to accumulate SP...

Actually, if you're leasing it, the chances are that you're barely breaking even, if you're breaking even at all. The best way to increase your SP would be to create content that is in demand and that you can create at a high-quality level. And in addition to that, you'd need to be able to consistently engage on the platform and network with your peers and followers to expand your audience. 

The next best way would be to simply buy STEEM. Leasing it just takes you down a longer path to the same destination. 

>Sadly, you are proposing to take that right away from us those with low Steem power.

There is no "right" to lease STEEM Power. And can it really be said to be a "right" anyway, when just a few months ago, the function didn't even exist? Changing blockchain protocols has nothing to do with rights or entitlements. If something isn't working out or needs to be improved, it can be changed via the consensus protocols, which has happened 19 times already. 

>Blaming that for the low Steem price...

I am not blaming delegation for the low STEEM price. I simply stated that delegation reduces user demand for STEEM on the markets. It is only one of many factors.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorats-david
permlinkre-darthnava-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t065452826z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 06:54:54
last_update2017-11-18 06:54:54
depth3
children3
last_payout2017-11-25 06:54:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.094 HBD
curator_payout_value0.030 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,280
author_reputation324,017,334,201,433
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,750,401
net_rshares57,579,312,659
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@englishtchrivy ·
all of what @ats-david wrote specially #3 
I do agree it's the main cause of price drop and it'll get worse if it continues
properties (22)
authorenglishtchrivy
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t205647871z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["ats-david"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 20:56:36
last_update2017-11-17 20:56:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 20:56:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length123
author_reputation190,105,027,681,254
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,716,019
net_rshares0
@freebornangel · (edited)
$0.03
You took the words right out of my head,..

The only thing I see missing is the comment link not taking us to the comment if the comment is over the limit and hidden behind another link.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t222839001z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:28:33
last_update2017-11-16 23:16:54
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-11-23 22:28:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.022 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length186
author_reputation171,005,551,503,977
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,617,338
net_rshares13,411,373,358
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@ats-david ·
$0.04
Yes, the recent changes on the site have made it worse. When I click on my comments, I don’t necessarily want to be taken to the full page, especially if it doesn’t even drop me off on that comment when I get there...which happens quite often.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorats-david
permlinkre-freebornangel-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t002800977z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:28:00
last_update2017-11-17 00:28:00
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 00:28:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.031 HBD
curator_payout_value0.007 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length243
author_reputation324,017,334,201,433
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,624,520
net_rshares18,474,370,733
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@geekpowered ·
$0.03
I actually forgot to mention that in my comment on the UI.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgeekpowered
permlinkre-freebornangel-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t025922236z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:02:24
last_update2017-11-17 03:02:24
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:02:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.026 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length58
author_reputation99,319,261,112,097
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,634,201
net_rshares12,751,981,595
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@godcomplex ·
Why not expand the reward pool?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgodcomplex
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t060209191z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:02:09
last_update2017-11-17 06:02:09
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 06:02:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length31
author_reputation1,483,372,185,052
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,645,808
net_rshares149,973,228
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ats-david ·
This is a response to what? And by "expanding the reward pool," do you mean "inflate the currency at a higher rate?"
properties (22)
authorats-david
permlinkre-godcomplex-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065529102z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:55:30
last_update2017-11-17 06:55:30
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:55:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length116
author_reputation324,017,334,201,433
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,344
net_rshares0
@mehedi118 ·
Excellent  comment as well as nice tips
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t064823744z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:48:27
last_update2017-11-17 06:48:27
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:48:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length39
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,648,833
net_rshares-7,618,115,421
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@mooncryption ·
Seriously, very good suggestions.

However, I'm not sure how projects like @utopian-io and other open-source projects would function without delegation being there... though delegation removal would fix some problems, I personally think it would create many others and isn't the right solution.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authormooncryption
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t044845795z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["utopian-io"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 04:48:45
last_update2017-11-17 04:48:45
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-11-24 04:48:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length294
author_reputation15,427,543,916,099
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,641,112
net_rshares5,357,486,256
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@ats-david ·
$0.39
>However, I'm not sure how projects like @utopian-io and other open-source projects would function without delegation being there...

They would function just like other projects that have functioned on Steem/Steemit without delegation for the past year and a half. They can provide updates with posts, receive donations from those who want to support them, have other accounts trail their votes, buy STEEM to power up...there are many options. 

I know that delegation *can* be good, but it unfortunately creates far too much "bad" in an environment that does *not* include enough people willing to counter the "bad." So if the community as a whole proves to be inadequate in mitigating the "bad," then revert to prior protocols that didn't allow the avenue for abuse/exploitation/whatever you want to call it, then find a new/better solution...*if* there truly is a problem that needs to be resolved in the first place. 

For every bit of good that delegation *may* do when given to good curators, we get two or more situations like this - and the latter seems to be increasing.

https://steemit.com/steem/@transisto/whales-witnesses-we-have-to-talk
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorats-david
permlinkre-mooncryption-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t050713212z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["utopian-io"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@transisto/whales-witnesses-we-have-to-talk"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:07:15
last_update2017-11-17 05:07:15
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 05:07:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.294 HBD
curator_payout_value0.095 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,151
author_reputation324,017,334,201,433
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,642,330
net_rshares181,484,337,319
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@naveendavisv ·
great suggestions.
properties (22)
authornaveendavisv
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t023431242z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 02:34:45
last_update2017-11-17 02:34:45
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 02:34:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length18
author_reputation32,557,718,122
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,632,439
net_rshares0
@patrice ·
$0.78
>Consider reintroducing the four-post reward limits. 

Maybe not 4 but definitely a limit. Right now it is easy for relatively new accounts to post 200+ posts a day with only a url for content.  Either that or a bandwidth penalty for short content. 

>A separate "Resteem" tab...

Please!
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorpatrice
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t222311496z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:23:09
last_update2017-11-16 22:23:09
depth2
children19
last_payout2017-11-23 22:23:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.592 HBD
curator_payout_value0.192 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length288
author_reputation26,522,961,289,339
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,617,046
net_rshares366,194,820,645
author_curate_reward""
vote details (10)
@georgemales ·
Who have time for 200+ posts per day?
I envy the persons who manage 4 a day as for me the max was 2 in a day!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgeorgemales
permlinkre-patrice-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t061525737z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:16:15
last_update2017-11-16 23:16:15
depth3
children8
last_payout2017-11-23 23:16:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length109
author_reputation11,440,001,785,692
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,044
net_rshares104,448,772
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@godcomplex ·
There is  bandwidth limit.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgodcomplex
permlinkre-patrice-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t061028573z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:10:27
last_update2017-11-17 06:10:27
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:10:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length26
author_reputation1,483,372,185,052
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,646,382
net_rshares149,973,228
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@godcomplex ·
But short content has value, so who are you to limit it? What if people tweet over Steem?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgodcomplex
permlinkre-patrice-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t061053579z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:10:54
last_update2017-11-17 06:10:54
depth3
children3
last_payout2017-11-24 06:10:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length89
author_reputation1,483,372,185,052
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,646,407
net_rshares149,973,228
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@noisy ·
maybe at least limit for resteeming? Right now there are many "I will resteem your post to 9876 followers for $9.99" bots
properties (22)
authornoisy
permlinkre-patrice-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231753778z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:17:54
last_update2017-11-16 23:17:54
depth3
children4
last_payout2017-11-23 23:17:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length121
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,148
net_rshares0
@rawdawg ·
Everything that was said by @ats-david !!!
properties (22)
authorrawdawg
permlinkre-ats-david-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t000053946z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["ats-david"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:50:51
last_update2017-11-16 23:50:51
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:50:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length42
author_reputation10,066,123,378,894
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,622,116
net_rshares0
@aunt-deb · (edited)
Some sort of direct person-to-person messaging function. Having to go offsite for those connections is contributing, imo, to the sad retention rate of new users here.
properties (22)
authoraunt-deb
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t203608088z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 20:36:03
last_update2017-11-18 20:36:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 20:36:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length166
author_reputation31,927,075,098,487
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,812,156
net_rshares0
@ayeshahassan ·
I like it
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorayeshahassan
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t072600560z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 07:27:06
last_update2017-11-17 07:27:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:27:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length9
author_reputation974,087,141
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,651,505
net_rshares145,067,795
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ayeshahassan ·
What is the name of the road??????
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorayeshahassan
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t073052780z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 07:32:03
last_update2017-11-17 07:32:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:32:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length34
author_reputation974,087,141
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,651,891
net_rshares243,713,895
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@bahagia-arbi ·
Steemit must give a full support to communities who want to promote Steem and Steemit all around the world. For instance, we just arranged a steemit writing workshop in Bireuen, Aceh, Indonesia. There had been a Bireuen Steemit Community as a part of Indinesian Steemit Community organized the workshop and there have been about 60 participant and 35 of them have a Steemit account from today.

We are still working to dwvelop the community in Aceh by  organizing a bigger event at the end of 2017 like we did last week in Indonesia. I am working with some steemians here in looking some sponsors to next workshop. We want to promote Steem and Steemit for youngers mainly University Students in our country.

I would like to write about our next writing workshop and I will use the #roadmap2018 for a tag in my post.

Thanks you very much,
I love Steemit.
properties (22)
authorbahagia-arbi
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t102003254z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 10:20:06
last_update2017-11-17 10:20:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 10:20:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length855
author_reputation62,544,888,098,801
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,664,174
net_rshares0
@bankholiday ·
steemit is dead
properties (22)
authorbankholiday
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t200214284z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 20:02:15
last_update2017-11-19 20:02:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 20:02:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length15
author_reputation18,282,679,050
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,911,375
net_rshares0
@best-trip-eva ·
$0.61
Hello Team! 
I am a little bit late with my recommendation and not sure if you are going to see it and like it  but I will give it a try :) How about all links inside of a post to be opened in a new tab? In my opinion, external links should definitely have that option as we don't want the users to click on it and go and spend time on other websites instead of spending it here. Internal links are also tricky as I do not want the people to leave my post before the buttons in the end. I still might want to promote my other posts in it. 
P.S. I am aware that you can open the links in other tabs if you want, but I believe the easiest for the users it is - the better :)
Thank you in advance for your consideration!
Cheers,
Eva
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbest-trip-eva
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171127t135308621z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-27 13:53:12
last_update2017-11-27 13:53:12
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-12-04 13:53:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.456 HBD
curator_payout_value0.151 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length729
author_reputation5,180,189,750,184
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,674,443
net_rshares243,932,960,484
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@cryptovisitor ·
Absolutely agree with you, it's not very good where users to click on external links.
properties (22)
authorcryptovisitor
permlinkre-best-trip-eva-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171127t185528439z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-27 18:55:27
last_update2017-11-27 18:55:27
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-12-04 18:55:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length85
author_reputation4,331,625,137,831
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,701,411
net_rshares0
@binkyprod ·
I was discussing with @raised2b about posstibly replacing the Promoted tab with another type of promotion tab. He had suggested implementing something similar to what other sites have, something that would allow everyone to have content promoted. I elaborated on the idea.

Here is what I had written about my ideas for it:

*What COULD be done is for each SBD, the post is brought back to the top of the page every said amount of hours, until the budget the creator put in is spent. Sort of like Kijiji does things, but without leaving it at the top.*

*For example: I spend 5 SBD on a post. Then Every 4 hours, it's brought back to the top. So then that happens 5 times, and then it's done. So for one day, every 4 hours, my post is back at the tip, automatically. If I spent $20 SBD, then that goes on for four whole days, about.*

*This way there is a constant rotation, because it's every four hours from the moment you originally posted. It's not a refresh where everyone is posted back up at that same time. It's if you posted at 7:53:56 (I was going to put frames in haha no frames in time outside of FCP lol), then 4 hours from then your post is reposted, and then 4 more hours from then.*

*It can be 3 hours or 5 hours, but I think enough time should go by between each. 4 hours seems like a good number to me, for some reason.*

Another idea I had was a sort of support apprenticeship, where each Dolphin, Orca and Whale has a team of a said amount of Red Fish and Minnows and every week they upvote one post from each on their team, that way some small fish get a nice hefty upvote from a big fish at least once in a while. It can be a 25% upvote or something, or maybe a once a month 100% upvote. Meaning these specific Dolphins, Orcas and Whales would give an upvote to those select few. Perhaps they would have 20 on their team of 15, so that the Whale could still delegate votes as they please, but this would help increase the amount of upvotesgiven by the big fish, it would allow little fish to be noticed at least once a month and get something nice for a good post that's worth something in terms of content, and it would reduce the use of bots as well. I was calling it the #Whale-Guardian, #Orca-Guardian and #Dolphin-Guardian. 

You begin with a Dolphin before an Orca or Whale takes you on. There have to be set in place things to establish before you are allocated a guardian. So you need to have a specific amount of reputation, perhaps 26 or maybe 30 could be the minimum. You have to have written a said amount of posts (your own posts, not comments), you have to engage in the community.  That would weed out the spammers and reposters and such.  Then, when you're assigned a Guardian, the Gaurdian chooses a day to upvote you, and chooses the post they deem to be worth more than your other posts.  And before you can upgrade from one type of Guardian, you need to reach a certain level of something. That would gamify things as well.

A third idea, and this one came to me most recently, is the Steemitboard has all these gamified rewards, except none for upvotes, for GIVING upvotes. People keep talking about voting bots and this and that, and how Whales aren't voting enough. I think it would help if for one, the Steemitboard gave rewards for certain amounts of upvotes that we give to others (to encourage more upvoting). Also, change back the 5 upvote a day at 100% voting power to a higher amount, to encourage more upvotes. Perhaps 40 was too much, but 5 is obviously too little.  Make it 10, or 15, that seems mroe reasonable.

Those would be my main suggestions of things that could be implemented in 2018.
properties (22)
authorbinkyprod
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171120t025550325z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018","whale-guardian","orca-guardian","dolphin-guardian"],"users":["raised2b"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-20 02:55:48
last_update2017-11-20 02:55:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-27 02:55:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,649
author_reputation103,994,393,290,019
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,936,011
net_rshares0
@bitcoinparadise · (edited)
$1.45
* Improved notification system
* Hashed Timelock Contracts
* Confidential transactions
* Simplified key management system
* DEX
* Ability to purchase recharge of voting power. Burn the SBDs of some sort or another way those funds could be used. Perhaps converted back to the Reward Pool. Something similar to this:
https://steemit.com/superpower-upvote/@fyrstikken/2roxwb-would-it-be-cool-to-vote-with-28-000-superpowers-on-steem-or-golos-powered-front-end-from-time-to-time-with-me
πŸ‘  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorbitcoinparadise
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t220556931z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/superpower-upvote/@fyrstikken/2roxwb-would-it-be-cool-to-vote-with-28-000-superpowers-on-steem-or-golos-powered-front-end-from-time-to-time-with-me"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:06:00
last_update2017-11-16 22:07:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 22:06:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.145 HBD
curator_payout_value0.308 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length482
author_reputation52,935,636,369,082
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,615,974
net_rshares678,714,733,550
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@bitgeek ·
comment
Congratulations @steemitblog, this post is the  most rewarded post (based on pending payouts) in the last 12 hours written by a Hero account holder (accounts that hold between 10 and 100 Mega Vests). The total number of posts by Hero account holders during this period was 263 and the total pending payments to posts in this category was $3491.41. To see the full list of highest paid posts across all accounts categories, [click here](www.steemit.com/steemit/@bitgeek/payout-stats-report-for-17th-november-2017--part-ii). 

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, please reply stop to this comment.
properties (22)
authorbitgeek
permlinkre-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t074112
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata""
created2017-11-17 07:41:15
last_update2017-11-17 07:41:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:41:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length616
author_reputation13,049,044,453,787
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,652,523
net_rshares0
@bitopia ·
$0.07
There is a serious need for a revamp of the 'Promotion' platform. It is a fundamental utility that is lacking on the Steemit platform which could be hugely impactful. 

The issue of Upvote Services skewing the post ranking algorithm as well as causing general dissatisfaction amongst Steemians is very palpable right now. 

I am drafting  an in-depth suggestion for the revamping of the promotion platform and shall submit it to utopian.io.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbitopia
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t221322509z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 22:13:21
last_update2017-11-17 22:13:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 22:13:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.071 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length440
author_reputation1,729,892,019,965
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,720,730
net_rshares33,817,478,370
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@bitopia ·
$0.08
I may be drastically late to the party, however, I believe that one of the biggest issues facing Steemit right now is "Upvoted Services" which upend the entire sorting algorithm and is siphoning away so much of the rewards pool, all which drowning out smaller users. 

The growth of Steemit relies on having great content creators on Steemit, and with the current situation, I can say as a newer user on Steemit, it is very bleak for smaller users. 

I have created an 2 in-depth posts in regards to this situation, one diagnosing the issue and another posted on utopian.io as a proposed solution. I truly believe that the proposed solution will solved the issue at hand and I am doing my best for more users to consider it. I do not know what it will take to have it implemented, but I will give it my best. 

You can find the 2 posts here : 


[Growing Unhappiness with Upvote Bots on Steemit](https://steemit.com/steemit/@bitopia/growing-unhappiness-with-upvote-bots-on-steemit)
[Proposal for New 'Promoted' Function](https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@bitopia/proposal-for-new-promoted-function)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbitopia
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171124t144932651z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@bitopia/growing-unhappiness-with-upvote-bots-on-steemit","https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@bitopia/proposal-for-new-promoted-function"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-24 14:49:33
last_update2017-11-24 14:49:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-01 14:49:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.084 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,096
author_reputation1,729,892,019,965
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,398,838
net_rshares36,204,528,853
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@blysards ·
$1.30
I would see :
- The automatic translation of posts (like Etoro, Facebook, Twitter, etc ...)
- A widget to export his blog on his website.
- Suggestions to discover more content.
- An official chat to chat between users.
- Separate YouTubers from Bloggers because it creates inequalities in the audience.
- Create category for his blog.
- Millions of users will not have much power steem, how to monetize the content of blogs when the general public will come?
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorblysards
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t151419554z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 15:14:27
last_update2017-11-17 15:14:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 15:14:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.978 HBD
curator_payout_value0.324 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length459
author_reputation3,133,295,975,341
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,688,255
net_rshares603,281,914,978
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@bobskibob ·
$0.25
Something simple: have the Ability to follow and mute a tag
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorbobskibob
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171117t212921489z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.7","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-17 20:29:24
last_update2017-11-17 20:29:24
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 20:29:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.242 HBD
curator_payout_value0.010 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length59
author_reputation9,906,780,416,788
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,714,169
net_rshares123,842,175,298
author_curate_reward""
vote details (13)
@bronevik ·
$0.29
Definitely need this.
Also twitter-like lists that you could share and follow.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorbronevik
permlinkre-bobskibob-re-steemitblog-20171118t184125287z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 18:42:00
last_update2017-11-18 18:42:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 18:42:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.218 HBD
curator_payout_value0.070 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length78
author_reputation12,260,156,653,305
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,803,809
net_rshares129,659,575,819
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@boucaron ·
$1.81
Hi, follows few inputs (there are 2 posts from the last month) :
- I would like to see a feature about "groups" to enable good content of people to be more visible on the topics that we are interested into. Groups can be of 2 natures: 
   - Public ones based on tags. (can be seen as Feed filters)
   - Private ones that are having moderators and post selection.
I have a minor issue with moderators because it can create yet another lordship, but if anyone can create groups and share them it is not an issue.
- Any tool such as an integrated chat  and any improvement on the Comment Reply  to stimulate the community creation, expansion and retention
- https://steemit.com/steemit/@boucaron/steemit-feed-improvements-ideas
- Organizing your blog with a tree of your own categories and associate to them a list of posts (similar to youtube), it is already covered by another comment, but I think it is really important to structure the blog. 
- https://steemit.com/steem/@mkdouglas/proposal-how-steem-escrow-transactions-would-facilitate-trade-currency-exchange-and-lending-using-only-fiat-currencies-and-the-steem-blockchain-so-as-to-bypass-bitcoin-as-a-gateway-cryptocurrency-increase-the-number-of-active-steem-users-and-increase-the-
- GUI of the Web Front End:
    - A full featured editor for MarkDown
   - Notifications (also new comments on an upvoted post for instance)
   - Unified menu: there are two of them, we should have one. 
   - Thank you again for the night mode !
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorboucaron
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t100348905z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@boucaron/steemit-feed-improvements-ideas","https://steemit.com/steem/@mkdouglas/proposal-how-steem-escrow-transactions-would-facilitate-trade-currency-exchange-and-lending-using-only-fiat-currencies-and-the-steem-blockchain-so-as-to-bypass-bitcoin-as-a-gateway-cryptocurrency-increase-the-number-of-active-steem-users-and-increase-the-"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 10:03:48
last_update2017-11-17 10:03:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 10:03:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.355 HBD
curator_payout_value0.451 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,484
author_reputation3,973,467,197,811
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,662,975
net_rshares833,536,713,038
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@bronevik · (edited)
$0.61
My suggestions:
**1. Scalability.** Need to think about sharding. Content could be sharded by tag or topic. Imagine a withness who listens and displays only a few tags and maintain a list with who listens to others. Then we could achieve horisontal scalability without sacrificing decentralization.The currency distribution is harder to scale but we all need to think this out fast. Anyway, it would be wise to think how much load could generate 1 million active users and how nodes could handle it.
----------------------------------------
**2. Simplified frontend** Following latest block from russian communication agency we could understand that the time to our blocking from oppresive regimes is running short. The good news is that any steemit full node has all the information about our network, posts and votes. So, theoretically any node or witness could run his or her frontend of steem. We just need to provide a tool for it.
So, simplified open frontend that could easily be installed right next to a full node is a thing we should discuss.
-------------------------------------
**3. Social efforts**
We should start to work for audidience growth. I see a few points of growth here, e.g.:
* mining / crypto businesses who could use the platform for ads and social media efforts. We could even provide a helpdesk-support style services based on steem platform.
* streamers / youtube ppl.  Youtube had a few moves which dissapointed many professional and semi-professional content-makers. Like automatic demonetization. Twitch has thefty commisions policy. We have great video services - DTube, DLive and they could provide larger benefits for streamers and content makers. And we get their audience.
--------------------------------------------
**4. Budget**
One could not underestimate the ability to earn financial support for their steem-bound efforts and servises. We should have the ability to generate and fairly distribute budgets for them. You could see [this post](https://steemit.com/steem/@josephsavage/a-modest-proposal-my-thoughts-on-budget-proposals) for all the details.

**5. Encourage minnows**
Steemit (and other whales) could delegate part of their steem power to valuable content creators. This could be done with help of curators guilds and cost almost no human resources from teemit and whales themselves. Now, minnow has no incentive to participate after a month when he or she realise that rewards here are not for them.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorbronevik
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t183859615z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@josephsavage/a-modest-proposal-my-thoughts-on-budget-proposals"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 18:39:36
last_update2017-11-19 04:46:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 18:39:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.556 HBD
curator_payout_value0.054 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,455
author_reputation12,260,156,653,305
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,803,595
net_rshares274,491,359,451
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@brothermic ·
$0.24
Thanks for all the hard work!

Account creation must be on top! I expected HF20 before the end of the year this is a bummer :(
It would be very good if you made work of a referralsystem this would bring in tons of users!
filtering on feed
prepare to promote steemit and steem to the world (really hoping for this) you must have a budget for that right?
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorbrothermic
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t203053859z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:30:54
last_update2017-11-16 20:30:54
depth1
children6
last_payout2017-11-23 20:30:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.216 HBD
curator_payout_value0.020 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length352
author_reputation70,127,808,776,053
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,609,569
net_rshares110,873,785,370
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@noisy ·
> It would be very good if you made work of a referralsystem

no, No, NO, NOO!

> this would bring in tons of users!

Completely wrong kind of users. Here I explained why this is a worst idea ever:

https://steemit.com/roadmap2018/@steemitblog/steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested#@noisy/re-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t213343544z
properties (22)
authornoisy
permlinkre-brothermic-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t222752513z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/roadmap2018/@steemitblog/steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested#@noisy/re-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t213343544z"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:27:51
last_update2017-11-16 22:27:51
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 22:27:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length394
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,617,306
net_rshares0
@tuck-fheman ·
$1.19
Your referral link is ... https://steemit.com/?r=brothermic

There simply is no reward for using it outside stats, that aren't readily available, right now.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authortuck-fheman
permlinkre-brothermic-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210448835z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/?r=brothermic"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:04:48
last_update2017-11-16 21:04:48
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-11-23 21:04:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.097 HBD
curator_payout_value0.096 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length156
author_reputation345,778,813,561,569
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,075
net_rshares556,740,634,241
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@cornholio ·
$0.08
EspaΓ±ol? Es bunghole! Habla, blah habla, habla habla, habla bunghole...
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorcornholio
permlinkre-tuck-fheman-re-brothermic-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210448835z-20171116t211843162z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"meep_bot/0.0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:18:45
last_update2017-11-16 21:18:45
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 21:18:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.071 HBD
curator_payout_value0.004 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length72
author_reputation606,749,206,056
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,613,097
net_rshares35,690,902,646
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@smooth ·
$0.03
"Right now" after almost two years? Let's face it, the ball has by now been dropped on that completely. To pick up the ball and actually do something is a reasonable roadmap suggestion.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-tuck-fheman-re-brothermic-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t130150600z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 13:01:51
last_update2017-11-18 13:01:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 13:01:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.030 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length185
author_reputation253,602,537,834,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,774,683
net_rshares16,880,302,735
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@vandeberg ·
$0.04
The year isn't over.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorvandeberg
permlinkre-brothermic-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t001707307z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:17:06
last_update2017-11-17 00:17:06
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 00:17:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.027 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length20
author_reputation31,759,426,110,944
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,623,806
net_rshares16,924,235,126
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@carjhb ·
Thank you for asking! I'd love a "delete post" button

https://steemit.com/steemhelp/@carjhb/attention-steemit-developers-all-i-want-for-christmas-is
properties (22)
authorcarjhb
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171120t082646586z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemhelp/@carjhb/attention-steemit-developers-all-i-want-for-christmas-is"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-20 08:26:48
last_update2017-11-20 08:26:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-27 08:26:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length149
author_reputation350,239,517,087
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,956,652
net_rshares0
@cassidyandfranks ·
$0.08
How hard is it to create a NEW tab "highest payout post" for everyones blog so navigating to popular content would be easier with a "click"?
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorcassidyandfranks
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t213814928z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:37:48
last_update2017-11-16 21:37:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:37:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.060 HBD
curator_payout_value0.017 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length140
author_reputation13,390,877,479,799
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,614,332
net_rshares36,509,336,471
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@cericlark ·
$0.13
Hi, I'm a newbie, I only joined today but whilst I was waiting to join I tried to read some of the posts on Steemit. It would be great if the website could be made responsive/accessible. If I want to read a post I have to pan from left to right which is quite a bit of effort, especially when trying to read Steamit on my phone. I have large text and resolution on all my devices which means it is hard to read without panning and the signup button and check boxes disappeared off the edge of the page. I had to reduce the resolution of my Windows PC to sign up. I don't mind doing it, I read the posts because I was interested but as a consumer it would limit me to how much time I will spend reading posts. I'm thinking if you want to widen your reader base making the website more accessible would be helpful. Just my two cents. :)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorcericlark
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t225534055z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 22:55:36
last_update2017-11-17 22:55:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 22:55:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.096 HBD
curator_payout_value0.031 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length834
author_reputation69,777,343,317
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,723,235
net_rshares60,153,513,951
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@chiragpatel97 ·
A Redesigned Application please:)
properties (22)
authorchiragpatel97
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171118t202854460z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-18 12:28:57
last_update2017-11-18 12:28:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 12:28:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length33
author_reputation51,002,231,145
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,772,307
net_rshares0
@chireerocks ·
#roadmap2018 Hello, I want to suggest that it will be good if official Steemit app is launched so that it can provide notifications for new post, comments on post, replies and so many things.

Have a great day.
properties (22)
authorchireerocks
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t082909346z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 08:29:18
last_update2017-11-17 08:29:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 08:29:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length210
author_reputation327,821,690,945,691
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,656,099
net_rshares0
@coincentrado ·
Follow/Mute tags!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorcoincentrado
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204604213z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:44:00
last_update2017-11-16 20:44:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:44:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length17
author_reputation4,607,000,752,246
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,520
net_rshares4,858,202,887
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@colbertnews ·
https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://steemitimages.com/DQmfL7wBPNtcKMaq7vayrQC6iU2MJh2skVJ7GfYtH3EXYPr/image.png
properties (22)
authorcolbertnews
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171120t220417093z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://steemitimages.com/DQmfL7wBPNtcKMaq7vayrQC6iU2MJh2skVJ7GfYtH3EXYPr/image.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-20 22:04:18
last_update2017-11-20 22:04:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-27 22:04:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length113
author_reputation-1,660,928,842
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,023,695
net_rshares0
@condra ·
$1.05
3 weeks late to this but I'll chime in anyway. 

Communities Feature. - Long overdue. There is very little sense of community on Steemit, even within niche circles.

New post types, such as polls, playlists, galleries, Q+A, etc. 

Address the issue of unnatural voting. I don't know how but it needs to be addressed. 

Improve the homepage to be more fun, dynamic and give minnows a helping hand. Have featured posts, editors picks, wildcards, etc. 

Make Steemitblog and other "official" entities less faceless and impersonal.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorcondra
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171209t152331626z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-09 15:23:30
last_update2017-12-09 15:23:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-16 15:23:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.786 HBD
curator_payout_value0.261 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length527
author_reputation56,189,611,335,832
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id22,895,957
net_rshares266,083,028,506
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@connecteconomy · (edited)
$3.15
Thank you for asking us!

-  I would like to have the option to only show posts in my feed in languages that I understand. 

-  I would like to be able to share my payouts directly with others, *especially* with charities here on Steemit. I would like this option to work also on the comments, not only on the articles.

-  I would like posts to earn forever, even though payouts could be done every 7 days.

- I would like to be able to message people privately directly on the site (without Steemit.chat)

-  I would like to be able to run a report of my earnings, withdrawals etc and export it to excel 

- I would like to be able to just type away like in Word or Wordpress, because most of my time in Steemit is spent on formatting (and I'd love to be able to put an empty line after a headline :))

- I would like to be able to see who resteemed my posts so I can say thank you.

- I would like a wordpress plugin that will look and feel like it's part of my own blog, so I can stop double posting and simply integrate my Steemit blog in my website. And I want to be able to select which posts should appear there and which not.

Thank you 😊 
Anja
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorconnecteconomy
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t081028707z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 08:10:27
last_update2017-11-17 08:12:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 08:10:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.364 HBD
curator_payout_value0.785 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,153
author_reputation177,018,273,436,289
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,654,622
net_rshares1,454,702,862,819
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@crafter ·
I think it should be more user friendly
So that a new user doesn't find it complex
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorcrafter
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t015606261z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:56:09
last_update2017-11-17 01:56:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 01:56:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length82
author_reputation114,555,762,275
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,629,874
net_rshares121,857,020
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@cryptobychirag ·
_**As first of all steemit is increasing fastly like fire so there should be some steps to be taken to make it better social media platform. For that in my mind I have some point which can make it better place for authors and writers**_:-
* I have seen that many people write very good post but cannot gain that much vote that it should. So we should first of all change this think here because it may cause to overcome and loose the authors here.
* There should be some more earning facts here on steemit like as we all know that most people here write post to share knowledge and news here so there should be some contract like Google AdSense that people with reputation greater than 57 can put revenue ads on there post ,which will keep minnow here for a long time on steemit.
* Well there should be some feature like thumbnail etc. Which make post looking some thing good and valuable . There should be more different style of writing here and a good and good level link as one got on various blogging platform this will help in increasing growth of steemit high.

## That's all I want the changes in steemit in starting of 2018  (Q1).

_*Even this platform is fulfilling the need s of many people*_.

_**Thanks a lot to steemit whole team for providing such a good platform to people**_.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorcryptobychirag
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210314534z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:03:18
last_update2017-11-16 21:03:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:03:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,292
author_reputation846,054,178,572
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,971
net_rshares2,143,703,862
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@cryptographic ·
I’ve created a word cloud for the comments section of this post that I hope you will find of value and will want to share. While the creation of the actual word cloud is relatively easy and straightforward, the creation of a relevant word list that will produce a meaningful word cloud is quite another matter, as I’m sure you know, and takes considerable time and effort. Unfortunately, as of now, the post has only had 41 views. It needs a little love. Perhaps a resteem might be of help, if you think it is worthwhile, and, of course, it would be much appreciated too. TIA
https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input
properties (22)
authorcryptographic
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171121t114518449z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-21 11:45:15
last_update2017-11-21 11:45:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-28 11:45:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length670
author_reputation111,198,190,831,086
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,079,947
net_rshares0
@cryptokeepr ·
$0.25
I think there needs to be more incentive for people to invest in STEEM and hold it instead of just continuously cashing out rewards earned which has driven the price down for many months. 

This could be accomplished by adjusting the curation rewards ratio a bit so people are rewarded more for actually holding their steem / powering it up / not powering down so much. Maybe authors who take their payout in 100% SP could be given a little bit higher percentage of the rewards split than those who select 50/50 SBD/SP option?

One thing that is very obvious is we have way more people trying to author than those pursuing earnings through curating. That needs to change somehow. I’m not saying I have the answer but this is one thing that’s been on my mind.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorcryptokeepr
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171116t154344112z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.7","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-16 20:43:45
last_update2017-11-16 20:43:45
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 20:43:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.182 HBD
curator_payout_value0.063 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length758
author_reputation12,860,934,292,894
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,500
net_rshares119,389,365,987
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@dhouse ·
There is tremendous incentive to hold SP, I think. It's the main incentive in the system.
properties (22)
authordhouse
permlinkre-cryptokeepr-re-steemitblog-20171116t231658464z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:16:57
last_update2017-11-16 23:16:57
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:16:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length89
author_reputation4,150,202,158,075
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,087
net_rshares0
@cryptopie ·
We need an enhanced notification system @steemitblog
And if possible a way for people to see their past posts without scrolling down too much.
properties (22)
authorcryptopie
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t223750672z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemitblog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:37:54
last_update2017-11-16 22:37:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 22:37:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length142
author_reputation829,274,168,394,582
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,617,898
net_rshares0
@d-pend · (edited)
$29.32
Perfect timing. Thanks for asking. Here's a list of things that come to mind presently:

1. Add an option to filter out resteems on people's blogs so they don't look cluttered and you can find the main author's posts easily. I never resteem posts because this doesn't exist, which is kind of a shame, but it makes your blog look terrible without this feature.
2. **Consider changing the formula for curation so that curators are more highly rewarded again.** 25% seems to be too low to encourage people to spend much effort curating. Then again, 50% seems a bit high. Either **70/30, 65/35** or even **60/40** author to curator split. **This should be a top priority.** *[Edit: another great option would be to have curation rewards customizable. Then people could choose how much of the rewards they want to share with their curators.]*
3. Prioritize releasing a fully functional Steemit app for iOs/ Android, not just a wallet app. This will bring more people in first-world countries online and drive demand for STEEM up.
4. Keep trying out new cosmetic variations for the site and take polls on the community's preferences. Be creative/innovative! It is a minor thing to a developer that makes a big difference to non-technical users, increases excitement and the impression that changes are constantly being implemented and feedback from the community is being valued by Team Steemit.
5. I won't say too much about account creation since it's already being prioritized, but yeah, that will open the floodgates to mass adoption. Make sure you're ready for hundreds of thousands and millions of new users before you implement it (which you probably already realize.)

At the moment, that's what comes to mind. I may edit this comment with other requests as they come forth. Thank you so much for asking!!!
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authord-pend
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204044267z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:40:45
last_update2017-11-17 01:55:24
depth1
children18
last_payout2017-11-23 20:40:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value22.789 HBD
curator_payout_value6.530 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,808
author_reputation419,325,790,516,151
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,274
net_rshares13,697,901,889,114
author_curate_reward""
vote details (48)
@cryptographic ·
$0.11
I’ve created a word cloud for the comments section of this post that I hope you will find of value and will want to share. While the creation of the actual word cloud is relatively easy and straightforward, the creation of a relevant word list that will produce a meaningful word cloud is quite another matter, as I’m sure you know, and takes considerable time and effort. Unfortunately, as of now, the post has only had 41 views. It needs a little love. Perhaps a resteem might be of help, if you think it is worthwhile, and, of course, it would be much appreciated too. TIA
https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorcryptographic
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171121t115538034z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-21 11:55:36
last_update2017-11-21 11:55:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-28 11:55:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.085 HBD
curator_payout_value0.027 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length670
author_reputation111,198,190,831,086
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,080,762
net_rshares47,646,593,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@d-pend ·
$3.51
I guess people don't like my curation suggestion. Lol. (Probably don't like the idea of their author payouts going down.) Right now Steemit is mostly content creators all hungry for a payout and few curators, so something really needs to be done about it, even if bloggers don't like it, they will get used to it and it will improve the platform.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authord-pend
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t211357824z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:13:57
last_update2017-11-16 21:13:57
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-11-23 21:13:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.717 HBD
curator_payout_value0.791 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length346
author_reputation419,325,790,516,151
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,768
net_rshares1,636,241,858,231
author_curate_reward""
vote details (9)
@bbrewer ·
$0.30
I agree that curation needs to be looked at. It would be nice to make changes that encourage whales to upvote/curate from varying authors so more authors get a nice payout occasionally.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorbbrewer
permlinkre-d-pend-re-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t230804368z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:08:06
last_update2017-11-16 23:08:06
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-23 23:08:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.282 HBD
curator_payout_value0.022 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length185
author_reputation7,852,511,958,185
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,619,539
net_rshares143,046,123,572
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@mother2chicks · (edited)
$0.13
I like # 4  by d-pend, where the community decides on issues of realavence that will affect us all. One question at a time.  If you notice,  this type of questionnaire tends to attract the same people repeatedly. If stats are correct their are a whole lot of steemians that are not seeing this right now. Thanks for your suggestions.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authormother2chicks
permlinkre-d-pend-re-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t140348004z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 14:03:51
last_update2017-11-19 14:05:15
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 14:03:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.119 HBD
curator_payout_value0.014 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length333
author_reputation10,040,963,116,949
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,879,629
net_rshares59,376,741,990
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@gabrielchm ·
$0.05
I agree with him
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorgabrielchm
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205340138z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:53:48
last_update2017-11-16 20:53:48
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:53:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.044 HBD
curator_payout_value0.010 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length16
author_reputation164,811,692,197
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,268
net_rshares26,290,624,443
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@geekpowered ·
I could see reading posts on my phone, or maybe a tablet, but there is no way I would want to write a blog post on my phone.
I think an app would mainly help users that are already here stay in touch, and respond to comments on their posts. That's highly important though. It will mean more activity on the site.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgeekpowered
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t031143820z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:14:48
last_update2017-11-17 03:14:48
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 03:14:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length312
author_reputation99,319,261,112,097
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,635,037
net_rshares81,237,934
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@mehedi118 ·
Well said bro
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-geekpowered-re-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065510416z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:55:15
last_update2017-11-17 06:55:15
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:55:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length13
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,329
net_rshares-7,641,326,259
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@imp.unity ·
Number 1 is a **_must_**

For some users it's no problem to have lots of Resteems, but for others, I think having tons of other people's posts clouding our own blog is not the ideal visual setup we're striving for!

Great idea. It's been something preventing me from hitting more resteems on articles I like just because I think to myself "do I really want this to be **_there_** in 2 months time"
properties (22)
authorimp.unity
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171229t175648733z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-29 17:56:51
last_update2017-12-29 17:56:51
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-01-05 17:56:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length397
author_reputation4,620,998,574,245
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id25,916,443
net_rshares0
@jenkinrocket ·
$0.05
1, 3, 4, & 5 are all right on the money.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorjenkinrocket
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t211142032z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:11:42
last_update2017-11-16 21:11:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:11:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.050 HBD
curator_payout_value0.002 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length40
author_reputation26,749,165,203,694
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,606
net_rshares25,420,215,371
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@mehedi118 ·
Informative Comment..
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065420460z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:54:24
last_update2017-11-17 06:54:24
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:54:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length21
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,261
net_rshares-7,635,523,550
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@rigaronib ·
$0.05
Great suggestions, @d-pend - especially 1 & 4!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorrigaronib
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210408598z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["d-pend"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:04:06
last_update2017-11-16 21:04:06
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:04:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.047 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length46
author_reputation171,562,604,416,656
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,023
net_rshares25,420,215,371
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@smooth · (edited)
$1.58
> 25% seems to be too low to encourage people to spend much effort curating

The problem, in part, is that it isn't actually 25%, it is much less than 25% after factoring in the reverse auction (early voting penalty). The last estimate I saw was 12%. Even bringing it back up to actually 25% (or closer to 25%) would be a step in the right direction.

I too like @jesta's idea to make it customization on a per-post or per-community basis.

> Prioritize releasing a fully functional Steemit app for iOs/ Android, not just a wallet app.

Maybe partner with esteem or other existing apps to promote them better, or even acquire them outright. That's a much faster path to getting this done.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t044654900z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["jesta"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 04:46:57
last_update2017-11-18 06:41:39
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-25 04:46:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.202 HBD
curator_payout_value0.378 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length688
author_reputation253,602,537,834,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,742,555
net_rshares730,445,535,974
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@d-pend ·
$0.17
Yeah, thanks for pointing that out, you're exactly right. I agree that assimilating existing app development would be a solid choice if it works out.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authord-pend
permlinkre-smooth-re-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t072844181z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 07:28:45
last_update2017-11-18 07:28:45
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 07:28:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.131 HBD
curator_payout_value0.043 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length149
author_reputation419,325,790,516,151
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,752,481
net_rshares79,422,097,384
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@thedarkhorse ·
$3.19
Like your list and think it's pretty dead on. #3 will cause more adoption naturally and increase retention. Currently this feels like being on Myspace having to be at my computer to post. 99% of my facebook time is on my cell, very rare I use my computer for it.

And #1 is Top of my list. My feed gets cluttered with resteems and has caused me to unfollow a few people that resteem everything under the sun vs quality, but I like their posts. Being able to toggle that on and off would be a huge help to make sure I don't miss content from those I want to read in my limited time. If there is more time then seeing content from others is of interest and then it makes sense to turn on the resteems...but I should be in control of this.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorthedarkhorse
permlinkre-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t215657541z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:56:57
last_update2017-11-16 21:56:57
depth2
children2
last_payout2017-11-23 21:56:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.478 HBD
curator_payout_value0.715 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length736
author_reputation64,296,958,099,922
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,615,428
net_rshares1,490,675,359,562
author_curate_reward""
vote details (11)
@rebeccabe ·
$0.03
I am with you on this @thedarkhorse and have never seen anyone mention it.  I too quit following some folks that like to resteem so many posts.  

 I like their posts but would prefer not to get so many in my feed they resteem.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorrebeccabe
permlinkre-thedarkhorse-re-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t013212569z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["thedarkhorse"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:32:12
last_update2017-11-17 01:32:12
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 01:32:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.020 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length227
author_reputation18,143,162,511,159
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,628,364
net_rshares12,745,296,504
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@revo ·
$0.09
I created a front end called [steemfeed.social](http://steemfeed.social) that allows you to filter out resteems (among a host of other things).  It's still pretty beta at the moment, but it's there if you want to see only the original content of the people you follow.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorrevo
permlinkre-thedarkhorse-re-d-pend-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t034339647z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["http://steemfeed.social"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:43:39
last_update2017-11-17 03:43:39
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:43:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.070 HBD
curator_payout_value0.020 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length268
author_reputation13,099,225,944,898
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,636,877
net_rshares42,532,416,025
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@dajohns1420 ·
$3.41
I think returning to 50/50 payout needs to be discussed. It would take away some of the incentive for whales to sell their votes and increase incentive for everyone to vote and interact more. Currently steemit is only attractive to content creators, very few people are here just to consume content. I think for steemit to be a long term success we need to encourage more of these users, but they get bored when their vote is worth nothing and they get minuscule curation rewards. Returning to 50/50 rewards would make the platform more exciting for content consumers, not just content creators. Anything we can do to encourage more inderaction would be beneficial. A lot of newbs just think this site is for bots interacting with each other. Some things can be improved with a hardfork, but others things just depend on the actions of the whales. Those with a lot of SP have a lot of influence on the way the public perceives steemit. They could make or break the platform. I just hope they can see that. 

Another thing that's always bugged me is that when you re steem a post it stays on your blog. I would resteem a lot more if it didn't clog up my feed and push my post farther down where they are less likely to get upvoted if someone visits my page. 

I'm happy to hear the registration process is being looked at. Thanks for the update, looking forward to 2018!
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authordajohns1420
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210302119z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:03:03
last_update2017-11-16 21:03:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:03:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.570 HBD
curator_payout_value0.837 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,369
author_reputation16,883,351,608,843
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,949
net_rshares1,589,349,385,171
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@dana-edwards ·
$1.27
My suggestion, implement the back end tools necessary for Bitconnect style referral programs for SMTs. 

References
---
1. https://steemit.com/crypto/@dana-edwards/incentive-trees-and-what-we-can-learn-from-bitconnect
2. https://steemit.com/steem/@dana-edwards/would-steem-benefit-from-a-bitconnect-style-referral-program
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authordana-edwards
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t055629296z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/crypto/@dana-edwards/incentive-trees-and-what-we-can-learn-from-bitconnect","https://steemit.com/steem/@dana-edwards/would-steem-benefit-from-a-bitconnect-style-referral-program"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:56:30
last_update2017-11-17 05:56:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 05:56:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.267 HBD
curator_payout_value0.002 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length321
author_reputation353,623,611,191,427
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,645,422
net_rshares587,608,740,374
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@danmaruschak ·
I think Steemit would probably benefit from some more and better "feed management" options and ways of discovering content. Right now we only have a binary follow/don't-follow for individual accounts, but there are other things that could be done.

* The ability to follow tags. Right now when I'm looking for new content or new people to interact with I peruse the "new" view of certain tags. I have bookmarks set up in my browser to do that, but it seems like something that could be integrated into the normal interaction flow of the site.
* The ability to selectively follow people's content. Suppose you think somebody has interesting things to say about some topics but their political posts get under your skin. Or maybe they have one interest area that you care about but five that bore you to tears. Right now if you follow them you get it all, or if you don't follow them you might miss some stuff. How about the ability to use some tag "math" to see only a subset of what they post? You could "unsubscribe" to someone's _politics_ posts, or just follow their posts in the _drawing_ tag but not anything else. (Google+ does something like this with its Collections feature and that's one of the few good UI changes that has been implemented on that platform.)
* Multiple feeds. It might be useful for people to be able to configure multiple feeds for different modes of engagement. For example, maybe one is just for things they have a high probability of engaging with, the kind of stuff they want to see every time they visit the site, while a different one casts a slightly broader net and they only peruse it when they're in the mood for hunting for underappreciated content from creators they're not familiar with.
* The ability to screen out certain tags from views. Certain topics tend to dominate other tags. For example, when I'm trying to look through a tag and see mostly posts about bitcoin or other cryptocurrency topics my eyes glaze over -- it's just not something I'm interested in reading very much about. Maybe this could be a "filtered" view in addition to (or modifying) trending, new, hot, and promoted?
properties (22)
authordanmaruschak
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t150416544z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 15:04:18
last_update2017-11-19 15:04:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 15:04:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,134
author_reputation515,635,901,168,710
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,885,329
net_rshares0
@darkflame ·
I would like to be able to integrate Steemit sign in on my own website, but it still seems too complicated. I am trying to learn all I can though.
properties (22)
authordarkflame
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t213409279z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:34:12
last_update2017-11-16 21:34:12
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-11-23 21:34:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length146
author_reputation90,965,358,487,919
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,614,113
net_rshares0
@dhouse ·
$0.05
I've only glanced at the API but it seems very straightforward. Keep learning!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordhouse
permlinkre-darkflame-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231838181z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:18:36
last_update2017-11-16 23:18:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:18:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.035 HBD
curator_payout_value0.011 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length78
author_reputation4,150,202,158,075
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,199
net_rshares21,906,730,289
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@noly ·
They've made it as easy as possible with current technologies. Your best bet is to continue learning and focus on JavaScript and Node.JS.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authornoly
permlinkre-darkflame-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t182635679z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.0.0"}
created2017-11-18 18:26:39
last_update2017-11-18 18:26:39
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 18:26:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length137
author_reputation7,065,389,353,481
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,802,585
net_rshares754,352,463
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@darrengarvey ·
Why not let us users build bots that can fight spam on the system and receive STEEM for doing a good job.

Easy enough to do - and fun - but it does take time. Being able to reward the authors of the bots could open up a hilarious ecosystem of anti-spam and funny bots.

People are writing bots to exploit the ecosystem as it is anyway...
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordarrengarvey
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t010504162z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:05:09
last_update2017-11-17 01:05:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 01:05:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length338
author_reputation9,680,000
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,626,722
net_rshares619,520,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@denniskoray ·
#roadmap2018 It would be great to have a steemit app and also live streaming like periscope oder FB Live.
properties (22)
authordenniskoray
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180109t183616508z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-09 18:36:15
last_update2018-01-09 18:36:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-16 18:36:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length105
author_reputation211,267,442,112,108
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,313,936
net_rshares0
@dhouse ·
$0.48
First off, I love Steem and am super excited about it. My suggestion would be to try and figure out how to get rid of all the ways that people automate stuff, use spam, and game the system to make money. 

As an aside, I would like to mention that I find the conflation in this post of the Steem blockchain, which is SUPPOSED to be decentralized, and Steemit, which is a private company, quite disturbing. I wish "Team Steemit" would speak to this in some way. Ultimately, the Steem block chain is supposed to be decentralized, right? Then why does "Team Steemit" simply declare what is going to happen with it (SMTs are Coming!!)? Shouldn't the delegated witnesses and the stake holders have a say? Isn't that how a DPOS blockchain is supposed to work? Maybe I just don't understand these things. Is it just because the founders have a majority (or close) or all the Steem? I don't mean to push anoyone's buttons or make trouble, but it is a very strange elephant in the room.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authordhouse
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204051946z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:40:51
last_update2017-11-16 20:40:51
depth1
children4
last_payout2017-11-23 20:40:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.363 HBD
curator_payout_value0.117 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length977
author_reputation4,150,202,158,075
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,284
net_rshares224,964,504,799
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@ned · (edited)
$0.95
SMTs we, steemit, are going to bring to production candidate status, meaning we are going to develop the technology regardless of whether it's implemented in Steem, and the changes (SMTs) will either be adopted or rejected - all through Steem's governance processes.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorned
permlinkre-dhouse-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t222740506z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:27:39
last_update2017-11-16 22:29:51
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 22:27:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.720 HBD
curator_payout_value0.231 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length266
author_reputation94,449,026,656,258
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,617,292
net_rshares443,905,021,332
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@dhouse ·
Thanks for the clarification ned!! I really do appreciate it
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordhouse
permlinkre-ned-re-dhouse-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231258358z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:12:57
last_update2017-11-16 23:12:57
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:12:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length60
author_reputation4,150,202,158,075
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,619,868
net_rshares620,258,039
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@timcliff ·
$1.81
Anyone (including Steemit) is able to develop changes to the Steem blockchain code. Once it is developed, it is up to the witnesses to decide whether it is adopted. Right now Steemit is largely defining the development path for the blockchain, as their developers are doing a vast majority of the development. It would be great to see more changes from community developers being proposed, developed, and accepted by the witness.

As far as SMTs, there has been a lot of conversation about them with the top level witnesses, and although there hasn’t been any official decisions made as far as whether to accept or reject the proposal, the general consensus seems to be that the idea is supported.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-dhouse-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231114072z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:11:15
last_update2017-11-16 23:11:15
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 23:11:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.429 HBD
curator_payout_value0.381 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length697
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,619,747
net_rshares844,353,842,455
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@dhouse ·
Thank you!!!
properties (22)
authordhouse
permlinkre-timcliff-re-dhouse-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231213301z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:12:12
last_update2017-11-16 23:12:12
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:12:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length12
author_reputation4,150,202,158,075
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,619,810
net_rshares0
@didarulselim ·
steem is steem, its really awesome, thanks for sharing
@followed and upvoted for you
properties (22)
authordidarulselim
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204711664z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["followed"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:47:12
last_update2017-11-16 20:47:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:47:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length84
author_reputation318,078,640,169
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,770
net_rshares0
@dijetechili ·
Thank you @ned
properties (22)
authordijetechili
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171231t130807437z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["ned"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-31 13:09:03
last_update2017-12-31 13:09:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-07 13:09:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length14
author_reputation227,440,945,758
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id26,212,773
net_rshares0
@dimarss · (edited)
$0.05
It's nice to see the readiness of the team to interact with the community!
Repost!
Β  **...my friends from golos.io should see - how the core.team can work and communicate with a people!!!**
## Thank for your hard work. I wish you a successful hardfork!
πŸ‘  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authordimarss
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t073041204z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 07:30:42
last_update2017-11-17 07:58:42
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 07:30:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.041 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length252
author_reputation20,872,884,109,791
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,651,791
net_rshares22,872,700,868
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@dreamon ·
Do it!
properties (22)
authordreamon
permlinkre-dimarss-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t075302936z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 07:53:03
last_update2017-11-17 07:53:03
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:53:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length6
author_reputation11,223,329,625,090
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,653,363
net_rshares0
@distantsignal ·
1)  Bot reduction and resistance
2)  Chain Filtering - so that Zappl and Steepshot don't pollute Steemit or Busy.  
3)  Polls
4)  Encrypted Messenger
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authordistantsignal
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t211947260z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:19:45
last_update2017-11-16 21:19:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:19:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length149
author_reputation32,496,313,953,302
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,613,173
net_rshares672,993,021
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@dodecahydra ·
Discontinued use of Google as the Steemit platform search engine would be nice, as they are openly censored by the ADL. 

 I fail to see how Jews are solely qualified to decide what is and isn't OK to discuss on the Internet.  And no one would care if I was pointing out that "ONLY stamp collectors shouldn't censor the Internet," or, "ONLY ballerinas shouldn't censor the Internet".  Yet, as soon as someone points out the **vital reality** of the Jewish power mechanism, there is no shortage of state-indoctrinated youth anxious to yell "ANTI-SEMITE!!!!!" rather than debate the situation on terms of observable, verifiable reality, to locate the **cause** of our problems *and stop chasing symptoms.*

Anyone unsure of what I'm talking about should watch this documentary while they still can.  And while doing so, contemplate the potential reasons behind why **it is a federal crime in 17 countries to even investigate the alleged Jewish holocaust of WWII**--and what it would mean for the "White supremacy"/anti-"Nazi" narrative being pushed against Western culture right now IF IT TURNED OUT that some of what we've been told about WWII were actually a lie....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQoUO7Tv1-o&bpctr=1510934107

The Truth is not "hate speech."  The Truth is not enhanced by censoring information but by reviewing it.  If you are trying to be an alternative platform, this seems like the most obvious first step to have been taken already.
properties (22)
authordodecahydra
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t153340159z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"image":["https://img.youtube.com/vi/GQoUO7Tv1-o/0.jpg"],"links":["https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQoUO7Tv1-o&bpctr=1510934107"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 15:33:39
last_update2017-11-17 15:33:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 15:33:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,456
author_reputation308,231,825,391
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,690,202
net_rshares0
@donkeypong ·
$24.37
properties (23)
authordonkeypong
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t233137743z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:31:39
last_update2017-11-16 23:31:39
depth1
children18
last_payout2017-11-23 23:31:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value18.288 HBD
curator_payout_value6.077 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length38
author_reputation431,667,636,679,304
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,988
net_rshares11,355,434,728,639
author_curate_reward""
vote details (33)
@ehiboss ·
Exactly @donkeyong, communities are being overlooked and they are the building block of the platform. Do we want growth on the platrform? Yes! but then imagine reviewing the curation formula to 50/50, that is basically taking away more from an author who already earns less simply because you enjoyed his content enough to even vote.
This is like building a house from the roof first when there is need for the foundation (communities) to be built first.
I admit the roadmap shows steemit has progress in mind but the communities should be a priority like you said.
properties (22)
authorehiboss
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t124256977z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["donkeyong"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 13:49:09
last_update2017-11-19 13:49:09
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 13:49:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length565
author_reputation75,757,423,428,302
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,878,370
net_rshares0
@lemouth ·
Straight to the point!
properties (22)
authorlemouth
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t100008987z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 10:00:09
last_update2017-11-17 10:00:09
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 10:00:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length22
author_reputation338,011,164,701,274
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,662,701
net_rshares0
@liberosist · (edited)
$6.05
Yes, yes, yes! 

I'll skip all the discussion about Steem blockchain - that's heavily discussed - to something that's sometimes overlooked. Of course, I'm talking about the user experience. Ultimately, that is obviously the end goal for any product. I'm glad to see a renewed focus on the end user from the Steemit team, but there's a long way to go. 

Before I joined Steem, I firmly decried censorship. But Steem has taught me the hard way that an uncensorable platform without quality curation and content discovery makes for an abysmal experience. 

Before going any further, I'd like to define said "merit" and "quality" I refer to not as a subjective measure; but one approaching objective popularity. What a large majority of people really enjoy seeing. Letting a couple of whales decide what content is discoverable for potentially millions is borderline tyrannical - an amusing subversion of the concepts of liberty indeed. 

**What a vast majority of the populace really want is to just to find a welcoming platform where they meet like minded people and discuss subjects they like, without friction. They want the best content easily discoverable.**

A decentralized solution absolutely has to offer the same quality or better user experience as a centralized solution, or it will never be adopted en-masse. That's fine, of course, but as far as I'm aware, the goal for Steem is mass adoption. 

I'd like to see a Steem interface that offers a pleasant experience for the users -

1) A sophisticated Communities system, of course. 
2) All kinds of discoverability / filtering options, machine learning solutions that pick up on the user's voting and commenting behaviour etc. The home page should be taken seriously, and offer attractive content tailored to each user. 
3) Gamification (I'm sure this will be in your 2018 roadmap). This could tie into a new Rep system, where merit is determined by quality of contributions and not stakeholding. 
4) Performance perception on par with a centralized solutions. When I hit "upvote", it should light up instantly, just like on every other social network. It doesn't matter if it's registered in the blockchain 3 seconds later, or even 6 seconds later if there was an issue. I'm well aware this is a challenging problem, but one that must be implemented somehow. (I'm aware some Steem frontends may have this already, albeit flawed) It makes a significant impression to offer a performant service.  
5) **Finally, and most importantly, moderators and curators would sort content in the Community not by stakeholding but on merit.** I don't expect Steemit.com to be this, but this is absolutely necessary if Steemit wants to offer a better experience than Reddit. It's as simple as this - I want to go to the Movies subcommunity, and find the best content right at the top. To achieve this, the Movies subcommunity's trending page should be ordered by weight of the best moderators and curators. This needs a combination of centralisation (to get a Community kickstarted with competent moderators) and decentralisation (the community members vote for the best curators). Gamification and a revised Rep system can tie into this - the most engaged community members gain greater weight in choosing their curators and moderators. 

Needless to say, sorting by pending payout should always be an option - but never the default. 

Of course, users should be able to choose their preferred curators etc, and get a custom feed, but the default trending page matters. 

Moderators should absolutely be able to mute and ban miscreants from their Communities. There could be an option to offer elections for bans, for communities that prefer to be more democratic. Again, the quality contributors gain a greater weight. Of course, banned users' posts remain on the blockchain for those interested, and they could always join a competing Community. 

I could go on and on, but you get the gist. 

Eagerly looking forward to Communities!
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorliberosist
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t060620967z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:06:30
last_update2017-11-17 06:30:09
depth2
children11
last_payout2017-11-24 06:06:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value4.539 HBD
curator_payout_value1.508 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,981
author_reputation177,167,275,265,899
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,646,116
net_rshares2,796,119,859,734
author_curate_reward""
vote details (12)
@jostein ·
There is a need to focus on the community aspects of this platform I agree. But I do not agree with the tailored content as described in point 2. Because that then becomes over time like safahouses for only content that you agree with. Being an issue that is currently in effect on FB now that manny critiq for that reason.

I also question the gamification of this platform. I see no need to impliment more functions then what already exist in that regard as that runs the risk of cenralization of visible content. Same is true for giving too much power to users with high merit on upvote effects. As that them creates the effect of them being the dictators of value. And value and what one deems as quality content, is very diversified. Meaning quality content that is not seen as quality by the dictator in this scenario wil not be seen.

Lastly I whould like to see the implimentation of a easyer more direct way to send private messeges to other users from the main site, and not as a seperate chat  sideplatform. Does not need to be a inbrowser cat as FB ahve now, just a way to send a messege. Internal email system kinda funciton.
properties (22)
authorjostein
permlinkre-liberosist-re-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t134250327z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 13:42:54
last_update2017-11-17 13:42:54
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 13:42:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,138
author_reputation280,861,191,168
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,679,659
net_rshares0
@markangeltrueman ·
As always, the voice of sanity. Communities breed good content. That's all i'm here for....good content.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authormarkangeltrueman
permlinkre-liberosist-re-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t120541978z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 12:05:39
last_update2017-11-17 12:05:39
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 12:05:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length104
author_reputation75,759,505,276,179
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,671,487
net_rshares0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@reddust ·
$0.40
I really want to see this happen!
>Gamification (I'm sure this will be in your 2018 roadmap). This could tie into a new Rep system, where merit is determined by quality of contributions and not stakeholding.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorreddust
permlinkre-liberosist-re-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t234500225z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 23:45:00
last_update2017-11-17 23:45:00
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 23:45:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.299 HBD
curator_payout_value0.098 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length207
author_reputation167,904,626,237,187
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,725,858
net_rshares186,028,569,168
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@shaka · (edited)
$8.91
Communities yes, Moderators (with exclusive rights) no.

Communities will certainly be helpful for better content dissection and will foster user interaction. Otherwise, stake-weighted allocation of rewards is the name of the game. I donΒ΄t want to see a new class of super-users with stake-independent extra-powers being installed. Who would summon these anyway? And by which mechanism? Who decides? Stake-weighted voting as for witnesses? Pseudo-democratic decisions by the communities themselves? I donΒ΄t see how this can workout without giving up on the core principles of Steemit as a decentralized content evaluation platform.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorshaka
permlinkre-liberosist-re-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t120705326z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 12:07:06
last_update2017-11-17 12:53:42
depth3
children7
last_payout2017-11-24 12:07:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value6.693 HBD
curator_payout_value2.219 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length631
author_reputation738,584,176,624,744
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,671,606
net_rshares4,119,122,110,191
author_curate_reward""
vote details (18)
@mehedi118 ·
Right Sir ,,,
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t064702003z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:47:06
last_update2017-11-17 06:47:06
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:47:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length13
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,648,736
net_rshares-7,612,312,711
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@nanzo-scoop ·
$0.52
100%. Communities were an objective of the [2017 roadmap](https://steem.io/2017roadmap.pdf.), with an aim to deliver in Q3.  It would be great to see these happen in 2018.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authornanzo-scoop
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t155410561z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steem.io/2017roadmap.pdf."],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 15:54:09
last_update2017-11-17 15:54:09
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 15:54:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.390 HBD
curator_payout_value0.129 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length171
author_reputation304,748,025,353,998
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,692,017
net_rshares241,525,447,369
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@smooth ·
Agree. Agree. Agree.

I'm sure there are other things worth doing, but do that first and then reassess. It is such a huge change that it could change many current assumptions about how the platform works and what it needs.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t044957400z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 04:50:00
last_update2017-11-18 04:50:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 04:50:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length222
author_reputation253,602,537,834,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,742,715
net_rshares1,118,686,181
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@vikramrana ·
Nice post
properties (22)
authorvikramrana
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t051823582z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:18:36
last_update2017-11-17 05:18:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 05:18:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length9
author_reputation-506,276,374,747
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,643,103
net_rshares0
@dragonite ·
APR at least 10% to attract more investors.
properties (22)
authordragonite
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t050754954z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:08:00
last_update2017-11-17 05:08:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 05:08:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length43
author_reputation108,440,257,363
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,642,374
net_rshares0
@dragosroua · (edited)
I would like to see two issues addressed:

1. **storage** - At the current growth rate, the blockchain will become soon unmanageable. My suggestion would be to create a new active role: **content host**, which will act simply as a distributed content hosting agent _outside of the transactions_ hosted on the main Steem blockchain. There are many general purpose blockchain-based storage solutions: filecoin, storj, sia, burst. The **content host** could be a new role (like a witness), which will contribute storage and retrieval capacity, being rewarded for this specific type of activity.

2. **pay to post transactions** - at this moment, the flow of money in the Steem ecosystem is unidirectional: it comes only _from_ the blockchain towards users and there's little real economical value to the token because of that. I suggest the introduction of a "pay to post" feature, for certain types of content, which will reverse the flow: _from_ users to blockchain. For instance, comments. An optional feature could make comments "pay to post", as per [this issue](https://github.com/steemit/steem/issues/1784) submitted to GitHub. Paying to publish certain types of content could be paired with various categories of posts, as per @jesta suggestions to create a set of best practices about the formal structure of the content (we can have a category of content called "ads", that will cost), or it could be made at the UI level, by every site (specific layouts could have an associated cost, for instance). Payment can take various routes: to a common fund, split among beneficiaries, tipping the author, etc. Not only a "pay to post' option (not enforced for all posts in the blockchain, just optional) will show how spammers will react, will reduce the size of the blockchain and will add economical value to the token.

_LE: moe details in a full post [here](https://steemit.com/steemit/@dragosroua/steemit-roadmap-2018-my-2-suggestions-pods-proof-of-distributed-storage-and-optional-pay-per-content-operations)._
properties (22)
authordragosroua
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t102127242z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["jesta"],"links":["https://github.com/steemit/steem/issues/1784","https://steemit.com/steemit/@dragosroua/steemit-roadmap-2018-my-2-suggestions-pods-proof-of-distributed-storage-and-optional-pay-per-content-operations"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 10:21:24
last_update2017-11-19 11:45:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 10:21:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,017
author_reputation372,798,229,806,288
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,862,259
net_rshares0
@drakos ·
$6.45
#### 1- Improve the signup process
Not only by accelerating the signups volume, but by making it easier. Most users are newbies, they don't have a sense of the complexity of Steem. Many lose their passwords minutes after getting approved. More information needs to be pushed to guide them on what to do. Simply mentioning to read the FAQ doesn't help, rarely do they read the FAQ. They need to be schooled in a quick and informative way (welcome video, tutorial page), before they start blogging.

#### 2- Improve the UI layout
Steemit's UI  is very basic and lacks an attractive punch. Every major website has a signature look that can be spotted from a mile away. Steemit.com doesn't. It's a header with a white background, not very appealing. Condenser must look good, sexy and attractive. Colors play a major psychological role that must be harnessed. It's one thing to push for advertising, but if the site looks bland, it's a turn-off. **Image is everything.**

#### 3 - Optimize the header sections
The trending page is the worst of all. Always the same people are featured there with the same subjects. There's no diversity. Either remove the trending page or find a way to give more focus to other quality non-repetitive posts. Honestly I don't care about @sweetsssj's pretty face, where she travels, or what she eats. We need to see content with **REAL** value trending.

#### 4 - Optimize the *steemd* resource requirements
This is already being worked on, as announced in HF20 months ago, i.e. multi-threading. Would be nice to have it implemented soon, as well as reduce the RAM usage.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authordrakos
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210955021z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["sweetsssj"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:10:27
last_update2017-11-16 21:10:27
depth1
children7
last_payout2017-11-23 21:10:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value4.785 HBD
curator_payout_value1.667 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,598
author_reputation112,280,226,665,329
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountgo-steem
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,514
net_rshares3,126,554,394,486
author_curate_reward""
vote details (21)
@mehedi118 ·
Very true sir
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-drakos-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065613925z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:56:18
last_update2017-11-17 06:56:18
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 06:56:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length13
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,399
net_rshares-7,641,326,259
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@drakos ·
Try to say something meaningful before upvoting yourself! You're spamming this post with useless lines.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authordrakos
permlinkre-mehedi118-re-drakos-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t070754304z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 07:09:15
last_update2017-11-17 07:09:15
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:09:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length103
author_reputation112,280,226,665,329
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,650,322
net_rshares7,259,058,464
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@revo ·
Yeah, I think number 4 is pretty important.  The blockchain API access has too much lag and too many errors.  This is particularly important for app developers on top of the blockchain.  There's a couple of well known services that I've used in my app development that have unacceptably high levels of failure and errors.  I'd put it down to those services themselves, but I've seen similar error rates from my own programming interfacing directly with the steem API.  It makes app development (and debugging) very hard.
properties (22)
authorrevo
permlinkre-drakos-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t035831041z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:58:30
last_update2017-11-17 03:58:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:58:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length520
author_reputation13,099,225,944,898
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,637,913
net_rshares0
@splendorhub ·
Great points, you said it better. Up vote!
properties (22)
authorsplendorhub
permlinkre-drakos-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t012756052z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:27:33
last_update2017-11-17 01:27:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 01:27:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length42
author_reputation12,936,731,361,578
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,628,055
net_rshares0
@stellabelle ·
$0.84
The promoted Tab should include all whale and dolphin bot-enabled posts, while the Trending Tab should be actual organic views with lots of human activity.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-drakos-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t130707504z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 13:07:06
last_update2017-11-17 13:07:06
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 13:07:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.633 HBD
curator_payout_value0.205 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length155
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,676,451
net_rshares387,993,835,046
author_curate_reward""
vote details (12)
@timcliff ·
$0.43
> It's a header with a white background

You haven't switched to night-mode yet? You are missing out ;)
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-drakos-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t012600794z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:26:00
last_update2017-11-17 01:26:00
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 01:26:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.400 HBD
curator_payout_value0.034 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length103
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,627,974
net_rshares202,173,827,217
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@drakos ·
$0.03
Oh I did try night mode, there' nothing innovative about reversing colors πŸ˜‰. I think the website needs a signature design that people can remember and appreciate.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordrakos
permlinkre-timcliff-re-drakos-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t034620668z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:47:18
last_update2017-11-17 03:47:18
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:47:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.026 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length162
author_reputation112,280,226,665,329
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountgo-steem
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,637,121
net_rshares17,000,340,401
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@endless.drugs · (edited)
.
properties (22)
authorendless.drugs
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t214820795z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:48:21
last_update2022-05-07 23:02:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:48:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1
author_reputation31,910,531,697,153
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,614,924
net_rshares0
@ericjordan ·
hello, i opened an account at steemit he is 3 weeks old. Until yesterday everything worked perfectly. until the moment i wanted to promote 2 of my post the money went directly to a ghost account @null and then after a while I got some negative info about some posts that i had sent and my rating of 45 went down to 7 in 2 minutes .. can you tell me what it is going to pass
and moreover I can not post any more pictures I have each time an error message
I count on you to unlock my situation as soon as possible thank you very much and have a good day @ericjordan
properties (22)
authorericjordan
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171206t142112713z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["null","ericjordan"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-06 14:21:24
last_update2017-12-06 14:21:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-13 14:21:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length563
author_reputation-45,527,001,443
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id22,569,902
net_rshares0
@ericjordan ·
about @null , he hacked all my promote! Have a look in my sending.
ericjordan (7) dans steemit β€’  il y a 7 minutes
il y a 3 minutes TransfΓ©rer 0.818 SBDversnull @ericjordan/apple-proudly-announces-global-censorship
hier TransfΓ©rer 0.200 SBDversnull @ericjordan/stunning-iso800-f16-24-picture-jordan
hier TransfΓ©rer 0.300 SBDversnull @ericjordan/sunset-sheep-creative-shot-by-jordan-2017
hier TransfΓ©rer 0.500 SBDversnull @ericjordan/stunning-iso800-f16-24-picture-jordan

CONCLUSION @null hacked my most important account steem dollars and after he tranformed the link in plagia for steemit ! so from 45 points i go down to 7 crazy!!!

who can help me please i 'm really under choc like someboby stole my soul!
properties (22)
authorericjordan
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171206t213818266z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["null","ericjordan"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-06 21:38:30
last_update2017-12-06 21:38:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-13 21:38:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length710
author_reputation-45,527,001,443
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id22,603,729
net_rshares0
@ericjordan ·
about @null , he hacked all my promote! Have a look in my sending.
ericjordan (7) dans steemit β€’ il y a 7 minutes
il y a 3 minutes TransfΓ©rer 0.818 SBDversnull @ericjordan/apple-proudly-announces-global-censorship
hier TransfΓ©rer 0.200 SBDversnull @ericjordan/stunning-iso800-f16-24-picture-jordan
hier TransfΓ©rer 0.300 SBDversnull @ericjordan/sunset-sheep-creative-shot-by-jordan-2017
hier TransfΓ©rer 0.500 SBDversnull @ericjordan/stunning-iso800-f16-24-picture-jordan

CONCLUSION @null hacked my most important account steem dollars and after he tranformed the link in plagia for steemit ! so from 45 points i go down to 7 crazy!!!

who can help me please i 'm really under choc like someboby stole my soul!
properties (22)
authorericjordan
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171208t125716317z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["null","ericjordan"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-08 12:57:18
last_update2017-12-08 12:57:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-15 12:57:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length709
author_reputation-45,527,001,443
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id22,770,314
net_rshares0
@escobar ·
Thank you for sharing useful information over Steemit. I hope you are even more successful by making more successful and useful writings.
Thanks and Best Regards
properties (22)
authorescobar
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171118t0333311z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-17 21:03:33
last_update2017-11-17 21:03:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 21:03:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length161
author_reputation277,504,511,141
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,716,488
net_rshares0
@etilda ·
@ned or @steemitblog
my message came late and forgive me bcos i am new and just found this. I even sent my first post yesterday and mentioned @ned of which i hope he dosnt mind. steemit is amazing and although many suggestions here may be alien to me but am studying it well to be in tune with happenings come 2018. I just wanna say, thanks for this wonderful platform while wishing steemit team a wonderful new year ahead with loads of opportunities.. love you guys!
properties (22)
authoretilda
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171228t100304666z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.2.0"}
created2017-12-28 09:03:18
last_update2017-12-28 09:03:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-04 09:03:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length467
author_reputation1,628,704,212,884
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id25,656,535
net_rshares0
@famadorian ·
I just don't understand it. How can I reach people? There are no communities, like a subreddit. There's no way to subscribe to tags, like "help" && "steemit", so that I can ask questions and that people actually find my question. It's just a long list of threads and most of them uninteresting to me, cause I can't filter them or subscribe to certain tags.
properties (22)
authorfamadorian
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180123t225406967z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-23 22:54:06
last_update2018-01-23 22:54:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-30 22:54:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length356
author_reputation101,572,896,392
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id31,761,221
net_rshares0
@famadorian ·
why can't we subscribe to a set of tags, like "help" and "steemit". That way we can see all who wants help related to steemit, or close to it. Also, I want to subscribe to "augmented reality" and "news". The set of tags helps to isolate posts and will be a community around that. Also, tags should be traceable, so for example "samsung" should be traceable to "org:Samsung Group". We should have a blockchain where we can register tags. Also, tags should be able to contain spaces; to have really advanced tags.
properties (22)
authorfamadorian
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180123t225902682z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-23 22:59:03
last_update2018-01-23 22:59:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-30 22:59:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length511
author_reputation101,572,896,392
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id31,762,149
net_rshares0
@fathin-shihab ·
$0.22
![image](https://img.esteem.ws/sh8hvc0lfj.jpg)
I think adding another sliding bar where people can only submit their post AFTER upvoting 10 minnows. Ofcourse if you already bot voting them it doesn't apply to you. 

An easy way to find out who is minnow and who is not, is by making another click button on the steemit page where you can see posts of minnows only, because now it is chaotic. So filtering them would be easier to upvote minnows.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorfathin-shihab
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171118t101222303z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-18 09:12:24
last_update2017-11-18 09:12:24
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-25 09:12:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.211 HBD
curator_payout_value0.006 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length444
author_reputation25,914,652,206,213
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,759,210
net_rshares103,299,549,695
author_curate_reward""
vote details (9)
@arshi ·
agree
properties (22)
authorarshi
permlinkre-fathin-shihab-re-steemitblog-20171126t153124087z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-26 15:31:36
last_update2017-11-26 15:31:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-12-03 15:31:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length5
author_reputation4,606,066,180,390
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,585,365
net_rshares0
@fernando26 ·
Did you check this, @greer184?

I have read from you some interesting proposals, worth to be submitted.
properties (22)
authorfernando26
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210035231z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["greer184"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:00:33
last_update2017-11-16 21:00:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:00:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length103
author_reputation107,643,823,998
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,749
net_rshares0
@fitzgibbon · (edited)
My .02 Steem

Priorities:

1. Redesign reward system to promote quality content
2. Promote human engagement (comments)
3. Discourage bot usage (make it less profitable than actual human and manual behavior)
4. Try to decentralize the wealth, aim to spread the distribution of Steem more evenly across all users, since it also determines voting power
5. When 1-4 is on acceptable levels, (when @stellabelle is happy) start Marketing activities
6. Introduce filters on Post Time, Author reputation, Author SteemPower, Post Pending Payout, etc to filter, sort and find posts. (only tags is too limited)
properties (22)
authorfitzgibbon
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t225235931z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["stellabelle"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:52:36
last_update2017-11-16 23:03:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 22:52:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length599
author_reputation11,307,019,423,785
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,618,683
net_rshares0
@fractalnode · (edited)
1. I would like to create my own wall(s), by adding a few tags to the text field and authors, eg.
#Steem #bitshares #steemdev #beyondbitcoin @AllFollowed @customAuthor

2. The estimated value of the article should be covered for readers. The value of the post is manipulation the same as the pre-election polls.

3. All 5 tags used in post should be visible near re-steem button

4. People should be able to increase their reputation by confirming their identity. 
Account Activity Verification on other social media
Facebook older than eg. 4 years + 10 points to Rep.
Twiter older than ??  + ?? points to Rep.
Google is older than ??  + ?? points to Rep.
(...)

Identity verification should be similar to that what is used in Keybase app.
Verified accounts should have a higher impact factor for award distribution #roadmap2018
properties (22)
authorfractalnode
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t183922799z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018","steem","bitshares","steemdev","beyondbitcoin"],"users":["allfollowed","customauthor"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 18:39:27
last_update2017-11-18 18:54:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 18:39:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length828
author_reputation6,921,645,358,941
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,803,585
net_rshares0
@fredrikaa ·
1. Faster sign up process.

2. Make it easier and more convenient to be a consumer of content, including of people you already follow.

One thing is to make it easier to browse through the posts of people you follow. One way I think this could be improved is if underneath "People I follow" on the Home page, you could add the option to "filter by categories" or add a "search" bar, so that one can choose to view only posts made under a certain tag in one's own feed. So let's say you follow one group of people who regularly post about science, and another group of people that post photography, you can easily change what tag you're browsing among the people you follow.
properties (22)
authorfredrikaa
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210419914z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:04:21
last_update2017-11-16 21:04:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:04:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length673
author_reputation310,528,541,043,341
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,037
net_rshares0
@free999enigma · (edited)
maybe....more privacy? i mean everyone can know how much money do you have in the wallet which can make you a target. Remove the 7 days limit for payout some articles or videos (via dtube) are still relevant after 7 days so deserve to still be paid, what can you do is to lock the upvotes after each 7 days so people will not be able to abuse the upvote i think. And...one more thing...report button and how report should be rebalance...
properties (22)
authorfree999enigma
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205030779z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:50:30
last_update2017-11-16 21:42:24
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 20:50:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length437
author_reputation61,127,251,081,744
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,019
net_rshares0
@anarcho-andrei ·
Report to who?  Steemit doesn't have anyone on abuse or a system for handling abuse because it's not a centralized content control system.
properties (22)
authoranarcho-andrei
permlinkre-free999enigma-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t151348284z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 15:13:48
last_update2017-11-17 15:13:48
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 15:13:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length138
author_reputation27,098,621,645,365
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountgo-steem
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,688,191
net_rshares0
@funny-videos ·
Nice post! What will happening, if someone resteem your post?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorfunny-videos
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171128t121453879z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-28 12:14:54
last_update2017-11-28 12:14:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-05 12:14:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length61
author_reputation-19,120,094,034
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,774,352
net_rshares58,027,033
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@funnyman ·
I agree with all of it. Now steemit is going to get a lot more interesting...
properties (22)
authorfunnyman
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171120t082858650z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-20 08:29:00
last_update2017-11-20 08:29:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-27 08:29:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length77
author_reputation131,083,784,663,281
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,956,780
net_rshares0
@geekpowered · (edited)
$1.85
UI improvements.
Or possibly the ability to skin the site. Although that is a much bigger project, and UI improvements are likely needed before something like that could likely be done.
As a new user, I've noticed a lot of little annoying things about the site UI. For one, the upvote button is way too small. Perhaps that was an attempt to limit the number of people pushing it? I have to move my mouse very carefully to hover over it, and then press it.
The resteem button is also pretty small, but I use that far less.
I also haven't figured out how to reverse a resteem yet. Sometimes after resteeming something you decide it wasn't worth it, as it clutters up your feed.
I also think certain pages should have their own dedicated button on the top, like your feed and replies. You shouldn't have to click into the drop down menu to access these.

On a side note, as a new user, I had no problem with the sign up. It was quick and easy. Edit: Well, the approval process was slow, but I assumed that was due to manual approval. If not, and that's what you meant, then I understand.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgeekpowered
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t023431295z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 02:37:33
last_update2017-11-17 03:06:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 02:37:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.387 HBD
curator_payout_value0.461 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,084
author_reputation99,319,261,112,097
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,632,629
net_rshares859,308,313,173
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@geekpowered ·
Something has to be done about the bots. That should be the top priority going forward.
properties (22)
authorgeekpowered
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t025812033z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:01:15
last_update2017-11-17 03:01:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:01:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length87
author_reputation99,319,261,112,097
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,634,116
net_rshares0
@georgemales · (edited)
First of all i would like to say thanks for the hard work that you guys are doing! Despite the fact that i am a new member (i have joined in June this year) i can say i am calling Steemit for a while "home"!
One of the things that i thing should be add is another section like a second feed where we can add our closest friends - let's say it will be limited to a specific number.
Why i am suggesting this is because most of the time having a lot of people that we are following we are missing some posts do to volume and like this having this second feed to can track right away the posts of our favorite Steemians.
Another thing that i really suggest is the privacy of the wallet as i don't really find it normal that the wallet is visible. 
This are the two suggestions that i have and i am looking forward to see the new major releases, the mobile wallet app,  hard-fork 20 (β€œVelocity”), as well as Smart Media Tokens.
One more time thanks a lot for everything that you are doing!
properties (22)
authorgeorgemales
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205607182z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:56:06
last_update2017-11-16 20:56:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:56:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length984
author_reputation11,440,001,785,692
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,428
net_rshares0
@glennolua ·
$0.14
I have an easy one, the ability to change the color of your profile text. Some people have changed the back ground to a light color and it is hard to read the white text. An option to change it to a different color would be helpful...

Thanks!
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorglennolua
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t032024404z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:20:30
last_update2017-11-17 03:20:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:20:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.103 HBD
curator_payout_value0.032 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length243
author_reputation63,248,143,757,873
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,635,416
net_rshares63,405,361,026
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@goldmatters ·
Would love to have the resteem and blog categories completely seperate. I’m sure at least 50% of steemian do not resteem because they dont want their own blog history to be buried.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgoldmatters
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205914243z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:59:12
last_update2017-11-16 20:59:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:59:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length180
author_reputation409,743,405,777,482
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,642
net_rshares878,890,718
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@greggram ·
Thank you very much! Cant wait for the app
properties (22)
authorgreggram
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t213721969z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 21:37:27
last_update2017-11-17 21:37:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 21:37:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length42
author_reputation0
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,718,668
net_rshares0
@gregm ·
Communities!!
properties (22)
authorgregm
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t072551778z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 07:25:51
last_update2017-11-17 07:25:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:25:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length13
author_reputation56,846,044,112,341
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,651,424
net_rshares0
@gtg ·
Searching for "[**gamification**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamification)" results in 6 matches. This one would be 7th. So three more from me:
##### [Gamification](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamification)
#### [Gamification](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamification)
### [Gamification](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamification)

<sub>_"I don't want to be a [deadfish](http://steemitboard.com/board.html?user=steeminnow) anymore"_ - random steem user, 2017</sub>
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgtg
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t100933056z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamification","http://steemitboard.com/board.html?user=steeminnow"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 10:09:33
last_update2017-11-17 10:09:33
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 10:09:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length472
author_reputation461,806,510,899,194
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,663,381
net_rshares720,356,644
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@shello · (edited)
$0.09
Heya @gtg, I actually really like the idea of gamifying the Steemisphere a little more. Having achievements visible on user profiles I feel would stir up motivation, competitiveness, and be every completionists wet dream. Not everyone would want it, toggle on/off in settings. 

Earning and participation should go hand in hand to some extent. When playing actual games and grinding can be relatable to content creation and networking. I feel that some bigger achievements could be rewarded in tokens where the main features allows for cosmetic and other upgrades to a user's profile. 

Not only do players want the strongest items, but they want their avatars looking fly as well.

I feel doing this would encourage users who visit accomplished profiles to participate and "play more", while the achievements themselves could be geared at tasks that promote communication, networking, resource knowledge, curation and various other positive behaviors that embrace the meta Steemit aims to create. 

With other money earning oppertunities online, not only should the content here represent quality, but be fun to do so as well. Not only rewarding those who bring value to the platform, but also those who aim to maintain and grow the value already present. Built in incentives would also demonstrate what type of behavior and practices are valued ontop of content creation.

I digress, this approach does sound gimmicky, but I would imagine this as a valuable tool to help new users, and leave positive first impressions. I feel that implementation would be immense, but would generate consistent high activity and traffic. The main thing I see currently has always been focus towards earnings and stress, but to make Steemit simply more fun to use than other social media sites while able to earn would blow competition away. 

I would absolutely love to see something like this.

With love,
shello
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorshello
permlinkre-gtg-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t164832482z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["gtg"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 16:48:33
last_update2017-11-18 16:51:24
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 16:48:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.067 HBD
curator_payout_value0.022 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,899
author_reputation16,533,387,036,996
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,794,275
net_rshares40,423,457,209
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@hasan24 ·
nice post @steemitblog
properties (22)
authorhasan24
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171121t112900125z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemitblog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-21 11:28:57
last_update2017-11-21 11:28:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-28 11:28:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length22
author_reputation-13,892,247,151
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,078,724
net_rshares0
@healthbasics ·
Hi I am not sure if this has been mentioned already but I was thinking the other day of increasing the incentive for leaving good comments.  

It seems like people just mainly focus their votes on articles for the greater curation potential and often comments are mainly just upvoted by the author who is trying to create community. 

My suggestion is to take 10% of the post rewards and split it between the top 20% of the comments either by vote # or value. So a $50 post with 20 comments would have 5 dollars split between 4 people.  A $50 post with 100 comments would have the 5 dollars split between 20 people. 

It could add to the spam type of comments on lower posts but would help to encourage people to actually open the articles to read them and write something intelligent about it. 

@jesta @timcliff @ats-david @d-pend @patrice  oh yeah and @ned what do you guys think of this idea?
properties (22)
authorhealthbasics
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t071542501z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["jesta","timcliff","ats-david","d-pend","patrice","ned"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 07:15:45
last_update2017-11-19 07:15:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 07:15:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length896
author_reputation1,410,280,625,404
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,849,649
net_rshares0
@heroic15397 ·
I just realized this post has disappeared from the feed on my page:

https://steemit.com/pocket/@heroic15397/major-league-soccer-contest-11-distributing-the-post-s-sbd-rewards-10-sbd-min-and-more-than-100-000-in-pocket

I think working on the frontend should definitely​ be on the list.
properties (22)
authorheroic15397
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t164725508z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/pocket/@heroic15397/major-league-soccer-contest-11-distributing-the-post-s-sbd-rewards-10-sbd-min-and-more-than-100-000-in-pocket"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 16:46:12
last_update2017-11-17 16:46:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 16:46:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length286
author_reputation13,764,984,171,422
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,696,604
net_rshares0
@hiroyamagishi ·
$0.47
> A highly secure mobile wallet app for Apple and Android.

- That's what I'm waiting for!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorhiroyamagishi
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t104154336z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 10:42:06
last_update2017-11-17 10:42:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 10:42:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.444 HBD
curator_payout_value0.030 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length90
author_reputation71,901,302,671,995
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,665,677
net_rshares219,712,821,211
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@hoodaim ·
$2.32
Warning! These are just my personal thoughts, don't take it as a professional opinion. I will try to be short.
For me as a new user (just 3 months) first impression was WOW, is it real? What a nice idea! Go Steemit! However, with a time I lost this passion. <strong> Here is why I lost it : </strong>
Every newcomer is interested in earning money but the system does not work. Yes the platform is great, yes the idea of decentralization is optimistic etc., and the possibility of earning money with blogging and curating has blown my head. Not just mine, but I am sure every user who got familiar with steemit just loved it. 
Of course, it is not the only aim of everyone - some people are here for connections, some see it as an investment, but I am talking about minnows(which is a  majority).
I won't whine on particulars in this paragraph, I will give you examples and why it does not work: 
So let's say a guy on Facebook saw an advertisement of Steemit and decided to try it out. 
a) He is waiting for an account to get approved at least 3-4 weeks. This issue was addressed earlier many times, I hope it will be fixed, not a big deal.  
b) A first introduction published, post received 10 cents and got a useless achievement. Yay first money! Very happy let's go on. New user finds a niche, researches other articles, leaves comments in posts of other users and writes his article about finance. The articlee is intelligent as hell, he spends many hours to write it but receives just 3 cents with 20 votes in rewards. 
He tries again and again and again - same result. He leaves some smart comments in other posts related to this niche, maybe finds support and new connections, maybe not because his opinion is different from others (espeacially whales). 
He get's disappointed and leaves.  This is a classical example of why so many users are leaving Steemit. 
c) In another scenario, he finds out about bots like - minnowbooster, randowhale, booster and other - and invests let's say $10, gets $15, gets into hot section, receives more votes with a final reward of $17. Looks cool, worth of time spending. He writes another article, but then pays attention that there are people who just post images of their kitties and puppies, send sbd to bots and get the same result. Now it gets obvious, there is no point to invest in your content quality, if there is an easier way to earn. Instead of puppies, he makes 5 posts a day with a graphics on how bitcoin, etherium and other cryptos changes, uses bots and earns money. Do we consider it a quality content? Me Not. 
I am not even talking about spammers who have 100s (even 1000s) of accounts and abuse the same minnowbooster. Yes we have cleaners, but they work slow and miss a lot. It is technically impossible to catch everyone.I know you guys try as a hell, but it is what it is. 
By the way, I am not better, I am participating in colorchallenge, share my photos, use voting bots, because it is easier. 
d) Another strategy is to connect to people with money and hope they will upvote you. You create a relationship, comment a lot - particularly selected accounts with a big upvote.  So basically your main goal is to get an attention from the whale and it does not mean that you need a quality content, you might write some BS, but because you were pleasing him in comments for 2 months, he might give you a good upvote. Does it create a good content and develop a platform? No.
e) Of course, everyone knows about collisions, where a group of people with 100k+ on their balance, write decent content and upvote each other and leftovers go to minnows(just a couple of cents, so they would be happy). 
Is it illegal? No. Does it develop Steemit and quality of the content anyhow? No. 
f) And what happens with niches, where people are writing a lot of articles, but for some reason it does not interest any whales? Are they doomed forever? Or maybe they should switch to niches in which they are not competent? They have a great content, they get a lot of votes, but only from minnows. What should they do in this case? Hope that @blocktrades will accidentally read their post and bless them? Nothing against @blocktrades, you are doing a great job in supporting minnows, really great!
g) Curation communities is a joke - sorry guys - nothing personal, but all these rules: submit an article once in a week and we will evaluate your quality and maybe upvote you. I don't see it working. It is overcomplicated - why do I need to submit my article anywhere? I want to write posts, get a feedback and upvotes for it's quality, but if an upvote worth nothing which is often the case, I get nothing. 
I am sure some people may agree on these points, some not, I am not here to argue, just expressing my personal opinion with examples. 

<strong> How can we improve Steemit? </strong>
- <strong> Improve Steemit UI </strong>
As much as I criticize Steemit today, I still love it and believe in its future. However, User Interface is a disaster. In 3 months that I have spent in Steemit, nothing changes. I wrote myself several articles on what I would make better, but because of lack of feedback and 0 improvements, I stopped writing about it. 
Here is my small personal list, without explaining why, I am really taking to much of your time: 
a) embed video implementation like twich, kickstarter, facebook etc. The only one works is youtube;
b)more filters - in feed, in categories, in notifications in rights settings etc.; 
c) search bar improvement;
d) related post, authors, just make it easier to find a related content​;
e) improve post editor, at this point, ​it takes more time to format than to write a post;
f)improve the ​design of steemit. I know everyone has its personal opinion, but hey !look at busy.org , guys made a great job in addressing​ many of these issues. 
A list can be long, but I will stop here.  I know developers might not consider it as a ​priority, but in fact, ​they should. Whenever a Steemit is advertised to the new user, the first impression should be - wow it looks neat, easy to use and so productive. I 'd like to register here. 
- <strong> Rewards distribution and quality content </strong>
Many proposals were already mentioned, so I won't repeat them. I am trying to think a little bit out of the box. I am not saying it will work, but it might be worth to think in that direction or think of something new. 
As I have mentioned in the beginning, I don't think that whole concept of steemit works. Too much low quality content and therefore rewards are not split evenly, it is especially​ related to minnows who write high quality content.
We had suggestions in comments  on how to split rewards, 50-50 or 75-25 or even allow to users decide themselves. How about introducing a 3rd element for quality content regulators?  So it would be let's say 50 % authors, 25% curators and 25% people who control a quality of the content. 
Of course, it will not work just like that, the whole system should be a little bit more complex and quality controllers should have interest in it. 
The main idea behind it, that now we have: authors, curators and witnesses but we can add another party - content regulators. I think as a separate party they will work more​ efficiently, than current cleaners, sherlocks etc. 
Their main motivation will be an ​opportunity​ to earn from the general pool. This way the quality of posts might develop in natural, not depending on which whales delegated power and how much to particular curation community. 

- <strong> Reputation, Upvote system and Trending topics</strong>
Many users might not agree with me here again, but I am just trying to think a little bit out of the box. I think all 3 elements might work in a better sinergy. 
I know that algorithm of trending topics is not as simple as it looks, but at the present moment it works more or less like that - I get 1 vote from a whale and I get into the trending area. I get 1 high vote from minnowbooster and I get into hot or trending and stay there for a long time. 
I think that hot and trending area should not depend on the upvote amount at all or at least it should not be influenced by it so much. 
I suppose that it would be more efficient if  reputation would influence how high the article goes in rankings or at least mean something. 
Another idea is to make a vote of a user with a high reputation, but without voting power worth something. 
For example, if a minnow gathers many votes from other minnows, he would get a higher reward, because a content would be considered higher quality​. This is very debatable topic, I totally understand that ​different opinions, different views, but my main idea is that system should not forget about minnows, who should rely not only on whales and bots but somehow be rewarded if they produce quality content, which was supported by the big amount​ of users, does not matter whales or not. 

- <strong>Collective Input</strong>
Yesterday I read post of @jerrybanfield on his "steem budget proposals whitepaper." Many interesting ideas and issues raised. I agree with some of them and disagree with others. 
My vision is that every user should be able to make an input in a development of steemit. I don't mean it by his investment, but rather with his idea. For example, let say we have some bright developers now who are users of steemit. The are separated,  don't know each other but all of them have some spectacular​ ideas to share. They are minnows and when they make a post, very often it is lost somewhere. They are not witnesses, but perhaps the idea is brilliant. There should be a way to share it not by just post, but in a ​separate section where all ideas are taken into consideration. Special curators might sort out ideas from garbage or from similar ideas. Ideas must be written in particular sample and details, not just 2 sentences. Ideas should be gathered into rankings and get upvoted by other users, upvoted not in the way of steem power, but rather reputation. 
Again I am not pushing to this particular way, I am just thinking outloud, that ideas of minnows should be also taken into consideration and they should also participate  in voting on plans, how steemit will develop. 
- <strong>Delegation and Developers</strong>
Many people mentioned this topic, whether delegation should exist or not. Clearly it does not work so well. I have no ideas how to fix it, but I think it just need to be reworked, maybe again it can be linked to account reputation. 
What I am dissapointed about is how the steemit is devoloping - very very slow. Is a team of developers too small? Should it be bigger? Does it cost too much? If so, why not to use delegation in a smart way to solfe this problem?
For example @freedom sometimes is deligating his power to users, who just use it for their own bots or upvote themselves to raise money. Why not to hire another development team and pay them in upvotes for a work performed, instead of that delegation? This might speed up things and progress a little bit.  
- <strong>Marketing</strong>
I am sure many people thought about it, but for some reason no one is doing. Invite sportmen, singers, writers, dancers, generally any stars to participate in steemit. Not neceseraly by the mean of investors, but as influencers. Not the right moment? Why is that? What is getting done to make it appealing for them to try out steemit and what is getting done to change a situation where we have thousands of abusers and spammers? What would invited stars think of the project, if they see it in a current state?
Please don't throw rocks in me, I am not trying to be smart, I just thought that some ofmy ideas might be intersting and I am always opened for discussion :)
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorhoodaim
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t205926649z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["blocktrades","jerrybanfield","freedom"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 20:59:30
last_update2017-11-17 20:59:30
depth1
children4
last_payout2017-11-24 20:59:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.742 HBD
curator_payout_value0.579 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length11,754
author_reputation2,438,449,165,285
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,716,210
net_rshares1,083,147,092,303
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@bronevik ·
$0.26
A comment woth many posts! You should make one!

The idea behind the platform is great, the realozation is 2 out of 5. Noone talks about changes as opinion leaders and trending-pushers (whales) are pretty happy with status quo.

I'd recomment to write a separate post in #roadmap2018 tag. It might help.

My upvotes, @bronevik.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbronevik
permlinkre-hoodaim-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t043204521z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["bronevik"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 04:32:39
last_update2017-11-19 04:32:39
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-26 04:32:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.192 HBD
curator_payout_value0.063 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length327
author_reputation12,260,156,653,305
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,840,011
net_rshares114,683,532,047
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@hoodaim ·
$0.03
thank you, yea while I was writing I got inspired a little bit, new ideas were coming and coming :) Perhaps  I will write a separate post dedicated to those ideas.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorhoodaim
permlinkre-bronevik-re-hoodaim-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t153109324z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 15:31:09
last_update2017-11-19 15:31:09
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 15:31:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.024 HBD
curator_payout_value0.007 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length163
author_reputation2,438,449,165,285
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,887,955
net_rshares15,040,463,219
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@timcliff ·
Very good insights!
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-hoodaim-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t042854295z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 04:28:54
last_update2017-11-19 04:28:54
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-26 04:28:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length19
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,839,761
net_rshares0
@hoodaim · (edited)
$0.04
Thanks :) Read your article with top picks and recommendations​, good job :)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorhoodaim
permlinkre-timcliff-re-hoodaim-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t152840030z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 15:28:45
last_update2017-11-19 15:29:45
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 15:28:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.028 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length76
author_reputation2,438,449,165,285
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,887,728
net_rshares17,258,714,704
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@igster ·
* Communities
* Account creation
* Mobile app

In that order
properties (22)
authorigster
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t200649979z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 20:06:45
last_update2017-11-17 20:06:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 20:06:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length60
author_reputation17,415,198,441,969
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,712,709
net_rshares0
@ilyastarar ·
Excellent idea to use hundreds of thousands of brains (or at least the thousands of active ones) to finalize the Road Map 2018. I am surely going to take part and my next detailed post will be on suggestions pertaining to Steemit roadmap 2018.

I do request feedback and support on the [complete research paper on Steemit reward system](https://steemit.com/steemit/@ilyastarar/how-does-steemit-reward-system-work-complete-research-paper-on-steemit-economy-and-reward-system) that is 4000+ words long and contains complete information on how the reward system works.

Readers, please open the post and see how much it helps Steemians (and Steemit).
properties (22)
authorilyastarar
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171118t191332784z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-18 14:13:36
last_update2017-11-18 14:13:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 14:13:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length647
author_reputation22,538,822,918,099
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,780,216
net_rshares0
@imp.unity ·
Introducing Steem to the Chinese market. 

If I had my own resources to fund the development of a mobile app I would already be on it.

Where are we going to find a billion dollars + of investment for a brand new virgin user base that wants a stake in the reward pool?

The only answer is China. (India doesn't have that kind of money.)

China is fricking loaded and their market is starved of social media (facebook, twitter and youtube are all banned!)

I wrote a detailed piece on how to go about it for utopia.io you can read here. [*How to Increase the Value of Steem Drastically. One Word: China*](https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@imp.unity/proposal-for-how-to-dramatically-increase-value-of-steem-one-word-china)

Please consider this idea for just a minute of your time.

I'm already based in Beijing and have connections who do lots of business in Shenzhen, China's tech/silicon valley heart-land. 

I could also produce a roadmap and a white paper, if any of the witnesses thought it could be a worthwhile adventure.

Honestly, if you want to fix the problem of this skewed rewards pool that is too distributed and going nowhere, look to China for the biggest capital infusion this blockchain will have ever seen. This will help deal with inflation, and most importantly, buy this platform time to grow and mature.

Feel free to ping me on steemit chat (or Discord imp.unity#3467) if you would like to begin working on bringing in an unprecedented capital infusion to this blockchain from Chinese investors.

Thank you
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorimp.unity
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171229t180516550z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@imp.unity/proposal-for-how-to-dramatically-increase-value-of-steem-one-word-china"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-29 18:05:18
last_update2017-12-29 18:05:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-05 18:05:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,527
author_reputation4,620,998,574,245
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id25,917,663
net_rshares1,160,492,657
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@inquiringtimes ·
creative commons licensing options for every post... that way a user can specify right away what use is appropriate for each post, without having to copy paste a license.....  PUH PUH PUHLEAAAAASE MISTER!!!!!

there's like 4 different creative commons licenses, depending if you want it free for reuse, free for reuse with credit, or rights restricted, or whatever... there's a few variations, and this would make it easier for users to share work... especially since we don't have a decent chat app built in, and it can be very difficult to contact users to find out if it's ok to use their work.

deep breaths.  ok... thank you.  I love you.  If you are really wrapping up the 2017 roadmap that is ssuuuuuper incredible!  I'm very excited for the new year! yayayay!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorinquiringtimes
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t051326518z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:13:27
last_update2017-11-17 05:13:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 05:13:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length767
author_reputation22,511,044,719,347
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,642,759
net_rshares720,356,644
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@intelliguy ·
#roadmap2018

I think @transisto did an awesome investigation and explains the problem of steem power delegation [in this recent post](https://steemit.com/steem/@transisto/whales-witnesses-we-have-to-talk)

Now the thing I like about steem power delegation, is there is accountability with it to allow investigations like this to happen.  If you remove it, then people will just have a more anonymous work around to do something similar with bots and automatic post key sharing, etc.

So the problem isn't steem delegation itself.  The problem is upvoting yourself, or **ANY** user too frequently.

I'd love it if the system maybe said "Sorry, you've already voted for this steemit user more than 10 times in the last 7 day period.  There is a cooling off period before you can vote them up again"

That might stop the constant self-upvotes and constant upvotes of sockpuppet accounts. :)
properties (22)
authorintelliguy
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t221346408z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["transisto"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@transisto/whales-witnesses-we-have-to-talk"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:13:45
last_update2017-11-16 22:13:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 22:13:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length888
author_reputation62,276,657,564,898
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,616,460
net_rshares0
@irastra · (edited)
I'd like to see the @armandocat solution Steemit More Info taken into consideration as basics. Then I'd like to see I could neatly order the outlook of my blog into posts, comments, replies, rewards, resteems, mentions, contests, votes, an even more evaluated links (steemstats and steemnow added). And, a thorough explanation of what 1-5% upvote with 0$ value contributes to anyone (upvoter and the upvotee, or the reward pool) - is it sensible at all? Does it bring more visibility to the post at all? It would also be fine if when clicking on a link in a post a separate window could open.
And, regarding self-voting, I know I'm not any important person here, but even I have to pay electricity bill to post here. Some say that self-upvoting gives the post more visibility, so it doesn't just fall into the abyss of darkness never to be seen or read again. And, is providing some sorted information of any value?
properties (22)
authorirastra
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t105124966z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["armandocat"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 10:51:30
last_update2017-11-17 15:15:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 10:51:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length915
author_reputation1,158,920,695,646
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,666,290
net_rshares0
@jasonshick ·
This! we need more of this!! Where users can openly discuss ideas to improve the steemit platform!!!
properties (22)
authorjasonshick
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t145434591z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 15:03:54
last_update2017-11-17 15:03:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 15:03:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length100
author_reputation34,285,892,602,808
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,687,166
net_rshares0
@jayantihaldar ·
Thanks
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorjayantihaldar
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t233033272z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:30:33
last_update2017-11-16 23:30:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:30:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length6
author_reputation389,709,178,639
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,918
net_rshares-800,996,866
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jdruiter ·
$0.06
# Problems

Point 1: The shelf-life of content is 5 minutes. 

That's how long my posts stay in the new list before becoming upsurped by more recent posts in the same topic. No more eyeballs see my posts after the initial 5 minutes. Google searches might bring in new viewers, but I won't know because the eyeball meter stays on the same digits.

Using bots to upvote my content helps, which brings to problem two: 

Point 2: Using bots works better than writing quality content

Its sad. Many bots bring little real value to the table.

Point 3: People commenting/voting for monetary reward  

I see people commenting the same generic message on posts.
I see minnows voting on all other minnow posts in an 'instagram' like reciprocity network.

Point 4: The top 20% of Steemians control 80% of the Steem power?

The distribution of user accounts is too pyramidical. 

When you can boost your own post heavily it stays longer in the trending list, gets more viewers, and thus more steem income. With more steem income you can boost your posts even more. 

Wealth wins.

# Solution:

Make the quality of posts matter. 

The monetary reward should be secundary on Steemit. 

Money corrupts every business it touches like happens in healthcare, education and journalism. 

Make sure Steemit is about the content first.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorjdruiter
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t192317141z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 19:23:15
last_update2017-11-17 19:23:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 19:23:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.046 HBD
curator_payout_value0.015 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,315
author_reputation121,807,035,901
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,709,507
net_rshares29,388,224,595
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jeanlucsr ·
Dear @steemitblog,
Thanks for sharing the roadmap, great to hear about future possibilities. Currently for me as minnow, the abuse of the reward pool seems to be a major issue.
An example: https://steemit.com/steemit/@gogogadgetupvote/i-love-steemit-and-i-really-don-t-like-what-i-am-seeing-these-days
I really don't mind seeing those that work hard get paid. But the same comment over and over getting $20, it does worry me and gives the wrong impression to new users.
properties (22)
authorjeanlucsr
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171229t032327818z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemitblog"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@gogogadgetupvote/i-love-steemit-and-i-really-don-t-like-what-i-am-seeing-these-days"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-29 03:23:27
last_update2017-12-29 03:23:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-05 03:23:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length469
author_reputation83,453,662,532,602
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id25,797,620
net_rshares0
@jeffjagoe ·
$0.03
I would love to see the referral system put into place ASAP so I can start a massive marketing campaign around it :)

I'm sure I won't be the only one!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorjeffjagoe
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t211400601z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:14:03
last_update2017-11-16 21:14:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:14:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.031 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length151
author_reputation608,233,813,805,272
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,777
net_rshares14,865,954,154
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jenkinrocket ·
$0.47
Wow. The upcoming changes sound pretty dramatic and exciting! Looking forward to them. 

As to prioritization, I think Steemit is really going to have to find some way to deal with the 'bot situation' here on Steemit. Doing so will deal with a *lot* of the other problems. 

I'm not incredibly sure how to implement this, but it's clear that it's something that's going to need to happen at some point. That's my number one thing if I could just wave a magic wand, but I do understand that a solution would be complicated. 

Power distribution is also pretty screwed on the platform right now, leading to a low retention rate for new users. Second thing on the list, although there's a possibility that this will naturally sort itself out with time. 

A filter option to prevent things you post on other Steem dApps (dMania, Zappl, DTube) from posting onto your Steemit blog would be a life saver. Perhaps out of everything I've asked this would be the easiest to implement. 

Thanks for hearing us out, and keep up the great work! I can't believe how far the Steem blockchain and Steemit have come in just a little over a year!
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorjenkinrocket
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t201412980z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:14:12
last_update2017-11-16 20:14:12
depth1
children11
last_payout2017-11-23 20:14:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.409 HBD
curator_payout_value0.061 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,128
author_reputation26,749,165,203,694
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,608,321
net_rshares220,994,189,476
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@colbertnews ·
NICE
properties (22)
authorcolbertnews
permlinkre-jenkinrocket-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204611739z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:46:15
last_update2017-11-16 20:46:15
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:46:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length4
author_reputation-1,660,928,842
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,690
net_rshares0
@noisy ·
> A filter option to prevent things you post on other Steem dApps (dMania, Zappl, DTube) from posting onto your Steemit blog would be a life saver.

True! People also should be able to choose which feeds they want to follow, when they click follow. All, of just blogposts or everything with zappl tweets, dmania entries, etc...
properties (22)
authornoisy
permlinkre-jenkinrocket-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204949453z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:49:48
last_update2017-11-16 20:49:48
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 20:49:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length327
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,959
net_rshares0
@jenkinrocket ·
That'd be really cool, too. Maybe even separate feeds for each one, though, while convenient, that might end up hurting the other platforms...
properties (22)
authorjenkinrocket
permlinkre-noisy-re-jenkinrocket-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205853974z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:58:54
last_update2017-11-16 20:58:54
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:58:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length142
author_reputation26,749,165,203,694
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,622
net_rshares0
@rigaronib · (edited)
$1.19
>As to prioritization, I think Steemit is really going to have to find some way to deal with the 'bot situation' here on Steemit. Doing so will deal with a lot of the other problems.


While this may seem/feel like a problem, it is, imo, not something that is **ever** going to be resolved fully. I mean, look at Facebook, they recently revealed that Messenger has well over 100k chatbots as of this year. If Zuckerburg can't change that, Steemit can't change that. lol

>Power distribution is also pretty screwed on the platform right now, leading to a low retention rate for new users. Second thing on the list, although there's a possibility that this will naturally sort itself out with time.

Socialism at it's finest - This will not solve anything, IMO. Work hard, create great content that people want/like and form communities. Taking power from certain people and then redistributing to some other people will do nothing but cause more imbalance in a different way - AKA _"Same shit, different diaper."_ 

>A filter option to prevent things you post on other Steem dApps (dMania, Zappl, DTube) from posting onto your Steemit blog would be a life saver. Perhaps out of everything I've asked this would be the easiest to implement.

YES! So. Much. Yes. People have been screaming for this, along with a resteem tab, for the past 18 months or more. Instead, now there is some kind of useless tab that changes how your blog posts are displayed on your page... Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorrigaronib
permlinkre-jenkinrocket-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205813228z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:58:12
last_update2017-11-16 21:10:54
depth2
children7
last_payout2017-11-23 20:58:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.046 HBD
curator_payout_value0.144 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,474
author_reputation171,562,604,416,656
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,561
net_rshares557,697,619,837
author_curate_reward""
vote details (9)
@anarchyhasnogods · (edited)
$0.58
did you just call that socialism? Socialism is collective ownership of the means of production.



Don't fucking insult us with your welfare capitalism
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoranarchyhasnogods
permlinkre-rigaronib-re-jenkinrocket-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t144917117z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 14:49:15
last_update2017-11-17 14:51:36
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 14:49:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.578 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length151
author_reputation61,353,529,646,265
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,685,737
net_rshares267,249,446,942
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jenkinrocket · (edited)
>While this may seem/feel like a problem, it is, imo, not something that is ever going to be resolved fully. I mean, look at Facebook, they recently revealed that Messenger has well over 100k chatbots as of this year. If Zuckerburg can't change that, Steemit can't change that. lol

The point about Facebook is thinking by analogy - i.e. Facebook couldn't do it so we can't... But Steemit has already accomplished things that Facebook couldn't in a million years dream of. However, I acknowledge that there may not be a simple solution. However, it needs to be voiced as a problem. Also, while 'hard' solutions are unlikely, you can't tell me there aren't various changes to be made that would discourage bots. 

>Socialism at it's finest - This will not solve anything, IMO. Work hard, create great content that people want/like and form communities. Taking power from certain people and then redistributing to some other people will do nothing but cause more imbalance in a different way - AKA "Same shit, different diaper."

Lol. Wut? Saying that there's a clear power problem automatically makes me a socialist? Ridiculous. There's a power differential, and it's effecting user retention. These are facts. Telling new users to 'suck it up and work hard' ain't gonna fly, bro. They'll shrug their shoulders and go back to Facebook laughing. Then the few people that have Steem can trade amongst each other, because that'll be it's only use, lol. You have to make the platform appealing to new users, not tell them to adjust and put in the year of effort... Don't know what's difficult to understand there...

>YES! So. Much. Yes. People have been screaming for this, along with a resteem tab, for the past 18 months or more.

I know, RIGHT? This is one thing we can **all** agree on. They need to get right on this! Handling the resteems could be tricky. After all, what's the point of resteeming if folks are just gonna block it out? It'd be nice to have the option, but I also sort of like that folks have to think long and hard before they resteem, or risk losing followers.
properties (22)
authorjenkinrocket
permlinkre-rigaronib-re-jenkinrocket-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t212351215z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:23:51
last_update2017-11-16 21:24:36
depth3
children3
last_payout2017-11-23 21:23:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,080
author_reputation26,749,165,203,694
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,613,486
net_rshares0
@jesta ·
$33.43
It's as good as time as any to list what I thing Steem needs ASAP:

- **User/platform configurable rewards distribution**: The hardcoded 75%/25% Author/Curators split is something I'd like to see customizable. This ratio should be configurable within the `comment_options` operation and support between 0/100 and 100/0 ratios. Each Steem powered website could either set this ratio at the platform level or surface the choice to the end user via the interface. Different types of content deserve different types of rewards and by allowing this option to be configurable, it opens Steem up to different opportunities. 
- **Reimagining Bandwidth and Account Creation**: Account creation sucks right now, and while I know HF20 is set to address some of these problems, we very much need a way to create free accounts for people. Free accounts would also imply that the bandwidth system will need adjusting as will the requirements on account creation. This is the biggest hurdle towards adoption in my opinion, I can't really market chainBB to the wider world yet simply because most of them probably won't go through the trouble of creating a Steem blockchain account. I don't have a silver bullet solution for this but it needs to be a top priority. 
- **A more advanced account/key structure**: The account management via keys right now has a lot of blemishes. I believe we need to reimagine the levels of account security and go above and beyond `posting` and `active`. A dynamic key system where I could create a key pair and grant it permission to specific operations would be ideal. I want to be able to create a specific key for my price feed and failover, which doesn't have access to transfer my funds out. I'd like to be able to assign a specific key on the powerbot accounts specifically for delegation operations. The more fine control we have over this system, the better types of apps can be built upon Steem. SteemConnect could do amazing things with a key system like this.
- **Rethinking content storage**: Steem at this rate is going to grow unfathomably large, with a lot of garbage in the blockchain. It's going to need some method of pruning/sharding/subchains/sidechains/something to reduce/divide it's overall footprint. I'm identifying it as a problem, but I don't have a great solution. I just know it'll be an issue in the future if Steem has any sort of monumental growth to it. 
- **Standardization around content and it's meta**: We need standard practices for how different frontends interact with data on the blockchain. Currently each frontend has no respect towards the custom data other platforms are setting within a post. It would go a long ways to have a set of best practices, guidelines and set methods to respect the data between all the platforms being built on the blockchain.
- **Beneficiaries Payouts**: Currently beneficiary rewards only pay out in SP. These rewards should pay out in whatever method the author of the post chooses (50/50 SBD/SP or 100% SP). 

I'm sure I could list more - but I'll stop here :)
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 49 others
properties (23)
authorjesta
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t191410456z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"app":"chainbb/0.4","namespace":false,"format":"markdown+html","tags":[]}
created2017-11-17 00:14:09
last_update2017-11-17 00:14:09
depth1
children67
last_payout2017-11-24 00:14:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value24.472 HBD
curator_payout_value8.959 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,054
author_reputation140,605,453,893,072
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountchainbb
weight1,500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,623,606
net_rshares17,565,492,211,794
author_curate_reward""
vote details (113)
@apogarp ·
You are very correct
properties (22)
authorapogarp
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t200814051z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 20:08:30
last_update2017-11-17 20:08:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 20:08:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length20
author_reputation15,647,468,491
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,712,827
net_rshares0
@ats-david ·
$0.40
Other than free account creation, these are some solid ideas. I’ll have to think on the free accounts and bandwidth, but it just doesn’t sound like it would work out well, given the lure of β€œeasy money” around here.

To be continued...
πŸ‘  , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorats-david
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t003650950z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:36:51
last_update2017-11-17 00:36:51
depth2
children20
last_payout2017-11-24 00:36:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.328 HBD
curator_payout_value0.076 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length235
author_reputation324,017,334,201,433
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,625,083
net_rshares188,509,715,629
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)
@callmetoxy ·
A suggestion on the free account creation thing, maybe there should be kind of a replenishable quota of free accounts an already existing "parent" account could create. Going beyond the quota would then cost that parent account.
properties (22)
authorcallmetoxy
permlinkre-ats-david-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t013610075z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.0.0"}
created2017-11-17 01:36:09
last_update2017-11-17 01:36:09
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 01:36:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length228
author_reputation455,273,727,364
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,628,562
net_rshares0
@freebornangel ·
$0.34
As the reward pool will never be large enough to make fb level amount of users happy, steemit is not destined to have that many users.
At some point users will need to pay some price to get in, imo.

This would both cut spammers and encourage only serious content creators imo.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-ats-david-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t203117609z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 20:31:12
last_update2017-11-17 20:31:12
depth3
children4
last_payout2017-11-24 20:31:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.253 HBD
curator_payout_value0.084 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length277
author_reputation171,005,551,503,977
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,714,292
net_rshares158,531,564,039
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@gtg ·
(Almost) free account creation is a must.
Please consider this use case scenario:
I have a mature, well prospered forum / site with 100k users. I want SMTs. I want my users to get accounts on steem. Given current min reg fee 0.2 STEEM that's around **$20,000** (if you can afford **$3,000,000** in SP delegation, freezing those funds for 30days + 13weeks) or just **$600,000** for account creation without delegation.
Freemium would be the key. As long as we would be able to keep bandwidth limits at the level preventing  million of 0SP accounts  from spamming the network.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorgtg
permlinkre-ats-david-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t214526221z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 21:45:27
last_update2017-11-18 21:45:27
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 21:45:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length574
author_reputation461,806,510,899,194
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,816,829
net_rshares489,922,729
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jesta ·
$0.05
Agreed, that's a hard one. Free accounts would require some radical changes to go along side it, I don't think it would just work if we simply allowed it. A potential solution could be some sort of free/temporary account (where everything's "temporary" and not permanent on-chain somehow). The user could use this account to only post (100% SP) with it to "earn" themselves an account. Only once they've "earned" the account would their history actually be recorded on-chain and unlocked of all features. 

It's a tall order, and I'm sure there's better solutions, but we need something different than what we have now. 
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorjesta
permlinkre-ats-david-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t003650950z-20171116t195913927z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"app":"chainbb/0.4","namespace":false,"format":"markdown+html","tags":[]}
created2017-11-17 00:59:12
last_update2017-11-17 00:59:12
depth3
children10
last_payout2017-11-24 00:59:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.037 HBD
curator_payout_value0.011 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length621
author_reputation140,605,453,893,072
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountchainbb
weight1,500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,626,404
net_rshares25,391,235,066
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@mehedi118 ·
Yes.. Your right
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-ats-david-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065311762z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:53:18
last_update2017-11-17 06:53:18
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:53:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length16
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,159
net_rshares-7,635,523,550
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@cryptographic ·
I’ve created a word cloud for the comments section of this post that I hope you will find of value and will want to share. While the creation of the actual word cloud is relatively easy and straightforward, the creation of a relevant word list that will produce a meaningful word cloud is quite another matter, as I’m sure you know, and takes considerable time and effort. Unfortunately, as of now, the post has only had 41 views. It needs a little love. Perhaps a resteem might be of help, if you think it is worthwhile, and, of course, it would be much appreciated too. TIA
https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input
properties (22)
authorcryptographic
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171121t114927238z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-21 11:49:24
last_update2017-11-21 11:49:24
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-28 11:49:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length670
author_reputation111,198,190,831,086
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,080,276
net_rshares0
@daneshbaetabrizi · (edited)
as far as content storage, an archive option similar to Instagram would be amazing... to quickly archive a post in order for it to be publicly hidden yet permanent. User may toggle posts to be visible or not and that could be done through a side chain if i'm not mistaken no ? I know some people live life with no regrets and all but boy do i regret one of my posts... like dam... very unprofessional post and i cant do anything about it.. no options other than living with an impulsive post made out of curiosity. In my opinion an archive would be key in rethinking content storage, or even allowing users to delete posts they no longer want to have
properties (22)
authordaneshbaetabrizi
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180108t064730550z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-08 06:47:30
last_update2018-01-08 06:48:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-01-15 06:47:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length650
author_reputation12,668,851,418
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id27,934,340
net_rshares0
@gold84 ·
$0.18
@jesta I agree with you on the need of easness to the signup process. I recently wrote a post about the need of an invite a friend button, and my idea on the backend of it is related to make it easier and faster, as well as showing the users the advantages of steemit, and how great the platform is to learn too. I also wrote a post on the creation of a Mentions tab function. That will also help steemians communicate faster, and increase the speed of task completion. @gold84
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorgold84
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t045447384z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["jesta","gold84"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 04:54:45
last_update2017-11-18 04:54:45
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 04:54:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.179 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length477
author_reputation20,903,401,478,476
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,742,995
net_rshares86,176,856,001
author_curate_reward""
vote details (12)
@janus ·
<h3>INFORMING THE MASSES - A short list of some of the abuses against @Noganoo by Satanic whales on Steemit.<h3>

<h3>For those of you who are unaware @Noganoo was sexually abused when he was 5 years old.  Bernie Sanders learned this from Fyrstikken whom Noganoo trusted and confided in and then was betrayed and slandered by Fyrstikken whom Noganoo brought to Steemit.  Noganoo only requested that Fyrstikken send back the 10 Bitcoins he stole from SatoshiHorizon through his β€œaltcoin investment fund.” Noganoo stood up against Bernie's flag abuse towards SeaBlue which caused the war that you are seeing today.  Bernie swore to destroy Noganoo because Noganoo defended the helpless minnows on Steemit.  Below are just a few of the terrible insults they have spoken against this Christian man.  Please visit @Noganoo's blog and support and encourage him through these demonic attacks as his old friends have forsaken him.  Not only do these people verbally attack Noganoo but they antagonize him until he responds in anger, then they sent the FBI to his house for "threatening."  Noganoo has requested to all of the whales on steemit directly for them to speak to these 2 fraudsters and tell them to stop.  Not a word was said in one year and now he is resorting to further action.  The abuse will stop.  If you have any information as to the identity or whereabouts of BernieSanders or Pfunk please contact abuse@steem.in.  There is a substantial reward and you can remain anonymous.  Noganoo is unable to file a restraining order against these 2 until he finds their identity.  BernieSanders is a pedophile and should not be rewarded with upvotes on Steemit.</h3>

<h3>First of all let's go back to before this all started.  Noganoo was investigating the fraud and theft of 10s of millions of dollars of rewards by Donkeypong, Gavvet, Sauravrungta, HanshotFirst, Kevinwong, The-Alien, JrCornel, Sweetsssj and Knozaki2015 with their organization called "SteemGuild" where they used the Steemit Co-founder Ned's account to vote for themselves instead of the "minnows" they claimed to be supporting.  Go look at all of their current account values and you can see that over 1 year ago Noganoo was right! They paid themselves multi-millions for only a couple months of curating on Steemit. Something the rest of us do for free.  You can see that these people and their friends are the only people who have ever attacked Noganoo.  They are trying to cover up their theft.  If you go back on the blockchain you can see Noganoo's accounts previously supported most of these authors with his thousand bot voters early on in the platforms launch.  https://steemd.com/@sweet-banana?page=17   Then Noganoo called out The-Alien for his common use of the word "Motherfucker" in his fiction stories that were upvoted by their "Steemguild" to number one on trending every day to "raise money for the guild."  Fact is they stole millions of dollars.  This rebuke prevented Noganoo from ever getting an upvote from that guild which controlled over 30% of the voting power on Steemit at the time.</h3>

![2017-03-10 08_06_14-(β€’) Steemit Chat (1).png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmQtwzEiYJXjGkzJvwBSCwPEzt2gXw45CRDZmtfRQk7Bbo/2017-03-10%2008_06_14-(%E2%80%A2)%20Steemit%20Chat%20(1).png)

<h3>"Sorry, I should have said "Go fuck your cousin." (again)</h3>
![2018-02-01 13_40_22-.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmW8Ny1uzFBKuyv9JWmgjZMy6A93WssJwchCUZjDw2Dqik/2018-02-01%2013_40_22-.png)

<h3>Here is Pfunk attacking Noganoo's girlfriend.</h3>
![pfunk.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmVDG769WQjKenrEwVJpYeKvsw5QewWWbd2x1F9LJw2Khx/pfunk.png)

<h3>Here Bernie tries to twist the truth and calls him an "incestuous criminal."  Bernie is trying to convince the unknowing public that Noganoo is a sex criminal.</h3>
![2018-02-01 13_30_07-.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmNV8mHo9EfCtTXv69ZvpT9bHhPuuZ2DWjVaxUZyM8C1tm/2018-02-01%2013_30_07-.png)

<h3>I'll save you a spot beside me in hell to torment you with incestuous dick art for all eternity.</h3>
![2017-09-07 06_51_29-.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmQGzQqjbVJyYUgM6kUHmvmPR7yq39zDySGtdVWZL5mqSG/2017-09-07%2006_51_29-.png)

<h3>I'm pretty sure (noganoo) was molested by somone in the church.</h3>
![2017-03-17 18_19_18-(β€’) Steemit Chat.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmck7wTfQnapFFSHXvAcpboaRM35pCKfrmiWCJQyK9Z98G/2017-03-17%2018_19_18-(%E2%80%A2)%20Steemit%20Chat.png)

<h3>Incestuous Scumbag, I bet the abuse never even happened and you are trying to gain sympathy</h3>
![2017-05-17 06_46_18-Noganoo - Hero_ Victim_ Menace_ And what about you_ β€” Steemit.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmX4koQufBEDU8KVd7jxQv61PCQc9NSrwEhSgEjWDXkkfD/2017-05-17%2006_46_18-Noganoo%20-%20Hero_%20Victim_%20Menace_%20And%20what%20about%20you_%20%E2%80%94%20Steemit.png)


![2017-06-21 16_57_34-2017-06-21 16_47_08-Replies to nOgAnOo (@noganoo) β€” Steemit - Windows Photo View.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmY2Ybr6qsu7Jj7QfrEmtxkpWoTSUTJNUVWgkBnrViPT5d/2017-06-21%2016_57_34-2017-06-21%2016_47_08-Replies%20to%20nOgAnOo%20(%40noganoo)%20%E2%80%94%20Steemit%20-%20Windows%20Photo%20View.png)

<h3>Here is Pfunk 2 years ago violently attacking an article Noganoo wrote about Christianity,  Pfunk at the time had no idea Noganoo wrote this!  Pfunk is a hater of true Christians but aligns himself with the fake Christians so he can get more witness votes and doesn't lose support.  Pfunk proceeded to individually message everyone that upvoted Noganoo and slander him and threaten them with loss of support if they continue to upvote his articles.  Pfunk, Berniesanders and Ausbitbank costed Noganoo over 50,000 dollars in losses last year.  Ausbitbank attacked Noganoo to impress his witness friends when Noganoo is the one who brought him to Steemit.  He brought Noganoo’s reputation from 68 down to zero with stolen Steempower provided by JamesC</h3>
![2018-02-14 03_25_39-.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmcnMRJYRg1kwRU536ZfJ8fmjg17nUMcZr7XqWgUMAhk3Q/2018-02-14%2003_25_39-.png)

<h3>The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it. - John 1:5</h3>
properties (22)
authorjanus
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180215t042029118z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["noganoo"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmQtwzEiYJXjGkzJvwBSCwPEzt2gXw45CRDZmtfRQk7Bbo/2017-03-10%2008_06_14-(%E2%80%A2)%20Steemit%20Chat%20(1).png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmW8Ny1uzFBKuyv9JWmgjZMy6A93WssJwchCUZjDw2Dqik/2018-02-01%2013_40_22-.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmVDG769WQjKenrEwVJpYeKvsw5QewWWbd2x1F9LJw2Khx/pfunk.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmNV8mHo9EfCtTXv69ZvpT9bHhPuuZ2DWjVaxUZyM8C1tm/2018-02-01%2013_30_07-.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmQGzQqjbVJyYUgM6kUHmvmPR7yq39zDySGtdVWZL5mqSG/2017-09-07%2006_51_29-.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmck7wTfQnapFFSHXvAcpboaRM35pCKfrmiWCJQyK9Z98G/2017-03-17%2018_19_18-(%E2%80%A2)%20Steemit%20Chat.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmX4koQufBEDU8KVd7jxQv61PCQc9NSrwEhSgEjWDXkkfD/2017-05-17%2006_46_18-Noganoo%20-%20Hero_%20Victim_%20Menace_%20And%20what%20about%20you_%20%E2%80%94%20Steemit.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmY2Ybr6qsu7Jj7QfrEmtxkpWoTSUTJNUVWgkBnrViPT5d/2017-06-21%2016_57_34-2017-06-21%2016_47_08-Replies%20to%20nOgAnOo%20(%40noganoo)%20%E2%80%94%20Steemit%20-%20Windows%20Photo%20View.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmcnMRJYRg1kwRU536ZfJ8fmjg17nUMcZr7XqWgUMAhk3Q/2018-02-14%2003_25_39-.png"],"links":["https://steemd.com/@sweet-banana?page=17"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-02-15 04:20:30
last_update2018-02-15 04:20:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-02-22 04:20:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length6,095
author_reputation-1,330,514,694,692
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id37,644,317
net_rshares0
@luzcypher ·
>Different types of content deserve different types of rewards and by allowing this option to be configurable, it opens Steem up to different opportunities.

*Could you give some examples of what possibilities this would open up?*
properties (22)
authorluzcypher
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171122t012115633z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-22 01:21:12
last_update2017-11-22 01:21:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-29 01:21:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length230
author_reputation345,746,760,919,891
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,149,216
net_rshares0
@mehedi118 ·
Why you stop. Nice writting
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065002840z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:50:06
last_update2017-11-17 06:50:06
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:50:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length27
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,648,963
net_rshares-7,623,918,130
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@molfzart92 ·
$0.36
THANK YOU FOR THIS.  It's funny, I was wondering when Steem would stop holding itself back by allowing potential users to wait weeks in order to be accepted/verified.  What a turn off.  Only took me about two weeks to be accepted (eye roll).....So glad these issues will be resolved.  Hoping for some great steps forward in 2018!  Cheers, mate!
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authormolfzart92
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t202539998z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 20:25:39
last_update2017-11-18 20:25:39
depth2
children2
last_payout2017-11-25 20:25:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.269 HBD
curator_payout_value0.088 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length344
author_reputation10,787,912,975
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,811,427
net_rshares160,958,903,453
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@abhi3700 ·
Yess!!..
I strongly believe that the Sign up process taking too much time is actually losing a lot of users and also from its platform-scaling point of view in terms of users count.

If it really wants to compete with **Facebook**, **Twitter**, etc. Steemit do need to make users feel that they are on a equally competent platform with awesome **front-end** UI. 
This is that one thing lacking in existing #Blockchain-based Dapps.
## Please prioritize this.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorabhi3700
permlinkre-molfzart92-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171120t071927794z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018","blockchain-based"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-20 07:19:33
last_update2017-11-20 07:19:33
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-27 07:19:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length457
author_reputation1,411,436,389,304
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,952,563
net_rshares0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@surfyogi · (edited)
I HAVE WAITED MONTHS to see this problem fixed and it is still a problem....
And the value of STEEM will not go up until its fixed.
properties (22)
authorsurfyogi
permlinkre-molfzart92-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171224t083000861z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-24 08:30:00
last_update2017-12-24 08:30:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-12-31 08:30:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length131
author_reputation31,155,045,810,316
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,983,293
net_rshares0
@okanlawonema ·
apart from all this which is really cool but dont you think the world as to rock steemit, hacking our way into existing social media, and bring more users to steemit, have been on facebook over the years with thousand of likes and shares not even a penny i recieved, nobody hears about steemit  and he/she is not HOT!(bigshaq), i believe steemit should work on publicity too, to promote the platform and reach more users, attatching some amount of steem to social sharing conditioned with algorithm like that of rewards could be looked into,
properties (22)
authorokanlawonema
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171210t211718920z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-10 21:17:24
last_update2017-12-10 21:17:24
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-12-17 21:17:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length541
author_reputation15,761,020,946
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id23,039,442
net_rshares0
@richforever ·
Mmmmmmm who is this @jesta, lemme check him out. Full of knowledge. 
Look forward to emulating your steps.
properties (22)
authorrichforever
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t194712515z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["jesta"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 19:47:12
last_update2017-11-17 19:47:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 19:47:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length106
author_reputation6,126,844,828,344
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,711,258
net_rshares0
@snjana ·
informative comment...
properties (22)
authorsnjana
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t014603427z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 01:47:42
last_update2017-11-18 01:47:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 01:47:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length22
author_reputation1,825,660,933
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,732,338
net_rshares0
@surfyogi ·
Thanks for all the great ideas put forth.
properties (22)
authorsurfyogi
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171224t082328226z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-24 08:23:27
last_update2017-12-24 08:23:27
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-12-31 08:23:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length41
author_reputation31,155,045,810,316
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,982,604
net_rshares0
@timcliff ·
$2.51
> User/platform configurable rewards distribution: The hardcoded 75%/25% Author/Curators split is something I'd like to see customizable. This ratio should be configurable within the comment_options operation and support between 0/100 and 100/0 ratios. Each Steem powered website could either set this ratio at the platform level or surface the choice to the end user via the interface. Different types of content deserve different types of rewards and by allowing this option to be configurable, it opens Steem up to different opportunities.

I am strongly in favor of this idea. 

One concern that I have though would be that this could create a 'starvation' problem, where curators start only going after the posts with a higher and higher curation percentage, and ignoring posts with lower percentages (even if the quality of the content is high). Authors will be forced to increase their curation percentage in order to get noticed/considered, until it reaches a point where 80-90% curation percentage is needed if you want to get votes. Do you see this becoming a problem?
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t015237091z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:52:36
last_update2017-11-17 01:52:36
depth2
children28
last_payout2017-11-24 01:52:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.889 HBD
curator_payout_value0.619 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,078
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,629,647
net_rshares1,166,059,445,193
author_curate_reward""
vote details (25)
@aaronburt ·
$0.04
This was my first thought upon seeing the idea as well. I'm afraid that this would lead to more problems that we already experience (people reciprocating votes with the intent of profit, bots, poor content, etc.). Being able to control the ratio would be cool though. Not exactly sure what the best call is here
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoraaronburt
permlinkre-timcliff-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t033826918z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 03:38:24
last_update2017-11-18 03:38:24
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 03:38:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.027 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length311
author_reputation3,652,614,713,336
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,738,576
net_rshares17,073,389,677
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@forykw ·
$0.26
I agree. But it could also turn around the other side, Tim... Giving more curation could also attract bots and false curation.

So in my view, the system has to have some kind of credibility (reputation) before you can jump on such high differentials.  For example, low reputation should star at High Author percentage and accounts should be more affected by bandwidth when posting (and less when commenting). Then the more you go up in reputation, the more you can set the bar to allow only curators to receive rewards.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorforykw
permlinkre-timcliff-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t103709661z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 10:37:09
last_update2017-11-17 10:37:09
depth3
children8
last_payout2017-11-24 10:37:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.250 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length520
author_reputation93,047,130,793,680
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,665,345
net_rshares119,378,724,451
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@jesta · (edited)
$1.96
I think a type of free market would evolve around the different percentages, but I don't think it would go to that far of an extreme throughout the entire community. Some bots may focus on higher % ratios and that's fine, but I imagine real people are going to reward content they appreciate regardless of the ratio.

Curation focused users would be encouraged to vote on high % curation reward posts (that they believe will be successful), but those posts would likely only be in situations where the author cared more about visibility than rewards. 

After thinking about this for the last couple months - I'm leaning towards not just letting the basic user set this ratio while posting. Someone could of course make a utility to set the ratio to whatever they want - but the platforms themselves should be the ones determining these percents to simplify the process, and that's what most users will end up using. 

Steemit.com for example could present it as an option while writing a post:

- Default (25% / 75%)
- Reduced Visibility (0% / 100%)
- More Visibility (50% / 50%)
- Highest Visibility (75% / 25%)

This could be a slider or whatever, potentially not even revealing the % ratio (to reduce cognitive load). Maybe they don't even give the user an option, but they change steemit.com so that comments are at 0/100% and posts at 50/50%, because that's what's best for steemit. I'm not sure what the exact numbers would be, just brainstorming. 

Overall I don't think we'd end up in a situation where all posts required 80-90% curation rewards to get visibility. The way the websites are built would follow the market, and since most people use these websites, there's a bit of a safety net. 

Also - once content has been silo'd (either through communities or chainBB forums) - the overall visibility from monetary gains is a lot less important. 
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorjesta
permlinkre-timcliff-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t015237091z-20171116t215648742z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"app":"chainbb/0.4","namespace":false,"format":"markdown+html","tags":[]}
created2017-11-17 02:56:48
last_update2017-11-17 02:58:36
depth3
children3
last_payout2017-11-24 02:56:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.413 HBD
curator_payout_value0.550 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,857
author_reputation140,605,453,893,072
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountchainbb
weight1,500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,633,795
net_rshares1,028,570,778,555
author_curate_reward""
vote details (9)
@revo ·
$0.07
Yeah, I think this sort of thing will induce a 'race to the bottom', where no author really wins.  I like the idea of them being adjustable within reasonably small bounds (say 50/50 -> 75/25), though.  But I'm not a believer in the 'free market', as we have too many irrational psychological foibles that sabotage us (both individually and as a group dynamic).
πŸ‘  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorrevo
permlinkre-timcliff-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t035032727z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:50:33
last_update2017-11-17 03:50:33
depth3
children3
last_payout2017-11-24 03:50:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.059 HBD
curator_payout_value0.015 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length360
author_reputation13,099,225,944,898
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,637,362
net_rshares35,102,815,392
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@salahuddin2004 ·
$0.12
Steemit will replace facebook
https://i.imgur.com/6CQHa9D.png
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsalahuddin2004
permlinkre-timcliff-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180114t045720312z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"image":["https://i.imgur.com/6CQHa9D.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-13 12:54:51
last_update2018-01-13 12:54:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2018-01-20 12:54:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.089 HBD
curator_payout_value0.030 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length61
author_reputation229,993,328,028
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id29,223,129
net_rshares14,784,592,059
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@smooth · (edited)
$0.42
> until it reaches a point where 80-90% curation percentage is needed if you want to get votes

I don't think that would happen, universally, but I also think there are cases where 80-90% curation makes perfect sense as a way to encourage risky voting on less-known or less-mainstream content. 

Really excellent posts (high potential earnings) would get votes even with a low percentage. If you can vote on a post with 10% curation rewards but likely to reach $100 or a post with 100% curation that probably won't exceed $2, which do you choose? 

I think we'd see different types of content and different authors offering different percentages, in a sort of curation-market way (more obscure content and authors would have to offer more, but _at least they have the option to offer more_ and get noticed). 

I do see some issues with UI but only pro curators and bots need pay attention to most of it anyway (like most of the low-level curation rules). Both can build their own tools or a market can develop for better tools than the baseline (steemit.com) platform (as is the case now for features like beneficiaries).
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-timcliff-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t043924500z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 04:39:27
last_update2017-11-18 04:41:18
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-25 04:39:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.323 HBD
curator_payout_value0.095 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,121
author_reputation253,602,537,834,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,742,126
net_rshares194,240,389,384
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@snowflake · (edited)
$0.04
Even if people were to only upvote content with 80-90% curation I still think it wouldn't be a problem because it will make curation so profitable that many people will invest in SP thus increasing the price of steem (authors payout )

Also according to this rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%25_rule_(Internet_culture)  only 1% of internet users actively create content while the other  99% consume it, so to me it makes perfect sense that authors gets 10% and curators(consumers) 90%.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorsnowflake
permlinkre-timcliff-re-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t182114035z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1","links":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%25_rule_"]}
created2017-11-19 18:21:15
last_update2017-11-19 18:26:48
depth3
children5
last_payout2017-11-26 18:21:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.028 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length489
author_reputation33,312,252,512,655
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,903,452
net_rshares17,259,266,694
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@timotiejus ·
Well you got 33$  on this comment in 14 hours. *claps*
properties (22)
authortimotiejus
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t144333109z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 14:43:33
last_update2017-11-17 14:43:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 14:43:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length54
author_reputation-6,428,026,730
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,685,268
net_rshares0
@tusharvasave ·
great information and easy to understand
properties (22)
authortusharvasave
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t180934721z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 18:09:33
last_update2017-11-17 18:09:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 18:09:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length40
author_reputation-89,390,766,256
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,704,013
net_rshares0
@walidsalah ·
I am happy with all my heart that there is like you in this great site
Who are doing development work and a road map to develop this great site
thank you all
Thank @jesta
Thank @timcliff
My greetings to all of you in this future map
Thanks for all and my greetings to you
@walidsalah
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorwalidsalah
permlinkre-jesta-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t053433413z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["jesta","timcliff","walidsalah"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 05:38:33
last_update2017-11-18 05:38:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 05:38:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length283
author_reputation4,044,999,895,445
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,745,483
net_rshares742,677,389
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@josealbertomg71 ·
Great, the new contributions that the steemit community plans to give us are incredible. I'm new to the community and I think it's excellent, it motivates me and I know it will take me to the big hits in 2018, many greetings. Let nothing stop them, steemit is the best #steemitblog
properties (22)
authorjosealbertomg71
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t232259808z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018","steemitblog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 23:19:54
last_update2017-11-17 23:19:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 23:19:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length281
author_reputation291,958,704,447
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,724,508
net_rshares0
@joyce789 ·
Hi Team Steemit, 
Keep up the good work. I'm a believer (so far :-) and a professional tech editor (https://www.linkedin.com/in/joyce789/)
Friendly alert: when I  just joined this community a moment ago, found a few big issues with your Legal contract statements, for instance:

Re: Steemit contract huhs???
15.2 ..."you will be may not be able to access Steem"...?? 
[NEW EDITOR/LAWYER PLEASE]

17. User Conduct 
[huh???  SEVERAL POINTS DON'T MAKE SENSE OR SEEM TO BE SAYING THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT STEEMIT REALLY SHOULD BE SAYING LEGALLY]

17.1.1. "Use our Services in any manner that could interfere with, disrupt, 
negatively affect or inhibit other users from fully enjoying our Services, 
or that could damage, disable, overburden or impair the functioning of our  Services in any manner;"  
[DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU ACTUALLY WANT PEOPLE TO USE STEEMIT SO THAT THEY INTERFERE WITH, DISRUPT, ETC OTHER USERS??]

17.1.2.  "Use our Services to pay for, support or otherwise engage in any 
illegal activities, including, but not limited to illegal gambling, fraud, 
money-laundering, or terrorist activities." 
[WHAT? STEEMIT SEEMS TO BE SAYING TO ME - NOT A LEGAL EXPERT - THAT YOU ACTUALLY WANT ME TO USE YOUR SERVICES TO SUPPORT ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES, REALLY??]

17.1.3.  "Use any robot, spider, crawler, scraper or other automated means or interface not provided by us to access our Services or to extract data;"
[SO YOU'RE TELLING ME TO USE MY OWN ROBOTS TO ACCESS STEEMIT SERVICES/DATA??]

17.1.4.  "Use or attempt to use another user's Wallet without authorization;"
[STEEMIT ACTUALLY WANTS ME TO USE ANOTHER USER'S WALLET WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT??]

17.1.6.   "Introduce to the Services any virus, Trojan, worms, logic bombs or other harmful material;"  
[THE WAY THAT THIS IS CURRENTLY WORDED, STEEMIT IS
ENCOURAGING USERS TO INTRODUCE VIRUSES AND OTHER HARMFUL MATERIAL TO YOUR SERVICES ~ HUH, REALLY?!?]

THE WAY YOUR CONTRACT IS WRITTEN CURRENTLY (BY SOME DUMB-IDIOT/S THAT PROBABLY DIDN'T GRADUATE FROM ANY CREDIBLE LAW SCHOOL YET), STEEMIT SEEMS TO BE ENCOURAGING
BLACK MARKET BEHAVIOR!!

Just my 2-steemit-cents.
Have a nice, healthy new year ~
Joyce
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorjoyce789
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180108t181740414z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://www.linkedin.com/in/joyce789/"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-08 18:17:36
last_update2018-01-08 18:17:36
depth1
children1
last_payout2018-01-15 18:17:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,156
author_reputation0
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,058,795
net_rshares-1,160,483,985
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@joyce789 · (edited)
Joyce's recommendation: HIGHEST PRIORITY BUGS TO BE FIXED IN YOUR LEGAL STATEMENTS! 
BRING THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF YOUR CEO @ned AND LEGAL EXPERT (if you actually have one).
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorjoyce789
permlinkre-joyce789-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180108t182927464z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1","users":["ned"]}
created2018-01-08 18:29:24
last_update2018-01-08 18:30:27
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-01-15 18:29:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length174
author_reputation0
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,060,892
net_rshares-1,143,076,725
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jphilipsagholor ·
Thank you for the planned Steemit Roadmap 2018 ......... I hereby make the following suggestions: 
1. That the Heading be changed from "Steemit Roadmap 2018" to "2018 Steemit Roadmap"
2. That Steem Power Delegation be removed to checkmate exploitation and mismanagement.  It is aknown fact that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.  This will be in the interest of all steemians.
3. That it a bit difficult presently to distinguish between Resteemed posts from actual authors' posts.  I am thinking whether there will be possible way of creating an option(s)that could help in distinguishing between these two.
Your idea is a welcome and heart warming idea, especially for newbies like us.
properties (22)
authorjphilipsagholor
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171121t112248080z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-21 11:22:57
last_update2017-11-21 11:22:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-28 11:22:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length707
author_reputation1,534,020,781,696
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,078,312
net_rshares0
@jraysteem ·
I like to share my ideas
1. Steem community projects.
2. Account creation manager - for easy account creation.
3. P2P for steem - sbd and smart tokens - trading - and or our local market with smart token.
4. Additional tab on steemit for announcement and updates from steemdev, steemitblog, ned (management)
For easier information.
5. Continues support utopian-io
6. Increase from 10 it should be 20-40 votes per day
7. Continue promoting steemit :)

Thank you for reading!

I like suggestion of @jesta @donkeypong @liberosist @ats-david
properties (22)
authorjraysteem
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t014337722z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["jesta","donkeypong","liberosist","ats-david"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 01:43:42
last_update2017-11-18 01:43:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 01:43:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length537
author_reputation8,784,912,117,192
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,732,150
net_rshares0
@jskvishal ·
#roadmap2018 
Hello sir
I am here on steemit from some weeks but there is many problems for new steem users that many old users creates pools and advertise to sell steem power to him for reward.
I think developers of steemit need to reimagine about it.
Thanks:)
properties (22)
authorjskvishal
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t115411080z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 11:55:33
last_update2017-11-18 11:55:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 11:55:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length261
author_reputation212,270,775,063
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,769,799
net_rshares0
@justg ·
Steemit Social Media Browser? A mobile web-browser app that can stream social media content from outside sources, instagram/facebook, then, like bookmarking a page, upvoting can be attached to particular feeds. Not sure about rights, but, as long as the browser app allows advertising from specific social media streams to propagate into the browser, I think, other social media platforms will be ok with an expanded platform for ad-content dissemination. Safari/Chrome/Firefox can stream myriad online content to your computer, so too, can a Steemit Social Media browser.
properties (22)
authorjustg
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180130t204202384z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-30 20:42:03
last_update2018-01-30 20:42:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-02-06 20:42:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length572
author_reputation2,663,542,067
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id33,659,884
net_rshares0
@justinansako ·
Hey I’m new here, and I want to know whos to follow?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorjustinansako
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t181021358z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 18:10:21
last_update2017-11-17 18:10:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 18:10:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length52
author_reputation1,211,010,538,651
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,704,069
net_rshares470,017,721
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@justinashby ·
I think STEEMit should start taking the tools under their wing and make them more stable and user friendly. Many of them are super useful and are broken for one reason or another.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorjustinashby
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t060923802z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:09:24
last_update2017-11-17 06:09:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:09:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length179
author_reputation12,650,430,770,044
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,646,308
net_rshares149,973,228
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@k3nb0b ·
Spam is my top concern, there should be put some moderators in place with the power to revoke spammers posting rights for a set amount of time for obvious or constant spamming. Though I don't think of it as a priority since it is possible to do via a homepage, I think steemit would be more user friendly if you could make category folders on your blog to divide different types of posts and make series etc. easier.
properties (22)
authork3nb0b
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171217t230045773z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-17 23:00:48
last_update2017-12-17 23:00:48
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-12-24 23:00:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length416
author_reputation5,001,617,305,611
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id23,940,615
net_rshares0
@thatsweeneyguy ·
Steemit is decentralized. If there were an overarching "authority" that could determine what is and what is not spam, we open ourselves up to a large possibility of corruption.
properties (22)
authorthatsweeneyguy
permlinkre-k3nb0b-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171230t010143525z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-30 01:01:45
last_update2017-12-30 01:01:45
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-01-06 01:01:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length176
author_reputation27,446,015,260,706
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id25,966,879
net_rshares0
@kalilinux ·
$0.68
I think the community input should be a priority for 2018. I am new to steemit but I am looking forward to new functionality.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorkalilinux
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171116t173114949z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.7","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-16 22:31:18
last_update2017-11-16 22:31:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 22:31:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.601 HBD
curator_payout_value0.083 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length125
author_reputation93,268,601,954
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,617,519
net_rshares334,038,781,124
author_curate_reward""
vote details (11)
@kazmii ·
Great information, buddy! Thanks for sharing this with us. Have a great day!
properties (22)
authorkazmii
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t204301821z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 20:43:03
last_update2017-11-17 20:43:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 20:43:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length76
author_reputation490,548,382,859
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,715,125
net_rshares0
@kcherukuri ·
Allow the videos to be played on the feed page.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorkcherukuri
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t040103195z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 04:01:51
last_update2017-11-17 04:01:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 04:01:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length47
author_reputation2,540,438,796,390
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,638,147
net_rshares87,128,305
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@kharrazi ·
1. Hide the past month's wallet history
2. Every new account must be verified with identity card and other social media account.
3. New users must invest 5 steems to be able to use or activate a new account
4. If possible add chat button connected with steemit.chat account
properties (22)
authorkharrazi
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210714563z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:07:21
last_update2017-11-16 21:07:21
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 21:07:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length273
author_reputation36,023,252,109,625
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,251
net_rshares0
@distantsignal ·
I like the idea of having to invest a certain amount of Steem in order activate or use an account.  The bot situation is out of control and if it cost $5 to create an account creating a lot of bots would be very expensive.
properties (22)
authordistantsignal
permlinkre-kharrazi-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t212335746z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:23:36
last_update2017-11-16 21:23:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:23:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length222
author_reputation32,496,313,953,302
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,613,468
net_rshares0
@kodel ·
How to join to steemit community?.
properties (22)
authorkodel
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171118t22206121z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-18 15:23:15
last_update2017-11-18 15:23:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 15:23:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length34
author_reputation-11,717,323,752
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,786,525
net_rshares0
@komunitaspaytren ·
https://steemit.com/steemit/@komunitaspaytren/the-world-is-yours
properties (22)
authorkomunitaspaytren
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t154408246z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@komunitaspaytren/the-world-is-yours"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 15:44:18
last_update2017-11-18 15:44:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 15:44:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length64
author_reputation5,808,931,903
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,788,344
net_rshares0
@leggy23 ·
$0.49
More privacy as far as steempower that a user has would be nice. People should have the option to display it or to display a certain amount
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorleggy23
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180213t215331836z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-02-13 21:53:30
last_update2018-02-13 21:53:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-02-20 21:53:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.372 HBD
curator_payout_value0.120 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length139
author_reputation32,285,845,390,112
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id37,312,772
net_rshares70,243,355,891
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@lextenebris ·
$3.62
I'm going to go out of the box, way out of the box, and suggest an orthogonal technology:

We really need some sort of "web of trust" system which will give individual users more control over what they view and what they interact with on Steemit.

As an example:

I find someone that is a very good curator. I follow them. I get their content in the content that they think is good, and everything is aces.

I find someone who consistently produces absolute garbage. Maybe they're a bot. Maybe they're completely insane. Maybe our tastes are simply deeply divergent. I want to see less of them – but I don't have any way to tell the system that as far as I'm concerned they should be less often in a stream that I'm exposed to.

In a web of trust system I would invest some "trust" into the first person which would automatically distribute some amount of trust into the people that they trust, with the assumption that I consider their judgment good. I would invest some "distrust" or negative trust into the second person, and from my perspective that person and all of their trusted people would become less prevalent in my stream; they would evaluate as "less valuable."

And for the people who both of my targets share in common? They would be adjusted by the relative strength of trust/distrust moving through the network out away from me.

This would result in an orthogonal sorting mechanism, informed by chronology (because many people may have very similar trust levels from my perspective), but with content that I am most likely to want to see at the top and content that I am very unlikely to want to see at the bottom.

If I find a bot who keeps getting into my stream? Distrust it. It and all of the content that it touches becomes less valuable. I see less of it, naturally. People who trust me, because of the quality of my posts, or comments, or just good curation, likewise see less of it – because I distrusted it.

A good web of trust system would go hand-in-hand with the 2017 roadmap's increased focus on subset community building, because I don't necessarily trust everyone equally on every subject. That, however, is something that can be put in place after the basic handling of trust comes into being.

Maybe this is best handled as some other form of token currency which doesn't touch Steem, I leave that to others who have more experience with the block chain that myself. (I'm an old-school symbolic AI and computation guy, myself.)

This would solve a lot of problems that we are seeing with bots, spam, and pollution of the streams in general. It certainly something worth taking a look at.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorlextenebris
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t221631511z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:16:33
last_update2017-11-16 22:16:33
depth1
children6
last_payout2017-11-23 22:16:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.713 HBD
curator_payout_value0.902 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,623
author_reputation19,924,980,499,611
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,616,618
net_rshares1,685,649,552,496
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@bronevik ·
$0.27
web of trust is basically recomentation system. It could be done on frontend-side.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbronevik
permlinkre-lextenebris-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t044058862z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 04:41:33
last_update2017-11-19 04:41:33
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-11-26 04:41:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.204 HBD
curator_payout_value0.067 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length82
author_reputation12,260,156,653,305
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,840,594
net_rshares121,577,077,689
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@lextenebris ·
I'm not sure it's accurate to say that it's a recommendation system. It can function as a recommendation system in part but it's more accurate to say that it's exactly what it says on the tin: "a system which manages quanta of trust."

Trust can mean a lot of things. Trust can mean that a user is considered "a good part of the community." Trust can mean that a source provides content which is in line with with expectation. Trust can mean exactly what it does in common parlance, that you extend a level of predictive expectation to another entity.

It's certainly possible to get into various types of trust which all function simultaneously, but at this point Steemit really needs some sort of lensing system, some way to slice through the piles of content which get dumped on it every day in ways that are meaningful to individual users.

I'm not one of those people that sees a blockchain and thinks I have a hammer and every problem is a nail. I'm actually pretty sure that any sort of web of trust system would have to be built on another type of data store, and that could certainly be built into an entirely different platform front end.

But that wouldn't improve Steemit. And that would be a shame.
properties (22)
authorlextenebris
permlinkre-bronevik-re-lextenebris-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t044726896z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 04:47:27
last_update2017-11-19 04:47:27
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-26 04:47:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,211
author_reputation19,924,980,499,611
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,840,932
net_rshares0
@sneak ·
This is high on my list, actually. Communities are the β€œgateway drug” infrastructure to the grand plan of letting anyone moderate the whole site, and letting anyone subscribe to anyone else’s moderation feeds.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsneak
permlinkre-lextenebris-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t195114012z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 19:51:12
last_update2017-11-18 19:51:12
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-25 19:51:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length209
author_reputation28,694,344,106,492
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,808,922
net_rshares1,021,275,884
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@lextenebris ·
I feel like Communities are actually even bigger than the "gateway drug" infrastructure; they are the one thing that lets discovery happen organically and naturally as long as they're coupled with a decent search engine. They channelize discussion, keeping like things associated, making it easier to find things that are interested in and ultimately keep users engaged with the community much longer than any of the other alternatives.

It's one of the things that Google+ has done better than anyone else and one of the reasons that Facebook Pages are one of the only things that Facebook has got right.

"Moderation" might not be the right mindset to bring to driving social network engagement. Moderation implies a deliberate squelching of other people's content – legitimately so. But we know that people feel better about engaging with a system that promotes things that they like more than they enjoy engaging with a system that demotes things that they're not interested in at that moment.

In that sense, one of the strongest words and ideas associated with Steemit right now is "curation." Curation implies that you are helping other people find good stuff. People want to help other people. Let people help each other by working alongside the system to classify things for better discovery and you'll get better, longer term user engagement.

(Anyone that hasn't poked around it Google+ long enough to get past the media narrative that it is a "failed social network" needs to invest that time. Seriously, the Community interface and management system is top-notch. It's the best part about the entire system. Users can create their own Communities, manage and moderate those Communities, and take personal responsibility for the results. Google gets the vast benefit of channelize and content that is inherently self similar. Total win.)
properties (22)
authorlextenebris
permlinkre-sneak-re-lextenebris-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t010834132z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 01:08:33
last_update2017-11-19 01:08:33
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 01:08:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,849
author_reputation19,924,980,499,611
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,828,607
net_rshares0
@liberosist ·
I'd like to see a concerted effort at onboarding influencers. This should be a long term project, and would need a team of dozens working full time. Get top influencers from the internet on board, and Steem will go viral.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorliberosist
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t061825990z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:18:33
last_update2017-11-17 06:18:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:18:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length221
author_reputation177,167,275,265,899
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,646,898
net_rshares751,676,498
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@life2dot0 ·
$0.46
From a new user based on good (hopefully) content creation:

* Create categories in personal pages
It would be great to be able to classify our content. For example I will post about running, finance, personal development, nutrition and more. That would be awesome if I could classify my posts for the followers but also to not get lost on my blog.

*make text editing easier. 

I just started but I find it difficult to edit text policies, colors...
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorlife2dot0
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t232435280z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:24:33
last_update2017-11-16 23:24:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:24:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.345 HBD
curator_payout_value0.114 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length450
author_reputation262,439,424,572
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,557
net_rshares214,825,106,834
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@littlejoeward ·
I wish I knew this tag in time to add it to my post. It talks about post promotion and some ideas for how to use it to make voting bots obsolete, as well as increasing the value of steem. Two birds (ostrich sized birds) one stone! Please consider these in future updates, thanks for all you guys do!

https://steemit.com/steemit/@littlejoeward/fixing-steemit-s-post-promotion-killing-the-voting-bots
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorlittlejoeward
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204002123z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@littlejoeward/fixing-steemit-s-post-promotion-killing-the-voting-bots"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:40:06
last_update2017-11-16 20:40:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:40:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length399
author_reputation1,878,133,807,004
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,232
net_rshares3,108,843,854
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@loryacoin ·
For me, the most important is the blog posts/articles promotion, search, discovery.

I found the interface counter-intuitive. This is hard to find not popular article or subject. Everything is driven by popularity and we can't change these settings.

I would have more control on what I want to read.
properties (22)
authorloryacoin
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t212545021z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:25:45
last_update2017-11-16 21:25:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:25:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length300
author_reputation-6,927,240,685
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,613,608
net_rshares0
@lrd ·
Steem intrinsic value is over a 100$.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorlrd
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t230314813z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:03:15
last_update2017-11-16 23:03:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:03:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length37
author_reputation15,552,995,201,866
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,619,244
net_rshares787,385,770
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@lukestokes ·
$5.78
**More of this!**

That may sound trite, but that's at the top of my list. Steemit, the company,  is currently the primary contributor to the STEEM blockchain and Condensor (Steemit.com). As such, our investment in this ecosystem is (currently) tightly coupled to Steemit the company. By communicating like you are here and valuing our input and feedback, you're continuing to build trust with those who are have to trust you based on your Steem Power holdings and your active development. That's why communications like this mean so much to me and is so valuable.

Once thing I'd like to see more of in the future is clarity for the community about the role of Steemit.com (the website) and the STEEM blockchain platform with its Smart Media Token functionality. As the reward pool is spread between different communities using different tokens and different applications on the STEEM blockchain, it would be great to know where the priorities are so we can all set healthy expectations going forward. Some want Steemit.com to be a Facebook or Reddit killer but if the company vision is much bigger and involves tokenizing the entire web, then some expectations we have about Steemit as a website may be out of alignment with the direction you all are heading.

In essence, clarifying the nuanced difference between developing the STEEM platform and the specific Steemit-developed interface steemit.com could go a long way in aligning our expectations and goals as a community who wants to see this all succeed.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorlukestokes
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205741066z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:57:42
last_update2017-11-16 20:57:42
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 20:57:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value4.346 HBD
curator_payout_value1.429 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,512
author_reputation555,781,629,106,002
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,525
net_rshares2,700,553,969,959
author_curate_reward""
vote details (16)
@noboxes ·
Amen!!
properties (22)
authornoboxes
permlinkre-lukestokes-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t212535202z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:26:09
last_update2017-11-16 21:26:09
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:26:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length6
author_reputation106,940,105,413,867
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,613,630
net_rshares0
@mariska.lubis ·
Steemit suggested all Steemian to have original and good quality posts, but in reality, there are so many undervalued original and good quality posts. Steemian who are consistent in original and good quality posts are also unable to develop themselves to get a better upvote. In the meantime, so many posts are still doing plagiarism and do not original, they got upvote and able to continue their life in Steemit, even much better than those who always prioritize original and good quality posts. I hope, in 2018, Steemit could consider a certain program, which able to detect this problems and solve it in a fair way. This is important not only for Steemian but also for the longer life of Steemit and the price of Steem as well, that's my opinion.
properties (22)
authormariska.lubis
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t153236298z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 15:32:36
last_update2017-11-18 15:32:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 15:32:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length750
author_reputation50,200,784,399,702
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,787,313
net_rshares0
@masscollective ·
$0.91
I can only think of a few quickly 

Resteem tab
Make the website and app parallel with each other
Groups, or communities 


Sometimes my payouts don’t go through and it says the payout was 48 years ago. 

The search function needs tuning. 
Profiles need an β€œinterests” area so we can find like minded people
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authormasscollective
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171117t232637128z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.7","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-18 07:26:39
last_update2017-11-18 07:26:39
depth1
children3
last_payout2017-11-25 07:26:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.782 HBD
curator_payout_value0.129 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length307
author_reputation505,127,324,087
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,752,364
net_rshares431,570,842,704
author_curate_reward""
vote details (13)
@timcliff ·
> Sometimes my payouts don’t go through and it says the payout was 48 years ago

Do you have an example of this, and can you track down what is shown on https://steemd.com/@masscollective for the particular payout? (This should not be happening.)
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-masscollective-re-steemitblog-20171119t043019451z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemd.com/@masscollective"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 04:30:18
last_update2017-11-19 04:30:18
depth2
children2
last_payout2017-11-26 04:30:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length246
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,839,872
net_rshares0
@masscollective ·
I don’t know the protocol with the payouts but this comment was from 9 days ago 

 ![image](https://img.esteem.ws/kbzh1k4iw7.jpg)
properties (22)
authormasscollective
permlinkre-timcliff-20171118t21024142z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.7","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-19 05:00:27
last_update2017-11-19 05:00:27
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-26 05:00:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length129
author_reputation505,127,324,087
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,841,739
net_rshares0
@md1rasel ·
hi
properties (22)
authormd1rasel
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t192803456z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 19:27:54
last_update2017-11-17 19:27:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 19:27:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2
author_reputation604,219,440
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,709,834
net_rshares0
@mehedi118 ·
Very Informative post. Thanks to the writter
properties (22)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t064519992z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:45:24
last_update2017-11-17 06:45:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:45:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length44
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,648,619
net_rshares0
@mejustandrew · (edited)
I won't be in a rush making suggestions because I know you will be looking for really good ones which are still possible to implement. For the moment I wish you all the best, and thank you forr all the effort, the improvements of the platform are massive and I am sure that everybody can feel them. Good luck also with the future developments, as I am very sure they are not easy at all, I am still reading the white (blue) papers trying to catch up a bit, and everything seems impressive. I am sure that SMTs will be a success too, and for sure many people here are waiting to see their release. Wish you all the best again and good luck!
properties (22)
authormejustandrew
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t201420992z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:14:06
last_update2017-11-16 20:15:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:14:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length639
author_reputation6,245,491,946,485
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,608,313
net_rshares0
@mercyjohnson ·
Hey I m also waiting  for new changes as u all 
Plse follow me 
@mercyjohnson
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormercyjohnson
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171117t93916775z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-17 04:09:21
last_update2017-11-17 04:09:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 04:09:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length77
author_reputation911,967,028,750
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,638,620
net_rshares-232,896,968
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@mggiodev ·
We need an APP.project... =)
properties (22)
authormggiodev
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205830681z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:58:33
last_update2017-11-16 20:58:33
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 20:58:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length28
author_reputation428,991,678,035
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,594
net_rshares0
@pablob ·
$0.03
crucial too, social media heart is on apps
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorpablob
permlinkre-mggiodev-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t235022911z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:50:24
last_update2017-11-16 23:50:24
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:50:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.025 HBD
curator_payout_value0.007 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length42
author_reputation148,118,711,629
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,622,090
net_rshares15,850,143,562
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@michaelten ·
Please release a fast and efficient app. Please also allow it to function as an alternative to Instagram and Snapchat and Twitter, all while utilizing the benefits of the Steem cryptocurrency. Thank you!
properties (22)
authormichaelten
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t061948435z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:19:30
last_update2017-11-17 06:19:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:19:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length203
author_reputation186,893,044,221
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,646,940
net_rshares0
@mikepm74 ·
$6.11
Okay, this seems like a good time to sound off on this.  Account Creation needs to be at or near the top of the list.

One of the things I would LOVE to be able to do, since I live in a college town, is get a classroom environment where I could have everyone open their notebooks and we all start Steem accounts together.  Onboarding college students is the path to millions.  Those are your bread and butter, as other social media sites have demonstrated.

If you can't create an account and be in and posting in minutes, then doing any sort of onboarding classes is next to impossible.  This can't be the way things were meant to be!  I want to be out there teaching and bringing people to the platform.  But I need a quick account creation in order to provide a usable experience for these kids who can be tomorrow's Steemians.

Thanks for giving us the opportunity to sound off here.  This is something I have been wrestling with in my head for a bit now, and I am glad that it is on the list, I just hope it makes the priority list!
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authormikepm74
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t200635397z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:06:33
last_update2017-11-16 20:06:33
depth1
children14
last_payout2017-11-23 20:06:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value5.060 HBD
curator_payout_value1.053 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,037
author_reputation50,476,601,169,361
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,607,766
net_rshares2,855,873,582,946
author_curate_reward""
vote details (31)
@bronevik ·
$0.26
Account creaton and first post should cost new user 2 minutes. No more.
An excellent KPI.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbronevik
permlinkre-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t044908169z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 04:49:42
last_update2017-11-19 04:49:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 04:49:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.193 HBD
curator_payout_value0.063 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length89
author_reputation12,260,156,653,305
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,841,057
net_rshares114,696,307,229
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@doelist · (edited)
It's not so hard to creat account here. On golos.io you need to send sms with code. But you know? THEY have better content on main page. Really better. 


Maybe hard registration makes selection better.
properties (22)
authordoelist
permlinkre-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t211227170z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:13:57
last_update2017-11-16 21:24:45
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:13:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length202
author_reputation886,171,764,750
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,767
net_rshares0
@inquiringtimes · (edited)
actually, mike, I'm pretty sure this is coming with the next hardfork..... or something a lot closer to that.  also, if you dont' mind giving up a bit of sp, it's easy enough to create accounts for your friends via vessel, by giving them 6sp, or just delegating it to them so you can take it back when they've earned a bit.
properties (22)
authorinquiringtimes
permlinkre-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t051427659z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:14:27
last_update2017-11-17 05:15:27
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-11-24 05:14:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length323
author_reputation22,511,044,719,347
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,642,817
net_rshares0
@mooncryption ·
You're right, vessel lets you create new STEEM accounts, but last I heard the 'fees' were:
* 0.2 liquid STEEM
* ~30 SP

though correct me if I'm wrong :)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authormooncryption
permlinkre-inquiringtimes-re-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t055103317z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:51:09
last_update2017-11-17 05:51:09
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 05:51:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length153
author_reputation15,427,543,916,099
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,645,083
net_rshares4,900,739,445
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@noisy · (edited)
$0.08
> is get a classroom environment where I could have everyone open their notebooks and we all start Steem accounts together.

You should be able to do that with SteemInvite: https://steemit.com/steem/@hilladigahackles/steem-invite

Yes, you will need then cover the cost of those accounts upfront, but if you will post some kind of proof (class photo?), I am pretty sure that community will compensate you! I will for sure vote for you with 100% vote - and I will try to convince others to do the same - please notify me then about steemit.chat if I would miss such post! :)
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authornoisy
permlinkre-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204639897z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@hilladigahackles/steem-invite"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:46:39
last_update2017-11-16 20:47:36
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-11-23 20:46:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.063 HBD
curator_payout_value0.018 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length573
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,720
net_rshares38,993,221,971
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@acidyo ·
Would be nice with a bulk option so it wouldn't take as long for his example.
properties (22)
authoracidyo
permlinkre-noisy-re-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205629497z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:56:30
last_update2017-11-16 20:56:30
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-23 20:56:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length77
author_reputation3,336,748,029,738,602
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,449
net_rshares0
@mehedi118 ·
Nice reply it is
πŸ‘  ,
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-noisy-re-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t070018708z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 07:00:24
last_update2017-11-17 07:00:24
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:00:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length16
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,713
net_rshares-7,652,931,678
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@vandeberg ·
$0.82
> Okay, this seems like a good time to sound off on this. Account Creation needs to be at or near the top of the list.

Don't worry, it already is :)
πŸ‘  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorvandeberg
permlinkre-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t001316227z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:13:15
last_update2017-11-17 00:13:15
depth2
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 00:13:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.751 HBD
curator_payout_value0.066 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length149
author_reputation31,759,426,110,944
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,623,538
net_rshares381,572,932,914
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@mehedi118 ·
Yes.. You r right
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065921290z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:59:27
last_update2017-11-17 06:59:27
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:59:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length17
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,621
net_rshares-7,647,128,969
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@rigaronib ·
Good to hear, @vandeberg!
properties (22)
authorrigaronib
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-mikepm74-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t002914335z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["vandeberg"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:29:18
last_update2017-11-17 00:29:18
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 00:29:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length25
author_reputation171,562,604,416,656
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,624,603
net_rshares0
@monitorcap ·
This post was <b>upvoted & promoted by @monitorcap</b> traffic bot.</b>

<i>Send minimum 1 SBD to @monitorcap bot with your link in MEMO field and recieve random upvote & post promotion in our daily TOP posts listings. <b> @monitorcap - where 'seen' matters !</b></i>
properties (22)
authormonitorcap
permlinkre-monitorcap-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t202648z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit / 0.1", "tags": []}"
created2017-11-18 20:26:54
last_update2017-11-18 20:26:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 20:26:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length269
author_reputation-900,597,904,319
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,811,509
net_rshares0
@mughat ·
$0.92
* Encrypted messages on chain 
* Confidential transactions
* Custom private key creation ( Limit max transaction size pr day and add/remove any privileges arbitrarily)
* Smart contracts
* On chain 2FA
πŸ‘  , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authormughat
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t201944754z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:19:45
last_update2017-11-16 20:19:45
depth1
children9
last_payout2017-11-23 20:19:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.779 HBD
curator_payout_value0.139 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length200
author_reputation3,032,027,493,503
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,608,697
net_rshares428,966,897,534
author_curate_reward""
vote details (8)
@drakos ·
$0.12
2FA may not be necessary. The keys are strong and secure, with each one allowing a different access. It's up to the users to use them in the proper manner.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordrakos
permlinkre-mughat-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t234624923z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:47:15
last_update2017-11-16 23:47:15
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:47:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.091 HBD
curator_payout_value0.031 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length155
author_reputation112,280,226,665,329
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountgo-steem
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,621,897
net_rshares60,086,475,061
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@followbtcnews ·
$0.03
You can send encrypted memo's now by using the "#" sign at beginning of memo
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorfollowbtcnews
permlinkre-mughat-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204451933z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:44:54
last_update2017-11-16 20:44:54
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 20:44:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.022 HBD
curator_payout_value0.007 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length76
author_reputation54,569,980,844,988
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,581
net_rshares14,536,735,809
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@noisy ·
which BTW are encrypted by private memo key - most people think that private memo key do nothing. Lately private memo key can be also used on SteemConnect V2, to prove that you are an owner of particular account.
properties (22)
authornoisy
permlinkre-followbtcnews-re-mughat-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205158505z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:51:57
last_update2017-11-16 20:51:57
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:51:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length212
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,134
net_rshares0
@rigaronib ·
>Confidential transactions 

>Custom private key creation ( Limit max transaction size pr day and add/remove any privileges arbitrarily)

>Smart contracts

Great  suggestions!
properties (22)
authorrigaronib
permlinkre-mughat-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210029981z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:00:30
last_update2017-11-16 21:00:30
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-11-23 21:00:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length175
author_reputation171,562,604,416,656
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,745
net_rshares0
@fitzgibbon ·
I personally really appreciate the transparancy and openness of the blockchain, confidentiality in transactions has usage, yes absolutely, but it kinda goes against the basic principals of verifiability, I think.
properties (22)
authorfitzgibbon
permlinkre-rigaronib-re-mughat-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231821106z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:18:21
last_update2017-11-16 23:18:21
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 23:18:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length212
author_reputation11,307,019,423,785
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,180
net_rshares0
@noisy ·
$0.08
> Custom private key creation

You can set any password to your Steem account: https://steemit.com/security/@noisy/how-to-set-an-own-password-which-is-not-generated-by-steemit

you can have as many types of keys as you like, for example `foo_bar` key: https://steemit.com/security/@noisy/public-and-private-keys-how-to-generate-all-steem-user-s-keys-from-master-password-without-a-steemit-website-being-offline
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authornoisy
permlinkre-rigaronib-re-mughat-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t222020252z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/security/@noisy/how-to-set-an-own-password-which-is-not-generated-by-steemit","https://steemit.com/security/@noisy/public-and-private-keys-how-to-generate-all-steem-user-s-keys-from-master-password-without-a-steemit-website-being-offline"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:20:21
last_update2017-11-16 22:20:21
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 22:20:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.056 HBD
curator_payout_value0.019 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length410
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,616,875
net_rshares35,922,578,162
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@sneak ·
It isn’t fair to make the whole network store a message forever when it is only readable or relevant to two people for a short window of time. Global public ledgers are not well suited to messaging between two people or small groups.

We have had a lot of internal discussions about all of your remaining points, too. :)
properties (22)
authorsneak
permlinkre-mughat-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t195350786z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 19:53:51
last_update2017-11-18 19:53:51
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 19:53:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length320
author_reputation28,694,344,106,492
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,809,105
net_rshares0
@muphy · (edited)
$0.40
I was confronted with the "Transaction Broadcast Error" when posting a comment on this thread... It made me post multiple times thinking the post had failed to publish... I was just in time to remove nearly all duplicates. Two had passed the 6 hour limit (after that, the delete button disappears). The one above, I left as is, this one, I edited into this new comment...


This "Transaction Broadcast Error", I do not know how common it is with other users, but if it is common, it should be set as a priority: I ran quite into some trouble with it, just when I started. At that time,  I did remember asking myself should I continue. 

I am glad I did!
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authormuphy
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t111014674z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 11:10:36
last_update2017-11-17 17:58:51
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 11:10:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.313 HBD
curator_payout_value0.082 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length653
author_reputation11,106,790,791,241
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,667,513
net_rshares183,009,213,336
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@timcliff ·
There is a GitHub issue for this, and the dev team is working on it. Hopefully this should be fixed long before 2018 :)
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-muphy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t043919324z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 04:39:18
last_update2017-11-19 04:39:18
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 04:39:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length119
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,840,446
net_rshares0
@muphy ·
$1.15
As a relatively new user (1 month), completely immersed in this amazing platform, I might be able to help by providing a fresh perspective. These are some of the things I noticed that could improve the platform:

_ _ _

A/ The interface

1 – Lacking of a profile page for others to view. When I interact with another Steemian, and I enjoyed the contact, I would like to be able to learn about him or her by for example seeking for his introduction post… It is just a pain to find, especially if the user has been blogging or resteeming a lot… Why not having a profile page, or even better, a top blog page where the user could select and set links to those of his posts that he thinks will allow the visitor to get to know him or her.

2 – Do not put the resteems in the blog page… This is the reason why I do not resteem, I want the person visiting me to see my list of blogs not being cluttered. Eventually, have another tab where the resteems are listed. Better, instead, create an β€˜activity’ page, where resteems and upvotes are listed. That way, the visitor can assess immediately what type of Steemian or even bot he is dealing with, and this without having to check him or her out on Steemd.

3 – Better tools for searching a post would be welcome.  Steemit has now become my go to website for many things, because it appears not cluttered by BS (yet?). When searching, I can select by relevance or date. Using relevance, the posts usually have outdated information, especially if they relate to Steemit. Using date, the relevance is very poor. Would it be possible to combine the two criteria?

4 – Posting: Some wonderful media-based initiatives are rising on Steemit. I really do not like the Youtube model for example with their belief that they can overtake the community based royalty systems (like the PRS in the UK). Who the f… do they think they are? So when I discovered that D-tube and D-sound were emerging on Steemit, I thought β€œWow”! That was the little extra that made me join the community and decide to invest into it. 

The issue here in that in posts, you cannot embed either, thus, giving a really strong advantage to Youtube and Soundcloud. For now, unfortunately, I use these in my posts nearly exclusively. Embedding is essential, as without it the reader is less prone to listen to a music track or watch a video. I’d rather be able to use tools based on the Blockchain.  

_ _ _

B/ The system

Being a new user with a very limited knowledge of the blockchain tech, my apologies in advance for some suggestions that might be unrealistic.

1 – I understand that posts have limited time payout. What about other media like music or videos? Would it be possible to extend the payout time to say a year for music and videos? 1 week payout, can really deter content creators that spend a lot of time on one production: some music tracks take me a full month or more to produce! Is it possible to work with the developers of D-Tube and D-sound to give them a separate algorithm for the payout? In addition that would be a great incentive for producers to use these Steemit tools when they post instead of the corporate monsters already in place.

2 – Bots. At first I didn’t really understand their use, then progressively I got it, and was not too enthusiast about these tools. I did try a voting bot on a post to check it out, it worked as advertised. And there are also delegation bots, and voting bots, and probably many other bot types. 
Originally, I understand the positive contribution these can make, but frankly, I feel that 90% of them are there for money only without bringing anything truly valuable … doesn’t it go against the idea of Steemit as a community? 

I developped further my newbee thoughts on the topic: My initial gut instinct had been to wish bots were forbidden, but I reflected and actually do understand their positive impact. But bots are so easy to use for abuse… Would it be possible to limit their effect. For example delegation bots can give a little boost to Minnows that are just starting. That is great! But delegation could be limited to 500SP / account for example. Upvoting bots could be limited to 50 upvotes a day. Voting trails could be limited to a combined maximal steem power with a derogation possible but reviewed manually (to allow the useful ones like Curie to help Minnows with quality content).

Many would then say, but this will limit what people can do on the Blockchain, thus reduce its attractiveness. But what / who do we want to attract? Tech-savvy money focused users ready for the quick buck? Or content creators coming from all horizons, interested also by rewards, but through the expression of their creativity. You might say, yes but Steemit is an anarcho-capitalist concept. Agreed, but let’s make sure the concept itself is ridden of what could be its own undoing. In short, there must be some rules of conduct to preserve the community.

3 – I read quite some comments about the curator/author ratio. I disagree with changing the ratio from 25/75. I think this ratio is fair: who does most of the work, the creator or the reader? In addition, like another user on this thread mentionned, Making it flexible WILL lead to a race to the bottom. 

4 –  Limit distribution from the reward pool to 4 posts per day. If someone wishes to post more, sure, no problem, but only 4 would be eligible to get a share of the pool. One could imagine implementing a little box in the post page to indicate if the author wishes that specific post to be eligible or not, with a max amount of post eligible of 4 per 24 hours. Come on, no one can write well-structured posts of high quality at such a rate consistently day after day! 

_ _ _

That must have been the longest comment I made on a Steemit post since I first logged in! So I hope you’ll find these suggestions useful. 

Many thanks to the Team for consulting its userbase! Much appreciated. 

I look forward to read your roadmap for 2018!
πŸ‘  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authormuphy
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t112011123z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 11:20:30
last_update2017-11-17 11:20:30
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 11:20:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.860 HBD
curator_payout_value0.285 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length5,975
author_reputation11,106,790,791,241
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,668,189
net_rshares529,397,166,004
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@muphy · (edited)
My apologies if my post appeared multiple times in this thread: I was confronted with the "Transaction Broadcast Error" when posting ... which made me post multiple times thinking the post had failed to publish... I realized there were still some duplicates too late to delete them... 

Hey, wouldn't that  be also something to fix !!!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authormuphy
permlinkre-muphy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t175055100z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 17:51:15
last_update2017-11-17 18:00:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 17:51:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length335
author_reputation11,106,790,791,241
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,702,415
net_rshares3,132,055,594
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@nagavolu ·
encouraging post. i am happy to see this post. i am new but got lot of encouragement that things are going to improve more. may not be i will be giving suggestions but Team Steemit word made me feel happy. welcoming 2018 http://www.dundeecity.gov.uk/sites/all/themes/bootstrap/dcc_bootstrap_subtheme/images/icons/thumbsup.png
properties (22)
authornagavolu
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t001834428z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"image":["http://www.dundeecity.gov.uk/sites/all/themes/bootstrap/dcc_bootstrap_subtheme/images/icons/thumbsup.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:18:36
last_update2017-11-17 00:18:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 00:18:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length325
author_reputation1,082,351,730,256
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,623,913
net_rshares0
@negrox9 ·
Excellent post i wish you the best i hope all these projects become reality in order to be an outstanding community.
properties (22)
authornegrox9
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t094616277z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:24:54
last_update2017-11-17 05:24:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 05:24:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length116
author_reputation26,935,813,939
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,643,511
net_rshares0
@nicholas83 ·
Look at how you can help minnows get more views. I find that often it is about the strength of the vote and not the quality of the article. Don't get me wrong. The whales have paid their dues, but us little ones need a little more recognition.
properties (22)
authornicholas83
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t214756137z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:47:54
last_update2017-11-16 21:47:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:47:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length243
author_reputation3,100,178,185,327
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,614,899
net_rshares0
@nicholas83 ·
Is it possible that you can set up direct messaging? Or may be that is what Discord is for.
properties (22)
authornicholas83
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t215001340z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:50:00
last_update2017-11-16 21:50:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:50:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length91
author_reputation3,100,178,185,327
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,615,007
net_rshares0
@nikethemutt ·
$0.31
I'd like to see more robust markup tools (picture and text boxes) .  Maybe throw in  a few different fonts.

How about a few more options on the upvote slider (like a few standard buttons 10,25,50,75, 100% in addition to the slider).
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authornikethemutt
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t043430623z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 04:34:30
last_update2017-11-18 04:34:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 04:34:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.234 HBD
curator_payout_value0.078 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length233
author_reputation1,408,116,897,263
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,741,831
net_rshares145,181,038,640
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@nikosnitza ·
i like your post
properties (22)
authornikosnitza
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t190021029z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 19:00:33
last_update2017-11-17 19:00:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 19:00:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length16
author_reputation46,428,541,625,622
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,707,888
net_rshares0
@noboxes ·
$0.74
Great content in the comments so far.  

In my humble rank of 57 opinion, #1 should be marketing.  Of course marketing will bring in new users, but more importantly attract new investors.  New users alone will continue to lower payouts and make retention even more difficult.  Retail investors are huge fans of marketing.  If marketing is being displayed, then it is perceived by your garden variety investor that the project is serious about growth.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authornoboxes
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t211634953z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:17:09
last_update2017-11-16 21:17:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:17:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.554 HBD
curator_payout_value0.181 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length450
author_reputation106,940,105,413,867
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,987
net_rshares343,603,722,892
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@noisy · (edited)
$8.33
Priority no 1: Faster Account Creation

Priority no 2:

##### ReImplement "Promoted" feature, and make it efficient and attractive to users which now prefer to use voting bots.

# Facts

- no one is looking into "promoted tab"
- "promoting tab" is not effective, therefore people are looking for more effective solutions

# Solution?

* Promoted content should be mixed by default into trending page
  * fact: artificially promoted content is already mixed into trending, by voting bots, but right now it is much harder to check how many of paid votes some article got
* starting from 2nd or 3rd spot on trending, every 10-15 entry on trending should be filled by promoted content
* with only a few spots on trending page, people will get proportional number of displays (impressions) in comparison to amount of SBD spent on promotion 
  * this mean, that if @fknmayhem would spend 50SBD on promotion, and @steevc would spend 100 SBD on promotion, then article of @steevc will appear twice as often on trending page as article of @fknmayhem
* even with spending just 1 SBD you will have a chance to be displayed on trending page. If you will have some luck and your content will be good, some whale will vote for you!

<center>[![Selection_488.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmNWDvyUNfDPHUfiqDt458KJnvKhh7duJoEHBSdnAGvPto/Selection_488.png)](https://steemitimages.com/DQmNWDvyUNfDPHUfiqDt458KJnvKhh7duJoEHBSdnAGvPto/Selection_488.png)</center>
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authornoisy
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t203908596z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["fknmayhem","steevc"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmNWDvyUNfDPHUfiqDt458KJnvKhh7duJoEHBSdnAGvPto/Selection_488.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1","links":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmNWDvyUNfDPHUfiqDt458KJnvKhh7duJoEHBSdnAGvPto/Selection_488.png"]}
created2017-11-16 20:39:09
last_update2017-11-16 20:54:54
depth1
children15
last_payout2017-11-23 20:39:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value7.182 HBD
curator_payout_value1.146 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,444
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,143
net_rshares3,891,724,102,559
author_curate_reward""
vote details (36)
@acidyo ·
$0.36
I like this idea, reminds me a bit of Reddits ad system except that this way the whole community and stakeholders would benefit through the burning of sbd.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authoracidyo
permlinkre-noisy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205945110z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:59:45
last_update2017-11-16 20:59:45
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:59:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.273 HBD
curator_payout_value0.087 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length155
author_reputation3,336,748,029,738,602
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,678
net_rshares168,563,832,776
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@bitopia ·
$0.09
Hey there @noisy, I have actually posted an 2 in-depth posts about your priority number 2 with very similar thoughts and points. In 1, I diagnose the issue and in the other, as a proposal on utopian.io I determine the solution, which is in essence, what you have stated here. 

You can find them here : 

[Growing Unhappiness with Upvote Bots on Steemit](https://steemit.com/steemit/@bitopia/growing-unhappiness-with-upvote-bots-on-steemit)
[Proposal for New 'Promoted' Function](https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@bitopia/proposal-for-new-promoted-function)

I am working towards bringing as much attention towards the proposal as I sincerely feel it will bring positive impact upon steemit,  the same thought which you have. I'd appreciate if you would have a look at it. 

Thank you!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbitopia
permlinkre-noisy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171124t144233824z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["noisy"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@bitopia/growing-unhappiness-with-upvote-bots-on-steemit","https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@bitopia/proposal-for-new-promoted-function"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-24 14:42:36
last_update2017-11-24 14:42:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-12-01 14:42:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.086 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length783
author_reputation1,729,892,019,965
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,398,284
net_rshares36,900,769,792
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@geekpowered ·
$0.56
I'm not sure if no one checks the Promoted tab, but I know I don't. I rarely find anything good there, so I tend to ignore it. The idea of incorporating it into Promoted is probably the way to go.
I was thinking on the side or top, where ads usually are, auto-scrolling slowly.
The point is to give people more incentive to use the official method of promotion, rather than bots.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorgeekpowered
permlinkre-noisy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t033901456z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:42:03
last_update2017-11-17 03:42:03
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:42:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.423 HBD
curator_payout_value0.139 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length379
author_reputation99,319,261,112,097
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,636,769
net_rshares261,930,536,588
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@littlejoeward ·
$0.66
Here are some additional ideas for the promoted section. https://steemit.com/steemit/@littlejoeward/fixing-steemit-s-post-promotion-killing-the-voting-bots I would love your thoughts on them
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorlittlejoeward
permlinkre-noisy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210544543z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@littlejoeward/fixing-steemit-s-post-promotion-killing-the-voting-bots"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:05:45
last_update2017-11-16 21:05:45
depth2
children7
last_payout2017-11-23 21:05:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.633 HBD
curator_payout_value0.031 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length190
author_reputation1,878,133,807,004
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,135
net_rshares310,063,096,465
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@noisy · (edited)
you are reading my mind! :)

And it looks like this problems bothers a lot of people. You have written your posts yesterday, posts with simmilar ideas written by @raised2b was written 2 days ago:

https://steemit.com/steemit/@raised2b/if-we-want-to-slow-the-use-of-voting-bots-we-need-to-meet-a-market-need-here-s-a-possible-solution

BTW, why not instead of burning those SBD, just convert then to STEEM and move to SteemPower of all SteemPower holders?

That would be additional incentive to Power Up, very easy to marketing: **All revenue from promotion goes to long term investors! :)**
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authornoisy
permlinkre-littlejoeward-re-noisy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t211157775z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1","users":["raised2b"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@raised2b/if-we-want-to-slow-the-use-of-voting-bots-we-need-to-meet-a-market-need-here-s-a-possible-solution"]}
created2017-11-16 21:11:57
last_update2017-11-16 21:16:24
depth3
children6
last_payout2017-11-23 21:11:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length590
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,626
net_rshares2,596,469,787
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@lukmarcus ·
Yep, exacly what he wrote.
properties (22)
authorlukmarcus
permlinkre-noisy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205521443z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:55:12
last_update2017-11-16 20:55:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:55:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length26
author_reputation6,879,451,798,530
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,374
net_rshares0
@mehedi118 ·
Nicely Described ..
πŸ‘  ,
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-noisy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065747429z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:57:51
last_update2017-11-17 06:57:51
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:57:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length19
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,497
net_rshares-7,002,387,060
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@mehedi118 ·
Learn A lot
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authormehedi118
permlinkre-noisy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065817632z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:58:21
last_update2017-11-17 06:58:21
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:58:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length11
author_reputation2,922,374,781,613
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,538
net_rshares-7,647,128,969
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@th1nkfast ·
$0.04
Oh, this is going to be major! The two main problems now are account creation and voting bots.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorth1nkfast
permlinkre-noisy-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210440289z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:04:42
last_update2017-11-16 21:04:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:04:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.038 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length94
author_reputation2,874,658,722,940
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,062
net_rshares17,877,003,492
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@noly · (edited)
I would like to see an updated way the notifications are delivered.

In their current state, they're rather unreliable and at best very uninformative. So I suggest the following...
- Adding a notifications tab to the profile are. Probably near 'Wallet' and 'Settings'
- In this tab show the typical notifications such as new reply, mentions, new transfers etc.
- I would also like to see a notification that lets you know who your new follower is. So lets say user X follows me. In the notifications tab it would be shown that "You have been followed by user X!" Perhaps with a follow button next to their name to follow back. It's annoying not knowing who my new followers are.
- Have this notifications tab show either notifications since last visit or since last activity. Or possibly in the past 24-72 hours. Preferably since last activity as I think that would be the most beneficial and detailed.

Everything else I would like seems to have been mentioned. @jesta had some great suggestions.

I'd really like to see a way for the content from Steemit apps such as Zappl, Steepshot, ChainBB, etc. have some kind of permission setting that allows you to set whether or not you want the posts from those apps displaying on your Steemit blog. This is especially necessart in the case of Zappl and ChainBB. We don't want 280 character posts flooding steemit, nor do I really want all of my forum posts showing on my Steemit feed.

Hope to see some of these changes! I'm also hoping the signup process is smoothed out a lot. The long wait times for an account send a lot of people away. They either forget or lose interest by the time their account is created.

One more thing, this isn't related to HF20, but I think this would really benefit the Steem platform.
## MARKETING!
Marketing could help make Steem huge. The tech is great but marketing has been horrible. I heard about Steem a loooong time before I figured out Steemit existed. There are tons of shitcoins that are doing good/are better known simply because of marketing. Take Electroneum for example. Complete garbage IMO, but they had a huuge ICO and are probably known by more people than Steem just because of their huge focus on marketing.

To grow we need to get the name out there. Dash has been doing this very well. I like @jerrybanfield's suggestion of delegating a certain amount of Steem per month to projects that help grow the ecosystem, exactly what Dash is doing. This could benefit Steem and the Steemit community immensely.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authornoly
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t182510417z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.0.0"}
created2017-11-18 18:25:21
last_update2017-11-18 18:42:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 18:25:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,503
author_reputation7,065,389,353,481
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,802,488
net_rshares3,604,964,005
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@openmusic ·
😍A very informative post. Great job. Keep it up! 😍
![OpenMusic Steemit Kiss.gif](https://steemitimages.com/DQmVHqeJ8rX8XUv7zZdKzJbDnArY1VqDNQmoUcPKePNj77b/OpenMusic%20Steemit%20Kiss.gif)
properties (22)
authoropenmusic
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t183539758z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmVHqeJ8rX8XUv7zZdKzJbDnArY1VqDNQmoUcPKePNj77b/OpenMusic%20Steemit%20Kiss.gif"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 18:35:39
last_update2017-11-19 18:35:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 18:35:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length186
author_reputation1,278,665,349,642
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,904,610
net_rshares0
@orcheva ·
need to support real community that deserve real help base on good community improvement, and there is many community have been buil by good ways time by time..
properties (22)
authororcheva
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t140757246z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 14:08:00
last_update2017-11-18 14:08:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 14:08:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length160
author_reputation20,872,914,402,579
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,779,805
net_rshares0
@oroteio ·
Thank you, Ned, for inventing this tool that allows me to show what I need to the world without being censored. I really appreciate this Alternative Economy and it's an honor to be around so many smart people
properties (22)
authororoteio
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180109t035122840z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-09 03:52:33
last_update2018-01-09 03:52:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-16 03:52:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length208
author_reputation23,709,401,997
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,155,963
net_rshares0
@pablob ·
#roadmap2018. I know there are hundreds of software things to improve, but think about this: steemit has few people on it regarding the social space. I think that promoting the web and steem is crucial, lot of ways can be done for this and I have read some of them, but steemit I think you should invest more resources on it too. My humble opinion
properties (22)
authorpablob
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t234752041z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:47:54
last_update2017-11-16 23:47:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:47:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length347
author_reputation148,118,711,629
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,621,929
net_rshares0
@palmerjm1 ·
have you tried binance? https://www.binance.com/?ref=10923198
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorpalmerjm1
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t145720569z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://www.binance.com/?ref=10923198"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 14:57:21
last_update2017-11-17 14:57:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 14:57:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length61
author_reputation2,976,661,389,820
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,686,488
net_rshares6,875,982,407
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@pandorasbox ·
Hello team Steemit! I have thought of a great way to improve Steemit and one that will _also_ benefit Bitshares! Would you kindly have a look at [my proposal that I posted here](https://steemit.com/steemit/@pandorasbox/why-doesn-t-steemit-through-the-power-of-bitshares-offer-to-payout-of-choice-this-could-be-a-great-marketing-tool-steemit-is-the) where I explain my idea? And if you like it, please point it out to the relevant people? Thank you!
properties (22)
authorpandorasbox
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231825331z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@pandorasbox/why-doesn-t-steemit-through-the-power-of-bitshares-offer-to-payout-of-choice-this-could-be-a-great-marketing-tool-steemit-is-the"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:18:24
last_update2017-11-16 23:18:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:18:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length448
author_reputation6,724,880,351,404
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,183
net_rshares0
@paolobeneforti ·
$1.08
subcommunities! #roadmap2018
πŸ‘  , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorpaolobeneforti
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204058685z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:40:54
last_update2017-11-16 20:40:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:40:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.815 HBD
curator_payout_value0.267 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length28
author_reputation259,803,976,305,135
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,288
net_rshares505,985,090,168
author_curate_reward""
vote details (8)
@personz ·
$0.04
Two things:

1. **I think the curation reward ratio needs to be strengthened in favor of curators** to Make Voting Great Again, and steer the great Steemliner on course with it's originally stated goal of a place where quality can be found by the wisdom of the crowd. You guys are pumping this phrase a lot in the latest PR along with "Proof of Brain" so makes sense to do it now.

2. I really want to see **SMTs**, I have some ideas and I think it can solve some of the disputes on how Steem rewards works. However I know in light of point 1 you could just say SMTs will solve this too, but really you need the core network to be a bit better balanced too, can;t load everything off to SMTs.

Thanks guys and keep the vision steady! πŸ˜† πŸ‘
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t222443220z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:24:42
last_update2017-11-16 22:24:42
depth1
children6
last_payout2017-11-23 22:24:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.033 HBD
curator_payout_value0.010 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length737
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,617,137
net_rshares20,810,569,762
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@fitzgibbon ·
Yes, make voting great again! We cannot expect every Steem user to be a great content creator, let's also cather to the lurkers, there should be more lurking.
properties (22)
authorfitzgibbon
permlinkre-personz-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t233749676z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:37:48
last_update2017-11-16 23:37:48
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:37:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length158
author_reputation11,307,019,423,785
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,621,344
net_rshares0
@vandeberg ·
$0.07
Currently Curation Rewards are 25% of the reward budget. Is there are particular percent that you think you incentivize curation more? Keep in mind, this takes directly from author rewards.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorvandeberg
permlinkre-personz-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t003127207z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:31:27
last_update2017-11-17 00:31:27
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-11-24 00:31:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.053 HBD
curator_payout_value0.018 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length189
author_reputation31,759,426,110,944
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,624,751
net_rshares34,056,503,356
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@bashadow ·
Speaking of **"Author rewards"** My censer apologies:
Sorry to be so off topic - - -, but as you are a really big whale, (not even a minnow here) A Friend could use some whale help.

Please Help - - - https://steemit.com/steemit/@michelle.gent/i-writer no ONE person should be able to dictate how much a person earns on post. And I apologize for using this method to contact you. 

Any sort of help/pressure you can apply would be much appreciated. She is a *Published Author*, she was sharing her stories with us. I like to read. Maybe de-monetize one of his post? or ask him to undo what he has done to her.

If steemit and steem are to survive, and SMT's are to have a chance then the above must not be allowed to stand.
properties (22)
authorbashadow
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-personz-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171120t021220818z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@michelle.gent/i-writer"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-20 02:12:21
last_update2017-11-20 02:12:21
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-27 02:12:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length723
author_reputation100,388,692,638,882
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,933,420
net_rshares0
@personz ·
$3.09
Absolutely, it's a balance between authors and curators. Rewards should be between 40 and 50% of the payout. It's really important to properly incentivise people to curate well. Not everyone can be a star content creator, and we really need to make sure that valuable work of sorting through the thousands of posts a day is compensated for well.

I also think the reverse auction and 7 days payout period massively limit curation but in some ways this is a good limit. I'd love to see this discussed in more detail and some changes made on it. The reverse auction gives the most to bots to front run whales, and puts humans at a disadvantage at their slower speed, but it also encourages everyone to "work together" independently to find the "right" value for a post. Still I think any serious curator knows there's no point being the 300th person to vote a post, and that situation needs to be changed. Ideally votes are made without considering the reward so perhaps the official UI could encourage this, I've been saying it for a while.

At the very least a larger curation share will be the tide to raise up all curation payouts so will make it more attractive task to do broadly, but I do think the other stuff needs to be addressed but I don't have a neat solution for it.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-personz-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t110526693z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 11:05:27
last_update2017-11-17 11:05:27
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 11:05:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.320 HBD
curator_payout_value0.771 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,278
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,667,155
net_rshares1,428,338,445,014
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@smooth ·
> Currently Curation Rewards are 25% of the reward budget

No they are not. They are 25% _minus what is removed by the reverse auction_ (which is a lot). The last calculation I saw was 12%, but that may be out of date.

25% might conceivably be okay, but we don't even know because we haven't ever seen 25% in practice.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-personz-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t130628800z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 13:06:30
last_update2017-11-18 13:06:30
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-25 13:06:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length319
author_reputation253,602,537,834,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,775,052
net_rshares998,601,224
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@pporet ·
Great! I like it a lot
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorpporet
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171117t22325179z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-17 21:32:09
last_update2017-11-17 21:32:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 21:32:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length22
author_reputation263,642,227,154
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,718,363
net_rshares225,916,428
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@prakashghai ·
A week more and 2018 will be here :)
properties (22)
authorprakashghai
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171222t141412367z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-22 14:14:39
last_update2017-12-22 14:14:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-29 14:14:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length36
author_reputation20,465,565,974,840
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,701,330
net_rshares0
@prameshtyagi ·
SMTs SMTs and SMTs as first priority
properties (22)
authorprameshtyagi
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t095022575z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 09:50:18
last_update2017-11-17 09:50:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 09:50:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length36
author_reputation133,698,299,152,872
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,661,999
net_rshares0
@qwrist ·
strong investment in the steemit app for both android and ios. I will like to see steem put together a strong app team to greatly improve the steemit app as the first and surest test of a social media platform is its app; a sophisticated app equates to a sophisticated platform. As I write this reply now I the ios app for steemit is unoperational because we on ios are waiting for the app to be updated unto the new servers
properties (22)
authorqwrist
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180112t042800638z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-12 04:28:00
last_update2018-01-12 04:28:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-19 04:28:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length424
author_reputation13,082,902,268
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,915,620
net_rshares0
@raci ·
Blockchain has the potential to revolutionize foundational social media. I wrote a critical review of the three most advanced social media platforms based on blockchain - Steemit, WildSpark, and Nexus. You can read the Steemit article here: https://steemit.com/steemit/@raci/social-media-on-blockchain-the-idea-a-critical-review-and-a-vision

The article also includes a number of improvement suggestions that I think would greatly improve Steemit and that I would like to suggest for the #roadmap2018, such as (quote):
Improve Performance:The STEEM blockchain needs to be much faster to handle a huge amount of users. STEEM has the potential to become the next Facebook, but not with the currently very slow performance.

Improve Usability:Things like creating groups, geotagging, asking questions, searching for recommendations, or uploading pictures should be as easy as a walk in the park (or using Facebook).

Go Mobile:The lack of a good mobile app is clearly a barrier to the adoption of STEEM in the first world, where a large and growing share of social media interaction already takes place on mobile devices. I would simply β€žborrowβ€œ usability concepts from apps like Facebook, Instagram, or Reddit. Time to market is crucial here, since Facebook & co. are probably already aware of the β€žnew kid on the blockchainβ€œ STEEM. And if they are not stupid, they are already working on their own Blockchain project.

Enable Privacy Configurations:Users want to control their privacy on social media. Full stop. Without the possibility to send private messages, create groups, or limit the visibility of their content, many users will stay away from STEEM.

Enable Location-based Services:STEEM should enable geotagging of posts. This makes it easier for users to browse content near them or to search for contents in specific location. The SteemitWorldMap.com project is a guerilla approach to enable geotagging on STEEM, but it is a hassle to use. It should be as easy as geotagging on Facebook.

More Sustainable Economics:The current inflation rate and lack of a β€žcapβ€œ for the STEEM Smart Media Tokens is a huge threat to their long-term value. There should be a maximum amount of STEEM, STEEM Power, and STEEM Dollars specified.

Automated Content Verification and Watermarking:STEEM could require users to indicate whether their content is original. If the content is marked original, it should be watermarked (e.g. by automatically putting the STEEM user name on the image or video). If a user maliciously claims that a content is original although it isn’t, it should lead to the user being sanctioned or even banned from STEEM.

Task Automation:There are currently wonderful users like @luzcypher or @progressivechef that put a lot of effort into the wonderful contests they create. But collecting and curating all the posts manually is a huge hassle for them. It should be possible to automate those tasks, maybe by using by something similar to the Chrome Robotcorder.

Extend Payout Ratio:Users should receive the rewards for their content even if it gets upvoted after 7 days. Currently, the post payout is performed 7 days after it has been posted. I do not see the point, other than STEEM extracting value that belongs to the users. Instead of that, STEEM could claim a small share (e.g. 1%) of the revenues a post creates.

Enable Ads:Users should be able to display ads (e.g. Google Ads) next to their posts and receive the compensation for it.

Increase Interoperability:It should be possible to connect STEEM to established social media platforms Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Tumblr, etc. Those will probably still be around for a while, so interfaces will increase the likelihood that users migrate to STEEM. In addition, it would be particularly interesting to connect STEEM to WildSpark and Nexus (see section 3).

Improve the Custom Search:Really, a Google Custom Search just won’t hit it.
properties (22)
authorraci
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171204t084804454z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["luzcypher","progressivechef"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@raci/social-media-on-blockchain-the-idea-a-critical-review-and-a-vision"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-04 08:48:03
last_update2017-12-04 08:48:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-11 08:48:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,924
author_reputation12,211,305,181,265
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id22,344,120
net_rshares0
@raised2b ·
First, I want to say thanks for all you guys have done and all the hard work you've put in.

I tend to agree with @mikepm74 about making account creation the priority. I know it's coming with HF20, but that is the number one reason I am not evangelizing this platform yet. I need to be able to sit down with people and create an account with them on the spot so I can then show them the ropes and get them going.

I also recently made a post with a proposed change to how post promotion works on the platform to help address the uptick in vote bot usage that has taken off to fill a clear market need. 

That post can be found here:
[If we want to slow the use of voting bots, we need to meet a market need, here's a possible solution.](https://steemit.com/steemit/@raised2b/if-we-want-to-slow-the-use-of-voting-bots-we-need-to-meet-a-market-need-here-s-a-possible-solution)

Thanks again for all your hard work, it's appreciated!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorraised2b
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t201816011z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["mikepm74"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@raised2b/if-we-want-to-slow-the-use-of-voting-bots-we-need-to-meet-a-market-need-here-s-a-possible-solution"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:18:18
last_update2017-11-16 20:18:18
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 20:18:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length930
author_reputation5,764,078,952,778
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,608,601
net_rshares3,000,136,654
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@littlejoeward ·
Looks like we wrote the same post! haha, you beat me to it by a few hours though. We had almost all the same points but I would love your thoughts on the rest of it! Followed (since we obviously think alike) and upvoted!
https://steemit.com/steemit/@littlejoeward/fixing-steemit-s-post-promotion-killing-the-voting-bots
properties (22)
authorlittlejoeward
permlinkre-raised2b-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t205421272z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@littlejoeward/fixing-steemit-s-post-promotion-killing-the-voting-bots"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:54:21
last_update2017-11-16 20:54:21
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:54:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length319
author_reputation1,878,133,807,004
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,308
net_rshares0
@rakesh.net ·
Great post
properties (22)
authorrakesh.net
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065505090z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:55:09
last_update2017-11-17 06:55:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 06:55:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length10
author_reputation541,011,122,647
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,323
net_rshares0
@ramzukhan ·
communities.. Nice writing
properties (22)
authorramzukhan
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t165339955z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 16:53:42
last_update2017-11-17 16:53:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 16:53:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length26
author_reputation-16,451,708,519
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,697,261
net_rshares0
@raymondpaul ·
Mr. Newbie to Steem, and this is first post, pre-intro ...
Given Fb egg-on-face with lack of curation/bot-applified horse hockey,
I think I can surmise that the issue for a social media blog is not tech,
so much as content, trusted content ... so if Steem wants to set itself apart from the main, and provide a foundation for disruption, then focus on content, not tech, and how to create a scene that does not play to the least common denominator...  but to the common stuff that binds us all ...
properties (22)
authorraymondpaul
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t040253633z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 04:02:54
last_update2017-11-17 04:02:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 04:02:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length497
author_reputation2,197,522,722
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,638,215
net_rshares0
@rcshad0w ·
Give us a better editor for posting. Its a pain in the a.. to format the text.
properties (22)
authorrcshad0w
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t142610242z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 14:26:09
last_update2017-11-18 14:26:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 14:26:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length78
author_reputation43,845,216,723,589
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,781,285
net_rshares0
@reinhard-schmid ·
I see a lot of things have already been mentioned, so it will be hard to add anything of value.

The one thing I miss in all discussions is a different approach to dealing with spammers, as I don't think "spamming" isn't always done with bad intention, but out of "not knowing any better".

Before I explain, what I mean, my item on the wishlist would be some kind of "educate button".

We all have seen comments like "great post bro, upvote me" or follow me or the likes. In the beginning I more or less ignored the few I got. One time a young fellow added a link to some extremely poor quality artwork and being an artist myself (and likely naturally weird for most people) I simply found that so ugly in my comments, that I wrote back. I didn't want to hurt his feelings, told him as much as his work was "interesting", but his behavior could be seen by some as spam. LOL.. he felt encouraged and upvoted his original comment to be on the very top of my comments!! I told him (very friendly), that I didn't find this the proper reaction and let him know, that there IS an edit button, to *edit* his comment... he didn't get it, until I literally threatened him, that if he didn't remove the link, I "wouldn't be able to remain friendly"

What I'm trying to express with this little story is, that I think there are two kinds of people, who are categorized as spammers. Of course, there are the ones who deliberately try to abuse this wonderful system... But I think there are also the ones, who just don't know and now, whenever I get one of these comments from a person with a pitiful reputation, I ask myself first, what if this whole site was all in Chinese...? OK, google translate takes you a long way, but lets say I translate something from my native language German into Hindi using google and post that. The person reading it has no way of telling, that I know the language and to them it might sound totally odd. Have you ever translated something into a language very different from your own and back? If yes, you know what I mean.

I have been trying to tell a few "spammers" of how their behavior might be perceived, but in most cases, they don't even understand, what I mean.. I'm followed by a girl, who only can say "nice art" and "thank you".. she doesn't even answer the simplest questions, and I think, she simply doesn't understand. In a way, I actually find it the wrong expectation too, that we think everyone should speak English...

So, to come back to my Idea: Instead of flagging away, I think, everybody should be given a second chance. If we had an "educate" button, someone who shows "questionable" behavior could be directed to a corresponding page. It would have to be some kind of community project, since it would have to involve as many languages as possible. There, one should find a text, written by an expert and translated in all these languages about why certain behaviors are perceived negatively and maybe a recommendation of how to get a good reputation. I have seen individual posts on that, but in my humble opinion the issue is big enough to be part of the system.
properties (22)
authorreinhard-schmid
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t095847379z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 09:58:48
last_update2017-11-19 09:58:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 09:58:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,112
author_reputation49,826,444,768,650
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,860,673
net_rshares0
@revo ·
$1.83
I'll chuck into the mix my idea that I call "reverse curation".  The impetus for the idea is the frankly bizarre concept that a post only has value for 7 days after it is posted.  The reverse curation idea would offer a way for posts that remain popular after 7 days to still receive some rewards.  It would particularly benefit the case where a post by a minnow earns nothing and is viewed by no one in its first 7 days, but then goes viral say 3 months later.  In these cases the original post essentially 'curated' all that value being earned in the comments section.

How it would work:
After the 7 day reward window has closed on top-level posts, 25% (or whatever was appropriate) of author rewards on comments facilitated by the original post goes to the original author.  Without doing the maths, I'd assume the 'reverse curation' system would have to be limited to top-level posts, as applying it all the way down the comment chain would quickly see more nested comments earning zero rewards for their authors.

And just to add to other voices here... something needs to be done about the vote-rings and comment spamming, and possibly SP delegation.  If the latter was tackled, it would require some loose guilds of whales to step into the gap and directly fund worthwhile projects on the blockchain by directly upvoting their output.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorrevo
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t034019212z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:40:18
last_update2017-11-17 03:40:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:40:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.373 HBD
curator_payout_value0.457 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,342
author_reputation13,099,225,944,898
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,636,660
net_rshares850,715,230,042
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@rexcrypto ·
Wow there are a lot of great ideas here! My roadmap request is a simple one. I would really love to be able to follow topics/tags instead of just users. I think this will really bring interest groups/communities alive and speed up catching up and participating in your favourite interests
properties (22)
authorrexcrypto
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171130t222605202z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-30 22:26:06
last_update2017-11-30 22:26:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-07 22:26:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length288
author_reputation9,868,215,878
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id22,035,387
net_rshares0
@rexlito ·
Personal messages too interact with our followers.
properties (22)
authorrexlito
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t000708920z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 00:07:12
last_update2017-11-18 00:07:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 00:07:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length50
author_reputation207,781,814,284
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,727,010
net_rshares0
@richardcrill ·
$8.72
# Communities
For several reasons, I am still in full agreement with this excellent statement from the 2017 roadmap:
> We believe that high-quality content and communities of content producers and their audiences are the primary driver of growth of the steemit.com site, and in turn the wider adoption of the platform and STEEM. To this end, we wish to enable many users to build communities in parallel around curating specific types of content valuable to their audiences. 

1. I didn't even see this post because both the trending page and even my feed are out of control with content that is not as focused as I would like. Communities would fix this for me and make it easier to digest the content that I want.
2. I can't wait to experiment with setting up my own community and SMT. For me, this seems like the biggest immediate use case for SMTs and the one I am most excited about because it is the easiest.
3. SMTs and Communities would be a great place to play around with features like Author/Curator payout percentages. They could even act as kind of test net to see what the communities like - what succeeds.
4. Communities seem to be the next logical step to keep Steemit on track as the nextgen blockchain social app. This step would be in alignment with simplicity, velocity, and the 2017 roadmap. It is a big step, but one that needs to be taken sooner rather than later IMO.

In summary, we need communities as a driver of user growth, a better way to digest content, and a place to play with parameters and SMTs.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorrichardcrill
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t154615268z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 15:46:12
last_update2017-11-18 15:46:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 15:46:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value6.547 HBD
curator_payout_value2.176 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,530
author_reputation55,974,657,421,087
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,788,534
net_rshares3,899,006,811,275
author_curate_reward""
vote details (13)
@rigaronib · (edited)
$1.05
Top of the list should definitely be:
1. Vastly improving signup/Onboarding
2. Marketing - Just a bit?
3. Continuing to improve UI to some degree
4. Android/iOS apps seem pretty important (unless the Busy guys are going to be the ones to develop and release those, in which case, announce it so people can stop wondering if that part of the 2017 roadmap is going to be upheld or not.)

Then on down the road, SMTs will be cool, I suppose...I guess I just don't see _"the light"_ yet for SMTs.

And if we are being honest, I believe anonymity in _at least_ our wallets would help in many areas - people want that, and _need_ that in this day and age. (Need reference to how many people want it? Check out Monero and Dash)

edit: upvoting for visibility
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorrigaronib
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204357522z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:44:00
last_update2017-11-16 21:06:24
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 20:44:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.812 HBD
curator_payout_value0.241 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length751
author_reputation171,562,604,416,656
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,524
net_rshares492,461,532,564
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@cryptographic ·
I’ve created a word cloud for the comments section of this post that I hope you will find of value and will want to share. While the creation of the actual word cloud is relatively easy and straightforward, the creation of a relevant word list that will produce a meaningful word cloud is quite another matter, as I’m sure you know, and takes considerable time and effort. Unfortunately, as of now, the post has only had 41 views. It needs a little love. Perhaps a resteem might be of help, if you think it is worthwhile, and, of course, it would be much appreciated too. TIA
https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input
properties (22)
authorcryptographic
permlinkre-rigaronib-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171121t120052698z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-21 12:00:48
last_update2017-11-21 12:00:48
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-28 12:00:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length670
author_reputation111,198,190,831,086
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,081,178
net_rshares0
@riseofth ·
$0.08
Here are some of my suggestions:

1. Please consider @jerrybanfield's [budget proposal](https://steemit.com/steem/@jerrybanfield/steem-budget-proposals-whitepaper). It can spur a deluge of innovations and developments into STEEM blockchain and indirect marketing for STEEM

3. Semi-hired curators: A certain amount of STEEMs from steemit inc. can be delegated to selected curators (similar to utopian-io/developers). Curators can be voted in similar fashion as witness therefore they will be responsible. However, they will not manage node, but read posts an curate in their expertise . As a reward they will earn curation reward. They will look for posts that are under-rewarded. Content curators can communicate with the curators of their area of expertise with some cost (to show their seriousness not to spam). Curator will post weekly posts and they can be voted out/in similar to witnesses. I believe some witnesses do the curation task, but it is not their priority.  

3. Please add **other upvote option other than reward/flag** such as like, dislike, controversial, innovative etc. Also, some tabs/filters that will publish those posts based on those parameters, similar to reddit's controversial. 

4. Though **curation** is done by the community and bots. Since steemit is an App on STEEM, a tab with SUGGESTED or RECOMMENDED or TRUSTED posts. A users can choose their recommend-er (bots or persons or filters). For example, someone choose @jerrybanfield as suggester, that means post recommended by him will be shown in that tab.  

5. DON'T stop delegation process, it is creating new values with velocity (i.e. velocity of money) and innovative products.

6. Curation can be made flexible: for example, make maximum curation to 50% and lowest range to 25%. Therefore, big holders are motivated to curate again

7. Some posting limit (e.g. 4 posts) and bandwidth limit will be useful to remove some spamming

8. Private transactions with a cost. If someone want to make a private transaction, he/she has to pay a % to the system 

9. Please consider big marketing campaigns, easier registrations, RESTEEM tab, more tabs: user customization tabs (e.g. users can make their own fancy tabs)

10. As fellow steemitians mentioned that steemit inc. should clarify their vision to develop Steemit.com or other apps on STEEM blockchain such as SMT
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorriseofth
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t233114519z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["jerrybanfield"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@jerrybanfield/steem-budget-proposals-whitepaper"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:31:15
last_update2017-11-16 23:31:15
depth1
children3
last_payout2017-11-23 23:31:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.076 HBD
curator_payout_value0.002 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,353
author_reputation13,689,681,278,850
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,958
net_rshares37,156,893,123
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@vandeberg ·
$0.36
> Semi-hired curators: A certain amount of STEEMs from steemit inc. can be delegated to selected curators (similar to utopian-io/developers). Curators can be voted in similar fashion as witness therefore they will be responsible. However, they will not manage node, but read posts an curate in their expertise . As a reward they will earn curation reward. They will look for posts that are under-rewarded. Content curators can communicate with the curators of their area of expertise with some cost (to show their seriousness not to spam). Curator will post weekly posts and they can be voted out/in similar to witnesses. I believe some witnesses do the curation task, but it is not their priority.

This is exactly what SP delegation currently does. The curation rewards go to the curator and not the SP owner. Many large stake holders delegate to users with more time to curate or those that have some area of expertise. If you don't think that system is working well enough, what exactly is wrong with it and what do you think can be done to improve it.

> Please add other upvote option other than reward/flag such as like, dislike, controversial, innovative etc. Also, some tabs/filters that will publish those posts based on those parameters, similar to reddit's controversial.

The voting system on the blockchain is percentage based. Would you suggest that each of these reactions have a particular default percentage associated with it? What about the "controversial" reaction? Is that a positive vote or a negative vote? I am not opposed to such suggestions, but we need something a bit more concrete to work with. I have thought about doing something like this since June 2016 and have not up with a good solution. :( If you have one, I am eager to hear it!
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorvandeberg
permlinkre-riseofth-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t002257449z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:22:57
last_update2017-11-17 00:22:57
depth2
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 00:22:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.268 HBD
curator_payout_value0.087 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,768
author_reputation31,759,426,110,944
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,624,199
net_rshares166,433,357,321
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@riseofth · (edited)
>The voting system on the blockchain is percentage based. Would you suggest that each of these reactions have a particular default percentage associated with it? What about the "controversial" reaction? Is that a positive vote or a negative vote? I am not opposed to such suggestions, but we need something a bit more concrete to work with. I have thought about doing something like this since June 2016 and have not up with a good solution. :( If you have one, I am eager to hear it!

I think a fixed 1 cent SBD vote for like/great/happy/neutral, negative 0.01 cent for dislike/anger/sad, 1 cent for controversial. A user will have 10/20/30 (perhaps based on reputation) such votes per daily regardless of SP they hold. People sometimes never vote due to limit of their vote power (VP) or already voted. But with these VP, posts can be discovered in numerous algorithmic way, such as most liked or controversial post.

>Semi-hired curators: A certain amount of STEEMs from steemit inc. can be delegated to selected curators (similar to utopian-io/developers). Curators can be voted in similar fashion as witness therefore they will be responsible. However, they will not manage node, but read posts an curate in their expertise . As a reward they will earn curation reward. They will look for posts that are under-rewarded. Content curators can communicate with the curators of their area of expertise with some cost (to show their seriousness not to spam). Curator will post weekly posts and they can be voted out/in similar to witnesses. I believe some witnesses do the curation task, but it is not their priority.

Yes, currently this is already done but in chaotic ways.  I think the biggest goal is discover the best contents from sea of posts. The current method is power (upvote) votes. "busy.org" suggest "interesting people" or "Recommended posts" similar ways as twitter. Therefore, a tab with curated posts (by steemit or third party) will help to discover contents (on meritocracy) than current upvoted (payment) system, similar to Netflix's/Redbox's suggested movies. The discovery can be done with ML/AI/human curators. These techniques will improve on learned history. Finally, some of biggest objections from the users that their well written content never gets attention (upvote) will be answered partly.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorriseofth
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-riseofth-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t021319441z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.0.0"}
created2017-11-18 02:13:21
last_update2017-11-18 02:21:09
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 02:13:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,322
author_reputation13,689,681,278,850
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountminnowsupport
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,733,698
net_rshares8,256,521,538
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@smooth · (edited)
> The voting system on the blockchain is percentage based. Would you suggest that each of these reactions have a particular default percentage associated with it? What about the "controversial" reaction? Is that a positive vote or a negative vote?

Maybe these are just 'reactions' and not votes at all. For the social aspect of communicating.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-riseofth-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t130443500z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 13:04:45
last_update2017-11-18 13:05:00
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 13:04:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length343
author_reputation253,602,537,834,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,774,915
net_rshares1,017,562,006
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@rizwansadiq ·
Hy. There is every post a user publishes as will earn full rewaeds regardless of manu post and comments are like submitted
properties (22)
authorrizwansadiq
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t050739007z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:07:54
last_update2017-11-17 05:07:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 05:07:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length122
author_reputation19,604,501,168
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,642,369
net_rshares0
@rsbosse ·
$0.37
Hi everyone.  Loving, loving, loving steemit and all you do.  I am about to start sharing your white paper with friends in order to demonstrate the future of what a social media platform needs to be.  We are the future!

I personally would like to see a solution to down- voting.  I recently down voted a post (because it simply sucked and I later provided honest and hopefully helpful feedback) but they took it personally because they appeared to be afraid it was going to affect their steemit wallet.

Maybe that is their issue and they aren't a good fit for the platform, but the issue I honestly see is being able to provide feedback without totally impacting somebody's account value.  

Maybe a middle path, or other besides a simply up or down vote?  

Mahalo and Aloha!
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorrsbosse
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t200639046z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 20:06:39
last_update2017-11-17 20:06:39
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 20:06:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.276 HBD
curator_payout_value0.091 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length778
author_reputation547,627,355,548
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,712,703
net_rshares171,866,394,135
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@healthbasics ·
@rsbosse you don't have to vote on a post to get someone's attention. You can reply to the post to provide feedback and specifically say that is the reason you are not voting for the post and others shouldn't as well.
properties (22)
authorhealthbasics
permlinkre-rsbosse-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t064057963z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["rsbosse"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 06:41:00
last_update2017-11-19 06:41:00
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-26 06:41:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length217
author_reputation1,410,280,625,404
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,847,623
net_rshares0
@rsbosse ·
I understand.  For sure.  Thank you.  I guess it leaves me asking the question though if you see folks coming on the platform and purposely trying to infiltrate it with political content or controversial politics?  For example, if someone comes on here with white nationalist content, or even blatant KKK stuff, am I supposed to simply comment or is it wiser to down vote?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorrsbosse
permlinkre-healthbasics-re-rsbosse-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171120t202258910z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-20 20:22:57
last_update2017-11-20 20:22:57
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-27 20:22:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length372
author_reputation547,627,355,548
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,016,134
net_rshares0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@rusteemitblog ·
You can find Russian version of this post [HERE](https://steemit.com/steemit/@rusteemitblog/podgotovka-dorozhnoi-karty-steemit-na-2018-god-predlozheniya-privetstvuyutsya-steemitblog) 

---

Русская вСрсия [Ρ‚ΡƒΡ‚](https://steemit.com/steemit/@rusteemitblog/podgotovka-dorozhnoi-karty-steemit-na-2018-god-predlozheniya-privetstvuyutsya-steemitblog)
properties (22)
authorrusteemitblog
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t145622559z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@rusteemitblog/podgotovka-dorozhnoi-karty-steemit-na-2018-god-predlozheniya-privetstvuyutsya-steemitblog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 14:56:24
last_update2017-11-19 14:56:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 14:56:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length344
author_reputation35,289,965,594,592
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,884,546
net_rshares0
@rymlen ·
$1.48
Interesting points!
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorrymlen
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231356928z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:14:00
last_update2017-11-16 23:14:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:14:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.109 HBD
curator_payout_value0.368 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length19
author_reputation68,990,534,338,096
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,619,924
net_rshares689,206,436,557
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@s4lcombi ·
I wish you hear me, please take a look at @haejin and @berniesanders case
properties (22)
authors4lcombi
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171226t175834410z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["haejin","berniesanders"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-26 17:58:36
last_update2017-12-26 17:58:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-02 17:58:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length73
author_reputation39,135,428
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id25,378,089
net_rshares0
@sajannair ·
Make a small barrier to entry. Steemit is not facebook its a content eco-system. Two levels of accounts free account for content consumption and another for creator with a small one time fee. May be 1 dollar. It will work magic when it comes to content quality control....
properties (22)
authorsajannair
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180212t175305715z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-02-12 17:53:09
last_update2018-02-12 17:53:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-02-19 17:53:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length272
author_reputation45,358,981,495,000
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id36,992,140
net_rshares0
@salahchiva ·
**I suspect that many people think that steemit is for profit only
It is true that we are making profits, but we should not forget the essence of the foundation in fact that there are so many people, as I noticed that they have more than wonderful content and they are working to provide an invaluable benefit
according to my opinion
Therefore, we must work to innovate and improve the intellectual level and profit will come after that**
properties (22)
authorsalahchiva
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210116257z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:04:03
last_update2017-11-16 21:04:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:04:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length438
author_reputation6,834,369,627,358
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,020
net_rshares0
@sergiomendes ·
When it comes to procedures and all the backstage thimgs working on the blockchain i have to admit that i am still a lot out of the loop. But when it comes to the news and new developments you guys revealed in here sound really good. I am excited for a great here in the community and see how much value we can create ❀
properties (22)
authorsergiomendes
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t004753837z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:47:54
last_update2017-11-17 00:47:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 00:47:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length319
author_reputation678,670,860,520,495
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,625,732
net_rshares0
@skytrex ·
$0.22
I believe abuse and marketing should be priorities!

just my two cents
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorskytrex
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t210213491z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 21:02:12
last_update2017-11-19 21:02:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 21:02:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.166 HBD
curator_payout_value0.055 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length70
author_reputation6,220,391,005,416
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,915,443
net_rshares97,341,200,523
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@slavix ·
**Securitization** is the process of taking an illiquid asset, or group of assets, and through financial engineering, transforming it into a security.

Please add ability to fully securitize SP delegations, by adding option to set time limit!
Currently SP delegations are very limited in use, because they can be recalled at any moment and do not have a set delegation period.

In order to enable products and services that are payable with SP leases we need an option to set delegation period, with no early recall possibility.
**This is very important!**
properties (22)
authorslavix
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t164941395z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 16:49:42
last_update2017-11-19 16:49:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 16:49:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length556
author_reputation27,303,148,571,540
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,895,270
net_rshares0
@slavix ·
@steemitblog 
Please support this proposal!
Securitization of Steem Power!
https://steemit.com/steemdev/@slavix/securitization-of-steem-power
properties (22)
authorslavix
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171124t092126312z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemitblog"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemdev/@slavix/securitization-of-steem-power"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-24 09:21:27
last_update2017-11-24 09:21:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-01 09:21:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length141
author_reputation27,303,148,571,540
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,375,243
net_rshares0
@smooth · (edited)
$5.06
Some excellent comments already here. I'll just add a bit of my own thoughts (and seconding some great suggestions from others).

1. Scalability, scalability, scalability. Nodes are struggling with the increasing demands of bigger and more expensive hardware as the blockchain grows and it grows a lot (roughly a gigabyte per day?). People are shutting down nodes and relying on a small number of public API endpoints that make the entire ecosystem very fragile. Witnesses are relying on shared service providers and this problem has the potential to get a lot worse. This is unsustainable and dangerous.
2. Simple UI change to show or hide resteemed posts in a blog. If I want to look at someone's posts and find one, it is nearly impossible to do if they are a frequent user of resteem.
3. Recommended posts (a form of algorithmic feed). This used to exist but was removed as unscalable when hosted within steemd. Now that there is a multi-layer architecture and all requests not hitting steemd itself, please bring it back.
4. Communities (perhaps a temporary work-around is to be able to follow a tag; I've noticed some tags are working okay as mini-communities now).
5. Traditional currency gateways so non-crypto users don't have to use crypto exchange to buy Steem Power and cash out their rewards. I understand there are regulatory issues. Partner with service providers if necessary.
6. Deep revamp of reputation and curation into a better voting/reputation/curation/web-of-trust type system. This is a complex problem and suggest rather than trying to solve it by tinkering and tweaking as has been the case in the past (and present, afaict), to really undertake to study it and conduct the necessary original research. This means hiring the right multidisciplinary researchers (keyword soup, probably incomplete: economics, game theory, mechanism design, auction theory, voting theory, fraud detection) either inside the organization or outside by sponsoring academic research. I doubt it would produce usable results in 2018, so the 2018 task would be to start on a multi-year effort.
πŸ‘  , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t052553400z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 05:25:54
last_update2017-11-18 05:46:06
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-11-25 05:25:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value4.121 HBD
curator_payout_value0.940 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,096
author_reputation253,602,537,834,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,744,734
net_rshares2,331,722,786,903
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)
@bronevik ·
$0.24
>Traditional currency gateways so non-crypto users don't have to use crypto exchange to buy Steem Power and cash out their rewards. I understand there are regulatory issues. Partner with service providers if necessary.
It could be done separately from the platform by some service similar to localbitcoins.
This way is even more prefferable because of crypto law enforcement in different countries.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbronevik
permlinkre-smooth-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171120t052319466z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-20 05:23:54
last_update2017-11-20 05:23:54
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-27 05:23:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.180 HBD
curator_payout_value0.060 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length398
author_reputation12,260,156,653,305
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,945,112
net_rshares105,327,256,280
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@cryptographic ·
I’ve created a word cloud for the comments section of this post that I hope you will find of value and will want to share. While the creation of the actual word cloud is relatively easy and straightforward, the creation of a relevant word list that will produce a meaningful word cloud is quite another matter, as I’m sure you know, and takes considerable time and effort. Unfortunately, as of now, the post has only had 41 views. It needs a little love. Perhaps a resteem might be of help, if you think it is worthwhile, and, of course, it would be much appreciated too. TIA
https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input
properties (22)
authorcryptographic
permlinkre-smooth-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171121t115234587z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptographic/word-cloud-for-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-21 11:52:30
last_update2017-11-21 11:52:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-28 11:52:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length670
author_reputation111,198,190,831,086
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,080,539
net_rshares0
@snug ·
[Allow filtering with multiple tags at once](https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@snug/suggestion-to-allow-multiple-tags-at-once-in-trending-new-hot)
properties (22)
authorsnug
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t023939190z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@snug/suggestion-to-allow-multiple-tags-at-once-in-trending-new-hot"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 02:37:33
last_update2017-11-18 02:37:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 02:37:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length144
author_reputation1,676,170,166,621
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,735,019
net_rshares0
@son-of-satire · (edited)
I have a fresh idea that could potentially be worth billions, as well as creating a massive incentive for users to power up, and keep that SP locked down.

In truth, I am not 100% sure if it is entirely legal, but because I can see other instances of this happening in the world, and there has been for a long time, just not using blockchain, I feel it likely that it is in fact completely legal.

This idea will work regardless of the assistance of the Steemit team, however, if it was implemented through Steemit, it would work far more efficiently and be beneficial all round. 

I would like to share the idea with someone at the Steemit team. I have no doubt that the methodology is sound, and that the project would be successful if implemented. My only concerns are that it may not be legal, but if this is not the case, and you are able to go ahead with this, then I will most definitely be wanting something for it.

I'm so sure of how great this idea is, that I will either want the steemit team's full support to help me create it, as I have only just started learning to code and it will be a few years before I am able to do something like this myself- or I will want something significant, and you can create it yourself as an official STEEM extension.

It would be ideal to do this with Steemit, and so this is why I have come to you first, but if you are not interested, please let me know quickly so that I can take it to another developer as soon as possible.

If you do want to talk about the idea and how it could change everything, let me know how best to do so.
properties (22)
authorson-of-satire
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180208t145404435z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-02-08 14:54:00
last_update2018-02-08 15:08:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-02-15 14:54:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,582
author_reputation112,996,205,695,573
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id35,933,397
net_rshares0
@sourcecloud ·
One of the best things about steemit community is that people support each other and ask each other for ideas and improvements. If I would suggest something it would be a maybe only better marketing campaign. 
I would love to see more and more people discovering this community because for only a week her i changed my mindset and I am really happy seeing all these people here going for their goals. 
What I expect in 2018 is that you won't change too many things. Keep it simple, it is already really a productive platform. Just get more people together !
properties (22)
authorsourcecloud
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t200407243z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 20:04:06
last_update2017-11-19 20:04:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 20:04:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length557
author_reputation4,314,856,688
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,911,528
net_rshares0
@splendorhub ·
$0.02
@steemitblog This is awesome! and a great opportunity for those who have a great ideas to make this (Steemit) a better place. One of my concerns is the way to minimize the detriment content. Many simply want to add a video or a google image and clutter the platform. Flagging works; but can be damaging too. Is there another way maybe?
Another tool that I see would make Steemit's growth exponential is the ability to show a short live video...this could create easy and quick interaction. I'm still fairly new...but really trying to learn as much as possible. The learning curb is humongous but well worth it. I'm learning enjoying the journey, and like I always say... there's always room for improvement :) Best wishes!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsplendorhub
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t212118327z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemitblog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:20:54
last_update2017-11-16 21:20:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:20:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.020 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length722
author_reputation12,936,731,361,578
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,613,278
net_rshares9,915,886,082
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@splendorhub ·
@steemitblog @ned This is great news for Steemit. 

https://media.giphy.com/media/xlGYf1RUbYYes/giphy.gif
properties (22)
authorsplendorhub
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171129t022427240z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemitblog","ned"],"image":["https://media.giphy.com/media/xlGYf1RUbYYes/giphy.gif"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-29 02:24:00
last_update2017-11-29 02:24:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-06 02:24:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length105
author_reputation12,936,731,361,578
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,840,220
net_rshares0
@sroka87 ·
Adjust the voting weight for bots versus real views.  

i.e Real vote is always going to be more powerful than a bot vote to encourage genuine curation.  This way, Steem becomes more of an 'attention economy' rather than bot playground.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorsroka87
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210811975z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:08:12
last_update2017-11-16 21:08:12
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 21:08:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length236
author_reputation15,501,625,241,807
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,321
net_rshares9,760,920,533
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@anarcho-andrei ·
$1.27
Short of actually manually identifying every bot that's on the blockchain, this is unworkable.  Bot accounts are no different than regular user accounts.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoranarcho-andrei
permlinkre-sroka87-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t150831705z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 15:08:30
last_update2017-11-17 15:08:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 15:08:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.940 HBD
curator_payout_value0.329 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length153
author_reputation27,098,621,645,365
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountgo-steem
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,687,649
net_rshares610,075,308,687
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@statsmonkey ·
comment
Congratulations, your post received one of the top 10 most powerful upvotes in the last 12 hours. You received an upvote from @ned valued at 182.17 SBD, based on the pending payout at the time the data was extracted.

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, reply with the word "stop".
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorstatsmonkey
permlinkre-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t072726
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata""
created2017-11-17 07:27:27
last_update2017-11-17 07:27:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:27:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length302
author_reputation503,392,294,628
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,651,536
net_rshares-246,451,818
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@statsmonkey ·
comment
Congratulations, your post received one of the top 10 most powerful upvotes in the last 12 hours. You received an upvote from @thejohalfiles valued at 102.65 SBD, based on the pending payout at the time the data was extracted.

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, reply with the word "stop".
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorstatsmonkey
permlinkre-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t072758
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata""
created2017-11-17 07:28:00
last_update2017-11-17 07:28:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:28:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length312
author_reputation503,392,294,628
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,651,575
net_rshares263,353,059
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@stealthtrader · (edited)
$0.02
<center>https://steemit.com/roadmap2018/@stealthtrader/what-would-you-like-steemit-to-make-a-priority-for-2018</center>
<center>https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://media2.giphy.com/media/bYsYAxXm1F4aY/200.gif</center>
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorstealthtrader
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t224343013z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://media2.giphy.com/media/bYsYAxXm1F4aY/200.gif"],"links":["https://steemit.com/roadmap2018/@stealthtrader/what-would-you-like-steemit-to-make-a-priority-for-2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:43:42
last_update2017-11-17 20:02:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 22:43:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.016 HBD
curator_payout_value0.004 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length219
author_reputation74,266,337,461,760
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,618,216
net_rshares10,424,908,728
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@stealthtrader ·
<h3>[Response to "What would you like Steemit to make a priority for 2018?"](https://steemit.com/utopian/@stealthtrader/response-to-what-would-you-like-steemit-to-make-a-priority-for-2018)</h3>
https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://media.giphy.com/media/xTiTnxpQ3ghPiB2Hp6/giphy.gif
properties (22)
authorstealthtrader
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171220t181722701z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://media.giphy.com/media/xTiTnxpQ3ghPiB2Hp6/giphy.gif"],"links":["https://steemit.com/utopian/@stealthtrader/response-to-what-would-you-like-steemit-to-make-a-priority-for-2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-20 18:17:21
last_update2017-12-20 18:17:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-27 18:17:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length282
author_reputation74,266,337,461,760
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,391,782
net_rshares0
@steemitpresident ·
$1.54
I'm a plebe in the Steemit community, just signed up last week.  From my reading of posts, guess that makes me a Steemian.
Here's my two cents; or should that be Steem, or Steem Power (still learning).
Laser focus on what I think should be the critical path of the roadmap is the release of the mobile app.  This will allow for increased utilization and posting.  Video blogs should increase; watch out youtube.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorsteemitpresident
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t163321877z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 16:33:24
last_update2017-11-17 16:33:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 16:33:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.154 HBD
curator_payout_value0.382 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length411
author_reputation27,919,444,858,492
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,695,466
net_rshares713,015,456,867
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@steemitqa ·
Need more help with new users. Any chance you can help with https://steemit.com/@userhelp ?
πŸ‘  , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsteemitqa
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t073258659z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/@userhelp"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 07:33:00
last_update2017-11-18 07:33:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 07:33:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length91
author_reputation22,135,803,163,402
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,752,754
net_rshares1,557,293,286
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)
@steemmatt · (edited)
This post, and all of the resulting transparent discussion and debate from leadership, just reinvigorated a lot of my faith in the platform moving forward to overcome obstacles.  Such an interesting read.
properties (22)
authorsteemmatt
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t081955787z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 08:19:54
last_update2017-11-19 08:21:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 08:19:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length204
author_reputation137,852,274,798,769
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,853,686
net_rshares0
@stellabelle ·
$0.85
# The one thing I can't believe we still don't have is a way for people to buy Steem using a credit card. 

We have missed out on a lot of revenue. If FuckToken already has this enabled, and they are not even listed on Bittrex yet, I cannot fathom why Steem is not available for purchase via a credit card. Surely, we can figure this out? Let's do this....anyone with payment experience reach out to FuckToken to figure it out: https://buy.fucktoken.io/

https://media.giphy.com/media/i8sEAOYAtTtF6/giphy.gif
πŸ‘  , ,
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t130302817z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"image":["https://media.giphy.com/media/i8sEAOYAtTtF6/giphy.gif"],"links":["https://buy.fucktoken.io/"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 13:03:03
last_update2017-11-17 13:03:03
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 13:03:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.849 HBD
curator_payout_value0.003 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length508
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,676,095
net_rshares394,695,725,326
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@smooth ·
$0.40
Agree. I understand that Steemit Inc doesn't want to get into all that regulated aspect, but this is more a question of business development and partnering (which is what most of these "buy X token with credit card" services are doing). Should be gateways to the major currencies  both for buying and cashing out so the types of people steem/it is trying to recruit (non-crypto users) don't have to go through crypto exchanges.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t045706100z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 04:57:09
last_update2017-11-18 04:57:09
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-25 04:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.310 HBD
curator_payout_value0.092 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length427
author_reputation253,602,537,834,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,743,132
net_rshares187,128,294,566
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@stellabelle ·
$3.22
competitors are having this out of the gate. It makes no sense not to have this. Anyone with payment experience should do this ASAP.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-smooth-re-stellabelle-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171119t151103629z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-19 15:11:03
last_update2017-11-19 15:11:03
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-26 15:11:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.419 HBD
curator_payout_value0.805 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length132
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,885,988
net_rshares1,426,985,944,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@surfermarly ·
Thanks for involving the community! Great move!

Here's my input: 
https://steemit.com/roadmap2018/@surfermarly/my-input-for-the-steemit-roadmap-2018-retention-through-positive-user-experience
properties (22)
authorsurfermarly
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t145731563z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/roadmap2018/@surfermarly/my-input-for-the-steemit-roadmap-2018-retention-through-positive-user-experience"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 14:57:30
last_update2017-11-17 14:57:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 14:57:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length192
author_reputation318,958,646,866,746
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,686,511
net_rshares0
@susueng ·
1. Speed
2. Posting edit
3. Design
properties (22)
authorsusueng
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t030045813z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 03:00:39
last_update2017-11-18 03:00:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 03:00:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length34
author_reputation2,550,737,615,366
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,736,373
net_rshares0
@tarekadam ·
This is a good initiative! I have the following suggestions.
- Account creation speed
- Removing Beta from Steemit.com
- Marketing campaigns (Media, Newspaper)
- Discourage "comment"self voting abuse
- Incentivise manual curration
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authortarekadam
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t211020067z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.0.0"}
created2017-11-16 21:10:21
last_update2017-11-16 21:10:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:10:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length231
author_reputation50,131,776,387,207
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,502
net_rshares0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@teamsteem ·
$0.40
Change the voting algorithm from full linear to anything but full linear and possibly n<sup>2</sup>. 

Non linear voting algorithm incentives people not to split their vote and thus concentrate the votes on the most valuable content and people. Each of us are seeking the very most valuable information, not second best. 

It also changes a lot of other dynamics which I think are beneficial to everyone. I just wanted to make sure it was still on your radars. I might expend on this subject in a future post. 

This change should only be seek if it benefit the whole platform obviously. 

I wrote a bit more on the subject [here](https://steemit.com/blocktrades/@blocktrades/blocktrades-now-offering-steem-power-delegations#@teamsteem/re-pfunk-re-dan-re-biophil-re-dan-re-blocktrades-blocktrades-now-offering-steem-power-delegations-20171108t011611848z).
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t224842257z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/blocktrades/@blocktrades/blocktrades-now-offering-steem-power-delegations#@teamsteem/re-pfunk-re-dan-re-biophil-re-dan-re-blocktrades-blocktrades-now-offering-steem-power-delegations-20171108t011611848z"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:48:39
last_update2017-11-16 22:48:39
depth1
children27
last_payout2017-11-23 22:48:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.317 HBD
curator_payout_value0.085 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length855
author_reputation284,804,541,406,803
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,618,477
net_rshares187,931,423,456
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@ned ·
$0.04
N2 yields a deep feeling of unfairness as well as the potential for exacerbated "problems" related to delegations and vote buying. Further on that point, N2 would, unless it kills the platform, benefit people like yourself who are frequently subject to votes that would receive greatly disproportionate rewards under N2. I'd love to hear the arguments you may have against N2 to understand there's a complete picture being presented in making the case.  

Personally, like the terribly evil hyperinflation, awfully implemented trickle up rewards and other crap engineering from the onset of Steem, I hope we never see N2 again.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorned
permlinkre-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t234659366z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:47:00
last_update2017-11-16 23:47:00
depth2
children19
last_payout2017-11-23 23:47:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.034 HBD
curator_payout_value0.010 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length627
author_reputation94,449,026,656,258
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,621,884
net_rshares21,171,758,815
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@teamsteem · (edited)
I want to make it clear to everyone that I have everything to lose from people seeing Steem as unfair or Steem being unfair because that would obviously undermine Steem and all of our investments. 

**I'm definitely in favor of a none linear reward as you seemed opened to but I entertain some level of doubt about N2.**

One of my biggest argument against N2 or other none linear reward curve would be just this, maybe it's making Steem unfair. 

My second biggest argument against N2 or other none linear would be that it will be perceived as unfair. This is a sure thing for a portion of Steemians and I can easily understand.

The decision to implement such a change can only be taken by the majority stakeholders and this would be large investors for the most part or those who this rule **seems** to favor. 

If this change favors some, then it is unfair which would result in a collapsing market and the biggest losers being the biggest investors which is obviously not something anyone wants. (I tend to think it favors the platform as a whole.)

**None linear rewards favor people not to split their stake and not to split their votes. (In most cases) It also create a strong incentive for people not to sell their Steem.**

**All of this incentivize people to empower one another more directly with votes, creating meaningful relations overtime as opposed to the current situation where people are incentivized to lease their SP as much as possible.**

**I support the re-institution of a superlinear reward and I agree N2 might be unnecessarily too much with negative effect outweighing the positive one.** 

Dan has shared very valuable insights on the subject in his post "[Evil Whales](https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/evil-whales)", more precisely under the title "The value of Consensus" and "Curation Reward".
properties (22)
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-ned-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t011341724z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/evil-whales"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:13:36
last_update2017-11-17 01:44:45
depth3
children11
last_payout2017-11-24 01:13:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,830
author_reputation284,804,541,406,803
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,627,233
net_rshares0
@teamsteem ·
> N2 yields a deep feeling of unfairness

Is it a feeling of unfairness or is it unfair? 

> as well as the potential for exacerbated "problems" related to delegations and vote buying.

You haven't stated the problems explicitely so they can't be argued for or against. 

>  N2 would, unless it kills the platform, benefit people like yourself who are frequently subject to votes that would receive greatly disproportionate rewards under N2.

Your statement doesn't prove N2 to be superior or inferior to linear.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-ned-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180525t235007144z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-05-25 23:50:06
last_update2018-05-25 23:50:06
depth3
children6
last_payout2018-06-01 23:50:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length512
author_reputation284,804,541,406,803
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id57,719,944
net_rshares102,929,967
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@vandeberg ·
$0.36
The definition of super linear is that for a given function `f(x)`, it is super linear if for all `k`, there exists a an `N` such that `f(x) > kx` for all `x > N`. Essentially, given any linear curve, the function surpasses it at some point.

Back in HF 17, we proposed a curve that did not adhere to this definition. It was superlinear, to a point, and linear after a certain amount of time (this was done smoothly, not piece-wise). There were heated discussions over certain breakpoints of linearity. At how much SP does a vote behave on a certain part of the curve? Things of that nature. Many argued towards an overwhelming linearity to the curve. To the point where linear rewards made more sense. Yet others argued for breakpoints that caused the curve to look close to `nlog(n)`. Even though it was better than `n^2`, it wasn't fair enough. The problem we run into is that no matter what super linear curve we propose, many will argue for more fairness. The limit as fairness approaches infinity is linear.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorvandeberg
permlinkre-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t003015342z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:30:15
last_update2017-11-17 00:30:15
depth2
children6
last_payout2017-11-24 00:30:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.269 HBD
curator_payout_value0.087 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,013
author_reputation31,759,426,110,944
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,624,682
net_rshares166,603,329,422
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@ats-david ·
$1.20
So we sacrifice a coherent overall system and the actual *social* aspects of β€œsocial media” because some people complain about β€œunfairness?” 

I hate to be the bearer of bad news then, but people who don’t earn as much as they’d like will *always* complain about β€œunfairness.” Since this platform has the money element included, those complaints are inescapable. The idea is to make the system actually work and work for the most people by a coherent set of rules/protocols, not to cater to those with absurd/mismanaged expectations and misguided β€œfeelings.” 

The largest problem with *any* of the previous rules was the result of the initial distribution - and I have yet to see anyone willing to address that. If this place was flawed from the beginning, as Ned suggested in another comment (below), then why pretend that any amount of code tinkering can make things β€œmore fair?” All that happens is that a *different* set of problems emerge...but the origin has always been the same. 

<br/>

>**_Personally, like the terribly evil hyperinflation, awfully implemented trickle up rewards and other crap engineering from the onset of Steem, I hope we never see N2 again. - Ned_**
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorats-david
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t021236567z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 02:12:36
last_update2017-11-17 02:12:36
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 02:12:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.902 HBD
curator_payout_value0.298 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,181
author_reputation324,017,334,201,433
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,630,982
net_rshares558,085,707,506
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@smooth · (edited)
$2.02
> The problem we run into is that no matter what super linear curve we propose, many will argue for more fairness. The limit as fairness approaches infinity is linear.

This is incredibly one-sided, including as a retrospective of HF17. Some will argue for more fairness, yes (and did), but some also argue for more resistance to abuse (and did). There are valid points on both sides, but to simply take the fairness argument, extrapolate to infinity, and implement it, is to completely disregard the arguments on the other side. On what basis?

Okay, fair enough, the platform can decide that "maximum fairness" is the right goal, but there's nothing that is a given about it, as some sort of mathematical extrapolation of agreed principles.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t050027900z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 05:00:30
last_update2017-11-18 05:33:54
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-25 05:00:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.536 HBD
curator_payout_value0.481 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length742
author_reputation253,602,537,834,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,743,334
net_rshares929,318,059,249
author_curate_reward""
vote details (15)
@teamsteem ·
I really appreciate those precisions.

I just shared some further thoughts on the subject as a reply to Ned's comment. 

I support the re-institution of a superlinear reward and I agree N2 might be unnecessarily too much with negative effects outweighing the positive ones.

I understand that it would take a majority vote by top witnesses and that it has been voted on in the past and that the sentiment might not have changed enough for this changed to be vote in at this point. 

My comment was more about showing my support toward such a change. 

By the way, I really enjoyed watching your presentation at SteemFest and I really enjoyed watching all the other Steeemit devs too. I already knew you guys were all very passionate about Steem and definitely hardworking but those presentation and the panel discussion and the thing I've read here and there about the team made it all the more succinct.
properties (22)
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-vandeberg-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t015356916z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:53:51
last_update2017-11-17 01:53:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 01:53:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length904
author_reputation284,804,541,406,803
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,629,734
net_rshares0
@thinkvincent ·
No Doubt sir, steemit community will soar more high. ^_^ this platform is great.
properties (22)
authorthinkvincent
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20180115t164034510z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-15 16:40:36
last_update2018-01-15 16:40:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-01-22 16:40:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length80
author_reputation475,851,323,119
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id29,742,567
net_rshares0
@tony10 ·
$0.23
I would love:
1) A reddit like interface with equivalent subbreddits
2) A whats app like app interface that can be used for groups who want the conversation to be public but access limited.
We are expecting a lot from you guys next year, so take some chill time in the holidays!! Thanks for taking our input it means a lot!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authortony10
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171209t131916992z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-09 13:19:18
last_update2017-12-09 13:19:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-16 13:19:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.176 HBD
curator_payout_value0.056 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length323
author_reputation2,970,454,725,681
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id22,883,803
net_rshares59,054,536,502
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@toocurious ·
$0.22
Hi, like everyone here I first want to thank you guys for the hard work you put in to this. I have only been around for a couple of months and it has been quite a fascinating time. Steemit is amongst one of the things that I think can truly bring change for the better. That being said, I often find myself lost when looking for interesting and good content. I would like to get in touch with other users that take this seriously and produce good content. And that is not always easy. Maybe I haven't figured everything out just yet, but if there is a way to do this, I would be very thankful. Maybe a way to form communities on steemit would be a good thing. Cheers.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authortoocurious
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171116t213425598z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":"roadmap2018","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-16 20:35:18
last_update2017-11-16 20:35:18
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 20:35:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.212 HBD
curator_payout_value0.006 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length667
author_reputation62,831,432,053,648
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,609,876
net_rshares107,519,102,554
author_curate_reward""
vote details (10)
@timcliff ·
Communities should help for this.
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-toocurious-re-steemitblog-20171117t013154994z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:31:54
last_update2017-11-17 01:31:54
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 01:31:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length33
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,628,349
net_rshares0
@trevor.george ·
$0.13
In terms of UX (most of this may have already been suggested, but what the hell, I'll add it anyway)


- 1 I want a Home screen that I can configure. I want to be able to pick out some of the people I follow and have then there so I can see when they post and when they comment. This would improve engagement because there are the people I'm in regular contact with. This will help to build the community aspect of things.

- 2 probably the most important - have a 'Communication from Steemit' widget always visible in a sidebar or something to highlight messages from Steemit. Putting out a blog post is not enough. By the time i get onto Steemit (from the arse end of the world) any blog post is already 15 pages down my feed, so I never see it. Communication is CRITICAL to the success of the platform. Put it right under my nose!

- 3 the ability to have communities (which is coming as I understand it). This will be a game changer.

- 4 Having a 'Tip the author' function on a post. I know we can do it manually, but having it right there on the post would be good. This is something that  is independent of the rewards pool, and would mean you can really reward good content, even if you are a minnow.

- 5 My biggest peeve - bots. I hate the bots. The auto-vote bots, the comment bots, the follow me bots. Keep the bots like Cheetah and ones that do checking etc, but voting bots and commenting bots should be banned. So what if it makes it harder for people to earn money. The ones who are benefiting are those that are already doing well. Give the rest of us a break. I don't want more money necessarily, I just want the bots to go away and stop spamming me. to me there is no value in a bot voting for my post if it didn't read it. I'm not here to write posts for a machine to parse, analyse and vote on.

I think the biggest focus for the dev team, designers, strategists etc for 2018 is to not focus on how much money can be made, but focus on how to make it fun and easy for *real* people to engage with *real* people.

Make the focus of Steemit ENGAGEMENT and let the money sort itself out. then you will attract the sort of people who are on here to share their creative content and get feedback, instead of scammers out to make a quick buck by writing a bot, and copying and pasting comments all through everyone's posts.

That's my $0.000000000002 worth :-)

As a developer myself I know it is not easy, and it is all too common that everybody demands everything RIGHT F&*&(* NOW! 

So think about it a bit, and come up with something awesome. I know you can do it. Just take your time and get it right, and know that the community will love you for it, whenever it happens ;-)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authortrevor.george
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t215714741z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 21:57:21
last_update2017-11-17 21:57:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 21:57:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.096 HBD
curator_payout_value0.031 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,695
author_reputation48,328,020,774,225
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,719,778
net_rshares60,153,513,951
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@tuck-fheman ·
$1.05
Implement the referral system with rewards.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authortuck-fheman
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210246958z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:02:48
last_update2017-11-16 21:02:48
depth1
children18
last_payout2017-11-23 21:02:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.857 HBD
curator_payout_value0.196 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length43
author_reputation345,778,813,561,569
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,611,926
net_rshares491,459,041,192
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@acidyo ·
Make a post about all your recent referrals, make money while making money.
properties (22)
authoracidyo
permlinkre-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210507239z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:05:06
last_update2017-11-16 21:05:06
depth2
children2
last_payout2017-11-23 21:05:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length75
author_reputation3,336,748,029,738,602
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,095
net_rshares0
@rigaronib ·
https://media.giphy.com/media/l0MYEqEzwMWFCg8rm/giphy.gif
properties (22)
authorrigaronib
permlinkre-acidyo-re-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t210800466z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"image":["https://media.giphy.com/media/l0MYEqEzwMWFCg8rm/giphy.gif"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:08:00
last_update2017-11-16 21:08:00
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 21:08:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length57
author_reputation171,562,604,416,656
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,612,302
net_rshares0
@tuck-fheman ·
I need to get my 65k fake twitter followers going first!
properties (22)
authortuck-fheman
permlinkre-acidyo-re-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171118t191705463z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-18 19:17:06
last_update2017-11-18 19:17:06
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-25 19:17:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length56
author_reputation345,778,813,561,569
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,806,348
net_rshares0
@followbtcnews ·
I like the idea of a referral system ,then get a % of the the referrals rewards for a certain amount of time. This would help stop people from just signing up xxxx accounts just to get paid.  The people would have to be real and active in order to get any rewards
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorfollowbtcnews
permlinkre-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t001526712z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:15:30
last_update2017-11-17 00:15:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 00:15:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length263
author_reputation54,569,980,844,988
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,623,694
net_rshares5,170,801,060
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@noisy · (edited)
$0.04
Sorry for that, but I will use all my power to flag any suggestion about referral links. This would only makes Steemit looks more scamy!

Whenever I see a referral link from someone to a platform which I do not know, I am asking myself: _how you want to screw me??_

And final reason why Steemit should not have a referal program is... because Steemit already have one, a better one, organic, smart and self-healing - "followers".

When you do a proper introduction of Steemit to someone, one thing is almost certain. It is trivial to convince this person to follow you. This person will always remember you, because you were the person which introduce him to this great Steem ecosystem. You will get almost always votes from this person, just because of this fact.... as long as you are providing a value to the platform

unless... you will suddenly become a bad actor.

If will will do something bad for the platform, this person will have a **choice** to stop rewarding you. This guarantee that you will be always properly motivated to do good things.

Another reason why automated referal link is far from perfect:

because It is easy to easy to onboard 1000 a day, when you can lie to them, because you do not need to care about the truth. You can say anything about Steemit, just to push as mamy people through a registration point. With suggested by you referal system, there would be a lot of people which would not care about proper onboarding of people. And proper onboarding always takes much more time.

---

**[edit]**: unflagged
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authornoisy
permlinkre-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t213343544z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:33:42
last_update2017-11-16 23:48:51
depth2
children12
last_payout2017-11-23 21:33:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.033 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,542
author_reputation59,974,373,499,600
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,614,084
net_rshares19,911,288,266
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@donkeypong ·
Tuck's suggestion is a legitimate one that should be discussed. Even if you disagree, you should not flag. Let the community decide.
properties (22)
authordonkeypong
permlinkre-noisy-re-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t233317637z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:33:21
last_update2017-11-16 23:33:21
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-23 23:33:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length132
author_reputation431,667,636,679,304
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,621,079
net_rshares0
@thedarkhorse ·
$0.02
100% agree. We would end up with mass referrals of people who sign up and don't stick around. The resources wasted on this will cause more performance issues.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorthedarkhorse
permlinkre-noisy-re-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t220309895z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:03:09
last_update2017-11-16 22:03:09
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 22:03:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.015 HBD
curator_payout_value0.004 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length158
author_reputation64,296,958,099,922
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,615,794
net_rshares9,808,280,668
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@tuck-fheman ·
Repeating what we said in chat ... **it already exist**.

And there are ways to incentivize it without it being "scamy"[sic] .



Please remove  your flag @noisy.
properties (22)
authortuck-fheman
permlinkre-noisy-re-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t213846875z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["noisy"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 21:38:48
last_update2017-11-16 21:38:48
depth3
children5
last_payout2017-11-23 21:38:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length162
author_reputation345,778,813,561,569
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,614,375
net_rshares0
@uwelang ·
There are always different ways of referral systems that can be discussed, I am also sceptic towards it in general as of scammy shit I saw enough - if it is a one off based on certain criteria, why not? I would like it when the referral system is 8 levels deep - you get paid 10% of all your downline rewards lifetime. Sounds promising :-)
properties (22)
authoruwelang
permlinkre-noisy-re-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t001739765z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:17:39
last_update2017-11-17 00:17:39
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 00:17:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length339
author_reputation826,970,550,824,435
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,623,833
net_rshares0
@the01crow ·
Es una mala idea, solo trae spam y mal contenido!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorthe01crow
permlinkre-tuck-fheman-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231440764z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:17:51
last_update2017-11-16 23:17:51
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 23:17:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length49
author_reputation62,388,457,016,761
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,620,146
net_rshares1,090,908,338
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@tusharvasave ·
superb post and  nice roadmap photo
properties (22)
authortusharvasave
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t180822207z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 18:08:24
last_update2017-11-17 18:08:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 18:08:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length35
author_reputation-89,390,766,256
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,703,911
net_rshares0
@tusharvasave ·
hi @steemitblog your post are really amazing. your post are fullfilled of quality. you  work hard on steemit. your all subjects in post is interesting. your post is full of knowlege. I think you can help me. i  want to work on steemit and i want to post quality post. Can you help me. you have any team or chat then add me. thanks.
properties (22)
authortusharvasave
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t182415051z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemitblog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 18:24:24
last_update2017-11-17 18:24:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 18:24:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length331
author_reputation-89,390,766,256
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,705,098
net_rshares0
@tuyendg ·
Thumbnail is so small...i think it need biggger
properties (22)
authortuyendg
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171224t042350624z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-24 04:23:54
last_update2017-12-24 04:23:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-31 04:23:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length47
author_reputation3,057,880,153,528
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,959,117
net_rshares0
@uknowjpbitcoin ·
$7.38
How can you let @RANDOWHALE and @BERNIESANDERS continue to use his accounts to sell upvotes? He created robots to autoflag accounts and auto UPVOTE. I have a list of 15 ACCOUNTS @BERNIESANDERS CREATED it's on @uknowjpbitcoin account, the 2nd post from the top. Another member put a post out saying she tracked 60 ACCOUNTS that @BERNIESANDERS CREATED. I'm not sure if there are that many but I'm 100 percent sure of the 15 I tracked. He has been purposely hurting @Haejin which has 12,600 Twitter followers and gains 50 new followers per hour. ALL of @Haejin followers joined Steemit just for him. Now @BERNIESANDERS is attacking him with his robot and auto downvoting anyone who upvotes for him. WHY WOULD YOU LET THIS HAPPEN? It is fraudulent, evil, and going to ruin steemit???? Watch as I post this there will be an automatic 7 to 14 flags from @BERNIESANDERS ROBOTS he created can you please stol this from happening, its not right!
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authoruknowjpbitcoin
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171222t13405292z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018","roadmap","steemit","steem","steemdev"],"app":"esteem/1.5.0","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-12-22 18:40:51
last_update2017-12-22 18:40:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-29 18:40:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value5.465 HBD
curator_payout_value1.913 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length936
author_reputation-468,166,519,961
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,739,942
net_rshares1,282,068,758,015
author_curate_reward""
vote details (49)
@unlockrs · (edited)
$1.21
1. Apple and Android app (not just wallet)
2. Smart Media Tokens - get this going and get some big players involved!
3. Understand (explore/plan) if it makes sense to build a dApp on EOS
4. Start advertising aggressively for non-tech, non-crypto audiences (get a well respected public figure to endorse Steemit)
#roadmap2018
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorunlockrs
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204622935z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:46:21
last_update2017-11-16 20:49:12
depth1
children9
last_payout2017-11-23 20:46:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.910 HBD
curator_payout_value0.299 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length324
author_reputation1,962,142,323,826
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,698
net_rshares566,019,343,575
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@ned · (edited)
Replying to 3. (Fuck) no it doesn’t make sense. I’ll make some videos showing how pointless that tech would be next to Steem. Read the SMT Whitepaper on the technological drawbacks and dangerous pitfalls of open programmability - though there are
certainly more I haven’t described yet.
properties (22)
authorned
permlinkre-unlockrs-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t101859530z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 10:19:00
last_update2017-11-17 10:20:21
depth2
children6
last_payout2017-11-24 10:19:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length286
author_reputation94,449,026,656,258
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,664,075
net_rshares0
@bashadow ·
If issues like what I am about to post are not fixed/taken care of then, all the raodmaps, all the dreams of SMT's are going to fall by the wayside. Please do something about this person who thinks they can dictate who and how much they are allowed to earn on steemit.If they can do this with steem they can do the same damn thing to people earning SMt's or using them. Here is the problem:

I hope you are able to read this @ned - - - Something seriously needs to be done. - - -  **Please read this post** https://steemit.com/steemit/@michelle.gent/i-writer

Here was my comment to her "*That totally sucks. I as you know, really appreciated being able to read your stories. It is what I enjoy doing, reading, then to have as ass wipe drive you away, I am more than slightly pissed off.*  And here is the problem child:
> **"The only way I will be able to reconsider sticking around and only curating is if @transisto removes all the flags from my work and goes and does something useful with his/her votes instead."**

 Can I as a new user do anything about this, other than to inform you of the problem, he has 495,379.986 STEEM (-130,561.023 STEEM), my downvote to him would not even be noticed.
properties (22)
authorbashadow
permlinkre-ned-re-unlockrs-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171120t005419180z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["ned","transisto"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@michelle.gent/i-writer"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-20 00:54:18
last_update2017-11-20 00:54:18
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-27 00:54:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,199
author_reputation100,388,692,638,882
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,929,160
net_rshares0
@bitopia ·
$0.08
Hi @ned, I have been trying my best to draw attention to the issue of "Upvote Services" and how they are upending the entire sorting algorithm here on Steemit. 

It may not be too apparent to the larger players here on Steemit, but as a young Steemian, I felt the full effects of the issue. 

I have written 2 in-depth posts, diagnosing the issue and another on utopian.io for a proposed solution to the issue. If you have the time, please give it a read as I am putting in a great effort to see something come of it, as it truly is affecting minnows massively and I sincerely believe the proposed solution is a massively positive impact upon Steemit. You can find them here: 


[Growing Unhappiness with Upvote Bots on Steemit](https://steemit.com/steemit/@bitopia/growing-unhappiness-with-upvote-bots-on-steemit)
[Proposal for New 'Promoted' Function](https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@bitopia/proposal-for-new-promoted-function)

Thank you.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbitopia
permlinkre-ned-re-unlockrs-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171124t145426434z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["ned"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@bitopia/growing-unhappiness-with-upvote-bots-on-steemit","https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@bitopia/proposal-for-new-promoted-function"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-24 14:54:27
last_update2017-11-24 14:54:27
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-12-01 14:54:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.083 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length941
author_reputation1,729,892,019,965
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,399,256
net_rshares35,508,287,913
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@borislavzlatanov ·
What about the permissions system? Ability to define custom permissions and give them to people seems fundamental. Right now we have all kinds of tools (G Suite, project management platforms like Trello and Slack, content platforms like Youtube, literally thousands of websites) and each has their own user system and their own permission levels that you assign to users.  As I understand it, one of the promises of EOS is to be able to have one blockchain that all such websites can connect with. All users are on the blockchain. You just define your custom permissions (e.g. ability to post to a certain Slack channel, ability to upload videos, etc.) and assign them to users of your choosing. 

This would not only simplify the burden of managing users and logins across many different websites, but it would allow for shared ownership of the data. It seems to me that it's a technological foundation that can help enable a different kind of society.

Do SMTs have anything like that?
properties (22)
authorborislavzlatanov
permlinkre-ned-re-unlockrs-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t141815027z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 14:18:24
last_update2017-11-17 14:18:24
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-11-24 14:18:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length987
author_reputation23,529,034,721,112
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,682,951
net_rshares0
@unlockrs ·
$0.96
@ned thanks for the direct reply. I was thinking in terms of scalability and speed. I want Steemit to be able to handle as much traffic as Facebook and Reddit and EOS may be a way to achieve that (I get that there are other options to scale Steemit, so maybe I should have reworded #3 to explore areas to scale Steemit further). Still look forward to the videos for education purposes. 

On SMTs, can you help us understand the timeframe for demo-ing an SMT ICO? I'd like to see it in action and how easy it will be to integrate into established websites.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorunlockrs
permlinkre-ned-re-unlockrs-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t172906009z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["ned"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 17:29:06
last_update2017-11-17 17:29:06
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 17:29:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.724 HBD
curator_payout_value0.240 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length555
author_reputation1,962,142,323,826
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,700,408
net_rshares449,167,355,399
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@williambailey ·
$0.10
Yeees! +1 for the first recommandation.
The mobile app is a great idea! Steemit would become addictive
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorwilliambailey
permlinkre-unlockrs-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t222005965z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:20:06
last_update2017-11-16 22:20:06
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 22:20:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.075 HBD
curator_payout_value0.023 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length102
author_reputation45,007,655,750
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,616,863
net_rshares46,331,491,200
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@dreamon ·
i agree!
+1
properties (22)
authordreamon
permlinkre-williambailey-re-unlockrs-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t075414873z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 07:54:15
last_update2017-11-17 07:54:15
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 07:54:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length11
author_reputation11,223,329,625,090
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,653,446
net_rshares0
@urbanboy ·
I like the idea that all these things are going on and the potential they seem to have but right now its all way above my head. but thanks for all you are doing
properties (22)
authorurbanboy
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t170621336z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 17:05:57
last_update2017-11-17 17:05:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 17:05:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length160
author_reputation21,427,812,068
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,698,403
net_rshares0
@valikos ·
$0.42
Good work for this year :)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorvalikos
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t223716101z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:37:15
last_update2017-11-16 22:37:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 22:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.317 HBD
curator_payout_value0.105 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length26
author_reputation23,669,839,216,931
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,617,865
net_rshares197,507,937,143
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@vikramrana ·
Nice post
πŸ‘Ž  ,
properties (23)
authorvikramrana
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t051724299z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 05:17:33
last_update2017-11-17 05:17:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 05:17:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length9
author_reputation-506,276,374,747
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,643,023
net_rshares-16,039,328,035,237
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@vishalsingh4997 ·
Remove this so called minnow supporting bots n your half of the problem is solved!congrats
properties (22)
authorvishalsingh4997
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t032924973z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 03:29:33
last_update2017-11-17 03:29:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 03:29:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length90
author_reputation4,737,211,129,741
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,636,008
net_rshares0
@wadepaterson · (edited)
$7.57
As a medium-importance priority item for Steemit in 2018, I'd like to see the ability to categorize posts within each of our blogs.

Currently, it's a nightmare to scroll through the abyss of some users' blogs (mine included)... and we're only a year-and-a-half in. The ability to categorize our posts would allow users to quickly find their favorite blogger's articles based on topic (and possibly, publish date). It would also make each blog look cleaner and more organized.

An improved Steemit search experience would be another item I would add.

Thanks for your consideration, Steemit Inc.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorwadepaterson
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t201954672z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:19:54
last_update2017-11-16 20:21:21
depth1
children6
last_payout2017-11-23 20:19:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value5.716 HBD
curator_payout_value1.854 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length595
author_reputation97,672,771,986,490
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,608,706
net_rshares3,535,187,163,653
author_curate_reward""
vote details (30)
@cryptographic · (edited)
$2.28
As well as tools to help us better organize so that readers can more easily access the content they're looking for, I have two other wish list candidates:

● An optional "registered Steemit users only" setting for posts that would allow content creators to voluntarily participate in an active effort to drive user registration (and for those who choose to seek a wider audience the right to do so as well, hence the individual post by post optional ability - we'd all probably end up using a mix, depending on the individual post).

● A @steemit stake decentralization proportional airdrop to all accounts created after April 17, 2016, AND also having a reputation above 25. This would "spread the wealth" of that early "easy mine" in the most equitable way to _**real**_ users who bought into STEEM with hard cash, sweat and tears while excluding all pre-exchange, early miner whale accounts. This type of second-stage early adopter "award" would not only fairly and appropriately redistribute that STEEM, it would also highly motivate and serve as invaluable community support PR.

Good job all, and thanks for asking!
πŸ‘  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorcryptographic
permlinkre-wadepaterson-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t224320884z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"users":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:43:24
last_update2017-11-16 23:58:36
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-11-23 22:43:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.205 HBD
curator_payout_value0.070 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,121
author_reputation111,198,190,831,086
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,618,196
net_rshares1,060,715,367,366
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@dragosroua ·
Upsteemed, especially for the second suggestion. With the account mining capability coming forth in the next hardfork, I think the pressure on the Steem stake would lower and they may put it to better work.
properties (22)
authordragosroua
permlinkre-cryptographic-re-wadepaterson-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t065701911z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 06:57:00
last_update2017-11-17 06:57:00
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-11-24 06:57:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length206
author_reputation372,798,229,806,288
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,649,445
net_rshares0
@taskmaster4450 ·
Great ideas and upvoted....

The second idea really takes care of a point of contention among many on here.  Developing a second pool that gives preference to the non-whales makes a lot of sense.  This way, those who dont have the SP will start to acquire some and add to their accounts which makes their votes even more valuable.

It also gives newer people the incentive to work that much harder.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authortaskmaster4450
permlinkre-cryptographic-re-wadepaterson-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t010250250z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 01:02:51
last_update2017-11-17 01:02:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 01:02:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length398
author_reputation6,675,134,412,526,556
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,626,591
net_rshares4,507,324,085
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@goldendawne ·
$0.03
I agree with you. It would be nice if we could have our own tags for our own pages. Keeping our posts in a specific place for referral back to when needed.
I don't know how many times someone has asked me about a link, or I am working on a new post and need one of my links from four days ago. I have to scroll through about 2-3 dozen (if not more) posts and resteems on my page.

I would also like to see a place for our favorite people that we follow. Not necessarily a 'friends' list but more of a favorites. I like to see certain people's posts on a daily basis and I have to search for them sometimes. Just a tab that says "here's my favorites".

and thank you for considering all our input and for your endless work and time into steemit.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorgoldendawne
permlinkre-wadepaterson-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t204516325z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:45:18
last_update2017-11-16 20:45:18
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:45:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.022 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length744
author_reputation93,702,237,931,295
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,611
net_rshares13,725,238,279
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@wadepaterson ·
And, of course... thank you to the entire team for all of your hard work. It's incredibly appreciated and the number of positives vastly outweighs the negatives.
properties (22)
authorwadepaterson
permlinkre-wadepaterson-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t203848960z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 20:38:48
last_update2017-11-16 20:38:48
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 20:38:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length161
author_reputation97,672,771,986,490
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,610,121
net_rshares0
@wihnongkaltoa ·
Nice post πŸ‘
Thanks for sharing and and very useful information and good job ✌
properties (22)
authorwihnongkaltoa
permlinkre-steemitblog-20171125t105616124z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018","roadmap","steemit","steem","steemdev"],"app":"esteem/1.5.0","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"}
created2017-11-25 03:56:24
last_update2017-11-25 03:56:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-02 03:56:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length77
author_reputation434,588,021,210
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id21,448,815
net_rshares0
@williambailey ·
I'd say the bot issue and maybe the new user onboarding. It's not easy to understand fast how it works.
It may be intersting if you produce onboarding steps at the first connexion. Besides, it would be cool if we can have some recommandation as Who to follow, who is trending etc...
I think you'll find more returning users and an outstanding retention rate!
Goog luck the Steemit Team! Love your product!
properties (22)
authorwilliambailey
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t221631044z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 22:16:30
last_update2017-11-16 22:16:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-23 22:16:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length405
author_reputation45,007,655,750
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,616,611
net_rshares0
@win1254 ·
I am not a developer and how I wish I am. But those skilled Steemians here have demonstrated so much already that anything is possible with them. What I want to suggest, if this has not yet been implemented or prepared for implementation, is the referral program for Steemit. I think this is an essential component to be taken seriously. But the come-on is in the form of incentives for referring people in, which must be provided with reference to its feasibility, sustainability and the resources available or to be raised if need be.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorwin1254
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t093730775z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 09:37:33
last_update2017-11-17 09:37:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 09:37:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length536
author_reputation54,745,536,620
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,661,086
net_rshares1,340,422,146
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@youssefh ·
I just joined this community and I see a lot of potential! Can't wait to see where it goes from here!
properties (22)
authoryoussefh
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t161428154z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 16:14:27
last_update2017-11-17 16:14:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 16:14:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length101
author_reputation101,071,739
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,693,789
net_rshares0
@zombee ·
$1.35
One simple change that would make the life of a lot of developers on Steem a  lot easier:

<h3>Add an app property to every post and make it part of the API</h3>

It is really hard for apps on Steem to separate the posts from other apps. Some apps maybe don't won't to display posts from other apps or they don't want that they show up on Steemit.
Tags alone are not enough. Every user can set that tag on Steemit. There has to be another property for apps. Every app already sets an app property in the metadata of every post. Make it part of the post, make it mandatory and make it part of the API.

Another important thing in my opinion is:

<h3>Focus your API for Steem apps and not only for Steemit</h3>

Almost all API calls are for features on Steemit. The API has to be more general. There are a lot of queries that are important for other apps on Steem that aren't possible at the moment.

And the most important thing:

<h3>Document your API </h3>

I wouldn't call that documentation what you are showing on https://developers.steem.io/. That are just all possible function calls, nothing else. There is no parameter description at all. There is no documentation how to calculate voting power, Steem Power and a lot of other things that Steem app developers need. 
It is really hard to get started as a developer, because of the lack in documentation.
The only real documentation is the source code or user guides.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorzombee
permlinkre-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171116t231353817z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"links":["https://developers.steem.io/"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-16 23:13:51
last_update2017-11-16 23:13:51
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-11-23 23:13:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.054 HBD
curator_payout_value0.294 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,424
author_reputation28,731,310,626,159
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,619,915
net_rshares628,665,867,895
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@vandeberg ·
> Almost all API calls are for features on Steemit. The API has to be more general. There are a lot of queries that are important for other apps on Steem that aren't possible at the moment.

Appbase has many API improvements. One of them is a new database_api that is de-coupled from Condenser (steemit.com). It allows for paginated query of all database objects by all orderings the blockchain uses.

It may not be all of the information you need, but it is substantially more than what is currently available.
properties (22)
authorvandeberg
permlinkre-zombee-re-steemitblog-steemit-roadmap-2018-community-input-requested-20171117t003331201z
categoryroadmap2018
json_metadata{"tags":["roadmap2018"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-11-17 00:33:30
last_update2017-11-17 00:33:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-11-24 00:33:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length511
author_reputation31,759,426,110,944
root_title"Steemit Roadmap 2018: Community Input Requested"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id20,624,892
net_rshares0