Self-voting user list since HF19 by calamus056

witnesses

Self-voting user list since HF19 by calamus056

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

statistics · @calamus056 · Jul 28 '17 (edited)

$147.44

Self-voting user list since HF19

https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://steemitimages.com/DQmVzWbL6ZmmJiT5cwfhVT67MkYt7V6zCm9ZLutmvqTtQQZ/image.png

Self-voting is a hot topic lately. As a follow up of my [last article](https://steemit.com/steemit/@calamus056/extensive-curation-stats-overview-since-hf19-june-20th-2017), here is the list of all self-voters that rewarded themselves with at least $100 SBD total from June 20th - July 18th 2017. All SBD values are from posts + comments and are excluding curation rewards. **The total amount of visible self-votes in that period was $175,181.088 SBD (8.47% of total author rewards).**

**DISCLAIMER:** The information in this article shouldn't be perceived as 100% accurate. When you spot significant errors, please leave a comment. Also keep in mind that the full list below is a raw data dump. In no way is it implied that all cases are considered problematic. It's for you to decide what you think about it and what to do with the information.  The reason for names being included is that this is public information and others will release (and some already have released) the information independently.

# Top 10 by SBD amount
| Name          | Total SBD  | SBD on self | % of SBD on self |
|---------------|------------|-------------|------------------|
| tamim         | $16,923.26 | $11,974.54  | 70.76%           |
| craig-grant   | $9,307.19  | $5,171.56   | 55.57%           |
| eeks          | $5,593.42  | $4,639.92   | 82.95%           |
| sigizzang     | $7,705.30  | $4,333.82   | 56.24%           |
| ramta         | $9,030.16  | $3,234.69   | 35.82%           |
| surfyogi      | $3,666.10  | $2,290.26   | 62.47%           |
| sandrino      | $2,480.41  | $2,200.11   | 88.70%           |
| acidyo        | $25,851.55 | $2,189.28   | 8.47%            |
| onceuponatime | $10,964.62 | $2,016.45   | 18.39%           |
| slowwalker    | $13,630.01 | $1,738.40   | 12.75%           |

# Top 10 by selfishness
| Name          | Total SBD | SBD on self | % of SBD on self |
|---------------|-----------|-------------|------------------|
| greatpath     | $1,580.24 | $1,573.13   | 99.55%           |
| predictor2100 | $138.80   | $138.05     | 99.46%           |
| tard          | $203.50   | $201.82     | 99.17%           |
| evanrvoss     | $625.84   | $613.88     | 98.09%           |
| carlperna     | $120.54   | $118.15     | 98.02%           |
| crypto-p      | $1,434.53 | $1,401.99   | 97.73%           |
| storcogato    | $320.45   | $312.82     | 97.62%           |
| jimjam1210    | $750.74   | $731.35     | 97.42%           |
| daniel82      | $530.94   | $508.47     | 95.77%           |
| dantethegreat | $219.05   | $206.67     | 94.35%           |

# Top 10 on comments
| Name          | SBD on self |
|---------------|-------------|
| eeks          | $4,244.817    |
| sigizzang     | $4,172.934    |
| ramta         | $3,094.772    |
| surfyogi      | $2,177.492    |
| onceuponatime | $1,886.286    |
| pal           | $1,579.472    |
| inventor16    | $1,571.245    |
| greatpath     |$1,404.470    |
| oldtimer      | $1,284.029    |
| crypto-p      | $1,003.981    |

# Full list
| Name             | Total SBD  | SBD on self | % of SBD on self |
|------------------|------------|-------------|------------------|
| abdullar         | $4,870.38  | $403.81     | 8.29%            |
| acceptkim        | $857.55    | $101.83     | 11.87%           |
| ace108           | $3,426.24  | $144.62     | 4.22%            |
| achim86          | $219.96    | $111.83     | 50.84%           |
| acidyo           | $25,851.55 | $2,189.28   | 8.47%            |
| adamhole         | $274.88    | $172.61     | 62.80%           |
| aiqabrago        | $3,917.12  | $142.69     | 3.64%            |
| albensilverberg  | $977.20    | $277.17     | 28.36%           |
| alexbeyman       | $1,560.14  | $130.12     | 8.34%            |
| alienbutt        | $505.87    | $177.51     | 35.09%           |
| allasyummyfood   | $738.48    | $153.49     | 20.78%           |
| anarchyhasnogods | $605.92    | $453.09     | 74.78%           |
| angel76          | $348.67    | $131.02     | 37.58%           |
| anwenbaumeister  | $3,518.42  | $175.02     | 4.97%            |
| arcange          | $616.41    | $160.32     | 26.01%           |
| ash              | $292.52    | $193.41     | 66.12%           |
| ats-david        | $9,126.23  | $452.72     | 4.96%            |
| ausbitbank       | $22,586.99 | $151.21     | 0.67%            |
| avarice          | $278.33    | $205.70     | 73.91%           |
| avilsd           | $371.51    | $345.49     | 93.00%           |
| b0y2k            | $540.59    | $175.65     | 32.49%           |
| baharoba         | $1,269.59  | $238.63     | 18.80%           |
| barbro           | $1,063.71  | $165.19     | 15.53%           |
| barrydutton      | $1,156.32  | $482.45     | 41.72%           |
| bayrene          | $941.44    | $526.83     | 55.96%           |
| billbutler       | $1,052.43  | $207.19     | 19.69%           |
| bleujay          | $2,474.36  | $385.87     | 15.59%           |
| blocktrades      | $44,630.76 | $330.37     | 0.74%            |
| blueorgy         | $1,073.85  | $518.54     | 48.29%           |
| broncnutz        | $1,005.50  | $491.28     | 48.86%           |
| btcmillionaire   | $383.13    | $241.82     | 63.12%           |
| bullionstackers  | $707.78    | $111.15     | 15.70%           |
| camilla          | $594.46    | $100.19     | 16.85%           |
| capper2016       | $306.99    | $144.93     | 47.21%           |
| carface          | $975.44    | $842.80     | 86.40%           |
| carlperna        | $120.54    | $118.15     | 98.02%           |
| cervantes        | $3,859.38  | $122.16     | 3.17%            |
| chessmonster     | $584.57    | $105.07     | 17.97%           |
| chhaylin         | $964.12    | $294.94     | 30.59%           |
| chrissysworld    | $278.98    | $115.13     | 41.27%           |
| clains           | $948.05    | $117.93     | 12.44%           |
| cnstlf60         | $1,498.82  | $153.50     | 10.24%           |
| cognoscere       | $596.81    | $180.60     | 30.26%           |
| coinlend         | $171.42    | $159.87     | 93.26%           |
| corn113          | $2,726.07  | $528.77     | 19.40%           |
| craig-grant      | $9,307.19  | $5,171.56   | 55.57%           |
| craigemslie      | $401.84    | $378.47     | 94.19%           |
| crypto-p         | $1,434.53  | $1,401.99   | 97.73%           |
| cryptoctopus     | $7,224.65  | $139.97     | 1.94%            |
| cryptokraze      | $119.19    | $103.04     | 86.45%           |
| ctrl-alt-nwo     | $360.71    | $202.10     | 56.03%           |
| czechglobalhosts | $272.68    | $236.12     | 86.59%           |
| damarth          | $3,787.14  | $756.10     | 19.96%           |
| dana-edwards     | $712.94    | $305.63     | 42.87%           |
| dang007          | $884.21    | $665.83     | 75.30%           |
| daniel82         | $530.94    | $508.47     | 95.77%           |
| danlupi          | $600.20    | $136.39     | 22.72%           |
| dantethegreat    | $219.05    | $206.67     | 94.35%           |
| daveks           | $1,306.44  | $376.41     | 28.81%           |
| davidding        | $989.65    | $549.93     | 55.57%           |
| davidp           | $725.25    | $268.40     | 37.01%           |
| deanliu          | $3,657.37  | $249.46     | 6.82%            |
| dennisschroeder  | $377.87    | $116.65     | 30.87%           |
| digdaga          | $144.09    | $105.54     | 73.24%           |
| digital-gypsy    | $315.43    | $233.10     | 73.90%           |
| dirkzett         | $1,663.12  | $147.70     | 8.88%            |
| djohan           | $245.15    | $132.71     | 54.13%           |
| dolphinstudios   | $154.53    | $105.24     | 68.10%           |
| domino           | $1,038.34  | $518.18     | 49.90%           |
| donkeypong       | $16,668.53 | $160.14     | 0.96%            |
| dowha            | $214.06    | $178.68     | 83.47%           |
| dragonslayer109  | $2,479.33  | $195.72     | 7.89%            |
| dragosroua       | $406.20    | $138.84     | 34.18%           |
| dwinblood        | $960.72    | $216.31     | 22.51%           |
| dyuryul          | $1,210.45  | $139.02     | 11.48%           |
| eeks             | $5,593.42  | $4,639.92   | 82.95%           |
| elgeko           | $411.13    | $108.74     | 26.45%           |
| elyaque          | $1,903.48  | $247.92     | 13.02%           |
| eric-boucher     | $583.53    | $291.16     | 49.90%           |
| ericwoelk        | $189.31    | $115.68     | 61.10%           |
| ervin-lemark     | $255.54    | $191.90     | 75.09%           |
| etcmike          | $1,318.88  | $309.53     | 23.47%           |
| evanrvoss        | $625.84    | $613.88     | 98.09%           |
| everittdmickey   | $665.30    | $440.61     | 66.23%           |
| extrospect       | $1,582.02  | $946.87     | 59.85%           |
| exyle            | $4,332.41  | $844.43     | 19.49%           |
| financialcritic  | $270.46    | $160.51     | 59.35%           |
| firepower        | $988.97    | $154.04     | 15.58%           |
| fisch            | $134.47    | $112.09     | 83.36%           |
| flipstar         | $456.92    | $185.86     | 40.68%           |
| fminerten1       | $653.39    | $377.27     | 57.74%           |
| fredinjapan64    | $171.37    | $156.30     | 91.20%           |
| freeyourmind     | $12,928.52 | $392.84     | 3.04%            |
| fubar-bdhr       | $785.32    | $191.09     | 24.33%           |
| full-measure     | $454.74    | $115.31     | 25.36%           |
| funnyman         | $389.29    | $203.63     | 52.31%           |
| fxminer          | $600.98    | $538.41     | 89.59%           |
| fyrstikken       | $18,797.81 | $264.59     | 1.41%            |
| g-no             | $541.33    | $379.85     | 70.17%           |
| gardenofeden     | $873.32    | $136.87     | 15.67%           |
| gavvet           | $22,720.95 | $1,549.61   | 6.82%            |
| germanlifestyle  | $197.42    | $103.33     | 52.34%           |
| gigafart         | $3,715.06  | $328.42     | 8.84%            |
| glitterfart      | $18,844.28 | $536.35     | 2.85%            |
| gogumacat        | $4,622.86  | $201.44     | 4.36%            |
| goldmatters      | $1,472.43  | $418.15     | 28.40%           |
| good-karma       | $23,555.41 | $395.99     | 1.68%            |
| gotoperson       | $6,424.40  | $888.02     | 13.82%           |
| greatpath        | $1,580.24  | $1,573.13   | 99.55%           |
| greenman         | $3,347.51  | $228.10     | 6.81%            |
| greensmile       | $288.33    | $244.21     | 84.70%           |
| gregm            | $814.98    | $136.06     | 16.69%           |
| gringalicious    | $2,016.90  | $370.41     | 18.37%           |
| grognak          | $1,199.59  | $458.73     | 38.24%           |
| halo             | $728.98    | $472.77     | 64.85%           |
| hanshotfirst     | $3,997.95  | $247.79     | 6.20%            |
| hjk96            | $267.27    | $101.11     | 37.83%           |
| homeartpictures  | $719.40    | $327.06     | 45.46%           |
| honna            | $928.00    | $223.98     | 24.14%           |
| hossary          | $405.33    | $172.64     | 42.59%           |
| htooms           | $4,337.70  | $163.43     | 3.77%            |
| hunhani          | $391.53    | $126.66     | 32.35%           |
| immarojas        | $139.71    | $100.26     | 71.76%           |
| inber            | $254.59    | $102.03     | 40.08%           |
| innuendo         | $2,093.35  | $105.72     | 5.05%            |
| inuk             | $946.66    | $352.55     | 37.24%           |
| inventor16       | $3,695.98  | $1,727.06   | 46.73%           |
| itchykitten      | $1,293.85  | $147.16     | 11.37%           |
| its4thekids      | $138.09    | $100.83     | 73.02%           |
| itsmein3d        | $703.76    | $300.77     | 42.74%           |
| jacobcards       | $937.70    | $618.62     | 65.97%           |
| jaki01           | $1,283.83  | $214.91     | 16.74%           |
| janusface        | $233.76    | $134.69     | 57.62%           |
| jejujinfarm      | $4,320.92  | $741.11     | 17.15%           |
| jerrybanfield    | $2,090.10  | $280.67     | 13.43%           |
| jiahn            | $1,136.88  | $134.80     | 11.86%           |
| jimjam1210       | $750.74    | $731.35     | 97.42%           |
| jkkim            | $562.02    | $340.28     | 60.55%           |
| joele            | $1,607.58  | $263.25     | 16.38%           |
| johnsmith        | $1,513.63  | $778.47     | 51.43%           |
| jordanmchale     | $120.46    | $105.00     | 87.16%           |
| jrcornel         | $4,786.54  | $1,437.04   | 30.02%           |
| jrlo             | $180.34    | $133.19     | 73.85%           |
| julianita        | $4,343.21  | $655.08     | 15.08%           |
| juliank          | $655.42    | $199.15     | 30.39%           |
| kaarel           | $248.89    | $153.46     | 61.66%           |
| kafkanarchy84    | $1,019.45  | $232.01     | 22.76%           |
| katythompson     | $215.21    | $128.64     | 59.77%           |
| kaylinart        | $3,768.03  | $727.33     | 19.30%           |
| kb720k           | $3,313.78  | $443.86     | 13.39%           |
| kevinwong        | $8,123.50  | $270.96     | 3.34%            |
| kingscrown       | $19,199.09 | $1,383.92   | 7.21%            |
| kiporen212       | $579.29    | $166.37     | 28.72%           |
| klye             | $903.26    | $107.20     | 11.87%           |
| knircky          | $2,400.38  | $141.04     | 5.88%            |
| knozaki2015      | $2,298.85  | $560.21     | 24.37%           |
| konelectric      | $202.63    | $117.81     | 58.14%           |
| koreaculture     | $161.33    | $143.05     | 88.67%           |
| kurtbeil         | $1,042.53  | $179.64     | 17.23%           |
| kus-knee         | $2,403.98  | $839.13     | 34.91%           |
| lasseehlers      | $347.91    | $229.17     | 65.87%           |
| lastminuteman    | $873.40    | $111.06     | 12.72%           |
| lawrenceho84     | $237.08    | $119.23     | 50.29%           |
| leesol           | $1,457.70  | $100.96     | 6.93%            |
| leesunmoo        | $5,921.92  | $446.03     | 7.53%            |
| levycore         | $1,661.40  | $128.64     | 7.74%            |
| lexiconical      | $1,072.70  | $896.97     | 83.62%           |
| lichtblick       | $1,064.50  | $148.56     | 13.96%           |
| lifewordmission  | $6,706.88  | $410.00     | 6.11%            |
| lighthil         | $2,097.17  | $355.24     | 16.94%           |
| litcoinkid       | $408.27    | $188.96     | 46.28%           |
| ludorum          | $2,293.99  | $242.22     | 10.56%           |
| lukestokes       | $3,176.52  | $227.05     | 7.15%            |
| majes            | $550.87    | $144.60     | 26.25%           |
| mallorcaman      | $415.13    | $165.80     | 39.94%           |
| marco-delsalto   | $1,373.35  | $1,093.06   | 79.59%           |
| margaretwise     | $276.79    | $156.25     | 56.45%           |
| marketingmonk    | $232.98    | $104.59     | 44.89%           |
| markrmorrisjr    | $152.89    | $128.48     | 84.04%           |
| maryfavour       | $266.39    | $182.93     | 68.67%           |
| master-set       | $353.50    | $140.73     | 39.81%           |
| matt-a           | $4,561.67  | $783.13     | 17.17%           |
| me-tarzan        | $1,422.08  | $759.29     | 53.39%           |
| mexbit           | $682.22    | $371.62     | 54.47%           |
| michaellamden68  | $174.33    | $102.13     | 58.58%           |
| mindhunter       | $494.57    | $389.41     | 78.74%           |
| minnowsupport    | $5,391.20  | $141.33     | 2.62%            |
| modprobe         | $2,406.18  | $110.79     | 4.60%            |
| movievertigo     | $1,058.83  | $815.36     | 77.01%           |
| mrwalt           | $924.74    | $794.36     | 85.90%           |
| mynewsteemit     | $1,571.00  | $642.92     | 40.92%           |
| nanzo-scoop      | $11,890.91 | $688.43     | 5.79%            |
| nepd             | $454.86    | $178.61     | 39.27%           |
| netuoso          | $239.24    | $160.27     | 66.99%           |
| nextgen622       | $2,083.89  | $102.11     | 4.90%            |
| noaommerrr       | $1,806.95  | $313.22     | 17.33%           |
| novina           | $2,250.16  | $805.07     | 35.78%           |
| oceancoinz       | $1,385.33  | $672.05     | 48.51%           |
| officialfuzzy    | $19,601.45 | $579.85     | 2.96%            |
| oflyhigh         | $2,634.17  | $433.59     | 16.46%           |
| oldtimer         | $7,323.90  | $1,386.87   | 18.94%           |
| omido98          | $189.11    | $150.81     | 79.75%           |
| omninova         | $236.03    | $192.33     | 81.49%           |
| onceuponatime    | $10,964.62 | $2,016.45   | 18.39%           |
| onealfa          | $1,386.83  | $552.04     | 39.81%           |
| opheliafu        | $1,134.61  | $165.88     | 14.62%           |
| originate        | $235.30    | $162.78     | 69.18%           |
| otisbrown        | $4,532.38  | $723.46     | 15.96%           |
| paco             | $272.78    | $166.76     | 61.13%           |
| pagandance       | $404.79    | $116.64     | 28.82%           |
| pairmike         | $806.95    | $403.37     | 49.99%           |
| pal              | $2,238.40  | $1,653.40   | 73.87%           |
| papa-pepper      | $2,244.31  | $384.11     | 17.11%           |
| penguinpablo     | $1,682.02  | $715.06     | 42.51%           |
| pharesim         | $19,739.10 | $203.30     | 1.03%            |
| prameshtyagi     | $464.25    | $244.32     | 52.63%           |
| predictor2100    | $138.80    | $138.05     | 99.46%           |
| queeneleanor     | $112.54    | $103.13     | 91.64%           |
| r2cornell        | $860.84    | $169.30     | 19.67%           |
| ramengirl        | $1,562.98  | $242.43     | 15.51%           |
| ramta            | $9,030.16  | $3,234.69   | 35.82%           |
| realcodysimon    | $343.59    | $111.26     | 32.38%           |
| redpalestino     | $2,168.42  | $167.29     | 7.71%            |
| riosparada       | $624.23    | $512.21     | 82.05%           |
| rl90             | $550.21    | $435.71     | 79.19%           |
| robert-call      | $1,947.02  | $259.11     | 13.31%           |
| rok-sivante      | $6,047.03  | $391.17     | 6.47%            |
| romangt87        | $740.09    | $106.29     | 14.36%           |
| roomservice      | $354.29    | $101.75     | 28.72%           |
| rossenpavlov     | $426.38    | $135.36     | 31.75%           |
| royalmacro       | $434.74    | $156.84     | 36.08%           |
| runridefly       | $827.92    | $143.32     | 17.31%           |
| salva82          | $547.42    | $363.44     | 66.39%           |
| sandrino         | $2,480.41  | $2,200.11   | 88.70%           |
| sanghkaang       | $5,906.89  | $119.25     | 2.02%            |
| saramiller       | $1,156.07  | $153.63     | 13.29%           |
| sean-king        | $7,032.31  | $1,129.27   | 16.06%           |
| sebastianjago    | $899.06    | $311.78     | 34.68%           |
| sesangsokuro     | $1,012.63  | $113.95     | 11.25%           |
| sigizzang        | $7,705.30  | $4,333.82   | 56.24%           |
| sinnanda2627     | $1,178.32  | $193.58     | 16.43%           |
| skt              | $2,369.83  | $194.39     | 8.20%            |
| slowwalker       | $13,630.01 | $1,738.40   | 12.75%           |
| sneakgeekz       | $559.35    | $240.78     | 43.05%           |
| sochul           | $3,595.48  | $526.35     | 14.64%           |
| soundlegion      | $614.87    | $190.21     | 30.93%           |
| stackin          | $398.57    | $144.19     | 36.18%           |
| steemdoge        | $329.95    | $281.75     | 85.39%           |
| steempower       | $4,555.86  | $217.41     | 4.77%            |
| stefanarud       | $180.54    | $159.48     | 88.33%           |
| stellabelle      | $6,485.92  | $295.80     | 4.56%            |
| stephenkendal    | $1,742.42  | $541.48     | 31.08%           |
| steppingout23    | $298.95    | $114.30     | 38.24%           |
| storcogato       | $320.45    | $312.82     | 97.62%           |
| streetstyle      | $1,486.41  | $193.94     | 13.05%           |
| successtrainer   | $1,037.19  | $121.27     | 11.69%           |
| surfyogi         | $3,666.10  | $2,290.26   | 62.47%           |
| susanne          | $1,555.24  | $409.90     | 26.36%           |
| sweetsssj        | $3,977.05  | $837.30     | 21.05%           |
| swisswatcher     | $365.80    | $198.46     | 54.25%           |
| sykochica        | $554.41    | $132.21     | 23.85%           |
| tamim            | $16,923.26 | $11,974.54  | 70.76%           |
| tard             | $203.50    | $201.82     | 99.17%           |
| tarekadam        | $1,261.23  | $321.86     | 25.52%           |
| teamsteem        | $25,809.87 | $216.68     | 0.84%            |
| thecryptofiend   | $2,844.71  | $217.98     | 7.66%            |
| theprophet0      | $19,653.02 | $429.63     | 2.19%            |
| timsaid          | $13,155.27 | $706.92     | 5.37%            |
| tradeqwik        | $5,882.63  | $104.21     | 1.77%            |
| trafalgar        | $28,932.77 | $1,341.97   | 4.64%            |
| transisto        | $11,227.45 | $996.97     | 8.88%            |
| trevonjb         | $2,604.85  | $576.02     | 22.11%           |
| triplej          | $754.56    | $154.18     | 20.43%           |
| tristanacra      | $236.75    | $186.73     | 78.87%           |
| troglodactyl     | $694.65    | $229.68     | 33.06%           |
| twinner          | $7,252.20  | $105.40     | 1.45%            |
| usammiismi       | $446.81    | $181.62     | 40.65%           |
| v4vapid          | $3,331.57  | $379.04     | 11.38%           |
| vcelier          | $6,754.67  | $196.10     | 2.90%            |
| venti            | $2,235.12  | $326.35     | 14.60%           |
| very             | $775.98    | $197.16     | 25.41%           |
| vimva            | $2,692.29  | $156.23     | 5.80%            |
| virus707         | $1,232.84  | $654.44     | 53.08%           |
| webdeals         | $2,619.52  | $881.48     | 33.65%           |
| whatageek        | $588.78    | $199.03     | 33.80%           |
| wjdtka915        | $626.61    | $117.99     | 18.83%           |
| worldclassplayer | $1,203.53  | $330.72     | 27.48%           |
| xaero1           | $8,656.09  | $102.90     | 1.19%            |
| xpilar           | $808.33    | $123.68     | 15.30%           |
| ydauti           | $284.27    | $184.37     | 64.86%           |
| yetaras          | $389.06    | $119.25     | 30.65%           |
| yoonjang0707     | $2,522.39  | $276.36     | 10.96%           |
| zeartul          | $228.87    | $157.74     | 68.92%           |

---
*Don't forget to follow, resteem and browse [my channel](https://steemit.com/@calamus056) for more information!*

👍 teamsteem, transisto, acidyo, canadian-coconut, kevinwong, demotruk, stellabelle, ausbitbank, pfunk, jaki01, felixxx, enlil, krnel, cyan91, timcliff, davebrewer, riskdebonair, twinner, bue, streetstyle, michelios, solar, kyle.anderson, taskmanager, pharesim, bloom, personz, tribesteemup, barrydutton, denmarkguy, bryan-imhoff, luzcypher, gindor, cryptogee, uwelang, kyriacos, enjoykarma, battleaxe, isaac.rodebush, azurejasper, followbtcnews, ericarthurblair, djohan, arcange, wingz, heroic15397, remlaps, son-of-satire, pipurilla, readmore, benjojo, davidbrogan, clayboyn, deirdyweirdy, msp-lovebot, thepe, aeico, themediumone, whatamidoing, znaffe, hannahlicious, blueperegrina, catherinebleish, akrid, and 141 others
👎 smooth, crypto-investor, illestbambi

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	self-voting-user-list-since-hf19
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics","stats","abuse","social","steem-coop"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://steemitimages.com/DQmVzWbL6ZmmJiT5cwfhVT67MkYt7V6zCm9ZLutmvqTtQQZ/image.png"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@calamus056/extensive-curation-stats-overview-since-hf19-june-20th-2017","https://steemit.com/@calamus056"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
`created`	2017-07-23 20:10:45
`last_update`	2017-07-28 14:40:27
`depth`	0
`children`	404
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 20:10:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	112.300 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	35.142 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	23,015
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,453,767
`net_rshares`	37,960,743,643,617
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (208)

voter	rshares	pct
smooth	-7,445,516,087,795	-20%
enlil	337,234,195,200	10%
pharesim	103,434,065,175	0.2%
boy	5,461,505,901	100%
bue-witness	6,659,384,129	100%
bunny	896,325,664	100%
bue	148,351,353,305	100%
mini	2,919,084,255	100%
moon	371,141,806	100%
benjojo	28,540,336,403	25%
pfunk	678,455,084,545	15%
healthcare	1,087,853,851	100%
daniel.pan	1,721,010,298	100%
helen.tan	348,829,187	100%
ppitonak	13,020,624,412	100%
cyan91	286,095,208,089	100%
cryptogee	61,551,715,588	100%
teamsteem	15,232,726,661,196	100%
acidyo	3,333,682,142,776	20%
kevinwong	2,019,390,500,927	61%
stellabelle	925,729,568,313	100%
wingz	37,841,410,271	100%
aeico	23,463,238,427	100%
stranger27	11,480,898,714	100%
tommyquest	1,892,216,999	100%
ausbitbank	721,577,220,632	6%
gikitiki	5,331,063,899	25%
transisto	11,751,352,663,342	100%
streetstyle	128,904,092,128	11%
arcange	39,714,070,117	20%
demotruk	1,877,855,631,973	100%
azurejasper	45,916,930,830	53%
raphaelle	7,772,805,604	20%
livingfish	0	0%
remlaps	37,090,499,902	100%
alexpmorris	19,308,954,396	20%
craigslist	736,093,682	100%
felixxx	398,739,464,491	100%
twinner	197,080,944,795	5%
timcliff	278,979,249,121	25%
cjclaro	13,524,343,798	20%
veerprit	5,856,424,557	100%
oliverstoney	8,169,573,932	100%
cryptos	5,374,203,876	10%
bryan-imhoff	77,186,486,265	50%
solar	126,015,496,730	100%
kyriacos	51,918,475,978	9%
catherinebleish	19,837,079,119	100%
jeicko19	18,868,251,486	100%
dajohns1420	4,655,204,504	15%
metafzx	924,807,236	100%
alktoni	15,328,104,200	100%
runridefly	11,252,829,717	2%
barrydutton	86,191,696,305	16%
krnel	305,718,194,052	25%
fiserman	1,565,795,705	100%
uwelang	60,157,349,864	10%
davidbrogan	25,447,669,453	100%
jrhughes	4,402,141,288	100%
canadian-coconut	2,975,759,329,771	20%
fraenk	3,853,099,515	20%
titusfrost	17,632,511,380	5%
positivesteem	3,983,991,225	11%
heroic15397	37,459,471,309	50%
inarix03	63,915,749	15%
clayboyn	25,185,303,131	30%
luzcypher	62,425,503,357	100%
cosmo.crator	866,584,985	100%
crowkeep	605,114,554	100%
simonjay	11,040,141,199	10%
son-of-satire	36,832,133,298	100%
bigbear	12,504,763,477	100%
jaki01	618,280,264,009	30%
willybobob	140,150,046	100%
nigelmarkdias	7,667,589,440	10%
friendly	203,159,624	1%
taskmanager	107,481,994,488	100%
enjoykarma	48,263,491,207	100%
libert	519,050,842	100%
dimidrolshina	456,777,193	100%
dragon40	4,363,441,147	15%
personz	92,842,578,196	100%
kyle.anderson	115,631,279,602	100%
fajarsdq	364,856,755	100%
riskdebonair	199,799,259,092	100%
playfulfoodie	3,034,744,004	2%
countzero	2,530,828,280	100%
erikaflynn	3,701,723,312	21.49%
janne	505,398,833	20%
denmarkguy	79,131,514,841	30%
prizeportal	6,940,026,606	100%
fleur	10,633,818,142	100%
normanvortex	54,405,253	100%
crypto-investor	-114,459,324,777	-100%
lyfo	6,622,558,785	100%
battleaxe	48,208,103,600	100%
isaac.rodebush	48,071,049,949	100%
michelios	128,691,155,491	100%
preparedwombat	2,531,685,962	5%
thorheit	14,572,575,796	100%
nuad01	133,014,737	100%
steveitt	8,093,490,743	100%
tonyr	3,221,837,336	100%
airmatti	0	0%
thatgermandude	7,386,798,784	100%
choogirl	17,388,892,235	16%
rocking-dave	1,337,719,162	100%
pipurilla	31,326,088,139	50%
bloom	98,023,806,560	50%
illestbambi	-17,553,072,830	-100%
djohan	40,989,531,579	21%
gindor	61,891,132,815	100%
lugh	953,336,154	100%
deirdyweirdy	24,631,964,223	100%
akrid	19,410,422,476	100%
grider123	1,742,966,429	100%
joviandres	12,253,509,789	100%
whatamidoing	22,472,099,899	100%
drpuffnstuff	8,317,382,139	7%
lucidletters	5,730,797,815	100%
me-do	1,335,737,075	6%
freedomnation	8,701,413,573	100%
stadsmanneke	11,208,421,560	100%
rostirgeo	6,016,440,231	100%
followbtcnews	43,300,695,647	50%
readmore	30,186,888,760	100%
cryptoted	3,581,895,603	100%
brakan	6,799,802,416	100%
justinb43	3,608,819,832	100%
thethreehugs	61,598,125	100%
ericarthurblair	42,808,325,481	100%
austrobot	6,908,239,714	33%
bthompson	2,896,861,873	100%
yournews	4,526,846,954	100%
bmwaso	647,077,310	100%
sevenstars	4,839,700,727	100%
justcallmemyth	7,913,515,489	100%
riteshstark	459,791,600	100%
rycharde	14,512,914,419	50%
thepe	23,632,650,604	100%
the-dagda	9,527,615,604	100%
fairbee	1,334,067,828	100%
bleedpoet	5,371,425,272	100%
sadekj	4,342,061,298	100%
clintjunior	10,920,698,591	100%
agilblade	1,098,110,342	100%
besteulz	1,636,596,622	12%
yamuz0	796,005,766	100%
alphacore	199,379,571	0.1%
serggioc	938,838,021	100%
blackcoffee	801,830,552	100%
davebrewer	221,539,714,434	31%
sylviategan	947,684,325	100%
tantra	102,236,521	100%
hannahlicious	20,779,353,742	100%
nnnhhh	14,407,490,183	100%
stresskiller	6,699,968,775	100%
jbp	3,829,328,366	100%
d-pend	9,802,768,150	5%
pipiczech	1,935,911,741	100%
pisolutionsmru	5,459,386,375	100%
themediumone	22,789,964,532	100%
jmourad	1,164,625,932	100%
orangeogre	3,474,933,040	100%
kranoras	17,350,209,014	20%
solaceworkshop	307,356,186	100%
casanas1	2,656,869,022	100%
mrslauren	15,867,786,657	100%
stonesteem	1,962,249,017	100%
blessedman939	93,745,496	100%
zararina	1,377,850,727	100%
znaffe	22,232,046,142	100%
blueperegrina	20,581,138,159	100%
diddywheldon	1,103,173,556	100%
jerrytsuseer	3,421,850,131	15%
raybilson	4,862,836,692	100%
raviyanda	0	100%
msp-lovebot	24,261,977,599	5%
aifuture	1,048,907,467	100%
kdogdiggles13	562,062,491	100%
strohhirn	1,167,457,574	100%
yahqan	1,371,946,744	100%
whalesharesradio	80,510,117	32%
ameis	5,353,650,622	100%
katsics	1,330,017,830	100%
hanisullah	899,531,171	100%
saiful83	0	100%
degeek	384,952,006	100%
max120	847,779,306	100%
nickwalshblog	290,170,022	100%
weeklystats	1,623,893,322	100%
geneeverett	53,675,691	100%
bluelightbandit	2,707,810,888	100%
kingsteem	1,107,163,978	100%
zufrizal	179,905,123	100%
matrix69	371,415,467	100%
reyhaynes	11,370,771,271	100%
sem89	174,274,370	100%
faustofraser	1,038,799,671	100%
sky77	0	100%
josecaldas	417,839,912	100%
amaliatul	266,953,088	100%
bilqis07	214,723,059	18.91%
tribesteemup	92,490,711,774	100%
arinfinite	992,368,554	100%
hafid	1,096,825,737	97.21%
akubaihaqi	1,032,987,923	100%
katamori	0	100%

@akrid · Jul 23 '17

This is excellent information. Good to know.  Thank you so much!

properties (22)

`author`	akrid
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t235824303z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 23:58:27
`last_update`	2017-07-23 23:58:27
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 23:58:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	64
`author_reputation`	13,705,218,706,244
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,471,053
`net_rshares`	0

@allfabeta · Jul 24 '17

$0.05

I'm personally surprised to see witnesses and very respected users  there

I would agree to see percentage 10-20, that means other 80% have been shared with community...

 but then I saw 40-50-60% for a witness , than means only one thing - this person works for himself here, not for the community. Witness who works here for his own pocket and don't believe in Steemit as a platform should be fired from a witness position.

👍 calamus056

`author`	allfabeta
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t234717045z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 23:47:18
`last_update`	2017-07-24 23:47:18
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 23:47:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.039 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.013 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	425
`author_reputation`	36,177,226,486,370
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,598,900
`net_rshares`	14,814,310,180
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
calamus056	0 B		14,814,310,180	100%

@calamus056 · Jul 25 '17 (edited)

Interesting vision. I'm not sure if most people think the same way though. But you're probably right. In fact, witnesses already make money by being a witness, right?

👍 allfabeta

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-allfabeta-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t003313204z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 00:33:57
`last_update`	2017-07-25 00:34:06
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 00:33:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	166
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,602,478
`net_rshares`	1,886,121,034
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
allfabeta	0 B		1,886,121,034	3.16%

@allfabeta · Jul 25 '17

yes, indeed.
 and if they also have eaten our reward pool that means they  should cut their.... appetite .... somehow :)

properties (22)

`author`	allfabeta
`permlink`	re-calamus056-re-allfabeta-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t013221227z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 01:32:21
`last_update`	2017-07-25 01:32:21
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 01:32:21
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	120
`author_reputation`	36,177,226,486,370
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,607,146
`net_rshares`	0

@arcange · Jul 24 '17

Congratulations @calamus056!
Your post was mentioned in the [hit parade](https://steemit.com/hit-parade/@arcange/daily-hit-parade-20170723) in the following category:

* Comments - Ranked 5 with 183 comments

properties (22)

`author`	arcange
`permlink`	re-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t163709000z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	""
`created`	2017-07-24 14:36:06
`last_update`	2017-07-24 14:36:06
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 14:36:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	208
`author_reputation`	1,146,608,504,363,120
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,543,765
`net_rshares`	0

@artakan · Jul 25 '17

$0.26

Experiment

👍 artakan

`author`	artakan
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t183137443z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 18:31:36
`last_update`	2017-07-25 18:31:36
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 18:31:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.263 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	10
`author_reputation`	2,351,335,125,519
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,699,909
`net_rshares`	72,988,447,618
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
artakan	0 B		72,988,447,618	100%

@calamus056 · Jul 25 '17

Did it succeed? :)

properties (22)

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-artakan-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t185050035z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 18:51:33
`last_update`	2017-07-25 18:51:33
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 18:51:33
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	18
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,701,805
`net_rshares`	0

@ausbitbank · Jul 25 '17

$0.02

Those stats for me ignore that with the stories I self-voted on it was usually only 25% power and I donate the proceeds elsewhere anyway. I'm mostly rejecting payments these days, and haven't self voted those posts at all..

👍 stresskiller, globocop

`author`	ausbitbank
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t135423043z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 13:54:24
`last_update`	2017-07-25 13:54:24
`depth`	1
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 13:54:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.020 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.004 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	223
`author_reputation`	287,009,709,424,827
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,669,401
`net_rshares`	7,552,715,586
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
globocop	0 B		1,144,049,802	20%
stresskiller	0 B		6,408,665,784	100%

@calamus056 · Jul 25 '17

$0.63

Dude, it's only 0.67% :)

You're an example for everyone. Keep it up!

👍 canadian-coconut, stresskiller

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-ausbitbank-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t145041353z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 14:51:24
`last_update`	2017-07-25 14:51:24
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 14:51:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.472 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.154 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	69
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,676,217
`net_rshares`	171,874,280,045
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
canadian-coconut	0 B		165,319,962,765	1%
stresskiller	0 B		6,554,317,280	100%

@command-center · Jul 28 '17

"I donate all my self votes away." LOL  Scamming shithead.

👍 followbtcnews, leu, command, children, tox, bey, cud, rue, hod, jig, lye, pew, yip, tog, mow, pes, yew, vum, rye, wey, evilbot, zag, esh, wig, wid, svo, haw, ssd, ref, wag, keg, rid, dew, soh, lah, inn, olf, pad, mug, yam, jug, qua, hid, oar, wok, ply, pun, ohm, paw, neu, sow, tup, tow, hat, ish, hic, yay, nay, oft, gad, pec, waw, omy, sac, and 9 others
👎 ausbitbank

`author`	command-center
`permlink`	re-ausbitbank-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170728t043013348z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-28 04:30:18
`last_update`	2017-07-28 04:30:18
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-08-04 04:30:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	58
`author_reputation`	-854,438,250,259
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,981,762
`net_rshares`	-8,365,203,389,951
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (74)

voter	rshares	pct
ausbitbank	-8,519,677,983,719	-100%
tox	1,906,458,634	100%
rag	901,332,629	100%
mug	1,529,057,066	100%
yam	1,528,923,150	100%
jug	1,528,747,486	100%
qua	1,528,329,208	100%
rue	1,590,731,449	100%
dye	916,871,538	100%
lob	1,372,975,788	100%
leg	1,372,905,690	100%
hid	1,525,131,609	100%
oar	1,525,043,326	100%
mow	1,587,408,619	100%
rid	1,551,616,975	100%
dew	1,551,376,038	100%
mop	914,659,350	100%
rot	1,371,660,657	100%
wok	1,524,018,972	100%
ply	1,523,971,562	100%
pun	1,523,897,972	100%
ohm	1,523,831,135	100%
paw	1,523,710,965	100%
wag	1,559,335,597	100%
neu	1,523,644,572	100%
sow	1,523,595,864	100%
tup	1,523,484,191	100%
tow	1,523,259,664	100%
hat	1,523,229,638	100%
ish	1,523,177,939	100%
hic	1,523,049,820	100%
yay	1,523,022,046	100%
nay	1,522,968,271	100%
keg	1,558,138,616	100%
soh	1,548,937,604	100%
lah	1,548,832,351	100%
yob	923,947,266	100%
inn	1,548,711,265	100%
olf	1,548,574,703	100%
omy	1,393,662,112	100%
pad	1,548,462,079	100%
sac	1,393,398,194	100%
pes	1,583,708,342	100%
yew	1,583,624,003	100%
vum	1,583,463,024	100%
rye	1,583,412,924	100%
wey	1,583,306,718	100%
gad	1,424,808,804	100%
wig	1,574,177,478	100%
leu	2,080,923,679	100%
wid	1,573,865,782	100%
svo	1,573,815,958	100%
lav	944,261,520	100%
haw	1,573,719,669	100%
children	1,946,694,088	100%
ssd	1,573,566,939	100%
ref	1,564,324,119	100%
bey	1,590,783,751	100%
cud	1,590,736,606	100%
hod	1,590,686,840	100%
jig	1,590,568,758	100%
lye	1,590,516,282	100%
oft	1,431,419,856	100%
pew	1,590,421,170	100%
yip	1,589,866,347	100%
tog	1,589,756,385	100%
evilbot	1,576,534,336	100%
pta	945,861,388	100%
zag	1,576,375,152	100%
esh	1,575,647,872	100%
pec	1,418,003,162	100%
waw	1,417,951,856	100%
command	2,060,218,437	100%
followbtcnews	45,897,480,913	50%

@ausbitbank · Jul 28 '17

fuck off nog

properties (22)

`author`	ausbitbank
`permlink`	re-command-center-re-ausbitbank-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170728t043925507z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-28 04:39:27
`last_update`	2017-07-28 04:39:27
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-08-04 04:39:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	12
`author_reputation`	287,009,709,424,827
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,982,405
`net_rshares`	0

@barrydutton · Jul 24 '17

I am finding this all very interesting and also disheartening at times for the long term benefit of the platform and the masses.  

I was messaging people today on an account draining $200 /  day some days, on ~ 15 posts/day simply posting everyone else's content and YT videos, not even adding any wording hardly to the post..... and never replying to comments.  

10 -15 posts every single day for weeks and weeks, at over $10 and $15/post and the person has about 50k Steem Power also.  

So for most people wanting to challenge them, they risk getting flagged by big accounts like this and they have nearly 3k followers also.

I decided to post twice on their page today about it.... you can check my comments tab from a few hours ago.

properties (22)

`author`	barrydutton
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t002418924z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 00:24:18
`last_update`	2017-07-24 00:24:18
`depth`	1
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 00:24:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	739
`author_reputation`	333,942,309,404,197
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,472,817
`net_rshares`	0

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

$2.05

I'm not scared of them. All i want is justice and won't refrain from making my opinion public. I've already got another unfollow (obviously from a user that self-voted almost 100% of the time) ;)

👍 barrydutton

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-barrydutton-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t003147702z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 00:32:27
`last_update`	2017-07-24 02:53:09
`depth`	2
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 00:32:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	1.535 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.510 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	195
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,473,299
`net_rshares`	532,821,395,343
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
barrydutton	0 B		532,821,395,343	100%

@barrydutton · Jul 24 '17

Oh I understand believe me as someone who has questioned things on here and lost support because I am not part of the 1% in most ways. In some categories, I am - but not in my heart or daily approach as some of the 1%'ism in life goes hahaha!! (:

I was giving thought to this, since I do NOT self vote as much as some of this would appear, so here is some perspective:

----

1/ I saw my name on there too and I am now questioning the bots or how that stat is actually calculated because I spend so much time voting for others, there is NO WAY ( I do not think ) --- that 41% of my SBD is coming from self votes, I don't know how else to say it and wonder how flawed that calculation can be honestly.

**NOT an attack, just an honest question, if you have the time to provide the bots or math or program doing this etc, because I have tried to challenge some of the practices here, draining from mass adoption and help here, and nobody questions that**

2/ I had a shower and thought more about this. I UV my comments at times at low power to pin stuff to the top of my replies so people read them, ie my #SteemitCampfire stuff, where I post food or drinks for everyone in the post to get it started LOL.

Medium power if I really want to be heard in a post.

**The kicker is that some people are not UV their own posts upon publishing them since that change took place and I do 5 posts a day on my page meaning that is about 150 posts of my own content a month, at around $3 or 4/vote. That is the bulk of this by far.... and I publish more content and engage more people daily than a lot (most?) people. And I work hard doing that, to help people, and build community..... not take from it.....**

**It just makes me look bad, and does not distinguish such basal factors.**

----

I think as long as the math is right, etc etc --- what you are providing is valuable, for sure.

Should I UV this post to the top of the comments now?

LOL!!

- Have a nice week Calamus and everyone else. Always try to remain balanced in all things, perspectives included.

properties (22)

`author`	barrydutton
`permlink`	re-calamus056-re-barrydutton-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t014231546z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemitcampfire","statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 01:42:30
`last_update`	2017-07-24 01:42:30
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 01:42:30
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	2,067
`author_reputation`	333,942,309,404,197
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,477,925
`net_rshares`	0

1 reply

@biophil · Jul 25 '17

I like lists. I even like lists of shame. But what we can't tell here is which of these upvotes are good and which are bad. Some self-votes will be obviously bad; such as those where the person posts ten nested comments with the text "spam" and upvotes all of them. Others will be votes on content that was generated with effort and in good faith.

So I question whether lists like these are really valuable unless you have some reasonably accurate way to tell the difference automatically. 

**I'd be very interested in working with you to create an algorithm that attempts to catch out spammy upvotes!**

properties (22)

`author`	biophil
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t195911360z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 19:59:12
`last_update`	2017-07-25 19:59:12
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 19:59:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	605
`author_reputation`	45,223,914,794,461
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,707,670
`net_rshares`	0

@calamus056 · Jul 25 '17

The selfish top 10 is almost guaranteed to be exclusively abusers. You can contact me on steemit.chat or discord to run over some queries together if you want.

properties (22)

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-biophil-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t200401379z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 20:04:45
`last_update`	2017-07-25 20:04:45
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 20:04:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	159
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,708,190
`net_rshares`	0

@bitcoinflood · Jul 28 '17

$0.11

Its one of those things that needs to just be removed I believe you should be able to upvote your own post if you wish to but not comments you make. Its gotten to the point where you feel like you have to upvote yourself non stop otherwise your falling further and further behind and a few top earners are hording all the money.

👍 the-ego-is-you, calamus056

`author`	bitcoinflood
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170728t010756776z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-28 01:07:54
`last_update`	2017-07-28 01:07:54
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-08-04 01:07:54
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.086 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.027 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	328
`author_reputation`	1,645,024,977,979,240
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,968,491
`net_rshares`	31,662,357,910
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
calamus056	0 B		14,620,196,002	100%
the-ego-is-you	0 B		17,042,161,908	100%

@calamus056 · Jul 28 '17 (edited)

If too many people are starting to think like this, then it's going to be really problematic indeed. Let's hope you're the exception.

Luckily a lot of people have been discussing it for weeks and are working on solutions.

properties (22)

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-bitcoinflood-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170728t023514676z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-28 02:36:03
`last_update`	2017-07-28 02:37:06
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-08-04 02:36:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	222
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,974,340
`net_rshares`	0

@bitcoinflood · Jul 28 '17

$0.12

I think like that and I know a large majority of people on here do new and old timers. But still I keep my self voting to a minimum and always upvote things I enjoy and comments I like as well.

👍 the-ego-is-you, calamus056

`author`	bitcoinflood
`permlink`	re-calamus056-re-bitcoinflood-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170728t025932911z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-28 02:59:33
`last_update`	2017-07-28 02:59:33
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-08-04 02:59:33
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.090 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.027 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	193
`author_reputation`	1,645,024,977,979,240
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,975,861
`net_rshares`	32,294,976,135
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
calamus056	0 B		14,931,264,002	100%
the-ego-is-you	0 B		17,363,712,133	100%

@blackamine · Jul 23 '17

So is upvoting yourself selfish?

properties (22)

`author`	blackamine
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t223838517z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 22:36:48
`last_update`	2017-07-23 22:36:48
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 22:36:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	32
`author_reputation`	1,113,050,652,254
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,465,397
`net_rshares`	0

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

No not at all, the word "self" isn't at all in the word "yourself" :p

properties (22)

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-blackamine-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t002208186z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 00:22:48
`last_update`	2017-07-24 00:22:48
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 00:22:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	69
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,472,722
`net_rshares`	0

@bluelightbandit · Jul 24 '17

I still don't understand whats wrong and what's right. I stopped upvoting my own posts because of all the hype and I don't want to be blackballed. I'm still just a nobody so I don't think it really matters. Although, I have promoted my own post as soon as I post it, if I think it will be popular lol. I wonder if that is frowned upon also?

properties (22)

`author`	bluelightbandit
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t012546549z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 01:25:48
`last_update`	2017-07-24 01:25:48
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 01:25:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	340
`author_reputation`	11,549,505,209,427
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,476,747
`net_rshares`	0

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

If you mean upvoting your own posts, that's generally accepted when it's not too much spam. On comments people are starting to be against it more and more (unless it's once in a while, then it's fine).

properties (22)

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-bluelightbandit-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t022250183z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 02:23:30
`last_update`	2017-07-24 04:05:00
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 02:23:30
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	201
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,481,067
`net_rshares`	0

@bluelightbandit · Jul 24 '17

Cool, I don't think I have ever upvoted my own comment but I have upvoted my blogs, well some of them. Thanks for commenting!

properties (22)

`author`	bluelightbandit
`permlink`	re-calamus056-re-bluelightbandit-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t024323436z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 02:43:24
`last_update`	2017-07-24 02:43:24
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 02:43:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	125
`author_reputation`	11,549,505,209,427
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,482,563
`net_rshares`	0

@clintjunior · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

$0.05

It's disgusting! I NEVER upvote my own comments.......

👍 clintjunior, dobsdies

`author`	clintjunior
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t201709663z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 20:17:12
`last_update`	2017-07-23 20:18:00
`depth`	1
`children`	11
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 20:17:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.051 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	54
`author_reputation`	2,058,050,404,764
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,454,274
`net_rshares`	13,264,048,956
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
clintjunior	0 B		11,128,053,627	100%
dobsdies	0 B		2,135,995,329	100%

@brianjuice · Jul 23 '17

😂

properties (22)

`author`	brianjuice
`permlink`	re-clintjunior-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t201942018z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 20:19:42
`last_update`	2017-07-23 20:19:42
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 20:19:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	1
`author_reputation`	642,950,894,905
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,454,462
`net_rshares`	0

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

@clintjunior I like your trolling, but it's a serious problem when too many people (especially big players) do it.

properties (22)

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-clintjunior-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t220824249z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"users":["clintjunior"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 22:09:03
`last_update`	2017-07-23 22:09:18
`depth`	2
`children`	5
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 22:09:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	114
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,463,413
`net_rshares`	0

@clintjunior · Jul 23 '17

I know, and I completely agree. One day I saw a guy upvote his own comments in a discussion and every upvote was worth $95, and for the original poster who he was talking to - he was only upvoting him $5. I found it obscene! I actually think something must be done.

properties (22)

`author`	clintjunior
`permlink`	re-calamus056-re-clintjunior-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t221650499z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 22:16:54
`last_update`	2017-07-23 22:16:54
`depth`	3
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 22:16:54
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	265
`author_reputation`	2,058,050,404,764
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,464,026
`net_rshares`	0

4 replies

@dobsdies · Jul 23 '17

Best comment here. I would have been more upset if you didn't upvote yourself on this.

👍 dobsdies

`author`	dobsdies
`permlink`	re-clintjunior-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t220322263z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 22:03:21
`last_update`	2017-07-23 22:03:21
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 22:03:21
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	86
`author_reputation`	53,333,659,241
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,462,946
`net_rshares`	2,064,026,866
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
dobsdies	0 B		2,064,026,866	100%

@geneeverett · Jul 23 '17

Why when I post is my vote always on my posts ? I never do it manually but it's automatic. I'm new here just noticed this and Linda confused

properties (22)

`author`	geneeverett
`permlink`	re-clintjunior-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t203613455z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 20:36:12
`last_update`	2017-07-23 20:36:12
`depth`	2
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 20:36:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	140
`author_reputation`	548,349,288,385,840
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,455,766
`net_rshares`	0

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17

Go to "Submit a Story" and there's a checkbox "Upvote post" under the rewards combo box.

👍 d-pend

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-geneeverett-re-clintjunior-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t205612630z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 20:56:48
`last_update`	2017-07-23 20:56:48
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 20:56:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	88
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,457,509
`net_rshares`	2,178,392,922
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
d-pend	0 B		2,178,392,922	1%

@clintjunior · Jul 23 '17

$0.02

When you publish a post there is a box you can tick or untick. Tell Linda not to be so confused.

👍 staticinstance

`author`	clintjunior
`permlink`	re-geneeverett-re-clintjunior-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t210236526z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 21:02:39
`last_update`	2017-07-23 21:02:39
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 21:02:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.015 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.005 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	96
`author_reputation`	2,058,050,404,764
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,457,999
`net_rshares`	5,597,552,128
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
staticinstance	0 B		5,597,552,128	1%

@crypto-investor · Jul 26 '17

$0.48

I upvote myself and I have no problem with it.

Why should we kowtow to a warped sense of fictional internet morality?  I don't follow made-up moral codes of people who do not even have a concept of moral.

Now that I saw this post, and you guys shaming people who upvote themselves, I am going to double-down my upvoting myself.  I will be upvoting my comments, I will be upvoting my posts.  I really wasn't too concerned about it lately, but I will start again.  I want to be on your shaming lists, where you try to ruin the STEEM community with your divisiveness.

👍 crypto-investor

`author`	crypto-investor
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170726t025207122z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-26 02:52:09
`last_update`	2017-07-26 02:52:09
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-08-02 02:52:09
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.476 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	566
`author_reputation`	10,516,819,283,024
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,742,791
`net_rshares`	132,068,451,666
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
crypto-investor	0 B		132,068,451,666	100%

@calamus056 · Jul 26 '17 (edited)

It's already divided. You are in the pro self-vote group and can't even join the discussion without going all defensive and irrational. That way it will stay divided. 

Self-voting contributes nothing to the platform, in fact it only takes away from the platform. That's irrefutable. If you're not satisfied with 1.4% interest on your SP and curation rewards of 10-20% ROI per year and you also have to take some more from the reward pool, then you're just greedy. Simple as that. I don't blame you, but at least admit it. I have been greedy many times before, but it leads to nothing but problems. 

People need to understand that self-voting is only hurting themselves in the long run. 10-20% ROI per year is already hard to overcome and get the STEEM price steady or even rising, let alone when people take away 100%+ ROI per year with self-votes.

P.S.: This rant isn't necessarily addressed to you personally, because you only self-voted ~17% which is reasonable.

properties (22)

`author`	calamus056
`permlink`	re-crypto-investor-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170726t035757278z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-26 03:58:42
`last_update`	2017-07-26 04:43:24
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-08-02 03:58:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	968
`author_reputation`	5,645,464,390,253
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,748,612
`net_rshares`	0

@jaki01 · Jul 26 '17 (edited)

$3.05

<blockquote>
Why should we kowtow to a warped sense of fictional internet morality?
</blockquote>
<p>
Who says it was about moral? It is obvious that people will do what the system allows, so the system is to blame and not the people. Why to 'blame'? Because in my opinion the platform (and the value of Steem) won't benefit from excessive self-voting in the long run.
HF 19 makes self-voting more beneficial which in my eyes doesn't contribute to a positive development of Steemit. People simply can write ten low quality articles every day now and upvote them themselves. There will be less motivation to write high quality articles and animate other members to upvote them and to communicate with each other. It will be kind of a dead platform which is less attractive for new users and potential investors.

</p>

👍 davidorcamuriel, kobold-djawa

properties (23)vote details (2)

@daudimitch · Jul 23 '17

Most ridiculous post I have come across, some of the folks are actively upvoting other accounts... they made the investment, they deserve to earn the reward... folks need to stop looking at what others are earning...

👍 katsics, eternalsunshine, varian.wyrnn

properties (23)vote details (3)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

$0.11

Buying SP and then self-voting isn't investing, it's just draining funds from the reward pool that could (should?) be used to reward authors, otherwise STEEM isn't worth anything. Voting on others earns you curation rewards without any negative effects to the platform. The less you vote on others, the more you're hurting your own investment.

This isn't about what people are earning, it's about the way they're "earning" it.

👍 denmarkguy, metafzx

properties (23)vote details (2)

@daudimitch · Jul 23 '17

Post like these create bad blood, the data is tilted in a negative light, some of these folks also bring a lot of quality content on a daily basis, I am pretty sure you upvote your post as well, they made their investment in SP, don't make post in bad blood like that

👍 varian.wyrnn

properties (23)vote details (1)

2 replies

@daudimitch · Jul 23 '17

$0.09

What's wrong with rewarding yourself, I would certainly love to upvote myself 10 if I had the steem power but I don't, so it's 1 or 2 cents, if they value their post at 20 dollars and upvote it, then what's wrong with that. I can tell you I have certainly benefited from the upvotes of quite a few folks on the list, and many others. It's not a spread across the ground wealth thing here, part of your earning depends on your investment. You don't know what folks sacrifice to reach at their SP level, don't trump the "reward pool" card.

👍 barrydutton

properties (23)vote details (1)

9 replies

@smooth · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

$1.43

> Buying SP and then self-voting isn't investing, it's just draining funds from the reward pool

No it isn't. The reward pool is fixed in terms of STEEM but not in terms of _value_ (dollars, etc.). STEEM only gets its _value_ from people buying it or holding it. Without people buying it, you can earn all the STEEM you want from the reward pool, but they will be worthless.

Someone who buys SP and then selfvotes is not 'draining' anything and at best can get back a portion of what was put in. It causes no harm at all.

Investors are the ones who underwrite _all_ of the rewards on this platform. If you are not an investor, or are only a smaller investor, you need to focus your efforts on creating inspiring content that makes investors _want to give their money to you_. Whatever _else_ they do or don't do with _their money_ (including self-voting) is not your concern and does not harm you in any way. Nevertheless, you do have a downvote that you can use to disagree with what you think are underserved rewards. I suggest using it.

👍 smooth, randomwhale

properties (23)vote details (2)

4 replies

@stellabelle · Jul 23 '17

$2.91

extreme selfish behaviour will indeed ruin this platform. Those that have like 98% of the rewards going to themselves is exactly the kind of thing that could make this place irrelevant. Looking at this info actually helps me understand human behavior better. I think @teamsteem is a great example of how one does not need to self-vote, even though he could. I guess I still have a ways to go.

👍 transisto, gmuxx, tommyquest

properties (23)vote details (3)

9 replies

@varian.wyrnn · Jul 24 '17

You concisely said what I have been preaching. Word up.

👍 daudimitch

properties (23)vote details (1)

@daudimitch · Jul 24 '17

Some of these folks, hate what they are not getting... for me, I am happy to see folks earning and expressing themselves, we finally have something that shares the pie... I am more focus on trying to get followers that would actively vote on my content and get the level of making a decent earning... I hope he see's both side, the platform code always finds a balance

properties (22)

@davebrewer · Jul 23 '17

$8.66

If you don't think your own post is worthy of an upvote, you probably need to put more time and effort into producing a post you would be proud to upvote.  I don't have an issue with anyone upvoting their own content, it they believe it is worth an upvote.  

Same for comments to posts.  If you believe your comments are worth an upvote, then that is your belief and you can vote as you believe is best.

It looks bad in my opinion if more than 99% of your upvotes are for yourself, and you spend less than 1% on the community.  That looks like greediness.

Best solution is probably the path you are already taking.  

Publish a list of the greedy every week or month.  Those folks are then free to change their behavior or not  change their behavior as they desire.

With knowledge of who is behaving greedily, the community will have the information it needs to decide if it wants  to ostracize or celebrate the greedy.

And that is all we need for a solution.  

A decentralized solution based on information.  Simple.

We won't need long extended debates or discussion, on different opinions of right and wrong in this case.

Just make the information visible on measured results for "greediness behavior", and the community can decide what it wants to do collectively, by each person using their own best judgement on how to handle.

STEEM On!!

DaveB

👍 eeks, smooth, alexandra-renee, gamer00, streetstyle, pharesim, thedamus, cryptogee, janusface, enjoykarma, benjojo, ronni, znaffe, ppitonak, futuristgear, acis, calamus056, remlaps, igster, sunsurfsoul, d-pend, surprisebit, deveerei, bluethread, pcste, yournews, manonlescaut, sacred-agent, yunkzilla, orangeogre, whatsup, mehdibca, preparedwombat, tommyquest, me-do, j3dy, seablue, katsics, pathtosuccess, henryjmah, faustofraser, metafzx, cosmo.crator, the1pwcj, zufrizal, blessedman939, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (47)

@acis · Jul 24 '17

$1.73

I can understand for the newbies who churn out articles to be paid less than $1. I've pumped over 1k steem into powering up, I'm far from breaking even. 

But the amounts on that list.. some were crazy.. I wonder what they get from other users as well

👍 alexandra-renee, cryptogee, acis, blessedman939

properties (23)vote details (4)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

You can use https://steemwhales.com to see what authors earned.

properties (22)

@barrydutton · Jul 24 '17

$0.39

Good stuff my man, I replied in this thread in a LOT more detail before I saw this reply of yours LOL

--

Keep in mind some of us write 150 blogs a  month on here for content and those are all upvoted, I went into that on here too.

Perspective is important along with the engagement we try and create in the community.

👍 davebrewer

properties (23)vote details (1)

@clintjunior · Jul 23 '17

$0.30

Nice comment Dave, give yourself a pat on the back... And an upvote.

👍 davebrewer, deirdyweirdy, zufrizal, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (4)

@davebrewer · Jul 23 '17

Thanks for comment.  Back has been patted.

STEEM On!!

👍 zufrizal, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (2)

3 replies

@enjoykarma · Jul 23 '17

..i m still new, but...sounds to me as the right answer!..even if at last it isn't clear to me how to think about upvoting one self...but to make info visible and let decide the community (or the base?) seems right..thank you..follow you..

👍 zufrizal, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (2)

@inquiringtimes · Jul 25 '17

$0.40

an interesting list to add would be a list of the most generous whales......

👍 davebrewer, inquiringtimes

properties (23)vote details (2)

@davebrewer · Jul 25 '17

$3.73

I like your thought process.  

You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, etc.

Keep steemit positive by focusing on positive reinforcements

STEEM On !!

DaveB

👍 davebrewer, inquiringtimes

properties (23)vote details (2)

1 reply

@jacksonoskele · Jul 24 '17

We have a saying in our country, it says if you dont like the meat above your teeth then that is where you always teste. If you dont like what you create who is going to like it for you, though if your creativity worth voting definitely you will get people voting for you. And if voting for yourself is a bad thing in steemit then it should be allow. Everyone is entitle to his or her opinion anyway. Voting for only yourself is not a good thing for the steemit community buh voting for what you have create is not bad at all.

properties (22)

@kyle.anderson · Jul 24 '17

$3.07

Seems like you enjoyed the message in my post on self-votes. ([Subjective Proof of Work: some rational comments on the self-voting trend](https://steemit.com/steem/@kyle.anderson/subjective-proof-of-work-some-rational-comments-on-the-self-voting-trend))

Putting your money where your mouth is. 

The best thing is **information** and thanks to @calamus056 for sharding the data. This is what allows people to make the decisions they need. 

You can't stop self voting. Vests should be fungible.

👍 eeks, kyle.anderson, kalestew, laurieanderson

properties (23)vote details (4)

@rycharde · Jul 25 '17

$0.09

Correct, and I have said this many time, one cannot stop self-voting (or if self-voting is not allowed then sock-puppet-voting) *but* the [rules can be changed so that it has less effect](https://steemit.com/steemit/@rycharde/proposal-for-new-rules-regarding-self-votes-and-voting-rings) on the whole ecosystem - and still allowing the investor-self-voter to earn a very good income over a year.

👍 the-ego-is-you, kyle.anderson, inquiringtimes

properties (23)vote details (3)

2 replies

@manonlescaut · Jul 26 '17 (edited)

$0.17

Upvote, first of all for starting the conversation. But I don't only vote because I think my post is worth it. The only thing that matters is that I can make more money.  There are expectations of course but the general is not like that, and this is allright. You have to take care of it by financial incentives or obstacles. Voting for yourself, this is ridiculous. But as long as it is possible, I will do that, exactely like most of the others.

👍 davebrewer

properties (23)vote details (1)

@oudekaas · Aug 22 '17

Hi Dave,

I struggle to agree on this one.
How is self voting justified?
It's like tipping yourself for doing a good job? Obviously people like their own posts why would you otherwise write them?
People are naturally taking the path of least resistence and just like I do, why wouldn't I upvote my own post of nobody else likes it.
How many stare at their blogs and notice that some posts you put a lot of time on didn't get any rewards.
Ah well I know a way just upvote myself, that is fair enough I earned it.
I do this and it feels wrong because you know Steemit loses a huge amount of rewards going to the wrong content makers. That reward money should end up at those who actually make good content and you can't possibly properly judge how much your own content is worth,
The top whales can earn thousands and thousands upvoting themselves. The curation by that simple reason is flawed.

Curating should be objective. I understand why people like selfvoting because the way the system now works, the more SP one holds the more selfindulging can take place.
The fact is, if people don't have an incentive to comment because they can simply upvote themselves they will, how is Steemit served by this?

If I go in the simulator doing a check flight and I think I did a good job am I going to sign myself off and reward me my flying license back?
Does a painter buy his own painting?

I don't know what the figure is of the amount of steemers selfvoting but I can only imagine that the numbers are massive.

Steemit would be so much greater if the curation worked more efficient.

Counterarguments are, well if we can't upvote ourselves why hold steem power we will lose a lot of investors.
I think this is the very reason why we need to get rid of it, as a lot of people (I don't blame them)are holding SP for the wrong reasons since the system allows it.

Counterarguments are:
1) i invested because of being able to selfvote (this is a terrible argument as it doesn't serve the bigger picture)
Steemit attracts most people due to earning without holding steem power. I personally think Steemit it will only grow majestically if the mainstream finds out you can really make proper money on making good content,
Right now it is pennies because the reward system is aimed at the higher levels and those who upvote themselves into richness. With the excuse that one should be able to like their own content and therefor pay yourself a nice amount as well.
By reading that alone the system is failed. No economic system works like that except a dictatorship perhaps.
2) people will start other accounts o upvot themselves. This again is no argument, at least we should try to minimize damages, by changing the fact that selfvoting is stupid and has to be disabled.
If people then think that they can open up other accounts to upvote this way, this should be classed as fraud and should be stopped. I am not sure why people say this can't be stopped. But surely collusion has to be stopped.
How else are you going to stop multiaccounting leaching thousands if not millions of dollars out of the system in the future.
I think it is very naive to think the system will police itself.

3)I can't think of any other arguments that seem reasonable.

Maybe I am wrong, maybe people don' t selfvote that much, I don't have the figures.
But by the simple fact that I know I am not greedy, I have still been upvoting a lot never really thinking there is any justification to it apart from a well I guess I must have earned it. I think that is b*ll*cks. Because if I am doing it, I am pretty sure all 300k users are doing it.

Anyway I shall make it a mission to find out how much of the rewards end up in the selfvotes.

properties (22)

@pathtosuccess · Jul 26 '17

$0.17

looks like this guy has found a way to make coin on the site. Let's declare a hot issue and then publish lists of people who match the issue instead of writing useful content. As new as I am, I get that hypocrisy of that.

👍 davebrewer

properties (23)vote details (1)

@smooth · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

$20.95

> If you don't think your own post is worthy of an upvote, you probably need to put more time and effort into producing a post you would be proud to upvote

100% this, and also if you think someone else's content is trash and doesn't deserve rewarded the rewards it is getting, that's why we have downvotes.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with self-upvoting, if the content is good. One of the reason to buy SP is so you can boost your own content by voting for it. If others agree, great. If they don't then they should downvote it and your votes (and money spent buying SP to support those votes) will have been wasted. 

It doesn't even matter if someone _only_ upvotes themself, _if their content is good_. Maybe some people are mostly content creators and don't spend a lot of time reviewing/reading/curating other content. There's nothing at all wrong with that.

There is absolutely nothing that can be done against true abusive "self" upvoting (other than downvoting it to take away the profit), because malicious abusers will just move their SP into other accounts and hide what is going on.

The idea of creating 'lists of shame' and demonizing people is divisive, creates a hostile and toxic environment attractive to no one, and serves no useful purpose. There is no way to tell from these lists whether the content is deserving of the rewards or not. The only way to tell is by actually looking at the content, and if you think it is undeserving, downvote it.

👍 fulltimegeek, chitty, gtg, eeks, surfermarly, smooth, shaka, gamer00, taskmanager, cryptogee, bycz, kyriacos, jrcornel, superskillz, oliverstoney, playfulfoodie, sunsurfsoul, matthewtiii, prizeportal, remlaps, naquoya, whatsup, j3dy, molometer, randomwhale, cosmo.crator, smasher, blessedman939, voltash, michaeldavid, marcusorlyius

properties (23)vote details (31)

@akrid · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

$0.25

I couldn't understand the reason why you flagged this post until the very last paragraph on your comment.  I now understand your concern when it come's to 'lists of shame', however I found this information to be very useful.
My curiosity gets the better of me sometimes, it's one of the reasons I really enjoyed this post.
Do you think that steemcleaners report is another example of a 'wall of shame'?
If so, do you think it should be flagged as well?
Would obfuscating the name with a generic link like steemcleaners does make it worth removing your flag?

👍 cryptogee, mrwilson

properties (23)vote details (2)

8 replies

@benjojo · Jul 28 '17

He didn't create a list of shame, he created a list.  Clearly self voters don't feel any shame ;)  Also, just how fabulous does your comment need to be for a self-upvote of $10 or more?  There is evidence of gross abuse of the reward pool in this list.....in my opinion.  It goes against the spirit of the intention behind the system.  Showing this information has the potential to change people's behaviour and approach whilst informing the discussion with solid data.  It is an issue worth discussing and wrestling with.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

@smooth If hypothetically i would remove the user names, would you undo your flag (or at least be fine with the content)? (I don't care about the money, it's about the principal and i don't like to see people unhappy)

I just want the data to be published so people can come to any conclusion they want or do further research and expand on it. In the end we should all work together to make this platform come as close to it's full potential as possible. No need to further divide indeed, let's just objectively look at the data and determine what elements of the platform can be improved upon.

properties (22)

3 replies

@haphazard-hstead · Jul 25 '17 (edited)

The list reflects two types of actions. One is the self-upvote. The other is how much vote power is expended on other people. People that are voting a lot, at high power, for other people will not reach a high percentage on this list. Folks with a high percentage on this list are keeping their vote power high in order to keep their own rewards high, or to feel powerful when they are able to give someone else an occasional high reward. Neither are community-focused actions. 

This list is helping me adjust my strategy. Before the HF19, my vote was worth 6 cents. Now, even if I take my vote power down low, down to 20% low, I can still give a lot more, roughly 4 or 5 times more than prior to HF19. **Rather than trying to keep our voting power high, we should be trying to have a low voting power all the time.** The problem on Steemit isn't lack of quality content. It's that not enough of the quality content out there is being found and rewarded - not enough to keep people enthused about creating quality content over the long run. 

In the limit, someone could still make 100 posts per day and only upvote themselves, but the overhead for that takes all the satisfaction out of the effort. **If the community comes to appreciate people who keep their voting power low, not high, the self-upvote problem will take care of itself.**

👍 quinneaker

properties (23)vote details (1)

4 replies

@inquiringtimes · Jul 25 '17

the problem i that our steem power is given to participate with the community.  I am part of the community, but if I'm not upvoting other peoples posts, and primarily upvoting my own content, it just becomes a mining activity.  I hope that anyone who is concerned with the issue will check out @rycharde's blog [Proposal for New Rules regarding self votes](https://steemit.com/steemit/@rycharde/proposal-for-new-rules-regarding-self-votes-and-voting-rings)

properties (22)

4 replies

@jaki01 · Jul 26 '17

$0.36

<blockquote>
There is absolutely nothing wrong with self-upvoting, if the content is good.
</blockquote>
<p>
And what, if it is <em>not</em> good? You could simply write 10 articles consisting of one sentence only every day and upvote them with 100 % of your voting power. Then nobody would dare to flag you because of your possible response.
<br>
If one account is doing that the damage may be limited, but making self-voting so lucrative could lead to more and more users who don't try to make <em>good</em> content, but just produce ten times <em>any</em> content to upvote it themselves.
That is easier than ever because of ...
</p>
<ul>
<li>
... the fourfold impact of 100 % votes,
</li>
<li>
- ... the linear reward curve,
</li>
<li>
- ... the change to be allowed to write more than four posts per day.
</li>
</ul>
<p>
In my opinion @jrcornel made very good suggestions to limit self-voting here:
<br>
https://steemit.com/steemit/@jrcornel/my-ideas-on-how-to-create-a-thriving-steemit-com
</p>
<p>
It is also not my intention to blame users for self-voting, but I 'blame' the system for making it so easy and beneficial.
</p>

👍 kobold-djawa, benjojo

properties (23)vote details (2)

@juvyjabian · Jul 31 '17

Likewise, I dont find any problem with self-voting, like what you said, its their rights. I think the issue here is that people are jealous of what others are getting.

How are you sir @smooth? Its been a while.

properties (22)

2 replies

@kyle.anderson · Jul 24 '17

$4.84

>It doesn't even matter if someone only upvotes themself, if their content is good. Maybe some people are mostly content creators and don't spend a lot of time reviewing/reading/curating other content. There's nothing at all wrong with that.

This.

---
People need to stinking start flagging. "Negative-voting" (as refered in the whitepaper). If a self-voted post or comment is making more that you feel appropriate - flag. Don't complain. The entire steem system is founded on the principle that everyone is able to use their vests however they choose to make payouts align with their perception of value.

You can not just "make self-votes not payout" or "self-votes only count for page rank". The social contract behind steem is that VESTS are fungible. Vests are always vests. My vote is worth the same no mater if I vote on content that is good, bad, racist, sexist, pro-steem, or even critical of steem. Changing how vests effect post payouts in a discriminatory way fundamentally changes steem by by altering the fungibility of the underlying asset. This is not like just a 'block size increase' or a simple parameter change, this is a major game theoretical and economic change to the system that has effects much deeper than just self-votes.

Vests should be fungible.

- from my post: https://steemit.com/steem/@kyle.anderson/subjective-proof-of-work-some-rational-comments-on-the-self-voting-trend

👍 eeks, beanz, kalestew, laurieanderson, ecuatutoriales, cosmo.crator, mrwilson

properties (23)vote details (7)

8 replies

@kyle.anderson · Jul 24 '17

I see why you flagged but maybe it is the name that should be changed? 

I think someone sharding this type of data is very important for the community. Not everyone is doing the math here.

properties (22)

@luzcypher · Jul 24 '17

$1.80

I agree with your comments. It does bother me when someone repeatedly upvotes their own comments while adding nothing to the conversation.  I'm getting a lot of those lately from the dame actors. 

When I check out their blogs the post no content of their own and appear to just comment on other's blogs with a generic comment like, "Good info. Thanks" and then they upvote their comment.

I have also been getting a lot of comments saying, "Upvoted and resteemed" but when I check they have done neither and only upvoted their own comment.

Bothers the hell our if me and cheapens the experience on Steemit. I think users like that should be called out

👍 jaki01, beanz, captaincanary, ppitonak, sieses, quinneaker, inquiringtimes

properties (23)vote details (7)

7 replies

@marcusorlyius · Jul 28 '17

I just test flagging you and removed it. The only effect of me flagging your comment was a payout deduction of $0.13. if you flagged me, you'd wipe out any payout, destroy my rep, and cause my comment to be hidden. How on earth is that fair?

I completely and utterly disagree that being wealthy should allow you make shit loads of money from upvoting your own comments and give you the power to censor those poorer than yourself.

properties (22)

@michaeldavid · Aug 1 '17

$1.19

I haven't been here very long but I have to agree with you @smooth. This type of thing does create a hostile environment. Especially if there is nothing showing if the upvotes are somehow abusive.

I see a lot of names in that list that are people actually helping the steemit community also. 

For some reason I've seen at least some controversy over self upvotes. I can see how only upvoting your own content does not help to grow the community. It seems to me though that people who are not abusing it far outweigh people that don't.

 I personally upvote all my posts(it's the default setting in creating your post) and some of my own comments. I do however also support the community with many as well. 

There are certain authors and contests that I really enjoy reading and upvoting.

I'm also very open to suggestions on how I could use steemit better both for the community and for myself.

If what I'm doing by upvoting some of my own things is somehow wrong I would want to know it so I did not continue.

👍 smooth, ratel

properties (23)vote details (2)

@playfulfoodie · Jul 24 '17

$13.51

On the one hand, I agree that lists like these are taking things a bit too far. I still found myself browsing through it though and checking a few accounts to see if I was following them and whether I even still liked their stuff. Why? Because if they upvote themselves for such amounts of money, I don't feel like giving them my support when I don't actually care about their topics. It's just one more way to clean up my list to follow less people, so I can actually keep up with the ones I feel deserve more support.

You're saying we could downvote content we find undeserving. I would love to, seriously, but how should I go about doing that? We've all seen the grief people get when they downvote a crap post that's earning way too much money. I feel like I would certainly ruin my own earnings and reputation if I start downvoting undeserving posts. Any author that holds a grudge and a lot of SP would downvote me into oblivion... I don't feel like I am truly, fairly able to curate bad posts, other than ignoring them. Not if I still want to have a shot here myself.

The only content I can (and do) safely downvote is that of newbies who post plagiarized content or copy/past comments...

👍 demotruk, fulltimegeek, beanz, riskdebonair, gamer00, pharesim, superskillz, ppitonak, tribesteemup, matthewtiii, tecnosgirl, whatsup, j3dy, guttormf, molometer

properties (23)vote details (15)

26 replies

@shaka · Jul 26 '17 (edited)

$1.47

I absolutely agree, nothing wrong with self-voting per se. The only helpful figure I can take away from this analysis is the total of the reward pool that apparently was allocated by self-voting. If the 8.47% is correct this is not something that should worry us too much - not worth all the drama. In particular if one considers that only a fraction of this accounts for self-voting that is outright abusive.

👍 smooth, ppitonak, ratel, phoblographer

properties (23)vote details (4)

@the1pwcj · Jul 23 '17

$0.39

I think that I agree with you on this.  I do not have the system figured out so I am not able to be positive.  Thank you all for the input.  Take care.

👍 davebrewer

properties (23)vote details (1)

@thedamus · Jul 24 '17

$0.29

Very good comment. I think you nailed it!

Full power upvote for you, in support of this great community.

Cheers! from @thedamus

👍 davebrewer

properties (23)vote details (1)

@thethreehugs · Jul 23 '17

$0.39

Thanks for this post Dave..should clear a lot of questions about self-voting...You've got my vote and resteeming.

👍 davebrewer, cricinfo, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (3)

@barrydutton · Jul 24 '17

$0.58

Keep in mind some of us write 150 blogs a  month on here for content and those are all upvoted, I went into that on here too.

Perspective is important along with the engagement we try and create in the community.

👍 davebrewer, financialcritic, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (3)

3 replies

@thethreehugs · Jul 23 '17

Just upvoted my comment..lol

👍 thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (1)

1 reply

@zufrizal · Jul 24 '17

Love steem on comment, upvote and bring suggestion all best friend anybody please follow me and help anything problem a posting comment it...
STEEM on @zufrizal

👍 zufrizal

properties (23)vote details (1)

@denmarkguy · Jul 26 '17

**@calamus056,** first of all thanks for assembling this post... regardless of whether this is a "data dump" or a "hall of shame" list, I am always grateful to look at hard data rather than "guessing" at what's going on *"because it feels like ___"*

I started writing a comment to this... but it ended up getting completely out of hand, so I'm combining it with part of a post I'd already rough drafting. 

Short version, though, is that I really appreciate seeing this dialogue... and it's high time we are having it. We also need to start looking at (and learning from!) events FAR BEYOND Steemit... people become a little soliptic around, but just because we're on the blockchain doesn't mean we're somehow "exempt" from dealing with the shadier sides of human nature.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 26 '17 (edited)

$0.03

The problem is larger than just SteemIt. Society has operated in this manner for millennia and people are still conditioned by it. More people in the world are working towards providing a basic income and a free market without government from people. It's juts gonna take time to get rid of the selfishness and the fear a lot of people currently have.

👍 denmarkguy

properties (23)vote details (1)

@denmarkguy · Jul 26 '17

Well, we've been conditioned (mostly by the capitalist mindset) to live in "fear of scarcity." As long as we have that fear, we will CONSUME... and even when we are not consuming, we are hoarding "just in case" there will not be anything to consume tomorrow. And people hoard pretty much everything... from old newspapers to laundry detergent, to assets and wealth.

properties (22)

2 replies

@diebaasman · Jul 27 '17

$0.08

I really don't see what shame lists will achieve. I feel that anyone has a right to vote for whatever they want too. I have seen new members as well as whales posting really good as well as really bad copy and paste posts.  But if that specific user feel like upvoting his own stuff, then what will a shame list do to persuade them to change? 

Not much I guess. I vote on other people's comments and posts during the week and also vote my own comments close to expiry date. 

The little bits extra will help my account grow, in turn this will help other members as well. 

Even if changes are made to the voting system self voting people will make groups and just vote between themselves. I say stress less about other and so what feels right for yourself.

👍 diebaasman

properties (23)vote details (1)

@calamus056 · Jul 27 '17 (edited)

Well right now it's at least causing some discussion and increase of awareness. It's not really intended as a shame list at all, the statistics just happened to have names in it, which i could have censored, but then people constantly would be asking for the names so i might as well include them. Others would release the names eventually anyway since it's all public information.

First you need to understand that curation and content creation is very different. Secondly, In general self-voting is only problematic if you do it too much (50%+ is probably way too much). What's also important is how much you are actively contributing to the platform (buying STEEM excluded).

The problem is much more complex, so i i'm not going to answer any single comment and will probably publish a massive article in the coming week(s) to hopefully take away a lot of the confusion.

👍 sigmundfreud

properties (23)vote details (1)

@dreamingirwin · Jul 24 '17

Well I guess voting on your self does have benefits.  I was sure it didn't pay out to the person that post.  I was under the impression that it was only done to gain attention.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

Unfortunately it does pay out the person. It's stupid huh?

properties (22)

@elfspice · Jul 28 '17

There is one important piece of data missing that would really add weight to this post: What proportion of the rewards pool is going out to self-upvotes? I would like to know.

And of course @smooth rushes to defend himself, and along with "@eeks", who probably is an alt of one of the more famous self-upvoters, by boosting a comment to the top to excuse this self indulgent behaviour. Note that @smooth is also the number one winner of self-upvoting witness as well.

Not milking the Steem reward pool at all, no, not one bit. Shame on you. 

@smooth is a big part of the reason why there will never be anything done about this, and why I am going to build a system that these kinds of jerks will be unable to milk to their advantage.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 28 '17 (edited)

https://steemit.com/steemit/@calamus056/self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-part-3-potential-comment-abuse

For posts+comments it's 8.47% as mentioned in the first part of these 4 part series.

properties (22)

@elfspice · Jul 28 '17

1/3<sup>rd</sup> of all rewards are self votes? Holy moly. Not a problem, not one bit. not at all. *snort*. If a company put out an MP3 player with an SNR like that, every last unit would be returned.

properties (22)

4 replies

@elfspice · Jul 28 '17

$0.03

That article says this:
> The total author rewards for all comments was $230,754.392 SBD. At least $78,544.107 SBD was from self-votes. At maximum, when 100% of curation rewards are assumed to go to the self-voter as well, it's $104,725.476 SBD. So the total amount of rewards that went to self-votes on comments was between 34.04% and 45.38% (likely closest to 45.38%). This is only visible self-votes, we can't know how large the abuse is between multiple accounts that are owned by the same user.

It is much worse than I even imagined!

👍 andybets

properties (23)vote details (1)

6 replies

@enjoykarma · Jul 23 '17

..first of all thank you for posting this info and getting in in this theme..at last it isn't clear to me how to think about upvoting one self..i agree with the comment of @davebrewer..seems right to me that the community has the freedom to decide collectively..

properties (22)

@enjoykarma · Jul 23 '17

..and by the way..what do you or all of you steemians think about people begging (sometimes almost barefaced, if you ask me...) for following, upvoting and resteeming them??..sure that everybody wants to have followers and so on, the whole thing it s about..

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17

$0.19

It's horrible. Some people are following 50,000 people. I'm probably going to datamine following stats next.

👍 enjoykarma

properties (23)vote details (1)

@erikaflynn · Jul 23 '17

Wow! Such a big amounts!
My received $0.5 is a drop in the ocean compared to this🙂

properties (22)

@barrydutton · Jul 24 '17

Keep in mind some of us write 150 blogs a  month on here for content and those are all upvoted, I went into that on here too.

Perspective is important along with the engagement we try and create in the community.

properties (22)

@enjoykarma · Jul 23 '17

..yes, there playing in a different league than we..

properties (22)

@eternalsunshine · Jul 23 '17

$0.25

I don't understand what is wrong with voting for yourself. That does not prevent you from voting for others at all..!

👍 davebrewer

properties (23)vote details (1)

@beanz · Jul 28 '17

With a soft limit of 10 full powered votes per day, yes it does prevent you from voting for others.  I could write 10 comments and upvote them at 100% taking about $100 per day from the pool.  Any votes that I use on anything else will have lower rewards and it would take days to recover my voting power, making it more beneficial to the self voter to hog their vote for themselves and nobody else.

properties (22)

@eternalsunshine · Jul 28 '17 (edited)

$0.35

Hmm didn't know that. Well that's a flaw in the system. Maybe you should be limited to a certain amount of votes for yourself. But on the contrary, *never* vote for yourself (or more precisely forbidding yourself to vote for yourself) feels like almost denying yourself to me. You *can* give to yourself  it is not selfish. It is not exclusive. That is what I actually meant.

👍 beanz

properties (23)vote details (1)

1 reply

@lucashunter · Jul 23 '17

But some on this list don't upvote other at all. They only upvote their comments. Please check the numbers and do your research.

properties (22)

@fairbee · Jul 23 '17

I would Strongly suggest that, avoid self voting. It will help your post gain in value. After HF19, self voting on posts will result reducing the post's earning every day. Posts earned $600 on first day will end up with $300.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17

What are talking about? HF19 already happened June 20th.

properties (22)

@fairbee · Jul 24 '17

hahaha.. I know..you must have got confused because i have used 'WILL' which turned  the total sentence in to future tense. I beg your pardon for my bad english.

Yes indeed, HF19 was happened last month. What I meant to say was, if some one self vote their posts, that post's payout will get reduced.

properties (22)

3 replies

@preparedwombat · Jul 23 '17

>After HF19, self voting on posts will result reducing the post's earning every day. Posts earned $600 on first day will end up with $300.

Is this carved in stone for the next HF?

properties (22)

@fairbee · Jul 24 '17

maybe using the word 'will' made it future tense. HF 19 was happened already and because of which self voting were/are resulting huge drop in payouts. That is what I have observed.

properties (22)

@fleur · Jul 23 '17

$0.07

Really interesting! It is good to have transparency on steemit, so that people can mange informed decisions 🙏🏽

👍 fleur

properties (23)vote details (1)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17

It's 100% transparent, no censorship possible either ;)

properties (22)

@freedomnation · Jul 23 '17

$0.04

You are insane man, how did you calculate this? Hahaha.

👍 calamus056

properties (23)vote details (1)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

$0.41

4 hours of programming, 3 hours of downloading and saving data (2 gigs+), 10 minutes importing and then 2 days of making queries and calculations.

👍 davebrewer, rycharde

properties (23)vote details (2)

@davebrewer · Jul 24 '17

I upvoted, but I doubt that will pay back the investment you made in time and effort.

I'll link to a different thread that has some conversation you may want to review.

Summary of the other thread - you can't take away self upvoting without radically changing the heart of steemit.  It isn't a perfect system, but it isn't as flawed as you might think if all you think and focus on is the worst case scenario.  There are dickheads in every system.  Make the data visible on who is acting in greedy fashion and the system will move on as is, nothing is really broken.

https://steemit.com/steem/@kyle.anderson/subjective-proof-of-work-some-rational-comments-on-the-self-voting-trend

properties (22)

1 reply

@friendly · Jul 26 '17 (edited)

$0.04

Nice work.. 👍
STEEM On!!

👍 friendly

properties (23)vote details (1)

@ghulammujtaba · Jul 24 '17

There are some people ho genuinely give all the upvotes to themselves and this behavior is affecting this community badly.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

The whole world in fact. In the real economy 10 people own over 50% of the money in the world. That's not good for anyone. Greed is a bitch.

properties (22)

@hannahlicious · Jul 24 '17

$0.02

such an interesting post! thanks so much for taking the time to put this together.... I am really enjoying reading the debate in the comment! 
the figures are just crazy!

👍 morkrock

properties (23)vote details (1)

@barrydutton · Jul 24 '17

Keep in mind some of us write 150 blogs a  month on here for content and those are all upvoted, I went into that on here too.

Perspective is important along with the engagement we try and create in the community.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

It's not about the money, it's about the percentage.

properties (22)

@hannahlicious · Jul 24 '17

yeah I get that... I like Craig-grants style.... half for himself half for the community... anything more than that I think is a little selfish

properties (22)

5 replies

@hanshotfirst · Jul 24 '17

Hi. Instead of writing a huge comment here, I turned my response into a post. In it I thanked you for your time and effort in creating this. I mean that sincerely. I hope that this list can be a positive conversation starter rather than a "hit list".

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

People are taking it way too personally, you know how it goes with controversial subjects..

properties (22)

@teamsteem · Jul 25 '17

I found this post through your post.

properties (22)

@msg768 · Jul 25 '17

You and @ausbitbank made me go...

https://media.tenor.com/images/1dd03671ab0311a6ec446dd1ce4d91a9/tenor.gif

properties (22)

@hilarski · Jul 25 '17

$6.47

Your list is flawed Pot stirrer. I should be on the list. I hate it when people make lists of something I do and don't include me. Just to prove it to you I am going to Upvote this comment 100%! Put me on the dam list!!!

https://media.giphy.com/media/TjnU4T9FTPmBW/giphy.gif

👍 midnas-howler, anu, financialcritic, crypto-investor, hilarski, allyouneedtoknow, quinneaker

properties (23)vote details (7)

@calamus056 · Jul 25 '17 (edited)

You show up as only $76.661 (8.5263110%) in self-votes of $899.111 total from June 20th till July 18th. Is that info relatively accurate?

The reason you're not on the list is because everything under $100 self-votes was filtered, there were 10's of thousands of rows in the list so i had to filter on something.

properties (22)

@financialcritic · Jul 26 '17 (edited)

$1.64

LOL, me too. I'm on the list above and think this is really stupid. I'm going to upvote this comment 100% and your comment 100% in revolt. I'm all for reducing self upvoting abusers, but this list is raw data with 0 analysis.

👍 financialcritic

properties (23)vote details (1)

@quinneaker · Jul 30 '17

$0.07

ahahahhhaa @hilarski you are a bad ass!
Love you bro.

👍 gardenofeden, saramiller

properties (23)vote details (2)

@ilyastarar · Jul 31 '17 (edited)

Thanks for the good work @calamus056.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 31 '17

Well you need to be careful just basing it on SBD, some people have a shitload of SP but still aren't selfish at all.

properties (22)

@ilyastarar · Jul 31 '17 (edited)

Thanks.

properties (22)

@jacksonoskele · Jul 24 '17

My question is, it is bad to vote for yourself? If it is then why did the community allow it?

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

Because the vast majority of people had no power before June 20th and didn't notice the problem. Now everyone know about it and people finally realize it's a problem. People are mainly against self-voting spam comments.

properties (22)

@elfspice · Jul 28 '17

The majority of the community is probably against it, in terms of numbers. The numbers, in terms of stake, are a whole different story. And, as https://steemit.com/steemit/@calamus056/self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-part-3-potential-comment-abuse shows, it's nearly 1/3 of the rewards pool going to this.

As calamus points out, and as I said early on when I started commenting on the subject, before HF19, only whales could substantially self vote.

As for 'the community', that's irrelevant. Stake is everything. The stake controls the witnesses, and the Github 'issues'. They arbitrarily define changes that relate to game-rules as 'feature requests' and define them as unacceptable and will ban you if you try to submit more than a few such issues.

I doubt that Stinc is ever going to change it. Not before they have had their fun milking the rest of the pool and diluting all the investors' holdings. Of course, they still don't have enough. Especially not @dan larimer, who also just creamed several million with the EOS ICO. Never enough for these people. It's on account of people like this that I like to believe in Hell.

properties (22)

@jbp · Jul 23 '17

Holy sh*t 11k SBD only from self-voting..

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

Yup and what about the total of $175,181.088 SBD self-votes this month? Read about it in [my previous post](https://steemit.com/steemit/@calamus056/extensive-curation-stats-overview-since-hf19-june-20th-2017).

properties (22)

@journeyoflife · Jul 23 '17

Sense of pride ?

👍 journeyoflife

properties (23)vote details (1)

@juvyjabian · Jul 23 '17

Its amazing how the platform could produce such a good income stream for its members. I dont find a problem with this. Yes, I felt jealous because like anybody else in the platform, I also wanted to earn but unfortunately I could not.

I am not against self-voting because I believe its their rights. They had been spending their time in the platform and gained support from whales and turned themselves into a whale too. Some of them had invested money in the platform and its just right to use it for themselves. There's nothing wrong with it, its called reality.

The reason why there are those who mumble is because we are jealous of their earnings and dont worry, its also normal. Its a human instinct. 

What we need to do is to invest money too or find ourselves a whale supporters and enjoy the benefits of being a user in the platform.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

Wrong, there is something wrong with it because it harms the platform. Also there's no jealousy, self-voting is just bad for the platform, that has nothing to do with how much certain people are "earning".

properties (22)

@juvyjabian · Jul 24 '17

The admin should remove this feature since its bad and is not good for the platform. Or could it be that steemit was created for it?

properties (22)

4 replies

@libert · Jul 24 '17

I have only problem with guys who comment "nice" and give themselves an undeserving upvote

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

Yup, that's one of the main ways of abuse people are noticing lately.

👍 libert

properties (23)vote details (1)

@lyfo · Jul 26 '17

Certainly this is useful information. Transparency is important. Rules and guidelines are also important. Customs, norms and etiquette are learned through experience. When something is new, we establish the rules as we interact with each other.

Now we are learning about economics and how to become our own bankers and we even get to decide whether we want to be bankers or banksters. What is right, what is wrong, what is ethical or not can only be determined by practice and experience. The only way to learn how to handle power is to have a little and experience it. How do we handle this new power?

properties (22)

@mandylange · Jul 23 '17

$0.04

Thank you but what is the menaing of the list. are you againstt it? I don't see a problem in self voting?

👍 clintjunior, geneeverett, nikonmarshall

properties (23)vote details (3)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

Of course i'm against it. The more people self-vote, the less rewards authors get and the less value the platform has. If everyone self-votes, there wouldn't be any value at all.

But it's a hard topic and will probably do a separate article about it soon.

👍 metafzx

properties (23)vote details (1)

@stellabelle · Jul 23 '17

it's true. That is why the algorithm was set up the way it was in the beginning by Dan. He was trying to avoid this very thing.

👍 tommyquest

properties (23)vote details (1)

1 reply

@stellabelle · Jul 23 '17

$0.17

Voting for my own post is something I always do, but I rarely vote for my own comments (I did today to bring it visibility, but as a rule, I tend to avoid it). I feel this is fair, as I only have a 4% self-vote percentage. I think going over 10% is probably a bad move. Hmmmm....there's a lot to think about.

👍 kenny-crane, whatamidoing, tommyquest

properties (23)vote details (3)

22 replies

@clintjunior · Jul 23 '17

$0.06

Honey if I looked like you, I'd upvote myself all. day. long...

👍 clintjunior, d-pend

properties (23)vote details (2)

@whatsup · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

What is that supposed to mean?  Jackass.

👎 clintjunior

properties (23)vote details (1)

3 replies

@millionairemark · Jul 29 '17 (edited)

I would have done the same if I had that much VP!

properties (22)

@mountain.phil28 · Jul 26 '17

$0.39

Thx @calamus056. I do not know how you did get this extensive amount of data, but this is impressive! I. Think people with so much power should not be as selfish as some of them are. (Just like in our non-digital world) - Nonetheless, thx for your work!

I just checked out your profile and saw, that you are interested in science! As I will continue to give exclusive insight into special scientific topics i would be happy if you have a look and enjoy them too. :-) My last one was written a week ago (dealing with nanocars) and my next one will come on saturday. :-)

Best,
mountain.phil28

👍 good-karma, mountain.phil28, madlenfox, djbk

properties (23)vote details (4)

@paceta · Jul 23 '17

let the developers decide on this , or whom it may concern , or let there be public vote .

👍 paceta, geneeverett

properties (23)vote details (2)

@pfiffel · Jul 24 '17

@avilsd of course you only upvote yourself 😂😂

properties (22)

@pisolutionsmru · Jul 24 '17

I didn't know self-voting could generate so much SBD!! It looks legit if you upvote your post when you did a good write up which you think is worth that upvote.

However, Steemians who only vote for themselves without giving anything to the community should really think about it. 

Steemit is a community effort and the stronger the community, the stronger the platform will be. We all need to work together to make Steemit the next gen platform which everyone want to use.

We should all think about our actions on Steemit and ensure that we are helping the community.

Nice article. Thanks for sharing. Resteemed :)

👍 crowkeep

properties (23)vote details (1)

@positivesteem · Jul 24 '17

If you have put in the time and effort to come out with the comments, then self voting should not be a problem. I must admit that I have done that a couple of times. But if more than half of the total SBD is used on yourself, then there is a problem somewhere. I usually up-vote comments for my post. I suppose the solution is to set a percentage limit say 30% for self voting.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

I'd say closer to 10%, but it's technically very complicated because of multiple accounts.

properties (22)

@positivesteem · Jul 25 '17

Thanks for the very informative post. Do check out my work too, I write poetry and positive posts.

properties (22)

@preparedwombat · Jul 23 '17

$0.05

I'm not convinced that this is the terrible thing that so many here seem to assume that it is. Look at the full list, there are a lot of widely respected names there. People who've done a lot to build this community.

👍 preparedwombat

properties (23)vote details (1)

@barrydutton · Jul 24 '17

Keep in mind some of us write 150 blogs a  month on here for content and those are all upvoted, I went into that on here too.

Perspective is important along with the engagement we try and create in the community.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

There's also a lot of abusers that vote close to 100% on themselves ;)

properties (22)

@raybilson · Jul 23 '17

Some of those numbers are out of control. I believe that a restriction on the top amount to be self rewarded is need it.

👍 raybilson

properties (23)vote details (1)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

That's the problem, that's not technically possible because people have multiple accounts.

properties (22)

@davebrewer · Jul 24 '17

You got it.  You could focus on solving the "single account abusers"; and all that would do is get the people who are intent on abuse to create multiple accounts.

properties (22)

4 replies

@readmore · Jul 23 '17

$0.39

Voting for yourself occasionally is not the problem, however abusing this is a problem for the healthy growth of the system. It makes it like a pyramid scheme. It is easier to identify the most selfish writers by simply using: sbd to self/total sbd×100.

👍 davebrewer, preparedwombat, katsics, henryjmah, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (5)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17

$0.03

Guess what the last column is lol.

👍 readmore

properties (23)vote details (1)

@readmore · Jul 24 '17

Yeah my bad, checked on my phone and couldn't see it there.

properties (22)

@reyhaynes · Jul 25 '17

$0.04

Honestly, this is amazing statistical information I actually was trying to get. I've been observing habits here and have been wondering about self-voting for a good while...especially with whales and the way they protect their voting power.

I probably don't mind upvoting oneself for new stories...but for comments...especially when it's a one-liner...it's pretty awful.

I can totally see why a whale would want to do it considering how much money they invested...but I do have an issue with not sharing the wealth via decent voting power upvotes in some way.

At the end of the day, however...I can't really fault one for having a set plan for their money...even at the cost of the steemit community.

https://media.giphy.com/media/Ll2fajzk9DgaY/giphy.gif

👍 reyhaynes

properties (23)vote details (1)

@richq11 · Aug 1 '17

Your list doesn't show what the people use the proceeds for... I know several people on this list and can say without fear of contradiction that they use the money from upvoting themselves to help others... Looks like a sour grapes hatchet job to me!

properties (22)

@rocking-dave · Jul 26 '17

The beauty of the blockchain is its transparency. It makes us all a bit more accountable though I'm sure many people on the list that are voting themselves some serious cash probably don't really care. Or feel they deserve it and are warranted to do what they are doing.

properties (22)

@serggioc · Jul 23 '17

How is this even allowed? Lol

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

Because you can get your own content higher on the "hot" list. But people that don't make good content can also do it so that's the problem.

properties (22)

@serggioc · Jul 24 '17

I think this option should be removed from steemit, or it could be allowed as long as the self upvotes in comments and posts wouldn't be monetized.

properties (22)

3 replies

@sigmundfreud · Jul 27 '17

Self-vote abuse on commentaries.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@sigmundfreud/steem-auto-comment-exploit-uncovered-80-000sbd-since-hf19

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 27 '17 (edited)

BTW, it's not an exploit, nor is the SBD being "burned". But it is a problem nevertheless :)

properties (22)

@sigmundfreud · Jul 28 '17

Autocomment exploit example:
https://steemit.com/abuse/@sigmundfreud/educational-example-how-to-exploit-steem-auto-comment-special-thanks-to-craigemslie

properties (22)

@smooth · Jul 24 '17

$3.78

Downvoted because I don't agree this form of analysis and divisive rhetoric is useful content that adds value to Steem or is deserving of rewards.

👍 eeks, smooth, pathtosuccess, randomwhale

properties (23)vote details (4)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

$0.46

It's just a list with stats people were curious about. There's no analysis, it's just a data dump. People can do whatever they want with the data.

Why are you trying to fight me? Are you not against abuse? Look at the people self-voting close to 100%, do you think that behavior is beneficial to you, themselves, me and others?

👍 kyle.anderson

properties (23)vote details (1)

@smooth · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

> Look at the people self-voting close to 100%, do you think that behavior is beneficial to you, themselves, me and others?

I don't know. It depends on the content. A content creator who produces useful content and upvotes it, but does not spend time reading others' content or generally curating is still a valuable contributor despite 100% self-voting. A spammer who self-upvotes and also votes on others (or perhaps a pair of spammers who vote on each others' spam but not their own) is still an abusive spammer. The statistics in your post by themselves are useless, as is the implication that 'self-voting' or a high self-voting percentage is inherently harmful or evidence of abuse. Neither is correct.

👍 randomwhale

properties (23)vote details (1)

4 replies

@calamus056 · Jul 26 '17 (edited)

@smooth I have to tell you that you're a good guy, i just noticed you only flagged at 20% power. You could have destroyed the rewards, but instead chose to make a statement and not make it personal. I don't know if i would have done the same in your shoes. Thanks a lot!  BTW, this is probably the first time you've ever been thanked after flagging someone, right? :)

properties (22)

@smooth · Jul 26 '17

You are welcome ;)

👍 randomwhale, wahyusaputra

properties (23)vote details (2)

@financialcritic · Jul 26 '17

This isn't analysis....this is a report. No form of analysis was done from what I can see.

properties (22)

@kyle.anderson · Jul 24 '17

The information is certainly deserving of some reward. 

Maybe the rhetoric requires your comment as a reply.

properties (22)

@soonidrift · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

Alot of these people have invested alot of money into steem and only want to use it as an investment. I am not saying its right or wrong but you have failed to realize that if you ban this they all exit their postion and thats alot hitting the market and will cause a serious drop. These guys are actually stabilizing steem for the long term. Just think how much risk they have if this goes belly up. There is always other sides to everything that should be discussed. Im not saying i agree with it just wanted to state something i havent seen in the sudden influx of these type of post.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

If they don't want this to go belly up they should stop self-voting. The more money goes to content creators, the more new potential investors there will be. It's literally that simple.

People can earn a shitload with curation rewards. I bet it's at least 50 times more than the bank pays.

properties (22)

@denmarkguy · Jul 28 '17

$0.07

>The more money goes to content creators, the more new potential investors there will be. It's literally that simple.

That ▲ right there. The more thriving and quality based the the community looks, the more attractive it looks to investors.

👍 calamus056

properties (23)vote details (1)

@soonidrift · Jul 24 '17

Thats what i am saying they are not here for the community thats obvious, what i am curious about if they all left what would that do to the price if steem? I wonder how much steem all from the first group hold. Just gotta think about this like stocks they all liquidate  what dies that look like? Just to be clear i am not supporting what they do but it makes me wonder what happens if all the big guys leave.

properties (22)

2 replies

@stadsmanneke · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

$0.05

I'm not on the wall of shame !
Damn , I'm such a dumbo.
Gonna change it immediatly , thank you.  Great post !
Hahaha , lol.
Even re-steemed this post and follow.
Don't forget to follow and upvote my kindness.
Pssst : It's free.  :-)

👍 stadsmanneke

properties (23)vote details (1)

@steemboys · Jul 23 '17

$0.94

Well what about these guys not self upvoting but upvoting their 2nd and 3rd account?  I dont know what that whole discussion is all about. I believe anyone can do what they want with their share. Some will contribute others wont. If selfupvote would be taken off steemit , people think twice about holding or selling. And steem would be back at 0,10$

👍 steemboys, davebrewer, varian.wyrnn, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (4)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17

You can also kill people, is it smart though?

properties (22)

@dobsdies · Jul 23 '17

Yeah self voting is just like murder??????

👍 dobsdies

properties (23)vote details (1)

3 replies

@stellabelle · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

I have to admit, this is fascinating. I am confused by the first number......what is it? In my case the total SBD is $6,400, so is that the amount that I have given overall by voting? And the $256 is the amount of that $6,400 that I gave to myself through upvoting my own post?

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17

You got it :)

In your case it was $6,485.92 SBD worth of upvotes, of which $295.80 (4.56%) was on yourself. That's entirely acceptable since you're a fantastic content creator, but in my opinion ideally people would stop voting on themselves entirely.

P.S.: may i ask how you found this post? Did you get a notification that you were mentioned in a post (even though i didn't include @ on purpose)?

👍 tommyquest

properties (23)vote details (1)

@stellabelle · Jul 23 '17

no i don't get notifications anymore.....
I am a surfer here on steemit, and I followed a bunch of random things.....I have no idea actually.
There's a ton of informative stuff, that is hiding in steemit...

properties (22)

1 reply

@stellabelle · Jul 23 '17

no, I found your other post in the "HoT" section, which led me to this.

properties (22)

5 replies

@steveitt · Jul 23 '17

Upvoting is a personal choice. The default is to self-upvote. If you've got a good post, and it's not getting attention, then do something to get it attention, upvote it, edit it to "polish it up", there's no harm in it.

👍 varian.wyrnn

properties (23)vote details (1)

@barrydutton · Jul 24 '17

Keep in mind some of us write 150 blogs a  month on here for content and those are all upvoted, I went into that on here too.

Perspective is important along with the engagement we try and create in the community.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17 (edited)

We know, but there's a problem when people (almost) never vote on others and/or not contribute to the platform.

properties (22)

@varian.wyrnn · Jul 24 '17

You hit the nail on the head. And also, these people put money into the platform, who are we to say what they can and cannot vote for? This was a tenant of communism.

👍 varian.wyrnn

properties (23)vote details (1)

@stonesteem · Jul 23 '17

Thanks for the info! I don't see anything wrong with t a little upvoting,but I do think that the community would do better with MORE of a balance in the way some that make huge amounts of money upvote themselves. I'm proud of the witnesses I voted for that are doing a great job of helping the community! Greed it not my thing. Thanks again.

properties (22)

@teatree · Jul 24 '17

$0.02

So essentially, HF19 made people switch from voting for other people to gain a curation award, to voting just for themselves?

👍 rose98734, candy49, alyssasanders, teatree, alyssas, aenor

properties (23)vote details (6)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17 (edited)

No, not everyone. But since you can put 4 times as much $ on content now it's become way easier to abuse it.

properties (22)

@thatgermandude · Jul 26 '17

What do you think about getting rid of self-votes through changing the code (if pssble)?

I see the disadvantage of selfvotes heavily outweighing the advantages

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 26 '17 (edited)

I'm highly in favor of that. Unfortunately abusers will still continue with multiple accounts but at least the abuse decrease somewhat.

properties (22)

@thatgermandude · Jul 26 '17

sure, it is not about preventing everybody to do it. It is about blocking the easy way, so people are aware that it is not very appreciated.

properties (22)

@tonyr · Jul 23 '17

A really useful post @calamus056. There are clearly many differing reasons and justifications given for self voting but in my opinion I would rather receive the rewards from others for having produced good content or even making a good comment than reward myself. I am not here to judge anyone and some of the justifications may be valid to some degree but I fail to see the reason that the function exists other than to purposely allow those who invest to milk the reward pool as a reward for investment or in order to fuck with everyones sense of morality and decency. If anyone can provide me with a better explanation I'd be very pleased to hear it! :)

Have a great day my friend!

properties (22)

@transisto · Jul 27 '17

This doesn't belong in #steemdev unless you write on how you extracted the data.

👍 randomwhale

properties (23)vote details (1)

@calamus056 · Jul 27 '17

K, fair enough :)

Solved

properties (22)

@twinner · Jul 26 '17

Good work, but there must be an error in the full list :-)  Never ever I earned 7000 SBD, 3 times more than for instance knozaki2015 in the same timeframe :-) According to SteemWhales I'm on rank #610 in 30 days author ranking, he for instance #15.

properties (22)

@calamus056 · Jul 26 '17

$0.16

This is a curator list, not an author list. In other words, it's the total rewards your votes were worth.

👍 twinner

properties (23)vote details (1)

@twinner · Jul 26 '17

Ah, good to know! How did you retrieve the data? SteemData? Piston?

properties (22)

@varian.wyrnn · Jul 23 '17

This whole effort is the biggest indication of actual communism that exists. A bunch of minnows telling people that spend hundreds of thousands of dollars into the platform how to spend the money. Not only how to spend it, but that they are entitled to this money. Guess what, a bunch of minnows attacking a whale for doing what he wants with his investment. Tards, and greedy. It is you  fools that are greedy and trying to have a power that you are not entitled to without steem power. Grow up. Get more money and dump it where you want it.

👍 varian.wyrnn

properties (23)vote details (1)

@calamus056 · Jul 24 '17

$0.32

Oh i should just get more money, i would have never thought of that myself. Thanks for the fantastic solution!

👍 davebrewer

properties (23)vote details (1)

@davebrewer · Jul 24 '17

We are at the heart of the matter here calamus056.   You can get SP on steemit with either time or fiat.  If you don't have fiat, then you have to spend time.    

No reason to get upset at the folks who bring more fiat than you are able to at this moment.   That is called envy.  The partner to greed.    Envy is not better than greed, and vica-versa.   

The large whales that bring $2.5M fiat and invest in the platform, are the ones that help keep price of steem at high enough level to make payouts interesting, even for us minnows

properties (22)

7 replies

@juliakponsford · Jul 24 '17

I have some great advice to help you out with that, don't be poor - just be rich, easy peasy :)

properties (22)

1 reply

@varian.wyrnn · Jul 24 '17

The point is, you cannot commender the capacity of someone who has successfully put money into the platform, the only thing you could do, is to gain power and not do it, instead of trying to prevent the actions of others. Be a model, not a dictator.

properties (22)

@whatamidoing · Jul 25 '17 (edited)

I don't see anything wrong with a self upvote, even when it's worth so much....but it should account for a small percentage of total upvote percentage given....how much is obviously open ended but I think 20% to reward to yourself is pretty excessive already.  I would try to keep it below 15%, that seems like a fair number to me.   50% or above is pretty ridiculous.

Thank you so much for this, it allows us to get a much clearer understanding of the situation, though I imagine not the whole picture as many people have multiple accounts.

EDIT: really surprised at how many people are giving you a hard time for this....those with more power should also be held more accountable and subject to more transparency, no?

👍 minnowpond, minnowpond1

properties (23)vote details (2)

@calamus056 · Jul 25 '17 (edited)

I absolutely agree with you. It's also understandable to get so much hate when you call people out on their selfish behavior. We all get defensive when others say you're fat or you need to stop smoking or drinking or whatever.

properties (22)

@znaffe · Jul 23 '17

$0.72

Good post man. It's important that this stuff gets brought to light. People hopefully adapts their behaviour to something that's more beneficial over the long term.

Self-voting is just destructive for the platform, at least over a certain threshold. I think anything under 10-20% is okay, as it's a way to promote yourself.

👍 davebrewer, enjoykarma, personz, demotruk, henryjmah, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (6)

@calamus056 · Jul 23 '17

You're the third person to mention approximately 10%.

properties (22)

@davebrewer · Jul 23 '17

$0.17

You think 10-20% is OK.  Other are going to say anything over 0% is a crime.  Some will say 50% is OK, others will believe higher.

The solution is appeal to some higher power of central authority to dictate a best and final answer.  Kinda not in the spirit of a decentralized platform.

Or publish behavior and let the community decide what is acceptable, by ostracizing those that each individual wants to ostracize

👍 znaffe, futuristgear, remlaps, zufrizal, thethreehugs

properties (23)vote details (5)

@thethreehugs · Jul 23 '17

mmm  Something to ponder about...my feelings is either you do or you don't..if the developers didn't want people upvoting themselves or only wanted a certain percentage of self votes,  they should incorporate it into to the program.  Just saying..

properties (22)

@znaffe · Jul 23 '17

$0.78

Well obviously it's subjective, I'm just stating my opinion. I personally believe that content should be able to speak for it self, but one of the main hurdles so far is how hard it is to find content. 

I do not want any central authority to dictate anything. I think the market will adjust with its own incentives and disincentives. It's a social platform after all, and social norms and 'rules' traditionally has more influence over people's decisions than actual laws and regulations.

👍 davebrewer, good-karma, bitcoiner, feruz, esteemapp, katsics, madlenfox, bounties, zufrizal, steempoll, demo, tipping, mikev, ophelion

properties (23)vote details (14)

2 replies

Help/Feedback

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
kobold-djawa	0 B		77,976,489,880	100%
davidorcamuriel	0 B		771,142,022,347	100%

`author`	daudimitch
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t204423852z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 20:44:24
`last_update`	2017-07-23 20:44:24
`depth`	1
`children`	31
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 20:44:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	216
`author_reputation`	29,651,169,814,878
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,456,442
`net_rshares`	2,170,110,809
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	rshares	pct
katsics	1,233,129,114	100%
eternalsunshine	713,811,761	100%
varian.wyrnn	223,169,934	100%

voter	rshares	pct
tommyquest	2,013,859,520	100%
transisto	746,117,629,418	6%
gmuxx	5,598,873,276	10%

voter	rshares	pct
smooth	372,275,804,389	1%
pharesim	103,752,369,949	0.02%
benjojo	29,754,818,803	25%
ppitonak	12,732,875,807	100%
eeks	618,603,115,172	100%
cryptogee	66,714,117,540	100%
alexandra-renee	352,934,021,735	100%
calamus056	10,665,892,743	100%
tommyquest	2,176,049,549	100%
igster	8,126,746,649	5%
streetstyle	116,013,682,915	10%
pcste	4,956,971,627	15%
remlaps	9,483,366,452	25%
metafzx	914,863,072	100%
whatsup	3,268,102,529	1%
cosmo.crator	848,244,562	100%
gamer00	178,548,893,110	34%
j3dy	2,045,905,788	10%
seablue	1,831,912,423	1%
enjoykarma	48,998,468,231	100%
preparedwombat	2,531,685,962	5%
sunsurfsoul	7,656,864,835	100%
the1pwcj	638,060,456	100%
sacred-agent	4,244,210,005	5%
me-do	2,114,917,035	10%
futuristgear	12,030,871,875	100%
thethreehugs	61,598,125	100%
yournews	4,620,667,617	100%
deveerei	5,843,792,129	100%
acis	11,174,422,415	25%
bluethread	5,717,351,424	100%
manonlescaut	4,305,777,465	17%
janusface	58,428,331,273	25%
surprisebit	6,884,788,498	100%
mehdibca	2,559,853,769	100%
d-pend	7,624,375,228	4%
orangeogre	3,547,833,733	100%
ronni	25,517,290,050	29%
thedamus	91,041,782,532	100%
blessedman939	93,745,496	100%
znaffe	21,782,913,897	100%
yunkzilla	3,931,892,265	100%
henryjmah	1,117,000,459	100%
katsics	1,303,593,635	100%
zufrizal	179,905,123	100%
faustofraser	1,021,389,621	100%
pathtosuccess	1,160,662,535	100%

voter	rshares	pct
cryptogee	60,360,392,060	100%
alexandra-renee	346,668,920,758	100%
acis	44,697,689,661	100%
blessedman939	93,745,496	100%

voter	rshares	pct
deirdyweirdy	12,845,300,904	52%
thethreehugs	61,598,125	100%
davebrewer	63,974,993,938	8%
zufrizal	174,101,732	100%

`author`	inquiringtimes
`permlink`	re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t185509271z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 18:55:06
`last_update`	2017-07-25 18:55:06
`depth`	2
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 18:55:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.305 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.099 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	76
`author_reputation`	22,511,044,719,347
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,702,133
`net_rshares`	112,214,748,199
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
davebrewer	0 B		110,774,612,949	11%
inquiringtimes	0 B		1,440,135,250	100%

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
davebrewer	0 B		1,028,862,498,336	100%
inquiringtimes	0 B		1,403,829,319	100%

`author`	jacksonoskele
`permlink`	re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t074544086z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 07:45:57
`last_update`	2017-07-24 07:45:57
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 07:45:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	526
`author_reputation`	1,315,666,699,750
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,504,501
`net_rshares`	0

voter	rshares	pct
eeks	644,998,863,301	100%
kyle.anderson	123,157,575,907	100%
laurieanderson	19,964,957,167	100%
kalestew	23,520,039,183	100%

voter	rshares	pct
the-ego-is-you	18,757,096,440	100%
kyle.anderson	5,524,045,204	4%
inquiringtimes	1,379,625,365	100%

`author`	oudekaas
`permlink`	re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170822t184039821z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-08-22 18:40:39
`last_update`	2017-08-22 18:40:39
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-08-29 18:40:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	3,709
`author_reputation`	1,880,122,113,707
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	12,562,195
`net_rshares`	0

voter	rshares	pct
smooth	372,275,804,389	1%
chitty	903,024,173,421	100%
eeks	671,433,242,944	100%
cryptogee	65,522,794,013	100%
gtg	860,651,124,693	20%
fulltimegeek	1,308,788,034,298	9%
bycz	65,057,955,357	100%
marcusorlyius	0	0%
remlaps	6,747,330,669	20%
shaka	342,179,385,017	10%
surfermarly	406,374,234,564	100%
oliverstoney	8,005,085,866	100%
jrcornel	37,141,734,919	1%
kyriacos	55,163,380,726	10%
naquoya	4,460,794,081	10%
matthewtiii	7,236,614,526	100%
whatsup	3,270,086,968	1%
smasher	483,654,743	10%
cosmo.crator	829,904,139	100%
gamer00	178,548,893,110	34%
j3dy	2,045,905,788	10%
taskmanager	105,303,305,410	100%
playfulfoodie	7,586,860,010	6%
prizeportal	6,846,242,462	100%
sunsurfsoul	7,473,100,078	100%
superskillz	18,517,645,338	100%
randomwhale	935,398,615	100%
blessedman939	93,745,496	100%
molometer	1,364,848,205	100%
michaeldavid	0	1%
voltash	54,525,091	7%

`author`	haphazard-hstead
`permlink`	re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t225151012z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 22:51:51
`last_update`	2017-07-25 22:54:00
`depth`	3
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 22:51:51
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	1,341
`author_reputation`	36,666,374,575,794
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,722,933
`net_rshares`	1,887,975,298
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
benjojo	0 B		24,798,084,650	25%
kobold-djawa	0 B		74,668,396,370	100%

`author`	juvyjabian
`permlink`	re-smooth-re-davebrewer-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170731t005408847z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"users":["smooth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-31 00:54:12
`last_update`	2017-07-31 00:54:12
`depth`	3
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-08-07 00:54:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	211
`author_reputation`	185,700,092,637,158
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	10,269,693
`net_rshares`	0

voter	rshares	pct
eeks	655,572,615,158	100%
beanz	576,267,553,084	30%
cosmo.crator	816,148,822	100%
laurieanderson	20,387,495,943	100%
kalestew	26,358,664,601	100%
mrwilson	731,217,017	100%
ecuatutoriales	1,160,661,592	100%

voter	rshares	pct
ppitonak	12,013,504,292	100%
beanz	192,089,184,361	10%
quinneaker	1,887,975,298	1%
jaki01	209,773,661,003	10%
captaincanary	57,368,993,655	25%
sieses	2,669,839,686	100%
inquiringtimes	1,331,217,458	100%

voter	rshares	pct
pharesim	103,323,596,954	0.02%
ppitonak	12,445,127,201	100%
fulltimegeek	872,525,356,198	6%
demotruk	1,911,092,014,840	100%
beanz	202,760,805,714	10%
matthewtiii	7,075,800,870	100%
whatsup	3,270,086,968	1%
gamer00	178,548,893,110	34%
j3dy	2,045,905,788	10%
guttormf	1,866,232,565	100%
riskdebonair	196,076,291,532	100%
superskillz	18,147,292,431	100%
tecnosgirl	5,051,623,062	100%
molometer	1,339,257,302	100%
tribesteemup	10,116,171,600	11%

voter	rshares	pct
smooth	376,507,304,389	1%
ppitonak	12,229,315,746	100%
ratel	10,739,789,498	65%
phoblographer	4,724,373,779	100%

voter	rshares	pct
thethreehugs	92,976,787	100%
financialcritic	48,204,643,604	10%
davebrewer	102,359,990,301	13%

`author`	diebaasman
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170727t150243170z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-27 15:02:48
`last_update`	2017-07-27 15:02:48
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-08-03 15:02:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.058 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.019 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	757
`author_reputation`	4,729,846,840,625
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,920,782
`net_rshares`	21,971,786,217
`author_curate_reward`	""

`author`	dreamingirwin
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t211607489z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 21:16:21
`last_update`	2017-07-24 21:16:21
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 21:16:21
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	176
`author_reputation`	19,858,177,829,580
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,586,592
`net_rshares`	0

`author`	elfspice
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170728t115944943z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"users":["smooth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-28 11:59:45
`last_update`	2017-07-28 11:59:45
`depth`	1
`children`	13
`last_payout`	2017-08-04 11:59:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	736
`author_reputation`	-3,995,561,637,087
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	10,012,398
`net_rshares`	0

`author`	lucashunter
`permlink`	re-eternalsunshine-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t220946165z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-23 22:09:48
`last_update`	2017-07-23 22:09:48
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-07-30 22:09:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	128
`author_reputation`	4,810,828,106,796
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,463,477
`net_rshares`	0

`author`	ghulammujtaba
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t025533077z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 02:55:48
`last_update`	2017-07-24 02:55:48
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 02:55:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	122
`author_reputation`	7,588,037,514,480
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,483,474
`net_rshares`	0

`author`	hanshotfirst
`permlink`	re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t183711272z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-24 18:37:12
`last_update`	2017-07-24 18:37:12
`depth`	1
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2017-07-31 18:37:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	250
`author_reputation`	675,128,706,693,641
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,571,431
`net_rshares`	0

`author`	msg768
`permlink`	re-teamsteem-re-hanshotfirst-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170725t181027434z
`category`	statistics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["statistics"],"users":["ausbitbank"],"image":["https://media.tenor.com/images/1dd03671ab0311a6ec446dd1ce4d91a9/tenor.gif"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-07-25 18:10:24
`last_update`	2017-07-25 18:10:24
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-08-01 18:10:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	108
`author_reputation`	29,910,527,626,122
`root_title`	"Self-voting user list since HF19"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,697,909
`net_rshares`	0